Total Ionizing Dose Effects in Bulk Technologies and Devices - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 36
About This Presentation
Title:

Total Ionizing Dose Effects in Bulk Technologies and Devices

Description:

... H2 moves quickly out of the package and a concentration gradient is ... Results shows time dependence of Nit build-up related hydrogen out diffusion ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:48
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 37
Provided by: ronsch2
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Total Ionizing Dose Effects in Bulk Technologies and Devices


1
Total Ionizing Dose Effects in Bulk Technologies
and Devices
  • Hugh Barnaby, Jie Chen, Ivan Sanchez
  • Department of Electrical Engineering
  • Ira A. Fulton School of Engineering
  • Arizona State University

2
Outline
  • Overview of ASU tasks
  • Total ionizing dose defect models
  • Device TID response
  • Drain-to-source leakage
  • Inter-device leakage
  • Analysis of defect buildup across oxide
    structure and between technologies
  • Other work

3
ASU task
  • Characterize and model TID effects in modern
    devices, primarily CMOS transistors
  • Technologies deep sub-micron bulk CMOS, and
    silicon on insulator, general isolations

4
ASU task
  • Characterize and model TID effects in modern
    devices, primarily CMOS transistors
  • Technologies deep sub-micron bulk CMOS, and
    silicon on insulator, general isolations

In Year 1, we have primarily focused
ondeep-sub-micron bulk CMOS and
generalisolation technologies.
5
Primary TID Threat
TID defect build-up in the thick shallow trench
isolation (STI)
Defects
  • Not - oxide trapped charge (E )
  • Nit interface traps (Pb)

Both Nit and Not are related to holesgenerated
and/or hydrogen present inoxide
first orderassumption
Not, Nit a tox
6
Model for Not buildup
After Fleetwood et al. TNS 1994
Model Parameters
D - total dose rad kg - 8.1 x 1012
ehp/radcm3 fy - field dependent hole yield
hole/ehp fot - trapping efficiency trapped
hole/hole tox - oxide thickness cm
7
Hole trapping processes
- surviving hole (p)

- hole trap (NT)
- trapped hole (Not)

fp
- hole flux
area s(e)
8
Simple analytical model (Not)
(steady state)
(fp gt 0 for all x)
fot
D
(No saturation or annealingand traps at
interface)
After Rashkeev et al. TNS 2002
9
Model for Nit buildup
After Rashkeev et al. TNS 2002
Model Parameters
D - total dose rad kg - 8.1 x 1012
ehp/radcm3 fy - field dependent hole yield
hole/ehp fDH - hole, DH reaction efficiency
H/hole fit - H, SiH de-passivation efficiency
interface trap/H tox - oxide thickness cm
10
De-passivation processes
- hydrogen defect (DH)
- protons
H
- Si-H (NSiH)
H
- dangling bond (Nit)
- proton flux
fH
area sit
11
De-passivation processes
(steady state)
(fH gt 0 for all x)
D
fit
(No saturation or annealingand traps at
interface)
After Rashkeev et al. TNS 2002
12
Leakage paths
Defect build-up in STI creates leakage paths in
CMOS ICs.
NMOS Drain-to-Source
1
NMOS D/S to NMOS S/D
2
3
NMOS D/S to NWELL
3
2
1
2 and 3 are inter-device leakage
CMOS inverters
13
NMOS drain-to-source leakage
Increasingtotal dose
14
Parasitic leakage model
  • Parasitic edge device modeled as MOSFET
    operating in parallel with as drawn FET.
  • Effective parameters for edge device are
    extracted from data.

15
Extracting electrical characteristics
IDedge(post) IDtotal(post) IDtotal(pre)
IDtotal(post)
  • Two assumptions
  • IDtotal(pre) IDas-drawn(pre)
  • IDas-drawn(post) IDas-drawn(pre)

IDedge(post)
IDtotal(pre)
16
Edge Capacitor
Prior to radiation exposure, the MOS capacitor
of the edge device has small dimensions, W and
tox
a tox-eff
Weff



STI

17
Edge Capacitor
Upon radiation exposure, the edge capacitor is
degradedand the dimensions enlarged.
a tox-eff
Weff




STI


a tox-eff
Weff






Increasingtotal dose
STI

18
Edge Capacitor
Increased defect buildup in theSTI sidewall
leads to further increases in W and tox, until
inherent limitations are met.
a tox-eff
Weff




STI


a tox-eff
Weff






Increasingtotal dose




STI







a tox-eff


Weff









STI

19
2D simulations
Simulations show how increased Not along sidewall
increases the width of the channel and the
capacitor thickness
Weff
Weff
Weff
Not 21012 cm-2
Not 51012 cm-2
Not 71012 cm-2
20
New Test Structure
Devices designed by Faccio and fabricated at
STMicro enable measurements on sidewall
capacitor.
  • 90 um

Pre-rad
  • 1.3 um

overlap
21
Parameter extraction
  • Weff increases withTID (increased strong -inv
    current)
  • Not and Nit increase with TID (shift in
    threshold voltage)
  • Nit and tox increasewith TID (reducedsubthreshol
    d slope)
  • Not increasewith TID (shifts inmidgap voltages)

22
Simultaneous equations
1. 2. 3. 4.
Solving simultaneouslyenables extraction
of parameters and defectlevels at each TID value
23
Parameters and sidewall defects
Parameters
Defects
24
Inter-device leakage
n D/S to n-well
n D/S to n D/S
Charge build-upin STI base
25
Field oxide transistors
n-well
Metal 1
n D/S
n
n




STI
-
n D/S
Metal 1
noise floor
n-well
130 nm bulk CMOS
26
Field oxide capacitors
Single cell
130 nm data
  • 1500 Single Cell FOXCAPs in parallel
  • gate area of individual cell 7.4 µm x 11.4 µm

27
Defect build-up in STI base
  • Defect build-up is
  • Greater for higher oxidefields (consistent w/
    fy)
  • Linear with dose(no saturation yet)

28
Comparison to other isolation technologies (Not)
data taken after 20 krad(SiO2) exposures
radiation bias is 0V for all devices
29
Sidewall vs. Base Comparison (Not)
Indicates saturation in defect buildup
30
Sidewall vs. Base Comparison (Nit)
31
Other Work
  • Separation of switch state defects in thick
    isolationoxides using frequency dependent charge
    pumping
  • Packaging issues

32
Gate sweep data
Nss
Nss
Increased current is caused by switching state
buildup (Nss) whichis composed of both interface
and border traps
33
Separation of Switching States
Indicates border traps
34
Packaging Issues
  • Recent testing showed 3x increase in Nit in GLPNP
    devices packaged with sealed gold plated kovar
    lids than packages with taped-on lids.

35
Its a hydrogen problem
  • As sealed lid is removed, H2 moves quickly out of
    the package and a concentration gradient is
    established for the remaining H2 in the oxide to
    diffuse out, thus reducing Nit generation.

36
Another time dependent process
Results shows time dependence of Nit build-up
related hydrogen out diffusion we are working
on the rate equations for this
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com