PROSPECTS AND POLICIES FOR LOW CARBON ECONOMIC GROWTH OF INDIA - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 64
About This Presentation
Title:

PROSPECTS AND POLICIES FOR LOW CARBON ECONOMIC GROWTH OF INDIA

Description:

Source: Based on IEA Data on Energy balances of Non-OECD countries, different volumes. ... Primary Commercial Energy and CO2 intensity over time. 19. 20 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:35
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 65
Provided by: nipf
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: PROSPECTS AND POLICIES FOR LOW CARBON ECONOMIC GROWTH OF INDIA


1
PROSPECTS AND POLICIES FOR LOW CARBON ECONOMIC
GROWTH OF INDIA
  • Ramprasad Sengupta
  • Professor of Economics
  • Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU), New Delhi
  • Paper for Presentation in the Round Table on
  • Fiscal and Non Fiscal Instruments for Sustainable
    Development of India
  • at the NIPFP, New Delhi.

2
Prospects and Policies for Low Carbon Economic
Growth of India
  • Climate Change due to Global Warming one of the
    most important global policy issues and
    challenges that humanity today faces
  • This is the case of greatest market failure
  • The rise in temperature is related with the
    rising level of stock of Green House Gases (GHG)
    arising from the entropic process of Worlds
    resource use
  • However, the stock of GHG is a state variable and
    not a control one
  • The emission of GHG is a flow variable and a
    control one.
  • However as most of the CO2 emission arises from
    use of energy, the control of emissions relating
    to energy use is the ultimate control variable

3
  • Climate can stabilise if the level of stock of
    GHGs attains stationarity. i.e. when the
    emissions can be offset by the rate of their
    absorption or transformation.
  • Current Emissions exceed substantially the
    earths capacity of GHG absorption per unit of
    time.
  • The Global Summit at the Copenhagen to find
    ways among others of curtailing total volume of
    emissions and of how to share the responsibility
    of the curtailment among Nations.

4
  • The developing nations need to grow until the
    poverty, hunger, malnutrition, disease and
    illiteracy of their people are removed.
  • However, emission is linked with the growth of
    scale of the economy, its structure, technology
    and pattern of resource use. Such countries need
    ecological space for the absorption of their
    carbon emission.
  • This would require curtailment of the absolute
    level of emission of the high income countries
    which significantly exceeds the level that per
    capita carrying capacity of the earth can permit.

5
  • All the nations, developing and developed,
    however, need to find ways for the weakening of
    the relationship between the economic growth and
    the environmental degradation particularly in the
    form of GHG emission.
  • A more comprehensive global policy required to
    moderate the rate of rise of entropy of the
    worlds resource system through scientific and
    technical progress.
  • The environmental economists have tested the
    Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis beyond
    a threshold level of per capita income the growth
    can be accompanied by the improvement of
    environmental quality.
  • There has been work on CO2 emission in the
    context of testing such hypothesis - mostly
    econometric work and by and large inconclusive.

6
  • In spite of no absolute reduction in volume of
    GHG emission, some countries have achieved the
    weakening of the economy-CO2 relationship, such
    that their CO2 intensity of GDP has been
    declining.
  • The concept of low carbon growth here would be
    the attainment of such decline of CO2 intensity
    with convergence to a limit value, which when
    multiplied by economys GDP, would not exceed the
    allowable emission limit, as per the emission
    quota based on the per capita principle (or some
    other principle) of allocation of world-
    ecosystems carrying capacity.
  • Our objective in the paper is modest and limited.
  • Examine if India is being able to reduce her CO2
    intensity of GDP
  • What level she can achieve over the horizon of
    2031.
  • Project what share of global eco space in the
    terms of absolute CO2 emission would be required
    for sustaining Indias high economic growth.

7
  • Review Indias performance in the weakening of
    the GDP - CO2 emission relationship both in
    pre-economic reform and post-economic reform
    periods using decomposition methods. (Have
    economic reforms made any real impact? )
  • Future projections of Indias energy related CO2
    emission for
  • - alternative growth rate, energy price and
    technology scenarios - using econometric models
    with macro-level aggregate as well as sectoral
    approaches
  • - under alternative hypothesis about sectoral
    energy behaviour.
  • Derive the implications of the analysis of past
    performance and future projections in respect of
    Indias achievability of low carbon growth and
    its policy implications.

8
Composition of GHG-Emissions- 2005(In CO2
equivalent units)
  • Note In India, the share of Agriculture in
    Methane and NOx emissions is 65 and 93
    respectively.

9
(No Transcript)
10
Indias comparative position in the World
11
Review of Indias performance
12
Source Based on IEA Data on Energy balances of
Non-OECD countries, different volumes.
13
Source Based on IEA Data on Energy balances of
Non-OECD countries, different volumes.
14
Source Based on IEA Data on Energy balances of
Non-OECD countries, different volumes.
15
15
16
Sectoral Distribution of Final Commercial Energy
Use
Sectoral Distribution of Total Direct and
Indirect Primary Energy (including Traditional
Fuels) in 2005
16
17
(No Transcript)
18
Supplies of Total Primary and Final Commercial
Energy and CO2 Emissions.
Source Based on IEA Data on Energy balances of
Non-OECD countries, different volumes.
18
19
Primary Commercial Energy and CO2 intensity over
time
19
20
Annual Average Growth Rate in the Pre-reform and
Post-reform Periods ()
21
(No Transcript)
22
Decomposition Method
  • Methodology
  • C ? e m
  • Thus
  • And
  • Total CO2 Scale Effect Structural Effect
    Energy Intensity Effect Fuel Composition Effect.

23
(No Transcript)
24
(No Transcript)
25
Models of Projection for the future
  • Macro economic approach Demand based on
    income, energy prices
  • 2. Sectoral approach Alternative Demand
    Behaviour
  • (a) Sectoral Income, Real Energy Price and
    Technology Energy Intensity.
  • (b) Sectoral Income, Share of Electricity in
    Final Energy, and Energy Intensity
  • Alternative Growth Rates 8, 6
  • Real Energy Prices
  • (a) no change in prices since 2005
  • (b) Real Energy prices increasing at 3 compound
    rate per annum.

26
  • Sc1A Macro-economic reference approach Demand
    for Final Energy f( GDP, real enery prices),
    GDP growth of 8 per annum, real energy price
    held constant at 2005 level.
  • Sc1B Sectoral Approach, Income price based
    regression model of demand for final energy for
    Ind and Trans and demand model based on growth
    cum technical change (change in energy intensity)
    for Agr, Oth Svs Res sector, GDP growth of 8
    and real energy price held constant at 2005
    level.
  • Sc1C Sectoral Approach Growth and technical
    change (share of electricity in final energy or
    energy intensity) based projection of Demand for
    all sectors. GDP growth of 8
  • Sc2A Same as 1A except that all the real energy
    prices rising at an annual compound rate of 3
    per annum.
  • Sc2B Same as 1B except that the real energy
    prices rising at an annual compound rate of 3
    per annum.
  • Sc3A Same as 1A except that the GDP growth rate
    is 6 per annum.
  • Sc3B Same as 1B except that the GDP growth rate
    is 6 per annum.
  • Sc3C Same as 1C except that the GDP growth rate
    is 6 per annum.

27
Comparative Trend Growth Rate of Energy-Intensity
of Sectoral or Overall GDP
28
(No Transcript)
29
  • Explanation of Sectoral Elasticity and Intensity
    behaviour Special comments on Agriculture,
    Households and other services.
  • Supply side assumptions for the energy industry
    (electricity and others) on efficiency in
    projections

30
(No Transcript)
31
  • Future projections
  • for 8 scenarios which capture
  • -the integrated efficiency of energy use as
    well as energy supply,
  • -projections of absolute levels of emissions,
  • -implications regarding structural dynamics of
    the economy,
  • -energy and CO2 emissions and their respective
    intensities and per capita levels,
  • -sectoral shares as well as fuel composition.

32
(No Transcript)
33
(No Transcript)
34
(No Transcript)
35
(No Transcript)
36
(No Transcript)
37
(No Transcript)
38
(No Transcript)
39
Percentage of CO2 Emission Sc1B
40
CO2 Emission (Dir Indirect Sectoral Share- )
Sc 1B
41
Projection of CO2 Emissions (mt.)
42
Projection of Electricity Generation Requirement
(mtoe) Generation Gross Electricity at Plant
43
Projection of Primary Energy 2005-31 (mtoe)
44
(No Transcript)
45
(No Transcript)
46
(No Transcript)
47
(No Transcript)
48
(No Transcript)
49
(No Transcript)
50
Policy Implications
  • Any reduction in the Growth Rate
  • What should be done about pricing
  • What about support for new Technologies
  • Special comments on energy poverty and
    requirement of carbon space for the household
  • What can India commit to the International
    Community

51
Concluding Remarks
52
The End
53
INCOME POVERTY AND ENERGY POVERTY
54
Poverty Definitions
  • Foster et. al.
  • Poverty line in energy units derived from energy
    consumption pattern of those around income
    poverty line.
  • Pachauri et. al.
  • Poverty line defined in energy units based on
    basic needs as combined with access to energy
    carriers.
  • Reddy
  • Poverty line based on amount of energy required
    to meet basic lifeline need for LPG for cooking
    and similar energy requirement for electricity
    for lighting.
  • Energy Poverty
  • Deprivation of access to modern efficient clean
    energy as principal source, i.e. electricity,
    petroleum products, etc.
  • In case of households, non-poor for lighting are
    those who have access to electricity as the main
    fuel for lighting. Non-poor for cooking are those
    who have access to hydrocarbons (kerosene and
    LPG) as the main fuel for cooking.

55
Rural Poverty Ratio Logit-relationship with
Rural MPCE levels LOG RPOV/(100-RPOV)
1.101 - 0.0039RMPCE
(0.001) (0.000) Adj R2
0.44 N99 Urban Poverty Ratio
Logit-relationship with Urban MPCE levels LOG
UPOV/(100-UPOV) -0.413 - 0.0014UMPCE
(0.3342)
(0.0024) Adj R2 0.11 N99 Source Based
on National Sample Survey Organisation Reports,
NSS 1993/94 (50th Round), 1999/00 (55th Round)
and 2004/05 (61st Round) Govt. of India.
55
56
Table Poverty Ratio and Estimates of Monthly Per
Capita Consumption Expenditure (MPCE) and Time
Required for Poverty Reduction in India
Source Authors own estimates based on NSSO
Reports, different rounds, CSO, 2004 and
Population Reference Bureau, 2007.
57
Relationship between Primary Source of Energy and
MPCE Regression Results
57
HHs Households
58
Source Estimated using data from National Sample
Survey Organisation Reports, NSS 1993/94 (50th
Round), 1999/00 (55th Round) and 2004/05 (61st
Round) Govt. of India.
58
59
The estimated accessibility of modern
energy for lighting
Income - Poverty
Ratio Rural Sector poverty ratio 28.3
4 Proportion of
household With access to electricity
44 84 Urban Sector
poverty ratio 25.7
3 Proportion of household With access to
electricity 88
96
60
Table Projected Accessibility of different Fuels
for Income Poverty
Source Authors own estimates based on NSSO
Reports, different rounds.
61
AppendixEnergy Poverty
62
Energy Poverty
63
AppendixEnergy Poverty
64
  • Thank You
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com