P1249945239qmnLc - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 50
About This Presentation
Title:

P1249945239qmnLc

Description:

Tim Ryan, Chief of Corrections. Santa Clara Department of Correction ... Judy Johnson. Psychological Services - Sacramento County Jail. Mel Voyles ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:96
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 51
Provided by: james62
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: P1249945239qmnLc


1
Board of Corrections
Phase II Mentally Ill Offender Crime
Reduction Demonstration Grant Workshop
2
LEGISLATION
  • Legislative Intent SB 1485
  • Grants to Counties to Develop and Implement a
    Comprehensive, Cost-Effective Plan to Reduce the
    Rate of Crime and Offenses Committed by Persons
    with Serious Mental Illness
  • Reduce Jail Overcrowding
  • Reduce Criminal Justice Costs Related to Mentally
    Ill Offenders

3
LEGISLATION
  • SB2108 - Provides Funding
  • 2 Million Awarded to Counties for Purposes of
    Planning and Developing Continuum of Responses
  • 24,650,000 for County Demonstration Grants

4
LEGISLATION
  • SB1485
  • Legislature Enacted the Mentally Ill Offender
    Crime Reduction Act (MIOCRG Program)
  • Four Year Program Time Frame
  • Commencing in 1999-2000
  • Shall Be Used To Supplement, Not to Supplant

5
LEGISLATION
  • SB1485
  • Grant Requires 25 Match
  • In Consultation With Department of Mental Health
  • Department of Drug and Alcohol Programs
  • Requires Assembly of a Local Strategy Committee

6
STRATEGY COMMITTEE
  • Directed by the Sheriff or Director of County
    Corrections Department
  • Chief Probation Officer
  • Local Law Enforcement Agency
  • Superior Court Judge

7
STRATEGY COMMITTEE
  • County Mental Health Director
  • Client of Mental Health Facility
  • Organizations That Can or Have Provided Treatment

8
Process for Program Development
  • BOC Appoints ESC Chair and Members
  • ESC Meets and Defines Review
  • Work Group(s) Meet and Make Recommendations to
    ESC
  • ESC Finalizes Recommendations to BOC
  • BOC Modifies and/or Adopt ESCs Recommendations

9
Executive Steering Committee
  • Harry Nabors - Chair
  • CPO Madera County
  • Jerry Krans
  • Asst. Sheriff Orange County
  • Dr. Susan Saxe-Clifford
  • BOC Member
  • Daniel Ballin
  • Programs

10
ESC
  • Supervisor John Flynn
  • Ventura County (CSAC Rep)
  • Sheriff Bill Kolender
  • San Diego County (CSSA Rep)
  • Captain Norm Hurst
  • San Bernardino County (CSSA Detentions
    Corrections sub-committee Rep)

11
ESC
  • Deputy Director Gary Pettygrew -
  • State Department of Mental Health
  • Deputy Director Susan Neesbaum
  • State Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs
  • Deputy Director John Anderson
  • Humboldt County - California Mental Health
    Directors Association Representative

12
Grant Criteria Work Group 11-05-98
  • Tim Ryan, Chief of Corrections
  • Santa Clara Department of Correction
  • Sean McDermott, Assistant Sheriff
  • Sonoma County Sheriffs Department
  • Karen Tait, M.D.
  • Corrections Medical Consultant
  • Richard McCathron, Commander
  • Kern County Sheriffs Department
  • Alisa Dunn, Specialist
  • Los Angeles County Mental Health Court Programs

13
Program Definitions Work Group 11-19-98
  • Sametha Cannon
  • State Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs
  • Judy Johnson
  • Psychological Services - Sacramento County Jail
  • Mel Voyles
  • State Department of Mental Health
  • Jim Higgins
  • State Department of Mental Health
  • Richard Blak, Ph.D.
  • Forensic Psychologist

14
ESC Met on 11-30 and 12-1
  • Received Public Comments re MIOCRG Program
  • Developed and Adopted
  • Grant Applications and Instructions
  • Grant Criteria and Critical Issues
  • Established Timelines

15
It All Begins With Planning
16
Phase I Planning Grant Status
17
Phase I Planning Grant Status
18
Phase I Planning Grant Status
19
Phase I Planning Grant Status
20
Phase I Planning Grant Status
45 Approved Applications
21
Building Your Demonstration Project
Build All Or Portions Of Your Demonstration Projec
t From Your Local Plan
Planning Is The Foundation
22
Demonstration GrantRequirements
  • Application Deadline - March 10, 1999
  • Board of Corrections 600 Bercut Drive,
    Sacramento, CA 95814
  • Postmarked By Midnight
  • Hand Delivered By 500 PM
  • No Extensions

23
Demonstration GrantRequirements
  • One Application From Each County
  • Even if Regional Proposal
  • Even if Regional Proposal Proposals Require Board
    of Supervisors Resolution
  • Regional Proposal Will Require a Resolution from
    Each County Participating
  • Only One Source May Be Designated To Receive
    Funds

24
Demonstration GrantRequirements
  • Original And 15 Copies
  • Including The Local Plan
  • Counties Not Participating in Phase I Planning
    Are Required to Submit A Local Plan
  • 12 Point Type Double Spaced
  • Please No Bindings, Hard Covers, Tabs
  • Counties Not Participating in Demonstration Grant
    Must Submit A Local Plan

25
Demonstration GrantRequirements
  • ELIGIBLITY - All California Counties Eligible for
    Demonstration Grants
  • All Proposals Will Be Evaluated Based Upon
    Established Criteria and Merit

26
Grant Awards
  • Counties Can Apply For Funds Commensurate with
    Their Need to Establish Programs Targeting
    Mentally Ill Offenders - There Is No Cap
  • Program Cost Effectiveness Will Be Considered

27
Multiple Programs
  • Counties May Submit Multiprogram Projects
  • Programs Must Be Prioritized in Order of
    Importance
  • Have Separate and Complete Budgets for Each
    Program
  • Must Demonstrate the Capacity to Administer
    Multiple Programs

28
Evaluation Design
  • Evaluation Designs are Required by Statute

29
Projects Not Considered
  • Seek Reimbursement for County Cost Previously
    Incurred
  • Supplant Existing Programs
  • Do Not Have as Primary Goal the Reduction of
  • Jail Crowding
  • Crime
  • Criminal Justice Costs

30
Grant Application Highlights - Section 1
  • May Be Individual Or Regional Proposal
  • Sheriff May Be Different on Phase II Application
    Due November Election
  • Please Include E-mail Address Whenever Possible

31
Grant Application Highlights - Section 2
  • 25 Match Required
  • May Be Hard or In-Kind or Combination
  • Priority Will Be Given to Match in Excess of 25

32
Grant Application Highlights - Section 3
  • Cost Breakdown (Line Item) Detailing How State
    Funds and Match or Other Funds are to be Expended
  • Multiple Programs Require Cost Breakdown for Each
    Program
  • Eligible Budget Items
  • Staff Costs Limited to Salary Benefits

33
Grant Application Highlights - Section 3
  • Eligible Budget Items (Continued)
  • Administrative Overhead - Not to Exceed 10 of
    Grant Amount Requested
  • Professional Services to Prepare RFP not Allowed
    - Professional Services may be Used For Program
    Implementation and Evaluation
  • Cost to Pay for Rent or Lease of Buildings for
    Demonstration Grant Period

34
Grant Application Highlights - Section 3
  • Eligible Budget Items (Continued)
  • Costs to Pay for Direct Client Services by
    Community Based Organizations as Part of the
    Continuum of Care
  • Furniture Exceeding 1000 Must Have BOC Approval
    - Must Demonstrate that Expenditure Represents
    the Lowest Cost

35
Grant Application Highlights - Section 4
  • Strategy Committee is a Requirement of the
    Statute
  • All Members Must be Identified in the Application
    and the Board Of Supervisors Resolution
  • Client Member Organization not Required

36
Grant Application Highlights - Section 5
  • Narrative
  • 1 Page Abstract Per Project or 1 Page Per Program
    if Multiple Program Project - List Programs by
    Importance
  • Complete a Research Design Summary Form for Each
    Project

37
Grant Application Highlights - Section 5
  • History of Activities
  • If no History of Programs With Mentally Ill
    Offenders - Provide a History Past Efforts of
    Program Design, Implementation, Management and
    Success Collaborative, Multidisciplinary and
    Innovative Approaches to Problem Solving and
    Obtaining and Maximizing Funding

38
Grant Application Highlights - Section 5
  • Problem Statement
  • Describe Current Condition of Local Justice
    System
  • Proposed Project
  • Describe Roles of Collaborative Agencies
  • Description of Current or Planned Capacity to
    Administer the Project

39
Grant Application Highlights - Section 5
  • Proposed Project (Continued)
  • Describe Each Element of the Continuum of
    Responses
  • Describe Your Basic Research Design for Each
    Program - A Process and Outcome Evaluation Must
    be Conducted
  • Delineate Relationship Between Needs of the Local
    Plan and the Demonstration Project

40
Grant Application Highlights - Section 5
  • Proposed Project (Continued)
  • Anticipated Cost Effectiveness of the Proposed
    Project
  • How will the Project be Supported After State
    Funding Ends

41
Grant Application Highlights - Section 6
  • Board of Supervisors Resolution must be Submitted
    with the Demonstration Grant Application.

42
Evaluation And Award Timelines
  • March 10 - 17, 1999 - BOC Staff to Review
    Demonstration Grant Evaluations and Prepare
    Worksheets for with Comments for Consideration by
    the ESC
  • Worksheets will be Sent to Applicant Counties by
    April 2, 1999

43
Evaluation And Award Timelines
  • March 18 - April 14, 1999 - The ESC will Complete
    Initial Review and Rating for Eligible Grant
    Applications Received
  • April 14 - 16, 1999
  • ESC will Receive County Comments
  • Schedule Based Upon Time Proposals Received
  • ESC will Meet in Executive Session for Final
    Review

44
Evaluation And Award Timelines
  • May 20, 1999 - ESC will Present Recommendation
    for Grant Awards to The BOC
  • All Planning Invoices Due to BOC by June 30, 1999
  • Counties will be Under Contract by July 1, 1999

45
Board of Corrections
Phase II Mentally Ill Offender Crime
Reduction Demonstration Grant Criteria
46
Grant Criteria Development
  • Developed by the ESC
  • MIOCRG Mission Serves as Guiding Principle
  • To Select the Best Grant Proposals Designed to
    Reduce Crime, Jail Crowding, Criminal Justice
    Costs
  • Valid
  • Fair
  • Equitable

47
Grant Criteria
  • Technical Compliance
  • Match Funding
  • Weighted Criteria

48
Technical Criteria
  • BOC Staff will Review Grant Applications for
    Completeness
  • Ensure Applications Contain all Required Elements
  • Rating is Pass/Fail
  • Will Provide Worksheet with Recommendations to
    ESC and Copy to Applicant

49
Match Funding
  • 25 Match is Required
  • Can be Hard or In-Kind
  • Match Less than 25 Fail
  • 25 Match Pass
  • Match 26-35 1 Point
  • Match 36-45 2 Points
  • Match 46-55 3 Points

50
Weighted Criteria
  • Bidders History of Past Efforts - 12 Points
  • Need for the Program - 15 Points
  • Collaborative, Multi-Agency, Multi-Disciplinary -
    15 Points
  • Probability of Success - 10 Points
  • Evaluation Design - 12 Points
  • Likelihood that Program will Continue - 10 Points
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com