Title:
1its not just a minor stroke
- APSS Telehealth Presentation
- Teri Green, RN PhD
- Calgary Stroke Program
- Faculty of Nursing/University of Calgary
- June 2008
2An Examination of Male Patient, Wife-Caregiver,
and Marital Dyad Outcomes Over a Three-Month
Period Following Minor Stroke
3BACKGROUND
- 50,000 Canadians have a stroke annually minor
stroke or transient ischemic attacks account of
82 of all cerebrovascular disease - Having a stroke creates a need for short and
long-term adjustments for the patient as well as
the family -
- Minor stroke patients are discharged from acute
care shortly after their stroke event -
- There is little empirical evidence available
regarding - the effect of minor stroke on patients
abilities to - return to their previous roles and
functions and - (b) how this seemingly minor event influences the
- marital dyad in the immediate
post-discharge period
4RESEARCH QUESTIONS
- Primary Question
- What are the changes in patient functional
status, patient and wife-caregiver health related
quality of life (HRQOL) and depression,
wife-caregiver strain, and marital dyad
functioning between hospital discharge and
3-months following the stroke event? - Secondary Questions
- What are the associations between patient
functional status, patient and wife-caregiver
HRQOL and depression caregiver strain and
marital dyad functioning over a 3-month period
following stroke? - What are the predictors of marital function at
3-months following a minor stroke? - Tertiary Question
- What do minor stroke patients and
wife-caregivers identify as factors affecting
their HRQOL and/or caregiver strain over 3-months
following discharge?
5RESEARCH METHODS
- Prospective pilot study of 38 male stroke
patients and their wife-caregivers -
- Demographic and clinical information obtained
from the health record and in-person interviews
at time of discharge -
- Questionnaires administered, using standardized
measures, at discharge and one month intervals
over a period of 3-months post-stroke using - SS-QOL
- SF-12v2
- BDI-II
- FADGFS
- BCOS (1-,2-,3-months)
6Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria
- Male patient with a wife-caregiver
- Minor stroke (NIHSSlt4, mRSlt2, BIgt65)
- d/c home within 7 days
- MMSE 24
- Able to provide informed consent
- Able to read/speak English
- No identified spousal caregiver
- Moderate/severe stroke
- Extended hospital stay
- MMSE lt 24
- Unable to provide informed consent
- Unable to read/speak English
7DATA ANALYSES
- Patients and wife-caregivers characterized using
descriptive statistics - Correlation analyses to examine relationships
between biophysical and psychosocial measures - Repeated measures ANOVA MANOVA to examine
changes over time - Logistic regression analysis to determine
predictors of marital function at 3-months - Conventional content analysis of responses to
open-ended questions from the Stroke-Specific
Quality of Life Scale and the Bakas Caregiver
Outcomes Scale administered at 1-, 2-, and
3-months post-discharge
8Demographic Characteristics
Patient Wife-caregiver
Age mean (SD) 63.9 years (12.0) (range 39-83) 58.5 years (11.7) (range 33-75)
Caucasian n () 38 (100) 36 (96)
MMSE mean (SD) 29.5 (1.71) 29.5 (1.49)
Employment Status n() No Yes Retired 3 (8) 25 (66) 10 (26) 8 (21) 21 (55) 9 (24)
Education Level n () high school High School graduate Post-secondary 7(18) 13 (34) 18 (47) 3 (8) 8(21) 27 (71)
9Stroke Characteristics
- Stroke Type ischemic 36 (95), hemorrhagic 2
(5) - Lesion Side right 21 (55), left 17 (45)
- Location supratentorial 27 (63), brainstem 4
(11), unknown 7 (18)
10Stroke Severity Functional Outcomes
Paired t-test Paired t-test Paired t-test Paired t-test
Discharge X (SD) 3-months X (SD) t(df) p
NIHSS (0-42) 2.0 (1.70) 1.1 (2.38) 1.87 (37) 0.076
mRS (o-6) 1.4 (0.95) 1.0 (0.75) 2.34 (37) 0.025
BI (0-100) 93.2 (12.44) 98.6 (8.13) -2.22 (37) 0.033
SIS-16 (16-80) 74.0 (8.26) 74.6 (7.05) -3.91 (37) 0.698
11Changes in Psychosocial Measures between
Discharge and 3-months Post-discharge
ANOVA ANOVA ANOVA ANOVA
Discharge X (SD) 3-months X (SD) F (df) p
SS-QOL (1-5) 4.08 (.504) 4.17 (.479) 1.06 (3) 0.311
SF-12 (0-100) Physical Mental Health 51.07 (9.45) 49.20 (9.95) 51.02 10.09) 51.10 10.64) 0.039 (3) 1.69 (3) 0.989 0.186
BCOS (15-105) 1 and 3-mo 57.13 (8.70) 57.80 (8.70) 0.201 (2) 0.819
12Changes in Depression and Marital Function
between Discharge and 3-months Post-discharge
Discharge X (SD) 3-months X (SD) MANOVA t(df) p MANOVA t(df) p
BDI-II (0-63) Patient Wife-caregiver 6.18 (6.70) 7.21 (5.73) 6.0 (6.64) 6.39 (3.50) 2.67(3) 0.063
FADGFS (1-4) Patient Wife-caregiver 1.58 (.503) 1.73 (.471) 2.0 (.428) 1.83 (.519) 3.75 (3) 0.025
13Patient and Wife-caregiver Mean BDI-II Scores
Over Time
Patient and Wife-caregiver Mean BDI-II Scores
Over Time
Patient and Wife-caregiver Means FADGFS Scores
Over Time
14Patient and Wife-caregiver Mean FADGFS Scores
Over Time
15Associations Between Outcome Variables
- Patient
- HRQOL depression
- r-.577, plt0.001 (discharge)
- r-.662, plt0.001 (1-month post-discharge)
- r-.495, p0.002 (2-months post-discharge)
- r-.758, plt0.001 (3-months post-discharge)
- Depression wife-caregivers perception of
marital function - r.442, p0.005 (discharge)
- r.376, p0.020 (2-months)
- r.610, plt0.001 (3-months)
16Associations Between Outcome Variables
- Wife-caregiver
- Depression wife-caregivers perception of
marital function - r .362, p0.026 (discharge)
- r.538, plt0.001 (1-month)
- r.334, p0.040 (2-months)
- r.578, plt0.001 (3-months)
- Wife-caregivers perception of marital function
and caregiver strain - r-.517, plt0.001 (1-month)
- r-.742, plt0.001 (2-months)
- r-.620, plt0.001 (3-months)
17Predictors of Marital Function at 3-months
OR 95 CI p
mRS . 270 .081 - .902 0.033
SS-QOL .032 .001 - .987 0.049
SF-12 physical 1.257 1.035 1.526 0.021
BCOS .739 .543 1.005 0.054
18Qualitative Data
- Transitional framework
- Passage from one life condition or status to
another - process
- time
- perception
- Content analysis
- Chick Meleis (1986). Transitions A Nursing
Concern - Hsieh Shannon (2005)
19Content Analysis
- Overarching Themes
- Being vulnerable
- Realization of the new self and changing
relationships - Subthemes
- Masculine image
- Hyper-vigilance
- Loss
20Being Vulnerable
- Uncertainty
- Fear of recurrent stroke vulnerable to the
disease - Frustration over recovery process
- Lack of assurance about the future
- - health status
- - work and financial situations
- - lifestyle
21Being Vulnerable
- Gossiped about
- Stigmatized
- Isolated abandoned
- Insecure
- Financial/work stability challenged
- Mood changes and stress
22Realization
- Increasing awareness and insight
- Apprehension about ability to put their lives
back together - Continuity of the family
- Maintenance of relationships
23- Adaptation
- Acceptance and denial
- Incorporation of physical deficits
- Ongoing challenges of emotional and cognitive
changes - Stabilization changing priorities
- Recognition of need for continuous adaptation
24Key Threads
- Masculinity imposed limitations, life-changes
- Hyper-vigilance protective monitoring, control
- Loss physical, emotional, social
25Masculinity
- I was surprised by the long term effects of the
strokenot prepared for the loss of energy and
changes in mood, thinking and personality. - The stroke has made me useless. I cant do the
things for my family like protect them. If an
intruder came in I couldnt even defend my
family. I wouldnt even have the strength to
fight off a child.
26Masculinity
- The largest challenge has been the feelings of
depression that have been part of life since the
stroke. Its a struggle to accept that I am not
the person I used to be, that I cant contribute
like I used to, it seems like Im not worthwhile
as I was before. - I am feeling blue and I cry at the drop of a
hatfear and anxiety are new to me.
27Hyper-vigilance
- always watching
- Since I am his wife and I am the one closest to
him, the only one who can really take care of
him, I really do feel this as a responsibility
and yet it is so different to have him here in my
space - my husband would kill me if he knew that I
check on him in the night to see if he is still
breathing. - My husband accuses me of babying him, but my
over-protectiveness is an automatic reaction
because I am afraid to let him go.
28Loss
- I am feeling the burden of having to make many
life decisions because my husband doesnt want to
make any decisions himself. - I feel trapped by my husband and sometimes I
would like to run awayI have to spend all my
time with him and this has negatively impacted my
relationship with friends and family. - I am feeling overwhelmedthe whole family system
is disrupted.
29Loss
- marital relationship is tense and negative with
arguments over everything. - I am not the same person that I was before.
- I always pride myself in being healthy and
athletic, now I feel so weak. Physically I am
going soft.
30Participants Personal Reflections
- There is more to life than tangibles, and I have
learned to count my blessings. - I realize how devastating the stroke could have
beenI am humbled by everything and I am most
grateful. - more reflective and more aware of what is
important - I am entering a transitional period, where I
will have to learn to get over my past
perceptions of self-image. Perhaps it is time to
focus on other thingsPreviously I had a
dichotomy between my physical and emotional
needs. The stroke has highlighted the need to
develop all aspects of myself in order to have a
better quality of life. It has taught me the
importance of moderation and balance.
31CONCLUSIONS
- its not just a minor stroke
- Patients experienced significant improvement in
functional status over time however overall
psychosocial status did not improve from time of
discharge - Though patients perceived a deterioration in
marital function over time, wife-caregiver scores
did not change significantly (on any of the
psychosocial measures)
32Conclusions
- Qualitatively, patients and wife-caregivers
reported difficulty returning to previous life
roles (including family, work, and social roles)
over the 3-month period - The lack of complete functional recovery over
time created a disconnect between the hope and
the reality of having a minor event
33(No Transcript)
34Thank You!