INF 201 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

INF 201

Description:

Hart, 1998, p.130 (Hart, 1998, p.130) Finished review should be: ... HART, Chris Doing a Literature Review: Releasing the Social Science Research Imagination. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:60
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: Bren64
Category:
Tags: inf | hart

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: INF 201


1
INF 201
  • Reviewing
  • the
  • Literature

2
A literature review
  • The selection of available documents (published
    and unpublished) on the topic, which contain
    information, ideas, data and evidence written
    from a particular standpoint to fulfil certain
    aims or express certain views on the nature of
    the topic and how it is to be investigated, and
    the effective evaluation of these documents in
    relation to the research being proposed.
  • Hart, 1998, p.130
  • (Hart, 1998, p.130)

3
Finished review should be
  • The relevant literature analysed systematically
    and coherently
  • Main arguments, theoretical and methodological
    variables identified
  • Evaluation related to justification of topic and
    methodology/methods to be used

4
WHAT ITS NOT!
  • A simple list of items found
  • A list of items found and read!
  • A list of items found, (and read!),with brief
    notes or abstracts
  • A factual description of the contents of items
    found

5
Why do it?
  • To justify your choice of topic and approach to
    it
  • To show familiarity with earlier work
  • To show understanding of how your work fits in
    with/relates to earlier work in the same area
  • To justify your choice of methodology and
    methods

6
Why do it?
  • Putting the topic in context
  • Whats been done - what needs to be done?
  • What have been the main methodologies used?
  • What are the main variables?
  • Gaining a new point of view?

7
Why do it?
  • To demonstrate understanding of relationships
    (theory, method, design)
  • to demonstrate what is new about your own work

8
Skills used/developed
  • Literature searching
  • Record keeping
  • Evaluation of research
  • Developing and defending a logical argument
  • Clear, coherent, consistent expression

9
Questions the review can/may answer
  • What are the key sources?
  • How is knowledge /information on the topic
    organized?
  • What are origins of the topic?
  • What are the main problems so far addressed?
  • .

10
Questions the review can/may answer
  • What are the important theories, concepts and
    ideas?
  • How/what has all this contributed to our
    knowledge/understanding of the topic?
  • How can you use previous work to help narrow your
    own interests down to a do-able/researchable
    topic?

11
Writing the review
  • All relevant documentation identified and
    analysed
  • All relevant main concepts. theories, approaches
    to topic identified, understood, evaluated

12
Writing the review
  • Provide a methodological justification for your
    research
  • Identify sections to deal with each sub-topic, in
    logical, clear order
  • Information (facts, statistics, quotations,
    extracts, case studies, examples, explanation,
    discussion)
  • Interest (visual aids, bullet points, anecdotes,
    rhetorical questions)

13
Writing the review
  • Breadth and depth
  • Rigour and consistency
  • Clarity and brevity
  • Effective analysis and synthesis

14
    Summary
  • Understanding of topic
  • Key works referred to and discussed
  • Conclusions about earlier research and
    range of approaches
  • Develops research problem
  • Shows gap in knowledge worth filling

15
Dos
  • Identify and review the key works
  • Keep accurate and organised records of what you
    read
  • Continue to update your literature search
  • Use as much up-to-date work as possible
  • Use quotations and examples to support analysis
    and argument

16
Dos
  • Make your own views clear
  • Say why you think the topic is interesting/importa
    nt/relevant
  • Get the bibliographical details right

17
Donts
  • Claim to have read anything you have not read
  • Believe everything you read
  • Deliberately misrepresent others
  • Use others work without proper acknowledgement
  • Cite a work if it is not relevant (even if is by
    one of your teachers!)

18
Donts
  • Use jargon, concepts, terms simply to impress or
    without explanation
  • Forget to include all items mentioned in the
    review in your bibliography or list of references

19
Further reading
  • HART, Chris Doing a Literature Review Releasing
    the Social Science Research Imagination. ix,
    230pp. London Sage, 1998
  • Main Library 4 copies. 300.1 (H)
  • St Georges 4 copies. 300.72 (H) (Short Loan
    Collection)
  • St Georges 2 copies 300.72 (H) One Week Loan
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com