Title: Board of Registration in Medicine
1Board of Registration in Medicine
- Expert Panel on Credentialing
2Anthony D. Whittemore, M.D.
- Chair Expert Panel on Credentialing
- Senior Vice President and Chief Medical Officer
- Brigham and Womens Hospital
- Professor of Surgery
- Harvard Medical School
3The Charge
- To develop specific standardized criteria to
assure competency for credentialing that all
hospitals would be expected to meet in the
biennial process.
4The Problems
-
- Current credentialing process does not assure
that staff are safe and competent. - Some aspects perceived as burdensome and
punitive -
-
5Solutions
- Provide criteria to assure competency
- Ensure process portrays a supportive posture, not
disciplinary or punitive -
-
6Board of Registration in Medicine Expert Panel on
Credentialing
7BWH Medical Staff
- Institutional Appointment Process
- Application
- Approval
-
8BWH Medical StaffApplication Process
- BWH Provider Services
- Completion and verification of Application
- CORI Check (Criminal Offender Record Information)
- Verification of Education and Training, Board
Certification - State Board of Registration in Medicine (all
states where a license has been held) (Mass state
license required, therefore CME) - Current Competence (Personal References)
- Work history, experience (10 years for initial
appointment) - OIG Medicare Exclusion (verified monthly)
- National Practitioner Databank
- Review of malpractice history from all previous
carriers - Verification of additional certification
including DEA - Verification of all gaps in work history
9BWH Medical StaffApproval Process
- Academic Department
- Department Credentialing Committee
- Department Chief
- Institution
- MSCC (Medical Staff Credentials Committee)
- MSEC (Medical Staff Executive Committee)
- CIC (Care Improvement Council)
- BWH Board of Trustees
10BWH Medical StaffApproval Process
- Academic Department
- Department Credentialing Committee
- Reviews completed/verified application and
delineation of privileges - Classifies as Category I or II
- Approves / disapproves appointment
11BWH Medical StaffApproval Process
- Category I
- No Category II Criteria
- Approval Process
- MSCC
- CIC (PCAC)
- Approval
- Appointment becomes effective
- BOT ratifies CIC decision
12BWH Medical StaffApproval Process
- Category II
- Incomplete application
- Failure to meet requirements for appt/reappt in
Bylaws - Pending/final disciplinary or other adverse
licensure action - Disciplinary or other adverse action at BWH or
any other institution such as revocation,
restriction or denial of appt or privileges - Medicare/Medicaid Sanctions (exclusion list)
- National Practitioner Data Bank
- Previous adverse recommendation by MSCC, MSRC, or
CIC - Recommended for Category II status by Dept, MSCC
or CIC - gtLawsuits within 5 years
13BWH Medical StaffApproval Process
- Category II
- Professional Liability Claims (5 year interval)
- Any settlement gt 1 million
- gt2 claims
- OB/GYN, Orthopedists, Neurologists,
Anesthesiologists - Plastic Surgeons, Urologist, Surgical Oncologists
- General Surgeons, Neurosurgeons.
Otolaryngologists - gt1 claim
- All other physicians
-
14BWH Medical StaffApproval Process
- Category II Approval Process
- Institution
- MSCC (Medical Staff Credentials Committee)
- substantiates or revises category status.
- MSEC (Medical Staff Executive Committee)
- CIC (Care Improvement Council)
- BWH Board of Trustees for final action
15BWH Medical StaffApproval Process
- Actions
- Approval
- Approval with restrictions
- Monitoring program
- Limitation of Privileges
- Remedial program
- Denial (Category 3)
16Todays Procedures
- Current process does not adequately address
competence. - Department Chiefs endorsement during the process
is best guide at present. -
-
17Competence is.
- a combination of skills, abilities and
knowledge needed to perform a specific task - (U.S.Dept of Education)
- the habitual and judicious use of
communication, knowledge, technical skills,
clinical reasoning, emotions, values and
reflection in daily practice for the benefit of
the individual and community being served. - (Hundert, et al, 1996)
18Competence is
- Finding and managing information
- Resolving ambiguous problems
- Emotional intelligence
- Responding to novel situations with flexibility
- Time management
- Teamwork
- Professionalism
19Specialty Boards
- Initial Specialty Board Certification
- Written exam - Fund of Knowledge
- Oral Exam -
- Logical thought processes
- R/O certifiable mental disorders (DSM-IV)
- Does not assess sustained competency
- Recertification
- Fund of current knowledge
- CME Requirements
-
-
20Specialty Boards
- Current initiatives to address a flawed process
- American Board of Medical Specialties (ABMS)
- ACGME Core Competencies
- Maintenance of Certification
- Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB)
- National Alliance for Physician Competence
-
-
21The ACGME Outcome Project
22General Competencies
- Patient Care
- Medical Knowledge
- Practice-Based Learning and Improvement
- Interpersonal and Communication Skills
- Professionalism
- Systems-Based Practice
23Expert Panel Framework
- Specific Criteria
- Patient outcome metrics
- Complaints
- Claims
- Accomplishments
- 360 Evaluations
- Certifications
- Other competency assessments recommended by
boards, agencies or societies - Interactive direct observation
24Performance Detail Measures for Vascular Surgery
Multiple Measures for Operational Efficiency,
Quality Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction
Report Link bring user to detailed data
25Report Link In Hospital Mortality Rate
Displays Deaths by HCFA DRG Code
26Report Link Surgical Site Infection Rate
Displays Infections by Wound Class
27Report Link Inpatient Satisfaction with Physician
Displays Responses to Individual Questions in
Section
28Expert Panel Framework
- Inventory of initiatives
- FSBM / Physician Competence Summit III
- ABMS (ACGME) / Outcome Project
- JCAHO / Standards MS 1-5
- NCHL / Competency Model
- Best Practices
- Liability Carriers / CRICO Forum
- Aviation
-
-
-
29Expert Panels Framework
- Define Competency
- Standard processes in MA hospitals
- Best Practices
- Metrics
- procedural
- cognitive
- Monitoring Process
- Remediation Process
-
-
-
30Board of Registration in MedicineCommonwealth of
Massachusetts
-
- Report of the Expert Panel on Credentialing
-
- Guidelines for Competency-Based
- Hospital Credentialing
31Expert Panel Suggestions
- Professionalism
- Demonstrates personal integrity
- Is honest and trustworthy
- Demonstrates respect, compassion, and integrity
- Holds self accountable to patients, society, and
the profession - Is committed to excellence and on-going
professional development - Demonstrates self-awareness and diligence with
respect to personal physical and emotional health - Measures 17, 18
32Expert Panel Suggestions
- Core Competencies
- Patient Care
- Medical Knowledge
- Practice Based Learning And Improvement
- Interpersonal and Communication Skills
- Professionalism
- Systems-Based Practice
33Expert Panel Suggestions
- Professionalism
- Maintains personal competence
- Pursues continuous professional development
- Participates in self- and others assessment of
competency - Displays intellectual curiosity
- Works within limits of competence
- Measures 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 11, 12, 17, 18
34Expert Panel Suggestions
- TABLE II Measures applicable to assessment of
clinical competence -
- ABMS Specialty Board certification,
re-certification and/or MOC - Malpractice Claims
- Co-worker or peer recognition of excellence or
complaints - Academic recognition of excellence or complaints
- Professional society recognition of excellence or
complaints - Patient/Family recognition of excellence or
complaints - Outcomes analysis
- Deaths
- Complications
- Readmissions
- Portfolio analysis of outcome data and 360
reviews for performance improvement - Appropriateness analysis (unnecessary surgery,
imaging, etc.) - Process indicators (core measures, e.g., eye
exams, B-blockers, etc) - Peer review record (American Board of Internal
Medicine ABIM tool, etc.) - Retrospective record review
- Communication assessment (Kalamazoo and other
instruments) - Observation assessment of a standardized
patient
35Expert Panel Suggestions
- Professionalism
- Demonstrates personal integrity
- Is honest and trustworthy
- Demonstrates respect, compassion and integrity
- Holds self accountable to patients, society and
the profession - Is committed to excellence and on-going
professional development - Demonstrates self-awareness and diligence with
respect to personal and emotional health - Measures 17,18
36Expert Panel Suggestions
- Professionalism
- Places patients interests first
- Is responsive to the needs of patients and
society that supersedes self-interest - Treats patients with respect regardless of their
life choices and beliefs - Avoids financial conflicts of interest when
possible fully inform patients if they exist - Observes ethical principles when providing or
withholding clinical care - Does not allow personal views of patients
circumstances or life choices to affect the
treatment recommended or provided - When patients wishes conflicts with physicians
convictions, physicians must be transparent and
offer care with an alternative health care
provider - Maintains confidentiality of patient information
- Measures 3, 6, 13, 17, 18
37Expert Panel Suggestions
- Professionalism
- Ensures competency and professionalism of
colleagues as applicable - Participates in teaching and training of
physicians and students - Participates in assessment of competency of
colleagues - Challenges colleagues when their actions are
inappropriate or unsafe - Takes action as necessary to protect patients
from unsafe acts of colleagues - Provides support for colleagues improvement
- Facilitates the learning of colleagues and
co-workers - Facilitates the learning of residents and
students - Measures 3, 5, 17-20
38Expert Panel Guidelines
- Document is designed to enable hospitals to
comply with external mandates - Joint Commission
- Federation of State Medical Boards
- ACGME