Board of Registration in Medicine - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 38
About This Presentation
Title:

Board of Registration in Medicine

Description:

Plastic Surgeons, Urologist, Surgical Oncologists. General Surgeons, Neurosurgeons. ... Communication assessment (Kalamazoo and other instruments) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:31
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 39
Provided by: informat615
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Board of Registration in Medicine


1
Board of Registration in Medicine
  • Expert Panel on Credentialing

2
Anthony D. Whittemore, M.D.
  • Chair Expert Panel on Credentialing
  • Senior Vice President and Chief Medical Officer
  • Brigham and Womens Hospital
  • Professor of Surgery
  • Harvard Medical School

3
The Charge
  • To develop specific standardized criteria to
    assure competency for credentialing that all
    hospitals would be expected to meet in the
    biennial process.

4
The Problems
  • Current credentialing process does not assure
    that staff are safe and competent.
  • Some aspects perceived as burdensome and
    punitive

5
Solutions
  • Provide criteria to assure competency
  • Ensure process portrays a supportive posture, not
    disciplinary or punitive

6
Board of Registration in Medicine Expert Panel on
Credentialing
  •  
  •   

7
BWH Medical Staff
  • Institutional Appointment Process
  • Application
  • Approval

8
BWH Medical StaffApplication Process
  • BWH Provider Services
  • Completion and verification of Application
  • CORI Check (Criminal Offender Record Information)
  • Verification of Education and Training, Board
    Certification
  • State Board of Registration in Medicine (all
    states where a license has been held) (Mass state
    license required, therefore CME)
  • Current Competence (Personal References)
  • Work history, experience (10 years for initial
    appointment)
  • OIG Medicare Exclusion (verified monthly)
  • National Practitioner Databank
  • Review of malpractice history from all previous
    carriers
  • Verification of additional certification
    including DEA
  • Verification of all gaps in work history

9
BWH Medical StaffApproval Process
  • Academic Department
  • Department Credentialing Committee
  • Department Chief
  • Institution
  • MSCC (Medical Staff Credentials Committee)
  • MSEC (Medical Staff Executive Committee)
  • CIC (Care Improvement Council)
  • BWH Board of Trustees

10
BWH Medical StaffApproval Process
  • Academic Department
  • Department Credentialing Committee
  • Reviews completed/verified application and
    delineation of privileges
  • Classifies as Category I or II
  • Approves / disapproves appointment

11
BWH Medical StaffApproval Process
  • Category I
  • No Category II Criteria
  • Approval Process
  • MSCC
  • CIC (PCAC)
  • Approval
  • Appointment becomes effective
  • BOT ratifies CIC decision

12
BWH Medical StaffApproval Process
  • Category II
  • Incomplete application
  • Failure to meet requirements for appt/reappt in
    Bylaws
  • Pending/final disciplinary or other adverse
    licensure action
  • Disciplinary or other adverse action at BWH or
    any other institution such as revocation,
    restriction or denial of appt or privileges
  • Medicare/Medicaid Sanctions (exclusion list)
  • National Practitioner Data Bank
  • Previous adverse recommendation by MSCC, MSRC, or
    CIC
  • Recommended for Category II status by Dept, MSCC
    or CIC
  • gtLawsuits within 5 years

13
BWH Medical StaffApproval Process
  • Category II
  • Professional Liability Claims (5 year interval)
  • Any settlement gt 1 million
  • gt2 claims
  • OB/GYN, Orthopedists, Neurologists,
    Anesthesiologists
  • Plastic Surgeons, Urologist, Surgical Oncologists
  • General Surgeons, Neurosurgeons.
    Otolaryngologists
  • gt1 claim
  • All other physicians

14
BWH Medical StaffApproval Process
  • Category II Approval Process
  • Institution
  • MSCC (Medical Staff Credentials Committee)
  • substantiates or revises category status.
  • MSEC (Medical Staff Executive Committee)
  • CIC (Care Improvement Council)
  • BWH Board of Trustees for final action

15
BWH Medical StaffApproval Process
  • Actions
  • Approval
  • Approval with restrictions
  • Monitoring program
  • Limitation of Privileges
  • Remedial program
  • Denial (Category 3)

16
Todays Procedures
  • Current process does not adequately address
    competence.
  • Department Chiefs endorsement during the process
    is best guide at present.

17
Competence is.
  • a combination of skills, abilities and
    knowledge needed to perform a specific task
  • (U.S.Dept of Education)
  • the habitual and judicious use of
    communication, knowledge, technical skills,
    clinical reasoning, emotions, values and
    reflection in daily practice for the benefit of
    the individual and community being served.
  • (Hundert, et al, 1996)

18
Competence is
  • Finding and managing information
  • Resolving ambiguous problems
  • Emotional intelligence
  • Responding to novel situations with flexibility
  • Time management
  • Teamwork
  • Professionalism

19
Specialty Boards
  • Initial Specialty Board Certification
  • Written exam - Fund of Knowledge
  • Oral Exam -
  • Logical thought processes
  • R/O certifiable mental disorders (DSM-IV)
  • Does not assess sustained competency
  • Recertification
  • Fund of current knowledge
  • CME Requirements

20
Specialty Boards
  • Current initiatives to address a flawed process
  • American Board of Medical Specialties (ABMS)
  • ACGME Core Competencies
  • Maintenance of Certification
  • Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB)
  • National Alliance for Physician Competence

21
The ACGME Outcome Project
  • Core Competencies

22
General Competencies
  • Patient Care
  • Medical Knowledge
  • Practice-Based Learning and Improvement
  • Interpersonal and Communication Skills
  • Professionalism
  • Systems-Based Practice

23
Expert Panel Framework
  • Specific Criteria
  • Patient outcome metrics
  • Complaints
  • Claims
  • Accomplishments
  • 360 Evaluations
  • Certifications
  • Other competency assessments recommended by
    boards, agencies or societies
  • Interactive direct observation

24
Performance Detail Measures for Vascular Surgery
Multiple Measures for Operational Efficiency,
Quality Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction
Report Link bring user to detailed data
25
Report Link In Hospital Mortality Rate
Displays Deaths by HCFA DRG Code
26
Report Link Surgical Site Infection Rate
Displays Infections by Wound Class
27
Report Link Inpatient Satisfaction with Physician
Displays Responses to Individual Questions in
Section
28
Expert Panel Framework
  • Inventory of initiatives
  • FSBM / Physician Competence Summit III
  • ABMS (ACGME) / Outcome Project
  • JCAHO / Standards MS 1-5
  • NCHL / Competency Model
  • Best Practices
  • Liability Carriers / CRICO Forum
  • Aviation

29
Expert Panels Framework
  • Define Competency
  • Standard processes in MA hospitals
  • Best Practices
  • Metrics
  • procedural
  • cognitive
  • Monitoring Process
  • Remediation Process

30
Board of Registration in MedicineCommonwealth of
Massachusetts
  • Report of the Expert Panel on Credentialing
  • Guidelines for Competency-Based
  • Hospital Credentialing

31
Expert Panel Suggestions
  • Professionalism
  • Demonstrates personal integrity
  • Is honest and trustworthy
  • Demonstrates respect, compassion, and integrity
  • Holds self accountable to patients, society, and
    the profession
  • Is committed to excellence and on-going
    professional development
  • Demonstrates self-awareness and diligence with
    respect to personal physical and emotional health
  • Measures 17, 18

32
Expert Panel Suggestions
  • Core Competencies
  • Patient Care
  • Medical Knowledge
  • Practice Based Learning And Improvement
  • Interpersonal and Communication Skills
  • Professionalism
  • Systems-Based Practice

33
Expert Panel Suggestions
  • Professionalism
  • Maintains personal competence
  • Pursues continuous professional development
  • Participates in self- and others assessment of
    competency
  • Displays intellectual curiosity
  • Works within limits of competence
  • Measures 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 11, 12, 17, 18

34
Expert Panel Suggestions
  • TABLE II Measures applicable to assessment of
    clinical competence
  • ABMS Specialty Board certification,
    re-certification and/or MOC
  • Malpractice Claims
  • Co-worker or peer recognition of excellence or
    complaints
  • Academic recognition of excellence or complaints
  • Professional society recognition of excellence or
    complaints
  • Patient/Family recognition of excellence or
    complaints
  • Outcomes analysis
  • Deaths
  • Complications
  • Readmissions
  • Portfolio analysis of outcome data and 360
    reviews for performance improvement
  • Appropriateness analysis (unnecessary surgery,
    imaging, etc.)
  • Process indicators (core measures, e.g., eye
    exams, B-blockers, etc)
  • Peer review record (American Board of Internal
    Medicine ABIM tool, etc.)
  • Retrospective record review
  • Communication assessment (Kalamazoo and other
    instruments)
  • Observation assessment of a standardized
    patient

35
Expert Panel Suggestions
  • Professionalism
  • Demonstrates personal integrity
  • Is honest and trustworthy
  • Demonstrates respect, compassion and integrity
  • Holds self accountable to patients, society and
    the profession
  • Is committed to excellence and on-going
    professional development
  • Demonstrates self-awareness and diligence with
    respect to personal and emotional health
  • Measures 17,18

36
Expert Panel Suggestions
  • Professionalism
  • Places patients interests first
  • Is responsive to the needs of patients and
    society that supersedes self-interest
  • Treats patients with respect regardless of their
    life choices and beliefs
  • Avoids financial conflicts of interest when
    possible fully inform patients if they exist
  • Observes ethical principles when providing or
    withholding clinical care
  • Does not allow personal views of patients
    circumstances or life choices to affect the
    treatment recommended or provided
  • When patients wishes conflicts with physicians
    convictions, physicians must be transparent and
    offer care with an alternative health care
    provider
  • Maintains confidentiality of patient information
  • Measures 3, 6, 13, 17, 18

37
Expert Panel Suggestions
  • Professionalism
  • Ensures competency and professionalism of
    colleagues as applicable
  • Participates in teaching and training of
    physicians and students
  • Participates in assessment of competency of
    colleagues
  • Challenges colleagues when their actions are
    inappropriate or unsafe
  • Takes action as necessary to protect patients
    from unsafe acts of colleagues
  • Provides support for colleagues improvement
  • Facilitates the learning of colleagues and
    co-workers
  • Facilitates the learning of residents and
    students
  • Measures 3, 5, 17-20

38
Expert Panel Guidelines
  • Document is designed to enable hospitals to
    comply with external mandates
  • Joint Commission
  • Federation of State Medical Boards
  • ACGME
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com