Title: English Programme update
1English Programme update a view of Scottish
Progress
- Dr Peter Scanlon
- DR Screening Programme Director, England
- Ophthalmologist, Gloucestershire Oxford
21921 the Discovery of Insulin
- Banting and Best tied off the pancreatic ducts of
several dogs for 7 weeks. Although the pancreas
became shriveled, the islets of Langerhans
remained intact, and a solution was extracted
from them. - Fourteen-year-old Leonard Thompson had been
diabetic since 1919, weighed only 65 pounds (4
stone) , and was about to slip into a coma and
die. - 1923 Nobel Prize
3(No Transcript)
4Blindness in Scotland
The incidence of blindness due to diabetes was
0.64 (SD 24, 95 CI 49-79) per 100 000 diabetic
population/year. Cormack 2001 BJO Gloucestershire
0.025 Newcastle 0.035 Arun 2003 Potential
reduction 213,000 x 0.615 1,309 new people /
yr
5Evolution
2007 103 programmes
2002 8 reasonable quality services
5/8 shown
6(No Transcript)
7The Future
- Moved from Planning and Implementation
- to
- Quality Assurance/Risk Reduction monitoring
8External Quality Assurance
- Analysis of data from annual reports European
procurement. - External on line QA sets of image grading
- 5 regional QA managers
- Grading review
- Full peer review visits on all programmes.
9QA Standards - Objectives
10Issues for the English Programme
- Accurate identification of patient lists
- Poor outcome data coming from Hospital
Ophthalmology departments - Is funding that is being given by PCTs for
screening actually reaching the screening
programme - Variations in
- Retinopathy levels - referable and background
- Numbers excluded
- Ungradable image levels
- Results from slit lamp biomicroscopy for patients
with ungradable images
11Main difference - Mydriatic 2-field
12Scottish Implementation
Predicted year end (08-09) eligible invited for
screening 96.65 Predicted screened
79.71 Referrals for retinopathy 3.5
13Scottish Successes
- DRS Registers fed automatically from GP systems
to Community Health Index (CHI) to Soarian via a
SCI-DC. - Link to risk factor data Hb A1c, B/P etc..
- Internal QA of graders - randomly selects 12
images on a weekly basis
14Scottish Successes
- Leadership and Collaboration
15Scottish Successes
- 6 monthly option for rephotographing.
- Keeping the slit-lamp biomicroscopy within the
screening service - Automated analysis software
16Scottish Key Performance Indicators
17Data to revisit
- Annual reports from Health Boards?
- Reported retinopathy levels and comparisons?
- Outcome data on Blindness / Visual loss
- 8.1 slit lamp biomicroscopy rate
- (with ? additional 3.5 referral to
Ophthalmology) - Temporarily suspended 10, permanent 4
- (the latter sounds high)
18Joint Working Scotland and England
Accreditation of The Workforce Certificate in
diabetic retinopathy screening
Competence frameworkNational Occupational
StandardsCertificate in Diabetic Retinopathy
ScreeningAccreditation by City Guilds
- 3 mandatory and 6 optional learning units
- Award includes 3 mandatory and a minimum further
3 optional units
19Where now?
- Is this Screening Test or a Screening Programme?
- What happens after referral?
- Is the standard of treatment good?
- What are the treatment outcomes?
- What are the visual outcomes?
201998 RCOphth audit of laser treatment - How well
are we as Ophthalmologists doing? - PRP
- DRS protocol, 800 1600 argon laser burns of 500
micron spot size - area of 157 to 314 mm2
- ETDRS protocol, 1200 1600 argon laser burns of
500 micron spot size - 236 mm2 to 314 mm2
211998 - How well are we as Ophthalmologists doing?
- PRP
- Initial panretinal photocoagulation in one
sitting in 41.2 - high risk characteristics (n65)
- the median was 104.6 mm2 (range 10.4 682.5
mm2) if standard lens used or - median 377.6 mm2 (range 37.6 2464 mm2) if
quadraspheric lens was used - DRS ETDRS protocol 157 to 314mm2
221998 - How well are we as Ophthalmologists doing?
CSMO
- Range of burns in National DR laser audit
- Grid treatment mean 161.6 burns (range 14
1226). - Focal mean 69.3 (range 4 650).
- Treatment of CSMO before or on the first
treatment session for PRP (n 86) - 26.7 (n 23) had Rx before commencement of PRP
- 45.3 (n 39) had Rx at same session
- 22.1 (n 19) had maculopathy Rx after PRP
- 5.8 no specific intention to rx maculopathy
23Outcomes of treatment Screening Programme not
just a Screening Test
- How are we going to collect this information?
- VAs 6 weeks after first laser?
- Are patients being lost in the Hospital system
proper tracking of patients? - Long term visions of our patients?
- CVI data
24(No Transcript)