English Programme update - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

English Programme update

Description:

Poor outcome data coming from Hospital Ophthalmology departments ... additional 3.5% referral to Ophthalmology) Temporarily suspended 10%, permanent 4 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:30
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: peters81
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: English Programme update


1
English Programme update a view of Scottish
Progress
  • Dr Peter Scanlon
  • DR Screening Programme Director, England
  • Ophthalmologist, Gloucestershire Oxford

2
1921 the Discovery of Insulin
  • Banting and Best tied off the pancreatic ducts of
    several dogs for 7 weeks. Although the pancreas
    became shriveled, the islets of Langerhans
    remained intact, and a solution was extracted
    from them.
  • Fourteen-year-old Leonard Thompson had been
    diabetic since 1919, weighed only 65 pounds (4
    stone) , and was about to slip into a coma and
    die.
  • 1923 Nobel Prize

3
(No Transcript)
4
Blindness in Scotland
The incidence of blindness due to diabetes was
0.64 (SD 24, 95 CI 49-79) per 100 000 diabetic
population/year. Cormack 2001 BJO Gloucestershire
0.025 Newcastle 0.035 Arun 2003 Potential
reduction 213,000 x 0.615 1,309 new people /
yr
5
Evolution
2007 103 programmes
2002 8 reasonable quality services
5/8 shown
6
(No Transcript)
7
The Future
  • Moved from Planning and Implementation
  • to
  • Quality Assurance/Risk Reduction monitoring

8
External Quality Assurance
  • Analysis of data from annual reports European
    procurement.
  • External on line QA sets of image grading
  • 5 regional QA managers
  • Grading review
  • Full peer review visits on all programmes.

9
QA Standards - Objectives
10
Issues for the English Programme
  • Accurate identification of patient lists
  • Poor outcome data coming from Hospital
    Ophthalmology departments
  • Is funding that is being given by PCTs for
    screening actually reaching the screening
    programme
  • Variations in
  • Retinopathy levels - referable and background
  • Numbers excluded
  • Ungradable image levels
  • Results from slit lamp biomicroscopy for patients
    with ungradable images

11
Main difference - Mydriatic 2-field
12
Scottish Implementation
Predicted year end (08-09) eligible invited for
screening 96.65 Predicted screened
79.71 Referrals for retinopathy 3.5
13
Scottish Successes
  • DRS Registers fed automatically from GP systems
    to Community Health Index (CHI) to Soarian via a
    SCI-DC.
  • Link to risk factor data Hb A1c, B/P etc..
  • Internal QA of graders - randomly selects 12
    images on a weekly basis

14
Scottish Successes
  • Leadership and Collaboration

15
Scottish Successes
  • 6 monthly option for rephotographing.
  • Keeping the slit-lamp biomicroscopy within the
    screening service
  • Automated analysis software

16
Scottish Key Performance Indicators
17
Data to revisit
  • Annual reports from Health Boards?
  • Reported retinopathy levels and comparisons?
  • Outcome data on Blindness / Visual loss
  • 8.1 slit lamp biomicroscopy rate
  • (with ? additional 3.5 referral to
    Ophthalmology)
  • Temporarily suspended 10, permanent 4
  • (the latter sounds high)

18
Joint Working Scotland and England
Accreditation of The Workforce Certificate in
diabetic retinopathy screening
Competence frameworkNational Occupational
StandardsCertificate in Diabetic Retinopathy
ScreeningAccreditation by City Guilds
  • 3 mandatory and 6 optional learning units
  • Award includes 3 mandatory and a minimum further
    3 optional units

19
Where now?
  • Is this Screening Test or a Screening Programme?
  • What happens after referral?
  • Is the standard of treatment good?
  • What are the treatment outcomes?
  • What are the visual outcomes?

20
1998 RCOphth audit of laser treatment - How well
are we as Ophthalmologists doing? - PRP
  • DRS protocol, 800 1600 argon laser burns of 500
    micron spot size
  • area of 157 to 314 mm2
  • ETDRS protocol, 1200 1600 argon laser burns of
    500 micron spot size
  • 236 mm2 to 314 mm2

21
1998 - How well are we as Ophthalmologists doing?
- PRP
  • Initial panretinal photocoagulation in one
    sitting in 41.2
  • high risk characteristics (n65)
  • the median was 104.6 mm2 (range 10.4 682.5
    mm2) if standard lens used or
  • median 377.6 mm2 (range 37.6 2464 mm2) if
    quadraspheric lens was used
  • DRS ETDRS protocol 157 to 314mm2

22
1998 - How well are we as Ophthalmologists doing?
CSMO
  • Range of burns in National DR laser audit
  • Grid treatment mean 161.6 burns (range 14
    1226).
  • Focal mean 69.3 (range 4 650).
  • Treatment of CSMO before or on the first
    treatment session for PRP (n 86)
  • 26.7 (n 23) had Rx before commencement of PRP
  • 45.3 (n 39) had Rx at same session
  • 22.1 (n 19) had maculopathy Rx after PRP
  • 5.8 no specific intention to rx maculopathy

23
Outcomes of treatment Screening Programme not
just a Screening Test
  • How are we going to collect this information?
  • VAs 6 weeks after first laser?
  • Are patients being lost in the Hospital system
    proper tracking of patients?
  • Long term visions of our patients?
  • CVI data

24
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com