Employee Relations AC219 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

Employee Relations AC219

Description:

... work on corporate management styles differences within unitarism (traditional, ... Stakeholder model a classic example of pluralism different interest require ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:30
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: murt
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Employee Relations AC219


1
Employee Relations AC219
  • Perspectives on the Employment Relationship
  • Unitarist and Pluralist Approaches

2
Structure
  • Reminder The Employment Relationship
  • What are organizations?
  • Different perspectives on the employment
    relationship
  • Unitarism, Pluralism, Marxism

3
What are Organizations? What is Employment
Relationship?
  • Generally happy and harmonious places, people
    work towards common goal, work is seen as
    fulfilling
  • Generally sites of come conflict, people have
    different interests and goals depending on group
    membership, class or professional status, work is
    necessary
  • Generally sites of exploitation, where interests
    of capital owners are served, work is alienating

4
Unitarism and Pluralism
  • Complex terms with long histories
  • Offer very different perspectives on
    organizations and employment relationships
  • Often seen as opposite ends of a continuum
  • In practice many shades within each approach
  • Different positions within unitarism can be
    located on a continuum

5
Unitarism
  • Work organizations are an integrated and
    harmonious whole existing for a common purpose
    (Farnham and Pimlott 1991)
  • Absence of conflict between capital and labour
    members of the same team
  • Conflict is pathological
  • Organisation single source of authority, unitary
    in structure and purpose
  • Employees loyal to the organization
  • Emphasises organizational culture, organizational
    values, norms and common interests

6
Unitarism
  • Assumed to be perspective most commonly held by
    many managers
  • See reflected in focus on managerial
    prerogative
  • Managers right to manage emphasises managers
    acting in the interests of all in the
    organisation because they know best
  • See Purcells work on corporate management styles
    differences within unitarism (traditional,
    paternalist, sophisticated paternalism) and
  • Guest and Hoques (1994) classification of
    non-union companies good, bad, ugly and lucky

7
Unitarism
  • Public policy issues
  • State to support and reinforce managerial
    prerogative
  • Removal of rights/power base to trade unions
    through legislation
  • Restore property and decision-making rights to
    managers
  • Removal of support for collective bargaining to
    widen basis of support for managerial
    decision-making
  • More active role for legislation to curb and in
    extreme cases outlaw strikes and other industrial
    action

8
Unitarism and New Right
  • In 1980s unitarism associated closely with New
    Right
  • Commitment to free markets and removal of
    obstacles to the operation of free markets
    market imperfections
  • Trade unions, collective bargaining - major
    market imperfections
  • Restrictive legislation to restore power of
    employers and managers
  • Managers to be allowed to manage their
    enterprises as they see fit

9
Unitarism
  • But
  • Why should managers values be accepted
    unquestioningly?
  • Why should we assume values of organisation
    those of individuals and groups? Values of
    unitarism are superficially appealing but much
    more difficult to turn into practice
  • How sensible is an approach which assumes an
    unquestioning acceptance of managerial
    prerogative?
  • Problems with more active role of law in ER
  • We know that conflict does exist in
    organizations, how do unitarists explain this?

10
Pluralism
  • For many (particularly academics) pluralism
    represents more appropriate and accurate
    description of organizations and employment
    relationships
  • Fox (1966) organization defined as
  • a democratic state composed of sectional groups
    with divergent interests over which the
    government tries to maintain some kind of dynamic
    equilibrium

11
Pluralism
  • Organizations characterised by competing
    interests
  • Conflict inevitable and legitimate and structured
    into employment relationship
  • For pluralists conflict is manageable and
    resolvable
  • Focus on resolution of conflict order,
    stability rather than how generated
  • Tends to assume balance of power between parties
    with different interests
  • Legitimacy of trade unions as representing
    employee interests and countervailing power to
    management

12
Pluralism
  • Major influence on Public policy in employment
    relations
  • Legalisation of trade unions and rights to ensure
    that independent unions can operate to defend and
    further employee interests
  • Encouragement and legal support for collective
    bargaining
  • New Deal in US in 1930s
  • Donovan Commission in Britain in 1960s and
    influence of Oxford School

13
Pluralism
  • Traditionally, pluralism linked to economic
    interests employees, employers
  • Interests more complex and identity linked to
    age, gender, race, ethnicity, religion, sexuality
  • Increasing wish to extend pluralism beyond the
    workplace (work of Ackers 2002)
  • Stakeholder model a classic example of pluralism
    different interest require means to resolve
    interest differences

14
Pluralism
  • But
  • Balance of power rarely exists in employee
    relations
  • Assumes some common ideology and an acceptance of
    Marquis of Queensbury rules willingness to
    trust institutions and a moral duty to
    compromise
  • Assumes all conflict is manageable and resolvable
  • Assumes that parties are rational
  • Assumes a consensus on truth and the values of
    outcomes

15
And Finally? Foxs Journey
  • Alan Fox leading pluralist IR academic in 1960s
    member of Oxford School
  • Research report for Donovan Commission (1966)
  • By early 1970s major questioning of pluralist
    position
  • Questioned legitimacy and sustainability of
    outcomes where agreed in context of major power
    imbalances
  • Argued that trust and commitment to agreements
    only possible under a radically different
    economic system
  • Moves closer to radical and Marxist position
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com