Title: RECONSTRUCTION:
1(No Transcript)
2 RECONSTRUCTION NORTHERN WAR AIMS
VERSUS SOUTHERN CULTURE
3 RECONSTRUCTION
Tests Commitment of Both Sides
4 CONSTITUTION OFFERS NO
GUIDELINES FOR RECONSTRUCTION
5 CURRENT INTERPRETATION RECONSTRUCTION FAILED
6CURRENT INTERPRETATION RECONSTRUCTION FAILED
Todays Racial Inequalities Are the Fault of
Reconstruction
7CURRENT INTERPRETATION RECONSTRUCTION FAILED
Todays Racial Inequalities Are the Fault of
Reconstruction
Civil Equality Too Mild a Program
8SOUTHERN ATTITUDESREGARDING THERESULTS OF THE
WAR
9 U.S. Commanding General
Ulysses S. Grant
10 Carl Schurz
11South Refuses to Accept Defeat
12South EnactsPresidential ReconstructionBut
Was Not Persuaded
13ACTION Ex-ConfederatesElected to Office
14ACTION Ex-ConfederatesElected to Office
Confederate Vice President Alexander
Stephens of Georgia
15REACTION Congress Refusesto Seat
Ex-Confederates
16REACTION Congress Refusesto Seat
Ex-Confederates
- Secretary of the House of Representative
- Edward McPherson
17ACTION The Black Codes
18REACTIONThe Civil Rights Act of 1866
19Civil Rights Act Confers Citizenship
Connecticut
20Civil Rights Act Confers Citizenship
- Bans Private Racial Discrimination
- in Property
21Civil Rights Act Confers Citizenship
- Bans Private Racial Discrimination
- in Property
- Equal Benefits of Law
- Same Punishments, Pains and
- Penalties
22Was the Civil Rights Act of
1866Constitutional?Implements Section 2 of
13th Amendment
23- 13th Amendment
- Abolishes Property Rights
- in Persons
- Abolishes Badges and Incidents of
Slavery
24REACTION
25Enforcement Act of 1870
- Congress Re-Adopts
- Civil Rights Act of 1866
26- 14th Amendment
-
- Alternative to Permanent
- Military Occupation
- of the South
-
2714th Amendment
- Citizenship
- Due Process of Law
- Equal Protection of the Laws
2814th Amendment
- U.S. Protects Individuals Against
- Discrimination By State Government
29U.S. Protects Individuals Against
Discrimination By State Government
30SOUTHERN STATESREJECT 14TH AMENDMENT
ACTION
31- CONGRESS ? RATIFICATION
- OF THE 14TH AMENDMENT
- THE SINGLE TEST OF LOYALTY
- TO THE UNITED STATES
32CATCH 22
33REACTION First Reconstruction ActMarch 2,
1867
- Imposes Military Rule
- on the South
34MILITARY RULESUPPORTED BYMODERATE and
RADICALREPUBLICANS
35Republican Senator John Shermanof Ohio
36- SOUTHERNERS
- PREFER
- MILITARY RULE
- TO CIVIL EQUALITY
37Congressional RepublicansOverride Presidential
Veto
- 135 to 48 in House of Representatives
- 38 to 10 in Senate
38RECONSTRUCTION ACTMILITARY GOVERNMENTREPLACES
CIVIL GOVERNMENT
39RECONSTRUCTION ACTMILITARY GOVERNMENTREPLACES
CIVIL GOVERNMENT
- Oversee Formation of New
- State Constitutions
40RECONSTRUCTION ACTMILITARY GOVERNMENTREPLACES
CIVIL GOVERNMENT
- Oversee Formation of New
- State Constitutions
- Black Males Vote
41RECONSTRUCTION ACTMILITARY GOVERNMENTREPLACES
CIVIL GOVERNMENT
-
- Oversee Formation of New
- State Constitutions
- Black Males Vote
- New Civil Government MUST RATIFY
- 14th Amendment
42Edwin L. GodkinFounder/Editor of The Nation
43-
- March 1868
- New (Pro-Northern)
- Civil Governments
-
44INHERENT DILEMMA OF
RECONSTRUCTION
Restoration of White Loyalty and
Racial Equality are
Conflicting Objectives
45- RECONSTRUCTION
- REESTABLISHED
- CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT
- IN AMERICA
46- Radical Republicans Seek
- Orderly Reunion through
- Civil Equality
47- CIVIL EQUALITY
- ENFORCED
- A MOMENTOUS
- ACHIEVEMENT
48- WAS RECONSTRUCTION
- TOO LIMITED?
49PRESENTISM
- BIASES HISTORICAL ACCURACY
50PRESENTISM
- HISTORY IS A PACK OF TRICKS
- WE PLAY ON THE DEAD!
51- RADICALS ACHIEVED THEIR
- PRIMARY OBJECTIVE ---
- and STOPPED!
52NORTHERN CONCEPT OF AFRICAN-AMERICANS
- Northerners Believe in
- Self Help for ALL
53Northern Middle Class ValuesMust Be Learned
54- Northerners Failed
- to Understand the Depth
- of Southern Culture
55FAITH IN LEGAL ENACTMENTS
56HISTORICAL SATURATION
57Radical Motives NOT Primarily Political
58Radical Motives NOT Primarily Political No
Attempt to Block Democratic Victories
59- Many Northern Republicans
- Defeated for Supporting
- 15th Amendment
60 Radical Motives NOTPrimarily Economic
61Radicals Badly Dividedon Economic Policy
Charles Sumner
Thaddeus Stevens
62NO LAND REFORM
- CONGRESS MAY NOT INTERFERE
- with PROPERTY RIGHTS in an
- ERA OF LAISSEZ-FAIRE LIBERALISM
63- NORTHERN BUSINESSMEN
- RELUCTANT TO LOAN MONEY
- TO SOUTHERNERS
64- RADICALS MOTIVATED BY IDEOLOGY ---
- BUT WHAT IDEOLOGY?
65(No Transcript)
66RADICALS NOT
- HUMANITARIANS
- BELIEVERS IN EQUAL INNATE
- RIGHTS
- DEVOUTLY EGALITARIAN
- OFFERING JUSTICE FOR
- CENTURIES OF BONDAGE
67Radicals Believe in Civilization
- Moral Exercise of Freedom
- Improves Ethical Level
- of Human Relationships
68- CIVILIZATION REQUIRES
- ORDER
69ORDER REQUIRESFREE INSTITUTIONS
- Free Institutions Internalize Conflicts
- In Peaceful Forums
70- CIVIL UNREST (DISORDER)
- THREATENS ORDER
- CIVIL INEQUALITIES
- CAUSE CIVIL UNREST
71CIVIL EQUALITY DEFUSES DISORDERRESTORES SOCIAL
HARMONY
- FREED PEOPLE CAN
- PROTEST THEMSELVES
72CIVIL EQUALITY FOR CIVILIZATION
73- CIVILIZATION ALSO REQUIRES
- RETREAT FROM RECONSTRUCTION
- ONCE FREED PEOPLE
- ARE PROTECTED ?
- TIME TO RESTORE WHITE SOUTH
74RADICAL REPUBLICAN GOAL
- PROTECT FREED PEOPLE BY CIVIL EQUALITY ENFORCED
- RESTORE WHITE SOUTH AS BALANCE
75Edwin L. Godkin
what valuable additions did we make to the
art of civilization.
76CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1875
- BANS RACIAL DISCRIMINATION IN
- PUBLIC ACCOMMODATIONS
77Civil Rights Act of 1875 Equal Public
Accommodations
Hotels
Public Conveyances
Places of Amusement
78 Primary Sponsors of the
Civil Rights Act of 1875
Senator Charles Sumner Republican - Massachusetts
Benjamin F. Butler Republican - Massachusetts
79Civil Rights Act of 1875 Equal Public
Accommodations
Desegregated Public Schools
80- CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1875
- RESTS ON ENABLING CLAUSE
- OF 14TH AMENDMENT
81WHY DID RADICAL REPUBLICANS PASS THE CIVIL
RIGHTS ACT OF 1875?
- IDEOLOGY
- BELIEF IN CIVIL EQUALITY
- ENFORCED!
82Election of 1874
Lost 100 Seats in House of Representatives
83James A. Garfield, Rep. Ohio
If Ruin Comes From This, I Welcome
Ruin.
84Chief Justice Morrison R. Waite
- U.S. v. CRUIKSHANK (1876)
- The 14th Amendment Does NOT
- Cover Private Discrimination.
85- CIVIL RIGHTS CASES (1883)
- The Civil Rights Act of 1875
- Is Unconstitutional
14th Amendment Does NOT Apply to Private
Discrimination
86JUSTICE JOSEPH BRADLEY
- Civil Rights Act of 1875 NOT
- Supported by 13th Amendment Either
87- EQUAL PUBLIC ACCOMMODATIONS
- AWAITS CIVIL RIGHTS ACT
- OF 1964
88CHIEF JUSTICE EARL WARREN
- Jones v. Alfred Mayer Co. (1968)
- CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1866
- IS CONSTITUTIONAL!
89WHERE ARE WE NOW?