The Nationstate and Sovereignty - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

The Nationstate and Sovereignty

Description:

What is meant by the state. Why the state has been seen as the central player in world politics. ... States are thought to be the central actors in world politics. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:38
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: aaronh7
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Nationstate and Sovereignty


1
The Nation-state and Sovereignty
2
Learning Objectives
  • At the end of this series of lectures, you should
    understand
  • What is meant by the state.
  • Why the state has been seen as the central player
    in world politics.
  • Why the nation-state became the preferred method
    of communal organization.
  • The state as a solution to the problem of
    violence
  • The state as a solution to the problem of
    credibility.

3
Learning Objectives cont.
  • You should also be able to define/identify the
    following terms
  • Sovereignty
  • Territoriality
  • Treaty of Westphalia

4
The State
  • The term nation-state (or just state) can be used
    interchangeably with country.
  • The term state also refers to the government of a
    particular country.
  • The modifier nation is used to denote that
    loyalty to the state, based on some shared
    characteristic (e.g., language, religion,
    history), binds citizens together as a community.

5
The State
  • States are characterized by three essential
    ingredients
  • Sovereignty.
  • Territoriality.
  • Monopoly on the legitimate use of force.
  • Communal myths.

6
Sovereignty
  • Definition The claim of final legal authority.
  • The principle of sovereignty was first codified
    in the 1648 Treaty of Westphalia.
  • Conventional date for the start of the state
    system.

7
Treaty of Westphalia
  • Significant because it established the principle
    that sovereignty rested with secular authorities.
  • Previously, sovereignty was a religious concept.

8
Territoriality
  • Definition Exclusive authority over a fixed
    geographic space.
  • Authority has not always been defined in spatial
    terms.
  • E.g., Christian church claimed to exercise
    authority over entire body of Christian believers.

9
Coercive Monopoly
  • The state also possesses a monopoly over the
    legitimate use of force.
  • Private uses of force are illegitimate, although
    the state may, in practice, delegate the right to
    use force to private parties.

10
Communal Myths
  • The nation-state also depends on the emergence of
    a sense of we-ness.
  • This sense is driven largely by notions that
    particular groups are connected to one another
    because they share language, history, cultural
    practices, and/or religion.

11
The State System
  • Political Scientists have long focused on the
    operation of the state system.
  • States are thought to be the central actors in
    world politics.
  • States have been best able to wield military and
    economic power and been able to shape the way
    international politics is conducted.

12
Development of the State
  • People have not always lived in a world dominated
    by states.
  • At one time, a variety of social organizations
    existed side by side including
  • City-leagues (e.g., Hanseatic League).
  • City-states (e.g., Athens)
  • Territorial states (e.g., France).

13
Competitors with The Sovereign State
  • City-leagues
  • Confederations
  • Non-territorial
  • Leagues lacked borders and were often
    non-contiguous.
  • Lacked final decision making authority

14
Competitors with The Sovereign State cont.
  • City-states
  • Fixed territorial borders.
  • Fragmented sovereignty.
  • Central city was focal point for external
    relations.
  • Dominated secondary cities resisted central
    citys control.

15
Evolution of the State System
  • Territorial states began to outperform their
    competitors.
  • Nation-states turned out to be better able to
    organize for and wage war.
  • Central authorities could extract resources more
    effectively
  • Nation-states could establish credible
    commitments more effectively than other social
    organizations.
  • E.g., standardized weights and measures.

16
Will State Sovereignty Survive Globalism?
  • What is the future of the state system?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com