Psychoneuroimmunology PNI

1 / 13
About This Presentation
Title:

Psychoneuroimmunology PNI

Description:

... that our illnesses are purely a result of our poor stress-management techniques. Stress management (as an example) is just an important part of the dynamic ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:194
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: Fabi47

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Psychoneuroimmunology PNI


1
Psychoneuroimmunology(PNI)
  • By Fabiola Tatone
  • EPI 6181, December 4, 2006

2
Psychoneuroimmunology (PNI) What is it?
  • The field that studies the interactions between
    the central nervous system, the endocrine system
    and the immune system the impact of
    behavior/stress on these interactions and the
    implications for health of these interactions -
    Ronald Glaser
  • From 1919, stress was noted to influence the
    progression of pulmonary tuberculosis.
  • In 1974, Robert Ader conducted the first
    experiments showing that the brain directly
    influences the immune system by using classical
    conditioning in rats. Ader paired an inert
    substance such as saccharine (the Conditioned
    Stimulus) with an immunosuppressive substance
    that decreases T-lymphocytes, cyclophosphamide
    (the Unconditioned Stimulus) and demonstrated
    that the harmless substance caused
    immunosuppression and rats died.

3
How psychological factors affect our immune
system vice-versa
  • The nervous system affects the endocrine system
    via the pituitary gland, controlling hormone
    secretion.
  • The endocrine system modulates the immune system
    through the hormones secreted by the pituitary
    and adrenal glands. This hypothalamus-pituitary-ad
    renal axis (HPA) plays a central role, as immune
    cells are equipped with receptors for HPA
    molecules, and are altered in number, function,
    and distribution as a result of the hormones
    secreted.
  • Through the autonomic nervous system, the nervous
    system also has direct effects on the immune
    system via the thymus gland, the spleen, and bone
    marrow.
  • Cytokines (communication molecules of the immune
    system), are secreted by immune system cells and
    are one of the components that fight foreign
    invaders, regulate the production of immune cells
    and also impact the central nervous system and
    the HPA axis.
  • Cytokines also drive our physiological illness
    response, affecting our mood, fever, eating, and
    sleeping patterns, along with other associated
    behaviours. This response to illness is evident
    at the neuronal level, demonstrating changes in
    neuronal firing rates and neurotransmitter
    turnover when presented with an immune challenge
    this provides evidence for a bi-directional
    circuit.
  • Thus, yes, its complex!
  • CNS
  • Endocrine Immune
  • System System

4
Stress the Immune System
  • In laboratory studies, short-term stressors such
    as making a speech, are shown to inhibit an
    effective immune system response in as little as
    5 minutes.
  • Longitudinal studies show that individuals who
    experience significant stressors at one point or
    another have increased rates of illnesses and
    long-term immune suppression over time this
    association is present even after controlling for
    confounding factors such as smoking and substance
    abuse.
  • The effect of stress has been investigated for
    the most part as a main effect, however other
    studies also show that it may interact with other
    factors (e.g. personality) in its effect on
    illness.

5
Stress Immune function Taken from J.L.Jarrys
(2002) Health Psychology slides at U.of T.
6
Mood the Immune System
  • Negative emotions induced by stress also impact
    the immune system.
  • Studies show that negative emotions such as
    sadness, grief, and helplessness, suppress immune
    function, such that individuals who are ill are 3
    times more likely to die as a result of their
    illness if they are depressed, in comparison to
    those who are ill and not depressed.
  • Studies on the effects of mood on cancer have
    shown that cancer patients who are depressed have
    lower natural killer cell activity (NKCA) in
    comparison to their non-depressed counterparts.
    These findings come from 2 types of longitudinal
    studies 1) studies following cancer-free people
    over time, measuring their mood and possible
    cancer onset 2) studies following individuals
    already diagnosed with cancer and monitoring how
    their mood is associated with cancer progression.

7
Social Support the Immune System
  • Emotional and instrumental support have also been
    shown to relate to proper immune function.
  • Theorell et al. (1995) found that HIV-positive
    men with low levels of social support had a more
    rapid decline in T-helper cell counts over a
    period of 5 years than did HIV-positive men with
    high levels of social support.

8
Effects on Immune Function
  • Other factors including, anxiety, sleep
    deprivation, abortion, divorce, family illness,
    unemployment, personality, coping style,
    psychiatric illness, and war have also been shown
    to impact immune function. (summarized by Reilly
    McCabe, 1997).
  • Conversely, the immune system and disease can be
    positively influenced by relaxation, humour,
    hypnosis, meditation, and positive attitudes.
    These techniques induce a physiological
    relaxation response (as opposed to the stress
    fight-or-flight response), reducing blood
    pressure, respiratory rate, heart rate, etc.

9
What does this mean for health practice?
  • Clinical Interventions
  • Therapeutic interventions such as hypnosis,
    psychotherapy, and stress management techniques
    have demonstrated benefits in alleviating
    symptoms of chronic illnesses such as cancer, and
    latent viral infections such as herpes.
    Immunological changes are also documented as a
    result of these interventions.
  • Women with breast cancer have seen extended
    survival rates as a result of participation in
    group therapy or self hypnosis.
  • However, it is important to note that direct
    associations are difficult to observe as a result
    of confounding factors such as changes in diet,
    lifestyle, and medical treatments.
  • Nonetheless, this does not discount the potential
    benefits obtained by considering psychological,
    behavioural, and emotional interventions in
    addition to traditional medical treatments when
    targeting an illness. As Roger Sturrock once
    mentioned
  • If you settle the patient, the illness then
    often settles.
  • However, this in no way implies that our
    illnesses are purely a result of our poor
    stress-management techniques. Stress management
    (as an example) is just an important part of the
    dynamic picture.

10
The Placebo Effect
  • Many argue that the therapeutic interventions
    described are simply a placebo effect a bodys
    ability to heal itself as a result of the
    confidence in an unknowingly inert intervention
    (e.g. a sugar pill).
  • The placebo effect is also defined as a change
    in a patients illness attributable to the
    symbolic import of a treatment rather than a
    specific pharmacologic or physiologic property.
  • Benefits obtained through placebos have
    implicated the autonomic nervous system (with
    improvements in hypertension, cardiac pain, and
    headaches), the endocrine system (diabetes and
    menstrual pain), and the immune system (colds,
    asthma, and cancer).

11
The Placebo Effect (contd)
  • The placebo effect is considered by many to
    represent that an illness was all in your mind.
    However, although the placebo may be chemically
    inactive, its effects are evident beyond the
    psyche.
  • 1) Through patients confidence in a treatment,
    placebos have been shown to reduce stress,
    anxiety, and depression, all which have been
    reviewed to associate with illness.
  • 2) Placebo treatments may also work as
    conditioned stimuli, similar to Aders
    experiments with saccharine in rats.
  • 3) The placebo response may also act directly on
    the CNS with the release of the bodys natural
    pain killers and narcotics (e.g. endorphins and
    enkephalins).
  • Thus, although the beliefs may be all in the
    mind, the effects of this belief alter an
    individuals biochemistry to mimic the effects of
    an active drug.
  • However, it is difficult to study the exact
    physiological mechanisms of placebo effect as its
    effectiveness also depends on the patients faith
    in the treatment, reduction of anxiety, and
    conditioning no individual has the same response
    to a given placebo. Just the same, the
    therapeutic potential of placebos merit important
    consideration.

12
Bi-directional Interactions between the Brain and
Nervous System
  • Evidence suggesting the presence of
    bi-directional pathways between the brain and
    immune system cannot be ignored.
  • The two pathways connecting these systems are
    primarily the autonomic nervous system and the
    HPA axis, and these communicate via chemical
    messengers from nerve cells, endocrine organs,
    and immune cells.
  • Although most research has focused on how the
    sympathetic nervous system and HPA axis affect
    the immune system, there is evidence that the
    reverse also occurs. The immune system impacts
    the nervous system inducing sickness behaviour
    through fever, loss of appetite, an increase need
    for sleep, etc. This results from active immune
    cells releasing cytokines, sending back messages
    through the HPA and to the brain.
  • The implication of this bi-directional pathway
    suggests the possibility for future chemical
    interventions to obstruct these chemical pathways
    so that, for example, stressful situations will
    be prevented from interfering with our immune
    function, and sickness behaviour can be better
    managed by interfering with its feed-back loop
    as well.
  • Does this all mean that people of lower SES, who
    tend to be more likely to experience stressful
    life circumstances, will no longer show
    disparities in health once we find a way to block
    these psychoneuroimmunological communication
    routes? That will be left to us future
    researchers to discover!

13
References
  • Azar B. A new take on psychoneuroimmunology.
    Monitor on Psychology, 200132(11). URL
    http//www.apa.org/monitor/dec01/anewtake.html
  • Jarry JL. Psychoneuroimmunology PPT-slides.
    Health Psychology (PSY333). Dept. of Psych.
    University of Toronto 2002.
  • Kinser PA. Therapeutic placebo effect A
    mind/body connection. 1999. URL
    http//serendip.brynmawr.edu/bb/neuro/neuro99/web1
    /Kinser.html
  • Kinser P. Psychoneuroimmunology and natural
    healing by the brain. 1999. URL
    http//serendip.brynmawr.edu/bb/neuro/neuro99/web2
    /Kinser.html
  • Reilly D., McCabe D. Creative consulting
    Psychoneuroimmunlogy, the mindbody. URL
    http//www.studentbmj.com/back_issues/0402/educati
    on/97.html
  • Wachterman M. Psychoneuroimmunology
    Bi-directional interactions between the brain and
    the nervous system. 2000. URL
    http//serendip.brynmawr.edu/bb/neuro/neuro00/web1
    /Wachterman.html
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)