L1 Pixel Trigger Status Report - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 11
About This Presentation
Title:

L1 Pixel Trigger Status Report

Description:

David Berg. Mike Haney ( -trigger) Mike Wang. Xiaonan Li. Gustavo Cancelo. Jinyuan Wu ... Current version of Pixel L1 and Muon L1 WBS is V9 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:19
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 12
Provided by: gustavo9
Learn more at: http://www-ese.fnal.gov
Category:
Tags: berg | pixel | report | status | trigger

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: L1 Pixel Trigger Status Report


1
L1 Pixel Trigger Status Report
2
BTeV L1 Trigger Task Group
  • Erik Gottschalk
  • Vince Pavlicek
  • Ken Treptow
  • Ted Zmuda
  • Greg Deuerling
  • David Berg
  • Mike Haney (?-trigger)
  • Mike Wang
  • Xiaonan Li
  • Gustavo Cancelo
  • Jinyuan Wu (?)

3
WBS
  • L1 Trigger Task WBS (Vince,Mike H, Gustavo, Erik)
  • WBS work started about 3 months ago
  • Current version of Pixel L1 and Muon L1 WBS is V9
  • 2nd revision after management feedback
    suggestions.
  • Muon and Pixel WBS coordination
  • L2 and L3 Trigger are being integrated

4
Trigger Processor block diagram
5
Pixel Processor and Segment Tracker (PPST)
  • BB33 algorithm is being implemented in VHDL code
    (Ted, Ken)
  • Inner and outer doublets
  • Objectives
  • Obtain better processing time estimates
  • Determine silicon requirements
  • Optimize algorithm implementation based on the
    size-speed tradeoff
  • Some simulations to improve BB33 algorithm
    implementation (Vince)
  • Alternatives to speed-up PPST processing or
    reduce silicon size

6
Pixel Processor and Segment Tracker (PPST) (2)
  • Data flow analysis Queuing analysis and
    simulation (Gustavo)
  • Data flow models have been developed
  • Some good suggestions like N-way branching
    (highways)
  • Buffer sizes, data channel speed.
  • Behavioral simulations are underway
  • closely related to VHDL implementation

7
Trigger Processor N-way branching
  • Advantages of N-way branching (highways)
  • Data uniformly distributed in fiber channels
  • Increase budget time of the Segment Processors
  • Chance to test several trigger algorithms at the
    same time
  • Fault tolerance
  • Supervise highway performance

8
DSP Farm Prototype board
  • Motherboard will have up to 4 Texas Instrument
    DSPs
  • Mezzanine DSP cards will allow testing of more
    than one typeof DSP. Floating point and fixed
    point DSPs will be supported.
  • DSP Farm Prototype main features
  • PTSM (Pixel Trigger Supervisor Monitor) network
    connection
  • Input and output ports to PCI-based Test Stand
  • Local memory for Segment Data
  • JTAG interfaces for programming
  • On-board microcontroller for network data
    handling and statistics
  • Test goals
  • study hardware constraints (i.e. DMA access,
    communication ports, FPGA and memory bandwidths,
    etc)
  • DSP algorithms and kernels
  • hardware-software integration

9
DSP Farm Prototype board (2)
10
Other Trigger Tasks
  • PTSM (Pixel Trigger Supervisor Monitor) (Greg,
    Vince)
  • Specification of network
  • Specification of interfaces and protocols
  • DSP farm (Erik, Vince, Xiaonan, David, Mike H,
    Mike W.)
  • Analysis and Specification of DSP farm
  • DSP test boards
  • DSP software
  • Trigger algorithms (Erik, Mike W.)
  • Generation of track-segment data (triplets) to
    feed DSPs
  • NSF ITR Proposal (Erik, Vince)
  • Request for funding for work on fault tolerance
    along with related DSP hardware and software
    issues.

11
The Near Future
  • Prioritize tasks for the BTeV Technical Design
    Report for February 2002.
  • More work on WBS, dictionary, and costing
  • DSP simulations
  • DSP line will probably be defined
  • more accurate estimation of computational time
    required
  • Data flow analysis
  • PTSM prototype
  • BB33 fully implemented in VHDL
  • possible improvements in the segment finder
    algorithm
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com