Why Humanitarian Reform - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

Why Humanitarian Reform

Description:

CAR. Chad. Colombia. DRC. Ethiopia. Liberia. Madagascar. Somalia. Uganda. Acute Emergencies ... Info sharing and analysis for evidence based action ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:33
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: pill6
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Why Humanitarian Reform


1
Why Humanitarian Reform?
  • Recognized gaps in humanitarian response
  • Humanitarian Response Review commissioned in 2005
  • Concluded that major improvements were needed in
    humanitarian response
  • IASC endorsed humanitarian reform in September
    2005

2
What is the Cluster Approach?
  • A method of work
  • to address identified gaps in response
  • to enhance the quality of humanitarian action

3
Why the Cluster Approach?
  • To improve the predictability, timeliness and
    effectiveness of humanitarian response
  • To strengthen leadership and accountability in
    key areas

4
What is a Cluster?
  • A group of agencies, organizations and other
    stakeholders, interconnected by their respective
    mandates, working together to address needs in a
    specific area of humanitarian activity for
    greater effectiveness and efficiency.

5
Expected Output of the Global Clusters
  • Develop global guidance, standards, tools and
    resources
  • Build response capacity through training, rosters
    and material stockpiles
  • Provide operational support through preparedness
    and planning, technical expertise, advocacy and
    resource mobilization

6
The Beginning of the Health Cluster
  • Set up in September 2005 with WHO as lead agency
  • First seen in action in Pakistan in October 2005
  • Currently 30 global level partners

7
Strategic areas of the Global Health Cluster
  • Coordination and Management
  • Information Management
  • Rosters and Stockpiles
  • Capacity Building of National Counterparts
  • Operational Support

8
Current work of the Global Health Cluster
  • Guidance and tools for Coordination and
    Management
  • Stakeholders analysis (to accompany 3W),
    strategic planning, joint action plans, gap
    filling
  • Health aspects of the recovery phase
  • Advocacy
  • Capacity Building of National Stakeholders
  • Information Management
  • an Inter-cluster Rapid Assessment Tool and
    accompanying definitions and guidance
  • comprehensive Assessment Tool
  • assessment, monitoring, tracking systems
  • Mainstreaming health information with larger
    humanitarian IM system
  • Rosters and Stockpiles
  • Selection, Training and Roster-ing of Health
    Cluster Field Coordinators
  • Regional stockpiles of health supplies with
    necessary logistic support
  • Capacity Building
  • Guidance to strengthen national capacity in
    emergency preparedness, response and recovery
  • Operational Support
  • Global working relations within the health
    cluster, between global clusters, and with
    country clusters
  • Advocacy, resource mobilization, trainings
  • Benchmarks/indicators for and evaluations of the
    impact of the cluster approach

9
Added Value from the Global Level
  • Partners work within jointly determined and
    agreed methods of work using cluster-endorsed
    guidance and tools
  • Increased surge capacity through trained and
    rostered emergency health experts
  • Collaborative and coordinated emergency response
    within and between clusters/sectors

10
Health Cluster at the Country Level
  • Lead and coordinate
  • Seek collaboration and inclusiveness
  • Conduct health needs assessment
  • Facilitate a joint strategic plan and action plan
  • Incorporate cross cutting issues
  • Turn plans into action through leadership
  • Monitor and report
  • Build local capacity
  • Advocate and mobilize resources
  • Be provider of last resort

11
Country Level Health Clusters
  • Chronic Emergencies
  • CAR
  • Chad
  • Colombia
  • DRC
  • Ethiopia
  • Liberia
  • Madagascar
  • Somalia
  • Uganda
  • Acute Emergencies
  • Pakistan
  • Lebanon
  • Philippines
  • Mozambique

12
Added Value at the Country Level
  • Joint health assessments
  • Joint strategic planning and planned actions
  • Info sharing and analysis for evidence based
    action
  • Avoid overlap, increase complementary actions
  • Identification and filling of gaps
  • Clear lead
  • more predictable and effective response

13
Feedback from country health clusters
  • Successes
  • Coordination
  • Joint planning, assessments, evaluations,
    advocacy and appeals
  • Info sharing mapping actors, mailing lists,
    assessment results, programming transparency
  • Funding donors pledge more funds to the pooled
    fund, access to funding is possible for more
    partners, increasing transparency and equity
    common platform capable of lobbying donors and
    governments
  • Clearly identified cluster lead with roles and
    responsibilitieswhich is not the case with the
    sector approach

14
Feedback from country health clusters
  • Challenges
  • Coordination is at the central level, but still
    weak at the provincial level
  • Lack of partner participation
  • Lack of government participation role unclear
  • Cluster approach perceived as a UN structure (top
    down) attempt to control other actors
  • Humanitarian appeals still under-funded no
    specific funds for cluster for dedicated
    resources and staff funding competition
  • Weak information flow
  • Weak inter-cluster linkages
  • Meeting overload parallel structures
  • Lack of guidance, bench marks and support from
    global cluster lead
  • Not sufficiently identifying and addressing gaps

15
Feedback from country health clusters
  • Needs
  • Increase communication between global and country
    clusters
  • Promote intensively the system and its added
    value
  • Merge cluster with existing coordination
    mechanisms
  • Increase government ownership of the process
  • Engage donors in clusters at all levels
  • Commit resources to the Cluster lead to enhance
    the leadership and coordination role offer
    training courses send experienced HCFC
  • Commit resources/funding to partners to fill gaps
    during the transitional period
  • Provide simple guidance, tools and resource
    materials
  • Increase transparency in the fund allocation
    process
  • Standardize information systems and indicators to
    be collected to monitor impact

16
Next steps for the Global Health Cluster
  • Bring products and services to country clusters
    through peer review, field testing and joint work
  • Strengthen communication between global and
    country clusters through website, working group
    representation, open discussion, work shops,
    field visits
  • Increase support to country clusters through
    advocacy, resource mobilization, rosters,
    pocketbook, trainings
  • Build inter-cluster/sector coordination and joint
    products at the global level, and introduce to
    country clusters through joint field visits and
    communications
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com