Dragon Tails - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Dragon Tails

Description:

... (rip rap, concrete, refrigerators, cars, etc.) Dams and diversions ... (vineyard development, dairy waste, cattle, stream crossings, clear-cut erosion, etc. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:33
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 43
Provided by: ccclea
Category:
Tags: dragon | tails

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Dragon Tails


1
Dragon Tails
  • Or, how we learned to stop worrying about permit
    compliance and love SUSMPs a fairy tale?
  • Greg Gearheart, PE
  • Stormwater Program / SWRCB

2
The Tail End
  • Our mission is to preserve and enhance the
    quality of CAs water resources, and ensure their
    proper allocation and efficient use for the
    benefit of present and future generations.
  • Who are the present and future generations?

3
Millions of Californians
  • 1980 23.7 million
  • 2005 37 million
  • 2030 48 million (projected)
  • where?

4
What are some examples of water resources we
should protect?
  • Wetlands and streams, including
  • Riparian areas
  • Intermittent, ephemeral and headwater streams
  • Isolated wetlands (e.g., vernal pools)
  • Watershed functions and values
  • Protect from what?

5
Paradise Lost why are they special?
  • California has lost 95 of our inland wetlands
    and streams since 1850's due to development
  • They are a critical part of the watershed
  • support BUs onsite
  • maintain the "quality of the water" of watershed
  • provide critical watershed functions like
    generating/moving/storing sediment, removing
    pollutants, retaining flood flows, and supporting
    habitat connectivity

6
Why do they need special protection?
  • Highly sensitive ecosystems
  • Most threatened by landscape activities
    (urbanitis, development, industry, etc.)
  • It is much more difficult to regulate landscape
    activities than it is to control point discharges
  • It is very difficult to restore them once they
    are gone

7
What human activities impact wetlands and streams?
  • Bank hardening (rip rap, concrete, refrigerators,
    cars, etc.)
  • Dams and diversions
  • Development (stream/swale burial, realignment,
    concrete-lining, etc.)
  • Agricultural activities (vineyard development,
    dairy waste, cattle, stream crossings, clear-cut
    erosion, etc.)

8
(No Transcript)
9
CWA 401 regulatory actions at Water Boards for
2003
  • 1094 401-related Projects Statewide
  • 26 projects denied certification
  • 12 project-related enforcement actions
  • 1880 acres of fill to State waters (includes 1280
    acres temp. fill)
  • 600 acres of permanently filled
    wetlands/streams/etc.
  • 1082 acres of compensatory mitigation

10
Water Boards nuts and bolts
  • Our regulatory actions (e.g., CWA401 Certs, WDRs,
    enforcement, etc.) require discharges to be
    protective of our water quality (WQ) standards
  • Water quality standard beneficial uses
    objectives
  • Water Boards may choose to prevent any
    degradation
  • Statewide General WDRs
  • for dredge/fill and linear projects

11
CWA - Water Quality Standards
  • Water Quality Standards are made up of
  • Beneficial Uses (designated to specific
    waterbodies), plus
  • water quality criteria and
  • an antidegradation policy.
  • Beneficial Uses (BUs) are
  • often not directly related to some key water
    resource uses valued by communities (it might
    take a suite of them to protect wetlands and
    streams, for example)

12
Beneficial Uses Used to Protect California
Wetlands Streams
  • AGR Agricultural Supply
  • FLD Flood Peak Attenuation/Flood Water Storage
  • FRSH Freshwater Replenishment
  • GWR Groundwater Recharge
  • MAR Marine Habitat
  • MUN Municipal and Domestic Supply
  • RARE Preservation of Rare and Endangered Species
  • REC-1 Water Contact Recreation
  • REC-2 Non-Water Contact Recreation
  • SHELL Shellfish Harvesting
  • SPAWN Fish Spawning
  • WARM Warm Freshwater Habitat
  • WILD Wildlife Habitat
  • WQE Water Quality Enhancement

13
Beneficial uses (BUs) and wetlands / streams
  • BUs are
  • designated in the Basin Plans to a specific
    waterbody at a specific location
  • are not easily translated to some key
    wetland/stream functions and values
  • frequently it takes a suite of BUs to cover
    wetland functions and values (often includes
    gaps and overlaps)

14
Functional FrameworkRegulatory Tools
  • Landscape / watershed tool(s)
  • Storm water permits
  • CEQA ?
  • Waterbody tool(s)
  • CWA 401 Certifications
  • Waste Discharge Requirements
  • Waivers
  • Laparoscopic techniques

15
CWA Permits
  • Section 402 Point Sources
  • The National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
    System (NPDES) applies to all point sources of
    pollutants
  • Stormwater outfalls are considered point
    sources and these regulations apply to
  • Industrial Sources (including Construction
    Activities)
  • Municipal Sources (large and small communities)

16
CWS - NPDES Permits (cont.)
  • Traditional Point Sources still need attention
    in sustainable growth context
  • Wastewater Treatment Plants
  • Collection Systems
  • Factories and mills
  • E.g., the City of Petaluma building a new
    sustainable system to handle both domestic
    wastewater and stormwater

17
CWA Dredge and Fill Discharges
  • Section 404/401 regulate the direct discharges
    of dredge and fill material to US Waters
  • US Army Corps issues 404 permit, which triggers
    the State's 401 Certification (that the project
    complies with our standards)
  • 401 Certifications are one-time compliance
    tools that apply to many new developments in
    California, due in part to our abundance of
    ephemeral and intermittent streams
  • CWC jurisdiction covers isolated waters of the
    State

18
401 Certification - One-time compliance
measurement
  • CWA 401 certification process give the Water
    Boards one shot at evaluating compliance with our
    standards
  • If we get our permitting wrong, the waterbodies
    and their designated beneficial uses could be
    lost forever
  • Could be a de-facto Basin Plan amendment
  • Interesting question does this process
    adequately comply with our Basin Plan amendment
    requirements?

19
CWA Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs)
  • If the beneficial uses are impaired, the State
    must adopt a TMDL
  • Result in pollutant Waste Loads Allocations
    WLAs applied to all sources in watershed
  • TMDLs take decades to implement

20
CWA TMDLs
  • They are watershed-based, but they are also
    pollutant (or impairment cause) specific, so they
    may or may not lead communities towards more
    sustainable approaches to Water Resource planning
  • Resulting WLAs are implemented via permits

21
Sustainability and Water Resources
  • Sustainability has many definitions and
    applications (some very specialized)
  • In our communities there are three main test /
    elements (each of which is undergoing a paradigm
    shift today).

22
Sustainability Tests
  • Resource protection to enhancement and reuse
    (runoff is a resource)
  • Technical complex, technological standard-based
    to simple, natural, performance-based solutions
  • Institutional centralized, subsidized
    approaches to decentralized, self-supporting
    approaches
  • Community healthy individual, societal cost
    driven equations to healthy community, community
    opportunity equations

23
NPDES Stormwater Permits help or hindrance?
  • Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4s), in
    both large and small communities, are required to
    comply with MS4 requirements
  • Much of the permit requirements focus on
    traditional BMPs and general, indirect municipal
    efforts (like general planning,
    outreach/education etc.)
  • In 2002, Standard Urban Storm Water Mitigation
    Plans (SUSMPs but they are called performance
    standards in some parts of the State) became
    mandatory for all MS4 permits

24
SUSMPs HMMPs Performance Standards, oh my!
  • SUSMPs - Standardized Urban Stormwater Mitigation
    Plans
  • HMMPs - Hydrograph Modification Management Plans
  • WQMPs
  • Performance Standards specifically for new and
    redevelop activities in MS4s

25
SUSMP History (brief)
  • 1996 - NPDES Permit for LA County MS4s first
    suggested SUSMPs (R4-1996-054)
  • 1999 - NPDES Permit for LA County Required
    improved SUSMPs (R4-1999-060)
  • 2000 - SB upheld RB4-99-060 with WQ-2000-11
  • Precedent - all new MS4 permits after WQ-2000-11
    must comply with general principles of
    R4-1999-060 SUSMP lang.

26
SUSMPs and Sustainability
  • SUSMPs and other performance standards in MS4
    permits require new developments and, in some
    cases, significant redevelopments to apply
    rigorous measures to mitigate the effects of
    urbanization.
  • The technical approaches and science behind some
    of the issues are still being debated in the
    State.
  • Q Does Low Impact Development SUSMPs and HMP
    compliance?

27
Yes, LID SUSMPs
  • In theory, a well designed and executed LID
    project would fully comply with MS4 permit
    requirements (and probably avoid 404/401 permits,
    too).
  • Translators are needed to help communities
    demonstrate compliance with MS4 requirements

28
LID and SUSMPs (cont.)
  • Clearly SUSMPLID works best for new development
    and significant redevelopment
  • But strategic LID projects could also be used to
    retrofit urban landscapes to address other
    watershed problems
  • State Board staff are working on developing
    translator tools for municipal officials who must
    comply with SUSMPs and wish to use LID-like
    approaches

29
(No Transcript)
30
SUSMPs in the Regions
  • As expected, most RBs took the liberty to
    improve on the SUSMP language in R4-1999-060
  • Some RBs have evolved at least one generation
    since the original SUSMP approach

31
Los Angeles Region
  • SUSMP Architects
  • Multiple generations new draft coming for
    Ventura County in June 2006
  • Numerical Hydromodification Criteria based on
    Stream Bank Erosion Potential
  • Limiting Directly Connected Impervious Area to no
    more than 5 pecent of Total Construction Project
    Area

32
LA Region (cont.)
  • Ventura updates (cont.)
  • Low Impact Development Technical Document to
    comply with SUSMPs and Hydromod Criteria
  • Post Construction BMP Inspection Program
  • Stream Bank Restoration Planning based on
    Southern CA Integrated Biological Index

33
S.F. Bay RegionOne Permit Approach
  • Phase I for 4 urbanized counties
  • Consistent requirements
  • Consistent deadlines (with a few exceptions)
  • Detail formerly in Stormwater Management Plans
    now in the Permit

34
SF Bay Super Permit (cont.)
  • BMPs, Level of Implementation and Reporting
    specified for all Performance Standards
  • Major improvements in Monitoring and TMDL
    implementation
  • Only minor changes to New Development Measures,
    Inspections, Public Information and Municipal
    Maintenance

35
San Diego RegionWatershed Approach
  • Tackle priority stormwater problems in each
    watershed, in addition to Baseline BMPs
  • Adding HMP requirements similar to S.F. Bay Area
    approach
  • Setting minimum inspection requirement

36
Other Regions Approaches within CA
  • Santa Ana Region like RB4
  • Lahontan Region no SUSMP requirements
  • North Coast Region like RB2 (2 year, 24 hour
    storm event, hydrograph modification management
    plan, etc.)
  • Central Coast Region not sure
  • Phase II
  • Caltrans

37
Other States
  • MD Recharge / LID credits
  • PA Recharge
  • DE Recharge / LID
  • NJ Recharge / LID
  • Handout available

38
Sustainable Projects Present Real Community
Opportunities
  • If done right, more sustainable projects will
    deliver
  • NPDES compliance
  • Clean Water Act promises
  • Low Lifetime Costs to operate, maintain,
    decommission, etc.
  • Community buy-in and support through meeting
    multiple objectives, etc.
  • Unpredictable community economic opportunities
    (e.g., tourism and other ancillary benefits to
    the community)

39
Evidence of Shift
  • Performance measures that would SHOW we are
    moving in the right direction.
  • NPDES permits for MS4s contain LID-type
    requirements for New Development
  • Increased judicial support

40
Shift (cont.)
  • Planning departments and land use agencies are
    excited about natural systems (we see this now)
  • Natural Systems (low tech, natural function-based
    technologies) are embraced as cornerstones of
    sustainable development
  • A number of disciplines integrated into
    stormwater management.

41
What can WE do to help implement / enforce the
CWA?
  • Appropriate designation, development and
    enforcement of appropriate Beneficial Uses would
    encourage smarter growth.
  • We also need to develop effective criteria for
    protecting uses from pollutants and/or habitat
    disturbance associated with urbanization impacts.
  • Apply all our tools to encourage avoidance and
    minimization of impacts through better siting and
    management practices.
  • Get out of the way of good practices

42
Greg Gearheart 916-341-5892 ggearheart_at_waterboards
.ca.gov
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com