Enrollment Planning Workgroup October 3, 2006

1
Enrollment Planning Workgroup October 3, 2006
Contributing Colleagues Sandra Archer Dr. Julia
Pet-Armacost
2
Topics

• Last weeks topics
• BOG Consultant questions
• Enrollment vision statement
• Todays topics
• Deans meeting Wednesday
• Review presentation
• Plan for college meetings
• Continue developing university-wide directional
  goals based on benchmarking
• Next week
• Provost to join the EPG meeting
• Present motivation for directional goals
• Provost initiative for the entire university
• We will bring in overall university numbers

3
Deans Presentation

• Current enrollment projections and process
• Moving from projecting to sculpting
• Four phases presented
• Phase I Directional Goals
• Phase II Program Level Targets
• Phase III Operational Plan
• Phase IV Implementation

4
Deans Presentation Questions

• Abraham Pizam Is this a if they build it they
  will come model? Is demand accounted for?
• Current university level projections are based on
  population and high school graduation rate
  projections
• Program specific demand may be a part of the
  discussion with the colleges
• Schell The group is cognizant of targeted degree
  programs at the state level
• Van Stryland There is room to create demand at
  the graduate level
• Ed Neighbor Who will decide what new programs
  will be implemented? The president?
• Provost Recommendations can be made for new
  programs to the Provost. If there is clear
  evidence of a need for a new program, it will be
  considered.
• Sandra Robinson How does this relate to the BOG
  strategic plan?
• Provost The current topics with the BOG relate
  to the whole SUS system
• Thomas Keon What about the disconnect between
  admissions and the enrollment plan?
• Provost Undergraduate admissions is involved in
  the Enrollment Planning Workgroup and have
  indicated that the admissions polices set will
  work toward the goals set forth by the group.

5
College Meetings

• Attendees
• Pre-meeting EPG change enrollment plan to
  reflect strategy
• 1) Data to provide for discussion and contextual
  conversation
• Program level enrollment and degree plan as
  submitted Oct 2005
• Program level historical headcount enrollment (5
  years)
• Current SCH by regional and web (of students
  enrolled in these majors)
• Upper/Lower and Grad
• Current FT/PT student ratio
• Number of faculty
• Number of research faculty
• Research productivity (w/splits)
• Percent of faculty involved in research
• Number of tenure and full time faculty
• Graduate supervision (w/splits)
• Number of graduate students supported and
  supervised
• Program retention rates
• UCFs current Research-mission focused and
  Access-mission focused metrics
• Colleges contribution to these metrics
• State targets and national trends

6
College Meetings

• 3 - ?) Framework between current trend and
  future goals
• Strategic questions
• What programs will grow/not grow?
• What programs will be fully online?
• What programs will be offered regionally?
• How much of the plan can be done with current
  resources?
• Faculty salary
• Space needs
• How can incentive funding be used to gain
  required resources?
• What kind of accountability measures should be in
  place to track incentive funds allocated?
• Bring back to second meeting the costs

7
University Level Goals to Set

• Graduate/Undergraduate
• FTIC/Transfer mix
• Masters/doctoral
• SUS Targeted
• 2025 about 60,000 headcount enrollment or ?
• To achieve goals
• Faculty
• Students
• Regional/Online means by which to achieve goals

8
College Level Projections
Business (CBA, RCHM) Science (CECS, BCBS,
COP, COS, MD)
9
College Level Projections
10
College Level Projections
Business (CBA, RCHM) Science (CECS, BCBS,
COP, COS, MD)
11
College Level Projections