Chancellor

1
Chancellors Office Update

• Tim Bonnel
• SFA Program Coordinator

2
Season Greetings

• Holiday Greetings and Best Wishes from all of us
  at the Chancellors Office
• Vice Chancellor - Linda Michalowski
• Deans, Sarah Tyson and Jeff Spano
• SFA Program Staff, Rhonda Mohr, Terrence Gardner,
  and Myself
• Significant Changes
• New Chancellor Dr. Brice W. Harris
• Vice Chancellor of Government Relations vacant

3
Reflections of the year past
4
SFA Program Performance

• 2011-12 MIS final FA reconciliation
• Pell Recipients 515,000 (up 21k)
• Pell Dollars 1.61 billion (down 100 mil)
• Participation growth is still significant, dollar
  declines due elimination of year round Pell,
  availability of units
• BOGFW Recipients 1.08 million (down 50k)
• BOGFW Dollars 602 million (up 191 mil)
• Participation decline a reflection of 0 Bogfw
  reporting and likely offset continued growth
  dollar growth reflects enrollment fee increase

5
Budget Prop 30

• Passage of Proposition 30
• Community colleges will receive 210 million in
  additional funds for the 2012-13 academic year.
• Most of the money will be used to accelerate
  deferred funding commitments by the state, but it
  will allow colleges to serve an additional 20,000
  students in the 2012-13 year.

6
Budget Prop 30 (contd)

• If Prop 30 had failed, it would have meant an
  additional 338 million cut to colleges in
  January translating into 29,000 fewer classes
  offered and 180,000 fewer students served
  throughout the 112-college system.
• Prop 30 did not by any measure restore California
  community colleges to their pre-recession levels.
  
• Recent budget cuts have shut nearly 500,000
  students out of community colleges since the
  2008-09 academic year, and course offerings have
  been slashed by 24 percent.

7
FA Categorical Funding

• Board Financial Assistance 2
• Anticipate work load funding adjustment for
  increased units waived
• Student Financial Aid Administration includes
  0.91 Base and Capacity
• Anticipate work load funding adjustment to base
  for increased units waived
• R2T4 requesting increased currently
  oversubscribed for the 500k (83 of eligible
  claims paid)

8
SSTF and SB1456

• Ed Code Changes
• first step to begin implementation of SSTF
  recommendations 2.2 (mandated services), 3.2
  (BOGFW conditions), and 8.2 (Student Support
  Initiative)
• Provides broad policy framework for the
  delivery of core matriculation services in the
  California Community Colleges
• Targets funding to core matriculation services of
  orientation, assessment, counseling and advising,
  and development of education plans
• Raises as a priority the need to fund core
  matriculation services critical to increasing
  student success. When State budget conditions
  improve and CCCs receive new monies, first
  priority of BOG, after funding COLAs, is
  augmenting funding for the Student Success Act of
  2012
• Ensures impacts to student equity are considered
  by disaggregating data and requiring college
  plans that are coordinated with institutional
  equity planning efforts

9
Student Success Act of 2012 (SB 1456)Student
Success Support Program Planning
Implementation Timeline
Fiscal Year 2012-2013
Fiscal Year 2013-2014
Fiscal Year 2014-2015
Fiscal Year 2015-2016
Fiscal Year 2016-2017

• Implementation Year 3
• FY 15-16 allocations based on 14-15 year-end data
  reported
• Legislative report due July 1, 2016

• Implementation Year 2
• FY 15-16 allocations based on 14-15 year-end data
  reported
• Application of funding formula beginning this year

• System-level Planning Year
• Implementation workgroups convened October 2012
  to develop proposals for title 5 Matriculation
  revisions, new allocation formula, revised MIS
  data elements definitions
• New program planning budget process developed
• SB 1456 effective January 1, 2013

• District/College-Level Implementation Year 1
• Program plans budgets submitted
• Continue to ensure accurate complete data
  reporting
• Allocations remain consistent as prior year, new
  formula not applied
• Legislative implementation report due July 1,
  2014 (biannually thereafter)

• District/College-Level Planning Year
• Develop program plans
• Implement MIS changes ensure accurate
  complete data reporting
• Allocations remain consistent as prior year, new
  formula not applied
• Funding targeted to core services of orientation,
  assessment, counseling advising, other
  education planning services

10
Student Success Act of 2012 (SB 1456)Student
Success Support Program Implementation
Communication Plan
Board of Governors
Consultation Council
Stakeholder Input
Final draft proposals submitted for broader
review input
Matriculation Advisory Committee
Advisory Group on Counseling
CSSO Workgroup
Implementation Workgroups develop draft proposals
for input
Title 5 Revision Adhoc Workgroup
MIS Allocation Formula Adhoc Workgroup
Student Equity Workgroup
Program Reporting Adhoc Workgroup
Student Services Categorical Input Workgroup
11
Crystal Ball for 2013

• State
• SSTF/SB1456 and the Fee Waiver Workgroup
• Implementation of SB1456 and the BOGFW
• 2013-14 Fee Waiver Manual Update
• 2013-14 Fee Waiver Form (integrating Dream Act
  AB131 eligibility)
• Statewide Default Prevention Initiative
• 0 Dollar BOGFW MIS changes
• Changes to Form 2 re MOE mid year reporting
• SB1289 Alternative Loan Disclosure requirements
• Continued focus on Fee Waiver program efficiency
  and effectiveness.
• Continued focus on Disbursement Card Services and
  fees

12
Crystal Ball for 2013 (contd)

• CSAC
• SB70 reporting requirements GSA 2012-39
• AB131 implementation for Cal Grants GOM 2012-33,
  34, 37
• Non SSN GPA files for the AB131 Dream Act Cal
  Grant applicants GOM 2012-35
• Annual update to CSAC posting of links to the
  licensing exam data for programs offered at your
  college. GSA 2012-39
• 2013-14 Webgrants College Cost Estimate sheets
  Due late January (fee increases to 36 and now
  to 46)

13
Crystal Ball for 2013 (contd)

• Federal
• FDSLP 150 of program implementation
• Focus on Distance Education
• Focus on Fraud and Pell Runners
• Federal Budget consequences of sequestration
  and the fiscal cliff / solutions
• Elimination of student awards for less-than PT
• Elimination of eligibility for non degree/Career
  Technical Education programs
• Refocusing federal aid (Pell) on success and
  degree attainment as opposed to access

14
Sequestration 2013

• Sequestration's across-the-board cuts would
  devastate nondefense discretionary programs.
• Funding for Pell Grants is exempt from automatic
  cuts in FY 2013, but many other programs vital to
  community college student success and
  institutional improvement would be sliced by
  8.2. Including TRIO, GEAR UP, Perkins Career
  and Technical Education, Adult Education, Trade
  Adjustment Assistance Community College and
  Career Training Grants, Workforce Investment Act
  programs, and many more.
• Cuts of this magnitude would severely impair the
  ability of community colleges to provide
  Americans with the education and skills they need
  for the 21st-century economy.

15
One of Santas elves?or BFAPBaby!!!
16
Questions

• ???