EU%20leadership%20in%20climate%20change%20policy%20? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

EU%20leadership%20in%20climate%20change%20policy%20?

Description:

Rob Bradley, Climate Action Network Europe. Who is Climate Action Network Europe? ... Proposal for harmonisation since 1992 going nowhere slowly ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:19
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: robbr8
Learn more at: http://www.inforse.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: EU%20leadership%20in%20climate%20change%20policy%20?


1
EU leadership in climate change policy ?
  • Rob Bradley,
  • Climate Action Network Europe

2
Who is Climate Action Network Europe?
  • We focus on climate change
  • 85 European member organisations
  • More than 300 members of the Climate Action
    Network (CAN)
  • Global perspective
  • CAN a major player in the Kyoto process

3
What is climate leadership?
  • International dimension ratification, coalition
    building, engagement with developing countries
  • Meet own target with strong and credible policies
    and measures
  • Show that technology forcing and creative PAMs
    achieve real emission cuts without economic
    disaster

4
Climate policy in the EU
5
Competitiveness worries
6
Energy market liberalisation
  • Slow and halting progress towards total market
    opening
  • Market still badly distorted by subsidies and
    strong incumbents
  • Lower prices and supply-focused reform make
    demand management very difficult

7
Security of supply
  • Issue raised to provide cover for coal and
    nuclear subsidies
  • Main threat in oil, but most action proposed in
    electricity
  • 15 rule explicitly allows market protection for
    favoured technologies

8
Domestic politics
  • Coal industry restructuring
  • Lobbying weight of the energy sector
  • Concerns over fuel poverty
  • Reluctance to tackle transport

9
So how are we doing?
  • Nice coherent package on paper
  • ECCP, ET, Kyoto mechanisms, member state actions
    balanced
  • EU world champion at saying the right thing!

10
Emission trading the proposal
  • Absolute cap to cover large point emitters
  • Target setting and allocation to be done by
    member states
  • Unrestricted trading within this cap
  • Compliance penalty 100/tonne (or 2x permit
    price) plus restitution

11
Emission trading the debate
  • How does this sit with pre-existing climate
    policies?
  • Mandatory or voluntary?
  • Links with other mechanisms
  • Sector and gas coverage

12
Emission trading the prospects
  • Germany opposed, UK going solo, many uninterested
  • Majority voting makes blocking hard
  • Growing enthusiasm among (non-German) industry
  • NGOs gradually warming to the idea

13
ECCP initiatives
  • Energy efficiency in buildings
  • Energy services/ DSM
  • Biofuels
  • Fluorinated gases
  • Cogeneration

14
Energy efficiency in buildings
  • Non-prescriptive approach based on auditing
    requirements and some reporting
  • Was supposed to save 45 million tonnes CO2
  • Timelines postponed too late to help with Kyoto

15
Energy services/ DSM
  • Energy services are the magic bullet of climate
    and liberalisation
  • DSM aspects of liberalisation legislation mostly
    rejected
  • Everyone seems unsure what this directive should
    even contain

16
Biofuels
  • Proposed Directive makes no attempt to ensure
    environmental advantages from biofuels
  • Commission estimates 100-150 Euro per tonne CO2
    abatement cost
  • Environmental measure has become another
    agribusiness subsidy plan

17
Fluorinated gases
  • Commission proposing to amend reg. 20/37 on O3
    depleting substances
  • Risks concentrating on containment (the
    consensus)
  • Needs to move much further in encouraging
    adoption of alternatives

18
Cogeneration Directive
  • Need for Directive as CHP often treated poorly in
    market liberalisation
  • Targets abandoned
  • Talk bogged down on definitions
  • Commission went slowly, now with Parliament

19
Fiscal measures
  • Many countries have electricity and/or carbon
    taxes
  • Proposal for harmonisation since 1992 going
    nowhere slowly
  • Concerns include fuel poverty (UK), inflation
    (Spain) and competitiveness (everybody)
  • Tackling subsidies is even harder, but possibly
    more important

20
And against that
  • Continuing subsidies to coal, nuclear and even to
    natural gas
  • Structural funds skewed in favour of road
    transport
  • Export credits, IFIs, bilateral aid

21
The need for coherence
  • ECCP was a package for a reason
  • Perverse effects from unbalanced policy
    implementation e.g. emission trading and trains
  • Many parts of government still have to realise
    that climate policy exists
  • EU policy famously multidirectional this will
    not be temporary! (fishing, tobacco)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com