Knowledge Systems for Development: A Survey of Core Questions, Tentative Answers - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

Knowledge Systems for Development: A Survey of Core Questions, Tentative Answers

Description:

Even the knowledge that exists is seldom integrated into systems that can ... Technology ('the growth of knowledge') is dominant engine economic growth (Solow) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:33
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: william321
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Knowledge Systems for Development: A Survey of Core Questions, Tentative Answers


1
Knowledge Systems for Development A Survey of
Core Questions, Tentative Answers
  • Bill Clark
  • Knowledge for Development Seminar
  • September 25, 2003

2
The Problem
  • Growing (recurrent) recognition that development
    "is built not merely through the accumulation of
    physical capital and human skill, but on a
    foundation of information, learning and
    adaptation but
  • Relevant knowledge is underproduced,
    underutilized, unevenly distributed
  • (World Bank, 1999. World Development Report
    Knowledge for development. New York Oxford
    University Press).

3
The Problem (cont)
  • Even the knowledge that exists is seldom
    integrated into systems that can support decision
    and application on the ground.

4
The world almost certainly under-invests in
knowledge
  • Technology (the growth of knowledge) is
    dominant engine economic growth (Solow)
  • Marginal social rates of return to RD v high
  • Eg. In Ag, 40 to private, 70 to public RD
    (Ruttan)
  • But private investments lag, in part because of
    large public spillovers, property rights issues
  • Public investments static or falling due to
    perceived irrelevance, ineffectiveness of results
    (ICSU/TWAS/ISTS)

5
Perceptions of the utility of RD
  • Researchers are dissatisfied because they are
    not listened to while decision makers are
    dissatisfied because they do not hear much they
    want to listen to
  • Lindblom and Cohen, 1979, Usable knowledge
  • Decision makers see the RD community as
    problem-raisers, uninterested in solutions
  • ICSU/TWAS/ISTS, 2002, ST for SD

6
Inequalities in the capacity to create
knowledge(4x greater than inequalities in income)
/M people
(Source WB, 1999)
(1987)
7
How to better harness science technology to
support decisions for SD?
  • Many policy measures being advocated
  • Send more money (Sachs)
  • Fix intellectual property rights (including
    TRIPS)
  • Build capacity (Johannesburg Summit)
  • Do more research (World Acads of Science)
  • Better monitoring and reporting (World Bank)
  • Reform institution X (UNEP, CGIAR, UNDP, WB)
  • Probably all useful but random and not obviously
    complementary or prioritized

8
Decision-support /Knowledge systems
  • Need to understand the knowledge systems that
    support decisions through
  • set priorities, mobilize funds, do the RD,
    review publications/promotions, facilitate
    practical application and reinvention
  • Recognize these not designed from scratch, but
    evolve through time
  • Example of a knowledge system
  • The international agricultural research system

9
ST in the Agricultural RD System
Ruttan, from Huffman and Evenson, 1993
10
Examples of other (relatively) effective
knowledge systems
  • Agriculture CGIAR commodity programs
  • Environment ENSO applications programs
  • Health WHO malaria campaigns
  • Military US Smart weapon systems

11
Learning from experience with knowledge systems?
  • What distinguishes more from less effective
    knowledge systems? What can be learned about
    improving performance from comparisons?
  • We dont know
  • Little systematic research within problem areas
  • No comparison across problem areas (Island
    empires)
  • Yet some core challenges beginning to emerge
  • Goal of of our work is to explore these

12
Useful knowledge for decision support?
  • Knowledge that is used is perceived by decision
    makers to be simultaneously salient, credible,
    legitimate not just one of these
  • Saliency (Is it relevant to decision making, to
    changing needs of specific users, producers?)
  • Credibility (Is it technically believable,
    endorsed by relevant evaluative communities?)
  • Legitimacy (Is it perceived to be politically
    fair, respectful, evenhanded by stakeholders?)

13
How can knowledge systems be designed that better
  • Empower end-users in setting priorities for RD?
  • Create location-specific knowledge needed for
    decision support?
  • Integrate basic and applied approaches to
    produce user-inspired basic research (Stokes)?
  • Incorporate both tacit knowledge of practice and
    global knowledge, technology in local solutions?
  • Integrate public and private needs and
    capabilities?
  • Foster boundary spanning organizations to
    connect knowledge and action in pursuit of the
    above?

14
For further information
  • On the general challenge of harnessing science
    and technology for sustainability
  • http//sustainabilityscience.org
  • On knowledge systems research seminar at Harvard
    University
  • http//www.ksg.harvard.edu/sed/k4dev_sem.htm

15
END
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com