D0 Run II Trigger

1
Hard Diffraction at DØ Run I and Run II
Christophe Royon DØ Collaboration / DAPNIA-SPP
Saclay, UT Arlington, Brookhaven
DIS 2001 Bologna
2
Diffraction
p p ? p p
p p ? p (p) X
p p ? p (p) j j
p p ? p p j j
3
DØ Calorimeter and Tracking
Central Calorimeter
End Calorimeter
Hadronic Calorimeter
Central Drift Chamber (Tracking) ntrk
charged tracks with h lt 1.0
EM Calorimeter ncal EM towers with ET gt
200 MeV and h lt 1.0 (use E for h gt 2.0)
4

L0 Detector
beam
.
.
.
.
.
5
Event Displays
6
Hard Single Diffraction
Measure Multiplicity here
or
-4.0 -1.6 -1.0 h 1.0 3.0
5.2
Measure Gap Fraction Forward Jet
Trigger 2-12GeV Jets hgt1.6
46K events (1800 GeV) 26K events
(630 GeV) Inclusive Jet Trigger
2-15(12)GeV Jets hlt1.0 14K
events (1800 GeV) 27K events (630
GeV) Study SD Characteristics
Single Veto Trigger 2-15(12)GeV Jets
1800 GeV (22K,38K) 630 GeV
(1K,24K)
7
Single Diffractive Results
Measure Multiplicity here
or
-4.0 -1.6 -1.0 h 1.0 3.0
5.2
Data Sample Measured Gap Fraction
(Diffractive Dijet Events/All
Dijets) 1800 Forward Jets 0.65 0.04 -
0.04 1800 Central Jets 0.22 0.05 -
0.04 630 Forward Jets 1.19 0.08 - 0.08 630
Central Jets 0.90 0.06 - 0.06
D0 Preliminary
Data Sample Ratio 630/1800 Forward
Jets 1.8 0.2 - 0.2 630/1800 Central Jets 4.1
0.8 - 1.0 1800 Fwd/Cent Jets 3.0 0.7 -
0.7 630 Fwd/Cent Jets 1.3 0.1 - 0.1
Forward Jets Gap Fraction gt Central Jets Gap
Fraction 630GeV Gap Fraction gt 1800GeV Gap
Fraction
8
MC Rate Comparison
f visible ?gap f predicted
? ?gap Add multiplicity to background data
distribution Fit to find percent of signal
events extracted
? Find predicted rate POMPYT2 / PYTHIA Apply
same jet ? cuts as data, jet ETgt12GeV Full
detector simulation

D0 Preliminary
Evt Sample Hard Gluon Flat Gluon Quark
1800 FWD JET (2.2 ? 0.3) (2.2 ? 0.3) (0.8
? 0.1) 1800 CEN JET (2.5 ? 0.4) (3.5 ?
0.5) (0.5 ? 0.1) 630 FWD JET (3.9 ? 0.9)
(3.1 ? 0.9) (2.2 ? 0.5) 630 CEN JET (5.2 ?
0.7) (6.3 ? 0.9) (1.6 ? 0.2)
Evt Sample Soft Gluon DATA 1800 FWD JET
(1.4 ? 0.2) (0.65 ? 0.04) 1800 CEN
JET (0.05 ? 0.01) (0.22 ? 0.05) 630
FWD JET (1.9 ? 0.4) (1.19 ?
0.08) 630 CEN JET (0.14 ? 0.04) (0.90
? 0.06)
Hard Gluon Flat Gluon rates higher than
observed in data (HG 1800fwd ?gap7410, SG
1800fwd ?gap223)
9
630 and 1800 GeV Ratios
D0 Preliminary

Event Sample Hard Glu Flat Glu
Quark 630/1800 FWD 1.7 ? 0.4
1.4 ? 0.3 2.7 ? 0.6 630/1800 CEN 2.1 ?
0.4 1.8 ? 0.3 3.2 ? 0.5 1800
FWD/CEN 0.9 ? 0.2 0.6 ? 0.1 1.6 ?
0.3 630 FWD/CEN 0.8 ? 0.2 0.5 ? 0.1
1.4 ? 0.3
Event Sample Soft Glu DATA 630/1800 FWD
1.4 ? 0.3 1.8 ? 0.2 630/1800 CEN 3.1 ?
1.1 4.1 ? 0.9 1800 FWD/CEN 30. ? 8.
3.0 ? 0.7 630 FWD/CEN 13. ? 4. 1.3
? 0.1

Hard Gluon Flat Gluon forward jet rate is
lower than central jet rate -- and lower than
observed in data Quark rates and ratios are
similar to observed Combination of Soft Gluon
and harder gluon structure is also possible for
pomeron structure
10
Diffractive W
nL0
?s 1800 GeV
ncal
nL0
ncal
Peak at (0,0) indicates diffractive W with a
signal on the 1 level
11
Double Gaps at 630 GeV
Gap Region 2.5lthlt5.2

• Demand gap on one side, measure multiplicity on
  opposite side

DØ Preliminary
12
Gap Summary

• Observed and measured forward gaps in jet
  events
• at ?s 630 and 1800 GeV. Rates much smaller
  than
• expected from naïve Ingelman-Schlein model.
• Require a different normalization and
  significant
• soft component to describe data. Large
  fraction
• of proton momentum frequently involved in
  collision.
• Observed jet events with forward/backward gaps
• at ?s 630 and 1800 GeV
• Observed W and Z boson events with gaps
• Finalizing papers and attempting to combine
  results

13

The Forward Proton Detector

• A series of momentum spectrometers
• used to measure t and x of scattered
• protons and anti-protons
• Gives ability to trigger on scattered proton
• in t, x bins -- allows large data samples
• without large bandwidth
• Full DØ detector is used to measure hard
• scattering

14
FPD Layout
Roman Pot
Bellows
p
Detector
P1UP
Q4
D
S
Q3
S
Q2
Q4
Q3
Q2
D1
P1DN
D2
A1
A2
23
33
59
57
33
23
0
Z(m)
momentum spectrometers allowing measurement of
Series of 18 Roman Pots forms 9
independent proton momentum and angle. 1
Dipole Spectrometer ( p ) x gt xmin 8
Quadrupole Spectrometers (p or p, up or
down, left or right) t gt tmin
15
Physics Topics with the FPD

• 1) Diffractive jet production
• 2) Hard double pomeron exchange
• 3) Diffractive heavy flavor production
• 4) Diffractive W/Z boson production
• 5) New physics
• 6) Inclusive double pomeron
• 7) High-t elastic scattering
• 8) Total cross section
• Inclusive single diffraction
• Higgs production in double diffraction

16
Run II Event Displays
Hard Diffractive Candidtate
Hard Double Pomeron Candidate
17
Acceptance
x
Quadrupole ( p or )
450 400 350 280 200
MX(GeV)
Geometric (f) Acceptance
x
Dipole ( only)
GeV2
450 400 350 280 200
MX(GeV)
GeV2
Dipole acceptance better at low t, large
x Cross section dominated by low t
x 0 0.02 0.04 1.4 1.4 1.3 2
35 95
18
Quadrupole Dipole Spectrometers
The combination of quadrupole and dipole
spectrometers gives 1) Detection of protons
and anti-protons a) tagged double pomeron
events b) elastics for alignment,
calibration, luminosity monitoring
c) halo rejection from early time hits
2) Acceptance for low and high t 3)
Over-constrained tracks for
understanding detectors and backgrounds
19
Roman Pot Castle Design
Worm gear assembly
50 l/s ion pump
Detector
Beam
Step motor

• Parts are degreased and vacuum degassed
• Plan to achieve 10-11 Torr
• Will use Fermilab style controls
• Bakeout castle, then insert fiber detectors
• Constructed from 316L Stainless Steel

20
Roman Pot Arm Assembly
Detector is inserted into cylinder until it
reaches thin window
Threaded Cylinder
Motor
Bellows
Flange connecting to vacuum vessel
Thin window and flange assembly
21
Castle Prototype
22
The Detector
Six planes (u,u,v,v,x,x) of 800 m
scintillator fibers () planes offset by
2/3 fiber
20 channels/plane(U,V) 16 channels/plane(X,X) 11
2 channels/detector 2016 total channels 80 m
theoretical resolution
23
Data Taking

• No special conditions required
• Read out Roman Pot detectors for all events
• (cant miss )
• A few dedicated global triggers for diffractive
• jets, double pomeron, and elastic events
• Use fiber tracker trigger board -- select
• x , t ranges at L1, readout DØ standard
• Reject fakes from multiple interactions
• (Ex. SD dijet) using L0 timing, silicon
• tracker, longitudinal momentum conservation,
• and scintillation timing
• Obtain large samples (for 1 fb-1)
• 1K diffractive W bosons
• 3K hard double pomeron
• 500K diffractive dijets

with minimal impact on standard DØ
physics program
24
Measurements Using the FPD

• Observation of hard diffractive processes.
• Measure cross sections

• dominated by angular
  dispersion
• 15 error for
  (reduced with
• unsmearing).
• Measure kinematical variables with sensitivity
• to pomeron structure ( h, ET, )
• Use Monte Carlo to compare to different
• pomeron structures and derive pomeron
  structure.
• Combine different processes to extract quark
• and gluon content.

25

• FPD Installation and Commissioning
• All of the castles are installed and tested since
  March 1st, 2001. ?
• All the tunnel electronics is installed and
  cables will all be laid. ?
• The dipole spectrometer is instrumented with full
  detectors and phototubes. ?
• The vertical spectrometers and one horizontal
  spectrometer are instrumented with
  pseudodetectors (trigger scintillators only) to
  study halo. ?
• We are ready to take data with a Phase I (10
  spectrometers) FPD (in May, 2 detectors and 8
  pseudo-detectors and in late summer, 10 detectors
  fully equipped). ?

26
Pot Motion LVDT vs. Encoder
27
Overall Conclusions
DØ has made significant progress in hard
diffraction in Run I

Much expected at RunII using the Forward Proton
Detector