Business Logistics 420 Public Transportation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 29
About This Presentation
Title:

Business Logistics 420 Public Transportation

Description:

... legislative and regulatory attempts to reduce air pollution from motor vehicles ... Average vehicle occupancy for all employee commuting trips during peak ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:15
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 30
Provided by: jamesh70
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Business Logistics 420 Public Transportation


1
Business Logistics 420Public Transportation
  • Lectures 16
  • Policy Issues III Public Transportation and Air
    Quality

2
Lecture Objectives
  • Provide an overview the transportation-related
    air pollution problem in the US
  • Describe options for reducing transportation
    sectors contribution to air pollution
  • Outline the history of legislative and regulatory
    attempts to reduce air pollution from motor
    vehicles
  • Evaluate public transits potential contribution
    to air quality improvements

3
Transportation As a Major Source of Air Pollution
  • 83 Carbon Monoxide (CO)
  • 41 Hydrocarbons (VOC)
  • 40 Nitrogen Oxides (NOX)
  • .2 Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)
  • 9 Particulate

4
Carbon Monoxide Trends
From VMT Growth and Improved Air Quality How
Long Can Progress Continue?, FHWA
5
VOC Trends
From VMT Growth and Improved Air Quality How
Long Can Progress Continue?, FHWA
6
Nitrogen Oxide Trends
From VMT Growth and Improved Air Quality How
Long Can Progress Continue?, FHWA
7
Ways To Reduce Air Pollution from Mobile
(Transportation) Sources
  • Solutions generally the same as for energy
    conservation
  • Reduce demand
  • Shift demand to less polluting modes
  • Clean up modes

8
Ways To Reduce Air Pollution from Mobile
(Transportation) Sources (Continued)
  • Major difference is that air quality is not a
    major issue in all areas
  • The benefit from reducing pollution in terms of
    health costs and other pollution-related costs
    varies depending on the overall or ambient air
    quality in a region
  • Example, the benefit of further reducing
    pollution from vehicles is lower in State College
    than in Los Angeles or Baltimore

9
Clean Air Act of 1970
  • The major piece of federal air quality
    legislation that is still in effect as amended
  • Set Ambient Air Quality Standards for urbanized
    areas, i.e., standards for the amount of several
    types of pollutants allowed in the communitys
    air.
  • Also set vehicle emissions standards

10
1990 Amendments to Clean Air Act
  • Adopted at the same time as the major
    transportation legislation, ISTEA
  • The Clean Air Act amendments set the rules, ISTEA
    implemented and paid for the changes

11
1990 Amendments to Clean Air Act (Continued)
  • Set more stringent emission standards for cars,
    trucks, and buses
  • Set national Ambient Air Quality Standards
  • Identified categories of non attainment and
    identified cities that fell into each category
  • Required special conformity tests before
    allowing new highway construction
  • Included sanctions on states for non conformity
    (lose federal highway funds)

12
Categories of Non Attainment
  • Extreme -- Los Angeles
  • Severe -- Philadelphia, New York,
    Baltimore, and 5 other cities
  • Serious -- Washington DC, Boston, 12 other
    cities
  • Moderate -- Pittsburgh, Reading and many others
  • Marginal -- all other Pa cities except State
    College and Williamsport

13
Two Major US Strategies for Reducing Pollution
from Mobile Sources
  • Clean up vehicles
  • More stringent emissions controls on internal
    combustion vehicles
  • Low emission vehicles
  • Zero emission vehicles (for example, electric
    cars)
  • Stringent requirements on buses
  • Shift travel from private vehicles

14
Strategies to Reduce Pollution From Vehicles
  • New controls on engines
  • Reformulated gas (one of the sources of the
    recent run up in gasoline costs)
  • Emission system inspections
  • Low emission vehicles (LEV)
  • Zero emission vehicles -- the California
    experiment

15
Strategies to Reduce Auto Travel, AKA,
Transportation Control Measures
  • Restrict auto travel
  • Facilitate transit
  • Improve transit

16
Restrict Auto Travel
  • Trip reduction ordinances and the CAA requirement
    for Employee Commuting Options (ECO)
  • Vehicle use restrictions (days of week)
  • Auto-restricted zones

17
Facilitate Transit
  • TMAs
  • Pass subsidies
  • Ridesharing offices
  • Area wide ridesharing

18
Improve Transit
  • New services
  • Marketing
  • Park and Ride

19
(No Transcript)
20
Big Question -- How Can We Modify Traveler
Behavior to Shift Modes?
  • Pollution benefits resulting from transit use
    only occur if individuals chose to ride
  • Major resistance to CAA transportation control
    measures led to abandonment of most of them --
    reason cited -- dont know how to change behaviors

21
Employee Commuting Options
  • 1990 CAA amendments required areas with extreme
    or severe pollution to implement Employee Trip
    Reduction Programs, or, by another name,
    Employee Commuting Options (ECO)
  • In these areas, employers with more than 100
    employees had to increase average vehicle
    occupancy by 25

22
Definition of Average Vehicle Occupancy (AVO)
  • Average vehicle occupancy for all employee
    commuting trips during peak hours within an area
  • Estimated by dividing the number of people
    reporting to work throughout an area over the
    course of a normal M-F work week by the number of
    vehicles in which they commute

23
Example AVO Calculation
  • Single Occupant Vehicle -- one person, one
    vehicle 1/1 1
  • Four-person carpool -- four people, one vehicle
    4/1 4
  • Bus rider, bicyclist, pedestrian -- 1 person/0
    vehicles

24
Example of Implementation
  • Connecticut did survey of employees, determined
    AVO 1.19 so under the regulations, needed to
    increase to 1.49 (25 percent increase over base)
  • Current situation say 1,190 employees arrive in
    1,000 vehicles (the 1.19 AVO)
  • To comply in future, the 1,190 persons will have
    to arrive in no more than 800 vehicles

25
Example of Implementation (Continued)
  • AVO Required 1,190/800 1.49
  • How to reduce vehicles by 200
  • Have 400 employees that now drive alone form
    two-person carpools
  • Generate 4 bus loads of riders (50 per bus)
  • Form 20 vanpools with 11 persons each

26
Employer Options to Comply
  • Offering cash incentives for ridesharing/ using
    mass transit
  • Imposing parking fees
  • Instituting preferential parking for ridesharers
  • Instituting compressed work weeks or staggered
    scheduling
  • Providing a comprehensive ridematching service
  • Subsidizing mid-day shuttles to local shopping
    areas

27
Employer Options to Comply (Continued)
  • Providing company-owned vehicles for
    ridesharing
  • Providing a guaranteed ride home program
  • Promoting bicycling and walking to work
  • Promoting the establishment of on-site amenities
    like banks, drug stores, and restaurants and
  • Offering telecommuting and work-at-home options.

28
ECO History
  • Many communities tried to comply in early 1990s,
    but others (NYC) resisted
  • Environmental Protection Agency essentially
    abandoned the program in 1994
  • Said only incentives could be offered
  • Could not force any changes in behavior
  • Neither employers or states would be penalized or
    sanctioned

29
Study Questions
  • What are the major pollutants that are largely
    attributable to transportation?
  • What are the major strategies that can be and/or
    have been tried to reduce pollution from
    transportation sources?
  • Does transit have a role to play in reducing air
    pollution? What is it?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com