Title: Business Logistics 420 Public Transportation
1Business Logistics 420Public Transportation
- Lectures 16
- Policy Issues III Public Transportation and Air
Quality
2Lecture Objectives
- Provide an overview the transportation-related
air pollution problem in the US - Describe options for reducing transportation
sectors contribution to air pollution - Outline the history of legislative and regulatory
attempts to reduce air pollution from motor
vehicles - Evaluate public transits potential contribution
to air quality improvements
3Transportation As a Major Source of Air Pollution
- 83 Carbon Monoxide (CO)
- 41 Hydrocarbons (VOC)
- 40 Nitrogen Oxides (NOX)
- .2 Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)
- 9 Particulate
4Carbon Monoxide Trends
From VMT Growth and Improved Air Quality How
Long Can Progress Continue?, FHWA
5VOC Trends
From VMT Growth and Improved Air Quality How
Long Can Progress Continue?, FHWA
6Nitrogen Oxide Trends
From VMT Growth and Improved Air Quality How
Long Can Progress Continue?, FHWA
7Ways To Reduce Air Pollution from Mobile
(Transportation) Sources
- Solutions generally the same as for energy
conservation - Reduce demand
- Shift demand to less polluting modes
- Clean up modes
8Ways To Reduce Air Pollution from Mobile
(Transportation) Sources (Continued)
- Major difference is that air quality is not a
major issue in all areas - The benefit from reducing pollution in terms of
health costs and other pollution-related costs
varies depending on the overall or ambient air
quality in a region - Example, the benefit of further reducing
pollution from vehicles is lower in State College
than in Los Angeles or Baltimore
9Clean Air Act of 1970
- The major piece of federal air quality
legislation that is still in effect as amended - Set Ambient Air Quality Standards for urbanized
areas, i.e., standards for the amount of several
types of pollutants allowed in the communitys
air. - Also set vehicle emissions standards
101990 Amendments to Clean Air Act
- Adopted at the same time as the major
transportation legislation, ISTEA - The Clean Air Act amendments set the rules, ISTEA
implemented and paid for the changes
111990 Amendments to Clean Air Act (Continued)
- Set more stringent emission standards for cars,
trucks, and buses - Set national Ambient Air Quality Standards
- Identified categories of non attainment and
identified cities that fell into each category - Required special conformity tests before
allowing new highway construction - Included sanctions on states for non conformity
(lose federal highway funds)
12Categories of Non Attainment
- Extreme -- Los Angeles
- Severe -- Philadelphia, New York,
Baltimore, and 5 other cities - Serious -- Washington DC, Boston, 12 other
cities - Moderate -- Pittsburgh, Reading and many others
- Marginal -- all other Pa cities except State
College and Williamsport
13Two Major US Strategies for Reducing Pollution
from Mobile Sources
- Clean up vehicles
- More stringent emissions controls on internal
combustion vehicles - Low emission vehicles
- Zero emission vehicles (for example, electric
cars) - Stringent requirements on buses
- Shift travel from private vehicles
14Strategies to Reduce Pollution From Vehicles
- New controls on engines
- Reformulated gas (one of the sources of the
recent run up in gasoline costs) - Emission system inspections
- Low emission vehicles (LEV)
- Zero emission vehicles -- the California
experiment
15Strategies to Reduce Auto Travel, AKA,
Transportation Control Measures
- Restrict auto travel
- Facilitate transit
- Improve transit
16Restrict Auto Travel
- Trip reduction ordinances and the CAA requirement
for Employee Commuting Options (ECO) - Vehicle use restrictions (days of week)
- Auto-restricted zones
17Facilitate Transit
- TMAs
- Pass subsidies
- Ridesharing offices
- Area wide ridesharing
18Improve Transit
- New services
- Marketing
- Park and Ride
19(No Transcript)
20Big Question -- How Can We Modify Traveler
Behavior to Shift Modes?
- Pollution benefits resulting from transit use
only occur if individuals chose to ride - Major resistance to CAA transportation control
measures led to abandonment of most of them --
reason cited -- dont know how to change behaviors
21Employee Commuting Options
- 1990 CAA amendments required areas with extreme
or severe pollution to implement Employee Trip
Reduction Programs, or, by another name,
Employee Commuting Options (ECO) - In these areas, employers with more than 100
employees had to increase average vehicle
occupancy by 25
22Definition of Average Vehicle Occupancy (AVO)
- Average vehicle occupancy for all employee
commuting trips during peak hours within an area - Estimated by dividing the number of people
reporting to work throughout an area over the
course of a normal M-F work week by the number of
vehicles in which they commute
23Example AVO Calculation
- Single Occupant Vehicle -- one person, one
vehicle 1/1 1 - Four-person carpool -- four people, one vehicle
4/1 4 - Bus rider, bicyclist, pedestrian -- 1 person/0
vehicles
24Example of Implementation
- Connecticut did survey of employees, determined
AVO 1.19 so under the regulations, needed to
increase to 1.49 (25 percent increase over base) - Current situation say 1,190 employees arrive in
1,000 vehicles (the 1.19 AVO) - To comply in future, the 1,190 persons will have
to arrive in no more than 800 vehicles
25Example of Implementation (Continued)
- AVO Required 1,190/800 1.49
- How to reduce vehicles by 200
- Have 400 employees that now drive alone form
two-person carpools - Generate 4 bus loads of riders (50 per bus)
- Form 20 vanpools with 11 persons each
26Employer Options to Comply
- Offering cash incentives for ridesharing/ using
mass transit - Imposing parking fees
- Instituting preferential parking for ridesharers
- Instituting compressed work weeks or staggered
scheduling - Providing a comprehensive ridematching service
- Subsidizing mid-day shuttles to local shopping
areas
27Employer Options to Comply (Continued)
- Providing company-owned vehicles for
ridesharing - Providing a guaranteed ride home program
- Promoting bicycling and walking to work
- Promoting the establishment of on-site amenities
like banks, drug stores, and restaurants and - Offering telecommuting and work-at-home options.
28ECO History
- Many communities tried to comply in early 1990s,
but others (NYC) resisted - Environmental Protection Agency essentially
abandoned the program in 1994 - Said only incentives could be offered
- Could not force any changes in behavior
- Neither employers or states would be penalized or
sanctioned
29Study Questions
- What are the major pollutants that are largely
attributable to transportation? - What are the major strategies that can be and/or
have been tried to reduce pollution from
transportation sources? - Does transit have a role to play in reducing air
pollution? What is it?