Title: REPUBLIC OF ANGOLA
1REPUBLIC OF ANGOLA
2UNIVERSITY AGOSTINHO NETO(Universidade Agostinho
Neto) - ANGOLA -
3Angola
- Area. 2,246,700 km2
- Population 13 Million
- Colonial period. 1482 1975
4Brief History of UAN (Breve história da UAN)
- Creation (Criação)
- 1962 decree nº. 44530 of 21 August General
Studies for Universities in Angola (GSUA)
Integral part of Portuguese University - 1968 (December) GSUA?University of Luanda (UL)
- 1976 (September) UL ?University of Angola (UA)
- 1985 (January) UA?University Agostinho Neto
- (UAN)
5Brief History of UAN (Breve história da UAN)
- Fight for Freedom 1961 1975 (14 years)
- Independance date November 11, 1975
- Civil war 1975 2002 (27 years)
- End of civil war April 04, 2002
6Status (Estatuto)
- Ministry of Education (Ministerio da Educação)
- State Secretary for Higher Education (Secretaria
de Estado para ensino Superior) - Autonomy (Autonomia)
- Scientific (cientifico)
- Pedagogy/Teaching (pedagogica)
- Administration (administração)
- Finance (finanças)
- Disciplinary (disciplina)
7School Organization (Organização de Escolas
Académicas)
- Faculties (Faculdades)
- Agrarian Sciences (FCA)
- Human Medicine (Medicina)
- Law (Lei)
- Engineering (Engenharia)
- Letters and Social Sciences (Letra e ciências
social) - Economy (Economia)
- Sciences (Ciencias)
- Superior Institutes (Institutos superiores)
- Teachers training (ISCED)
- Technology (técnico)
- Nurse (enfermagem)
- (Total number students 41,527 (2007))
8Organization of UAN (Organização da UAN)
- Assemby (assembléia)
- Senate (senado)
- Rector (reitor)
- Secretary of University (secretariado)
- Counsel of the Direction (conselho de direção)
- Faculties and Schools (unidades organicas)
9Program approved by the State(Programa aprovado
para o Governo)
- Increase the number of students admited per year
(aumentar o numero de estudantes admitidos por
ano) - Increase the number of finalists per year
(aumentar o numero de finalistas por ano) - Improve the quality of teaching and research
(melhorar a qualidade de ensino e investigação) - Expand the University (espanção universitaria)
10University Locations in Angola
11Collaboration
- Successful cases of collaboration
- Span. MSc program with Barcelona, Veterinary
medicine - Span Creation of School of Forestry, Cordoba
- Portugal MSc program in agronomy and Natural
Resources - USA. Michigan State Univ. CRISP Bean and Pulse
- Cuba. Mobility of teachers and global training
12Case study 1. Collaboration program
- The Association Liaison Office (ALO) for
University Cooperation in Development - 2004 Special Request for ApplicationsU.S. -
Southern Africa Partnerships for Agriculture
(USSAPA)
13Case study 1. Collaboration program
- Justification and Objectives
- ALO, in cooperation with USAID/Regional Center
for Southern Africa, issued an RFA (Request for
Applications) for three (3) two-year
institutional partnerships in agriculture to
promote rural livelihoods, food security and
agricultural growth.
14Case study 1. Collaboration program
- Conditions
- Partnerships should include U.S. higher education
institutions or consortia, Southern African
universities, agricultural research centers,
NGOs, and private industry in multiple Southern
African countries.
15Case study 1. Collaboration program
- There will be one (1) award in each of 3 areas
- Applied Research and Technology Transfer
Consortia (2.2 million) - Appropriate Germplasm (550,000) and,
- Economic Research and Agriculture Policy
Harmonization (670,000).
16Case study 1. Collaboration program
- Relevance
- The war in Angola lasted about 30 years and has
destroyed almost all infrastructures.
Agricultural production was inexistent and the
country relayed entirely in food importation.
Education was frequently interrupted by civil war
and qualified human resources fled the country.
Year 2004 was only two years away from the
concretization of internal peace process and the
country needed assistance to boost its
agricultural production and education. University
involvement in collaboration is one of the best
ways of cooperation in development as the
Universitys aim is to educate human being, i.e.
the society.
17Case study 1. Collaboration program
- Effectiveness
- Alliance was created between USA and African
Universities. University Agostinho Neto was in a
consortium with Stellenbosch University (SA),
Bunda University (Malawi), Cornell University
(USA), and Purdue University (USA). Proposal of
common interest was drafted to respond to the
call (RFA). Efforts and expenses were engaged to
concretize the project - Unfortunately, the project was not approved.
18Case study 1. Collaboration program
- Reflection for failure
- - Collaborative universities are out of the
reflection as they are agreed on common
activities to be carried out to fulfil
objectives. - - It is only the donor side that we may
speculate. Guess, what difficulty to control the
donor!. - - Presumption It is possible that the evaluation
committee (the donor) has a biased judgement on
some African countries. May have a pre-selected
list of participants countries/beneficiaries? - - Unmatched agenda between universities
Activities may be concentrating abroad than in
Africa? Thus, more funding stays abroad? - - Difference in priorities between universities
- - More demand (clients) than offer (funding)
- - Out of the standard required
- - Donor expectation not met by applicants
19Case study 2. Integration program
- The Southern African Regional Universities
Association (SARUA) - Justification and Objectives
- The SARUA project is an integration program of
the Southern African Universities. It aimed in
facilitating mobility among members,
communication and problem solving among members.
20Case study 2. Integration program
- Relevance
- The war in Angola lasted about 30 years and has
destroyed almost all infrastructures. Many
sectors of development were collapsed and
education was not preserved and was frequently
interrupted. After the peace process in 2002,
the government has to define new policies for the
development of the country. Actually, it was in
one hand about choosing priority among
priorities. It was mostly a matter of internal
organization rather than external. In other hand,
African countries were unstable in many essential
areas of development thus when launched, the
project faced many barriers to overcome.
21Case study 2. Integration program
- Effectiveness
- Several meetings were carried out without
tangible results. - Nothing was done by countries members.
22Case study 2. Integration program
- Reflection for failure
- Lack of interest of collaborative
countries/universities - Difference in priorities setting between
countries/Universities - Difference in curriculum setting and orientation
- Harmonization of priorities
23- THANK YOU FOR ATTENTION
- OBRIGADO