Title: To simulate interference during a delay we present a number of objects to the network'
1A COMPUTATIONAL MODEL OF RECOGNITION MEMORY IN
PERIRHINAL CORTEX A CRITICAL ROLE FOR COMPLEX
CONJUNCTIVE REPRESENTATIONS
R.A. Cowell 1, S.J. Bartko2, T.J. Bussey2 L.M.
Saksida2, 1. Dept. of Experimental Psychology,
University of Oxford, U.K., and 2. Dept. of
Experimental Psychology, University of Cambridge,
U.K.
- On test, each network was presented with the
sample stimulus and a novel stimulus in order to
assess their relative familiarities, as indexed
by the selectivity of the peak of activation on
the grid. - As in rat studies using SOR, we measured relative
preference for the novel stimulus, indexed by a
difference score, d (f n)/(f n), where f is
the selectivity of the familiar stimulus and n is
the selectivity of the novel stimulus. - Results
Introduction
Results
- The canonical evidence for a memory impairment
following brain damage is a delay dependent
deficit in performance, with good performance at
short delays. - Recognition memory tasks such as delayed
non-matching to sample (DNMS) and spontaneous
object recognition (SOR) have been used to
demonstrate a delay dependent deficit following
perirhinal cortex (PRh) lesions in monkeys (e.g.
Meunier et al., 1993) and in rats (e.g. Winters
et al., 2004), respectively. - In addition, a perceptual role has been proposed
for PRh (Eacott et al., 1994 Bussey, Saksida
Murray, 2002) Can we link the findings of
perceptual and mnemonic contributions of PRh? - An explanation for the effect of PRh lesions on
visual discrimination has been proposed in terms
of complex conjunctive representations in PRh
that resolve ambiguity between objects with
common features. Here, in considering the
mechanism for a delay dependent PRh lesion
deficit, we apply this explanation to recognition
memory. - We have built a connectionist model that can
account for a delay-dependent impairment in
memory performance following PRh lesions, and the
effect of PRh lesions on perceptually difficult
object recognition memory tasks. The two
demonstrations employ a common mechanism.
Intact
Lesioned
A two-way ANOVA with Group as between subjects
factor and Perceptual Difficulty as within
subjects factor revealed a significant effect of
Group (F1,10 954.5, plt.0001), a significant
effect of Perceptual Difficulty (F3,30 3761,
plt.0001)and a significant GroupPerceptual
Difficulty interaction (F3,30 274.8, plt.0001).
Connectionist Model
Architecture
- The model comprises two self-organising,
topographic Kohonen grids PRh and a more caudal
region of ventral visual stream (VVS). - It is assumed that representations of visual
objects increase in complexity with progression
rostrally down the VVS towards PRh. - A complex visual object with four features is
represented by 8 input units, i.e. 2 input units
per feature. This object is represented as a
whole in PRh and as four separate features on the
Caudal VVS layer.
Mechanism
Mechanism
- To simulate interference during a delay we
present a number of objects to the network. - We assume that these objects are composed of
simple features, and that many objects share
features in common, so that the same features are
seen repeatedly (and encoded) by the Caudal VVS
layer during interference. - The representations of all of these interfering
features are sharpened. - However, the probability that a particular
conjunction of features will occur more than once
is much lower. The same object is very rarely
seen more than once by the PRh layer during
interference, thus representations of interfering
objects are not sharpened. - When a novel object, composed of the commonly
occurring features, is presented to Caudal VVS
all of its features look familiar and
discrimination of the familiar object from a
novel object becomes difficult. - When a novel object is presented to the PRh layer
the representation of the familiar object remains
the only sharp representation.
PRh Layer
Encoding Mechanism
Preliminary Behavioural Data
Two rat groups Sham (sham lesions) and PRh
(perirhinal postrhinal lesions) were tested on
SOR using LEGO objects with two different levels
of perceptual difficulty.
- As a stimulus is presented to the PRh and Caudal
VVS layers repeatedly during encoding its
representation becomes sharply tuned. - In a simulation of SOR the network chooses
between the familiar and novel objects according
to the relative sharpness of their
representations.
A two-way ANOVA with Group and Perceptual
Difficulty as factors revealed a main effect of
Group (F1,22 26.17, plt.0001), a main effect of
Perceptual Difficulty(F1,2235.95, plt.0001) and a
significant GroupPerceptual Difficulty
interaction(F1,2215.88, p .001).
- 2. Object Recognition Memory with Increasing
Perceptual Difficulty (e.g. Eacott et al., 1994) - Method
- Intact and Lesioned networks were trained on a
sample stimulus. - No interfering stimuli were presented, to
simulate a zero delay. - Four Perceptual Difficulty conditions, see
table below.
Simulations
Summary and Conclusions
- Object Recognition Memory over a Delay (e.g.
Meunier et al., 1993). - Assumption the ability of the network to
distinguish between novel and familiar
representations deteriorates over a delay owing
to interference from inputs that intervene
between encoding and retrieval. - Method
- Two groups of networks Intact (PRh Caudal
VVS) and Lesioned (Caudal VVS only) were
trained on the sample stimulus. - Four Delay conditions, described by the number
of interfering stimuli seen during the delay
0,300,600 or 900.
- The proposed model can account for a
delay-dependent deficit in object recognition
memory following PRh lesions. - In addition, the same mechanism can account for
the critical role of PRh under conditions of
perceptual difficulty. - In each case the critical role of PRh arises from
its complex, conjunctive representations. Object
representations in caudal VVS are feature-based
and provide insufficient information for
discriminating between stimuli when task demands
are increased either by introducing a delay or by
introducing perceptual difficulty.