To simulate interference during a delay we present a number of objects to the network' - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 1
About This Presentation
Title:

To simulate interference during a delay we present a number of objects to the network'

Description:

... encoded) by the Caudal VVS layer during ... Caudal VVS Layer ... Object representations in caudal VVS are feature-based and provide insufficient ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:51
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 2
Provided by: rosiec1
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: To simulate interference during a delay we present a number of objects to the network'


1
A COMPUTATIONAL MODEL OF RECOGNITION MEMORY IN
PERIRHINAL CORTEX A CRITICAL ROLE FOR COMPLEX
CONJUNCTIVE REPRESENTATIONS
R.A. Cowell 1, S.J. Bartko2, T.J. Bussey2 L.M.
Saksida2, 1. Dept. of Experimental Psychology,
University of Oxford, U.K., and 2. Dept. of
Experimental Psychology, University of Cambridge,
U.K.
  • On test, each network was presented with the
    sample stimulus and a novel stimulus in order to
    assess their relative familiarities, as indexed
    by the selectivity of the peak of activation on
    the grid.
  • As in rat studies using SOR, we measured relative
    preference for the novel stimulus, indexed by a
    difference score, d (f n)/(f n), where f is
    the selectivity of the familiar stimulus and n is
    the selectivity of the novel stimulus.
  • Results

Introduction
Results
  • The canonical evidence for a memory impairment
    following brain damage is a delay dependent
    deficit in performance, with good performance at
    short delays.
  • Recognition memory tasks such as delayed
    non-matching to sample (DNMS) and spontaneous
    object recognition (SOR) have been used to
    demonstrate a delay dependent deficit following
    perirhinal cortex (PRh) lesions in monkeys (e.g.
    Meunier et al., 1993) and in rats (e.g. Winters
    et al., 2004), respectively.
  • In addition, a perceptual role has been proposed
    for PRh (Eacott et al., 1994 Bussey, Saksida
    Murray, 2002) Can we link the findings of
    perceptual and mnemonic contributions of PRh?
  • An explanation for the effect of PRh lesions on
    visual discrimination has been proposed in terms
    of complex conjunctive representations in PRh
    that resolve ambiguity between objects with
    common features. Here, in considering the
    mechanism for a delay dependent PRh lesion
    deficit, we apply this explanation to recognition
    memory.
  • We have built a connectionist model that can
    account for a delay-dependent impairment in
    memory performance following PRh lesions, and the
    effect of PRh lesions on perceptually difficult
    object recognition memory tasks. The two
    demonstrations employ a common mechanism.

Intact
Lesioned
A two-way ANOVA with Group as between subjects
factor and Perceptual Difficulty as within
subjects factor revealed a significant effect of
Group (F1,10 954.5, plt.0001), a significant
effect of Perceptual Difficulty (F3,30 3761,
plt.0001)and a significant GroupPerceptual
Difficulty interaction (F3,30 274.8, plt.0001).
Connectionist Model
Architecture
  • The model comprises two self-organising,
    topographic Kohonen grids PRh and a more caudal
    region of ventral visual stream (VVS).
  • It is assumed that representations of visual
    objects increase in complexity with progression
    rostrally down the VVS towards PRh.
  • A complex visual object with four features is
    represented by 8 input units, i.e. 2 input units
    per feature. This object is represented as a
    whole in PRh and as four separate features on the
    Caudal VVS layer.

Mechanism
Mechanism
  • To simulate interference during a delay we
    present a number of objects to the network.
  • We assume that these objects are composed of
    simple features, and that many objects share
    features in common, so that the same features are
    seen repeatedly (and encoded) by the Caudal VVS
    layer during interference.
  • The representations of all of these interfering
    features are sharpened.
  • However, the probability that a particular
    conjunction of features will occur more than once
    is much lower. The same object is very rarely
    seen more than once by the PRh layer during
    interference, thus representations of interfering
    objects are not sharpened.
  • When a novel object, composed of the commonly
    occurring features, is presented to Caudal VVS
    all of its features look familiar and
    discrimination of the familiar object from a
    novel object becomes difficult.
  • When a novel object is presented to the PRh layer
    the representation of the familiar object remains
    the only sharp representation.

PRh Layer
Encoding Mechanism
Preliminary Behavioural Data
Two rat groups Sham (sham lesions) and PRh
(perirhinal postrhinal lesions) were tested on
SOR using LEGO objects with two different levels
of perceptual difficulty.
  • As a stimulus is presented to the PRh and Caudal
    VVS layers repeatedly during encoding its
    representation becomes sharply tuned.
  • In a simulation of SOR the network chooses
    between the familiar and novel objects according
    to the relative sharpness of their
    representations.

A two-way ANOVA with Group and Perceptual
Difficulty as factors revealed a main effect of
Group (F1,22 26.17, plt.0001), a main effect of
Perceptual Difficulty(F1,2235.95, plt.0001) and a
significant GroupPerceptual Difficulty
interaction(F1,2215.88, p .001).
  • 2. Object Recognition Memory with Increasing
    Perceptual Difficulty (e.g. Eacott et al., 1994)
  • Method
  • Intact and Lesioned networks were trained on a
    sample stimulus.
  • No interfering stimuli were presented, to
    simulate a zero delay.
  • Four Perceptual Difficulty conditions, see
    table below.

Simulations
Summary and Conclusions
  • Object Recognition Memory over a Delay (e.g.
    Meunier et al., 1993).
  • Assumption the ability of the network to
    distinguish between novel and familiar
    representations deteriorates over a delay owing
    to interference from inputs that intervene
    between encoding and retrieval.
  • Method
  • Two groups of networks Intact (PRh Caudal
    VVS) and Lesioned (Caudal VVS only) were
    trained on the sample stimulus.
  • Four Delay conditions, described by the number
    of interfering stimuli seen during the delay
    0,300,600 or 900.
  • The proposed model can account for a
    delay-dependent deficit in object recognition
    memory following PRh lesions.
  • In addition, the same mechanism can account for
    the critical role of PRh under conditions of
    perceptual difficulty.
  • In each case the critical role of PRh arises from
    its complex, conjunctive representations. Object
    representations in caudal VVS are feature-based
    and provide insufficient information for
    discriminating between stimuli when task demands
    are increased either by introducing a delay or by
    introducing perceptual difficulty.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com