Decisionmaking in the EU - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 29
About This Presentation
Title:

Decisionmaking in the EU

Description:

'a set of interrelated decisions taken by a political actor or group of actors ... Constructivism. Convergence? IR/Comparative/Federalism perspectives? Governance? ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:57
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 30
Provided by: computi1
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Decisionmaking in the EU


1
Decision-making in the EU
  • W E E K 9

2
Introduction
  • There is not one uniform decision making mode as
    there is not one single policy-making process
  • Experimental and evolutionary
  • Policy-making Decision-making issues modes

3
What is politics?
  • The authorative
  • Allocation of values
  • For a society (Easton 1965 50)

4
What is policy?
  • a set of interrelated decisions taken by a
    political actor or group of actors concerning the
    selection of goals and the means of achieving
    them within a specified situation where those
    decisions should, in principle, be within the
    power of those actors to achieve (Jenkins 1978)
  • Public policy consists of political decisions
    for implementing programs to achieve societal
    goals(Cochran/Malone)
  • Public policy is the outcome of the struggle in
    government over who gets what (Cochran et al.)

5
What types of public policy do exist? (Lowi)
  • Regulative Policies
  • Expenditure
  • Re-distributive Policies
  • Distributive Policies
  • Macro-Economic Stabilisation

6
EU policy making
7
The Four Main Stages of the Policy Process
8
The Policy Cycle
9
Theories of Integration
  • Neo-Functionalism
  • Intergovernmentalism
  • Liberal Intergovernmentalism
  • Liberal democracy at national level
  • Intergovernmental bargaining
  • RC interpretation of institutions
  • New institutionalism (RC, sociological,
    historical)
  • Constructivism
  • Convergence?
  • IR/Comparative/Federalism perspectives?
    Governance?

10
5 modes of policy making
  • Traditional Community Method
  • Supranational
  • Locking in / decision trap
  • Strong commission
  • CAP
  • EU regulatory mode
  • Commission as architect, Council as forum
  • Consultation of stakeholders
  • EP as one channel for non-economic input,
    otherwise weak
  • Common market

11
5 modes of policy making
  • EU distributional mode
  • Commission programs
  • EP and local/regional authorities as pressure
    groups
  • Cohesion, research
  • Policy coordination
  • OECD method
  • Commission networks of experts/benchmarking
  • Role of EP limited (experts)
  • Lisbon strategy, Unemployment

12
5 modes of policy making
  • Trans-/Intergovernmentalism
  • European Council/Council of Ministers
  • Commission limited
  • EP, ECJ, national citizens largely excluded
  • Opaque
  • Sometimes quite efficient
  • JHA, Schengen, CFSP

13
General Principles
  • Unanimity voting
  • QMV
  • Simple/Absolute majority voting
  • Consensus

14
Decision-Making Institutions
  • 3 main types of actors EU Institutions, national
    governments, national/transnational interest
    groups
  • Main EU institutions involved in decision-making
  • Commission
  • Council of Ministers
  • European Parliament

15
Preparation
  • Policy-shaping before formal process begins
  • Commission involved (Art. 211 TEC)
  • Consultations between EU and national level
  • Formal forums
  • Informal policy networks
  • Issue networks (large, open, conflict)
  • Policy communities (small, tight-knit, consensus)
  • Stage where the most lobbying activity occurs
  • After this stage only 20 of the proposal can
    be subject to change

16
Decision-Making Procedures
  • four main legislative procedures
  • consultation
  • co- operation (virtually abolished)
  • co- decision
  • assent
  • co- decision now most common procedure
  • budget passes through a complex process

17
The Consultation Procedure
18
The Budget Procedure
19
Decision-making modi in the Council
20
Decision-making EP/Council
Administrative Law
21
Implementation
  • an integral part of policy-making
  • three main types of EC instruments
  • Decisions (applies only to particular addressees)
  • Directives (binding aims, MS choose means)
  • Regulations (immediately applicable)
  • national actors important in implementation
  • Indirect implementation (Member states
    responsible)
  • Direct implementation (Commission responsible)
  • European Court of Justice decisions are final
  • Court of Auditors checks EC expenditure

22
Monitoring
  • Commission understaffed
  • Needs to rely on national administrations
  • Delay of implementation recorded by the
    Commission
  • Huge monitoring exercise for the Central and East
    European Countries

23
Stages, actors and channels of policy process
  • 4 features of policy making
  • 1. numbers of actors involved
  • 2. multi-layered (region government EU)
  • 3. levels of seniority (HSG, Ministers, COREPER,
    committees)
  • 4. levels of formality official semi-official
    informal

24
Complexity of decision making role of Member
States
  • Size of state
  • Significance of particular negotiations
  • High and Low Politics
  • Capacity of governments
  • Relations with other governments
  • Competence of negotiators
  • Mix of package dealing and side payments
  • Agreement on how a matter has to be decided can
    take as long as decision making

25
Multiple policy stakeholders
  • Policy communities
  • Different types of actors institutional,
    non-institutional, governmental, non-governmental
  • Epistemic communities (experts)
  • Nested and repeated games

26
Multi-level EU decision making(according to
Peterson/Bomberg)
27
Inter-institutional Cooperation Agreements
  • Maastricht and Amsterdam strengthened position of
    EP and therefore the need of all institutions to
    communicate, find compromises, bargain, dealing
  • Inter-institutional agreements (1995 Code of
    Conduct to guarantee functioning of EU)
  • Result any proposal will be watered down
    (generally accepted, lowest common denominator),
    depends on many variables common mood,
    presidency, national elections, interest groups,
    expected public effect, divergent interests, even
    single persons

28
Efficiency of EU policy process
  • seen to be slow (up to 7 years), complicated,
    distant from the people, not understandable, too
    many parties
  • Lack of transparency
  • Sub-optimal outcomes
  • EU is lacking of a fixed, central, authoritative
    point to have the last word
  • not very different from national policy making
  • EU tries to set up long term goals (5 year
    financial programme, Agenda 2000 - 2006), and
    Commission annual work programme

29
Class questions
  • 'Stagnation, decision-making, blockages,
    institutional paralysis'. To what extent is this
    a fair summary of the EU in the seventies and
    eighties?
  • How far did the Single European Act and the
    Maastricht Treaty go towards more efficient
    decision-making in the Community?
  • And what did the Amsterdam and Nice Treaties
    provide to maintain the functioning of
    decision-making in an enlarged Union?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com