Welcome to Abnormal Child Psychology - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Welcome to Abnormal Child Psychology

Description:

Welcome to Abnormal Child Psychology Jill M. Norvilitis, Ph.D. Higher Order Processes Adequate on simple, but performance decreases as task complexity increases Word ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:409
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 77
Provided by: JillNor
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Welcome to Abnormal Child Psychology


1
Welcome to Abnormal Child Psychology
  • Jill M. Norvilitis, Ph.D.

2
Issues that research in this field addresses
  • What constitutes normal/abnormal behavior for
    kids of different ages and both genders.
  • Identifying causes and correlates of abnormal
    child behavior
  • Making predictions about long term outcomes
  • Developing and evaluating methods for treatment
    and prevention

3
Unique to disorders of childhood
  • Often not clear whose problem it is
  • Problems often involve failure to show expected
    developmental progress
  • Many problems are not entirely abnormal
  • Interventions are often intended to promote
    further development

4
Developmental Psychopathology
  • Multiply influencedpsychological, sociocultural,
    biological
  • Patterns of behavior, emotions, cognitions that
    are abnormal, disruptive, distressing
  • Either to person or to others around the person

5
Defining Psychological Disorders
  • Person shows some degree of distress
  • Behavior indicates some degree of disability
  • Distress or disability increases risk of further
    suffering or harm

6
Keys to Remember
  • Importance of relationships
  • Labels and stigma
  • Competence
  • Frequency/intensity of problems
  • Multifinality
  • Equifinality
  • Accurate views of what is normal

7
Risk Factors
  • Characteristics, events, or processes that
    increase risk for the development of psych
    problems
  • Categories
  • Some risk factors are more predictive of problems
    than others
  • Vulnerability varies
  • Risk accumulates
  • Some connection between risk factors and specific
    disorders
  • Number of risk factors is important

8
Resiliency/Protective Factors
  • Characteristics, events, or processes that
    protect an individual from the dev of
    psychological problems
  • Personal attributesintelligences,
    self-confidence, etc
  • Family strengths
  • Support from outside the family

9
How common are problems?
  • Epidemiology
  • Prevalencetotal of cases at a given time
  • Incidence-- of new cases in a given period
  • Between 1/8 and 1/5 have clinical problem that
    impairs functioning
  • 10-20 meet diagnostic criteria
  • 10 of those with problems receive tx
  • Youngest ¼ of population receives 1/9 tx dollars

10
Theories and Causes
  • Theorysystematic set of statements designed to
    help organize, analyze, explain, and predict
  • Purpose
  • A good theory should
  • Account for the majority of existing research
    data
  • Give relevant explanations/logical reasons
  • Be able to be tested for accuracy
  • Predict new events, incorporate new info
  • Be parsimonious
  • Be logically consistent

11
Etiology
  • Underlying assumptions
  • Behavior is multiply determined
  • Child and environment are interdependentthis
    dynamic interaction is called a transaction
  • Abnormal development involves continuity and
    discontinuity
  • Adaptational failurefailure to master or
    progress in accomplishing developmental
    milestones
  • Developmental psychopathology is a macroparadigm
    that draws on multiple perspectives

12
Freud
  • Deterministic
  • Mental processes are often unconscious
  • Conflict modelid/ego/superego
  • Stages
  • Oral
  • Anal
  • Phallic
  • Latency
  • Genital
  • Advantages to this theory
  • Helped establish field of psychology
  • Emphasized importance of childhood

13
Updates to Psychoanalytic Theory
  • Object relations theoryimportance of
    relationship with caregiver is key.
  • Melanie Kleinhealthy relationships as infants
    lead to healthy relationships as adults
  • Attachment theoryBowlby 1969, Ainsworth, 1978
  • Secure, ambivalent, avoidant, disorganized

14
Biological Model
  • Hippocratessomatogenesis
  • Late 1800s, bio causes for everything
  • Varies by genetic and constitutional factors,
    neuroanatomy, rates of maturation
  • Neural plasticitymalleability
  • It is rare to find a disorder that is completely
    bio in origin
  • Diathesis-stress model

15
Genetic Contributions
  • ADHDmultiple genes, Huntingtons Choreasingle
    gene
  • Heritabilityproportion of variation in a given
    trait that is genetic/inherited
  • Concordance ratesMZ, DZ, adoption

16
Neurobiological Contributions
  • Brain structure function
  • Many locations, particularly frontal lobes
  • Damage to brain pre or post-natally
  • Accident
  • Illness
  • Malnutrition
  • Toxic substances
  • Neurotransmitters
  • Implicated in many disorders
  • Not as well understood in kids

17
Psychological Factors
  • Emotional influences
  • Reactivitydifferences in threshold and intensity
    of expression of emotion regulation
  • Temperament
  • Easypositive affect and approach
  • Difficultnegative affect or irritability
  • Slow to warmfearful or inhibited

18
Behavioral Theories
  • The connection with developmental psychopath
    really began with Watson
  • Operant conditioning
  • Some disorders are more linked to behavioral
    contingencies than others. For example, phobias,
    enuresis, oppositional problems
  • We will talk about this theory more when we
    discuss tx
  • Social learning theory

19
Cognitive Behavioral Theories
  • Observable behavior can be influenced by mental
    processes
  • Particularly useful as a theory for depression
    (but others as well)
  • Automatic thoughtsimmediate, unquestioned
    thoughts when faced with a new or recurrent
    situation
  • Cognitive distortions-help develop and maintain
    symptoms

20
Family Systems Theory
  • The child is only the identified
  • Childs problems are a reflection of family
    problems or problems in marital relationship
  • Families want to maintain homeostasis
  • Family structures and alliances are often
    disrupted
  • Communication is also often disrupted
  • Can be enmeshed or disengaged

21
Bronfenbrenners Ecological Systems Theory
  • There are many systems and settings to be
    considered when trying to understand the etiology
    of problems
  • Macrosystembeliefs and values of the culture
  • Exosystem-social structures
  • Mesosystem-interconnections between various
    community systems
  • Microsystem-childs immediate environment
  • Ontogenic developmentthe childs own internal
    development and adaptation

22
Ethics in Working with Children and Families
  • Competencecant just deem yourself competent
  • Multiple relationshipsalso known as dual
    relationships
  • Informed consent and assentmust inform about the
    kind of therapy or assessment
  • Alsomust clarify who is the client and what role
    each person plays

23
Confidentiality and Limits to Confidentiality
  • Suicide, homicide, and abuse of a dependent
    person
  • Tarasoffduty to warn
  • Involuntary commitment
  • Childrens legal rights in treatment decisions
  • Children cant be forced to participate, but can
    be forced to sit there

24
Research Ethics
  • IRBs
  • Non-harmful procedures
  • Incentives
  • Deception
  • Anonymity
  • Mutual responsibilities
  • Jeopardy
  • Informed consent and assent
  • Confidentiality
  • Informing participants of results

25
Research in Abnormal Child Psychology
  • Time frame of the study
  • Cross-sectionalpossible cohort effects
  • Longitudinal designstime consuming, expensive,
    drop outs, historical factors
  • Accelerated longitudinal designs aka sequential
    designs
  • Where do we get participantsschools, clinics,
    hospitals, community, laboratory

26
Just a Bit on Freud Himself
  • Born 5/6/1856 in Freiburg, Moravia (now Pribor,
    Czech) to a 40 yo wool merchant father on his 2nd
    marriageremote and authoritarian.
  • MotherAmaliemore nurturing
  • Had 2 older ½ brothers, but had nephew 1 yr older
  • 1859 moved to Leipzig for economic reasons
  • 1860to Vienna where Freud stayed until 1938 when
    Nazis came
  • Had brother Juliusone year younger, died in 1858
  • Sister Anna
  • Age 17moved by curiosity about human concerns
  • Became physician in his 20s
  • Trained as a neurologist under Charcot and then
    under Breuer.
  • With Breur treated Anna O in 1895, began to
    develop own ideas after that

27
Dora
  • Dora began to suffer from a hysterical cough and
    loss of voice
  • Threatened to kill herself
  • Freud found multiple sexual conflicts
  • Doras father was having an affair with Frau K,
    whom Dora had adored
  • Dora envied both of the lovers and felt betrayed
    by both
  • Frau Ks husband was attracted to Dora and Herr K
    made advances to Dora
  • Doras father didnt believe her, but Dora was
    also attracted to Herr K and had fantasized
    marrying him but Dora learned hed been having an
    affair with the governess and she was mad.
  • But Dora quit tx abruptly

28
Doras Outcome
  • Freud had had high hopes for the tx. Wrote it up
    in only 3 wks
  • Book was written as a follow up to Freuds dream
    book. Not intended to convey every treatment
    utterance.
  • In April 1902, 15 mos after termination, Dora
    reappeared. She had improved. Had visited Ksgot
    Frau K to admit affair and Herr K to admit
    advances.
  • In Oct. 19011 yr after beginning therapy, Dora
    lost her voice again after she bumped into Herr K
    on the street. He stopped and was run over by a
    carriage. He survived and her voice got better.
  • Later Dora married and Freud wrote that she was
    reclaimed by the realities of life

29
The Real Dora
  • Ida Bauer, born 1882 in Vienna of Bohemian Jewish
    ancestry
  • Dora's father, Philip Bauer, was a wealthy
    textile manufacturer.
  • Dora's brother, Otto Bauer, became a leading
    figure in the Austrian Social Democratic Party, a
    Marxist theorist who specialized in the question
    of nationality and nationalism.
  • Dora married in 1903 at the age of twenty-one.
  • She continued to suffer from a variety of
    psychosomatic ailments throughout her life.
  • One of her few satisfactions, a later analyst
    reported, was that she knew herself to be the
    subject of one of Freud's most famous case
    histories.

30
Hysteria
  • Originally wandering uterustherefore only
    women
  • Multiple somatic complaints without any obvious
    medical cause
  • Overtime took on connotation of exaggerated or
    overly dramatic
  • Take overpowering anxiety and convert it into sx
    (conversion hysteria)

31
Assessment
  • Developmental considerations age, gender,
    cultures
  • Many purposes of assessment
  • Determine levels of problematic emotions and
    behaviors
  • Determine range of problematic emotions and
    behaviors
  • Help identify any appropriate diagnoses
  • Identify strengths and competencies
  • Evaluate efficacy of treatment by assessing
    before, during, and after tx
  • Determine etiological factors of problem
  • Identify children at risk for dev problems in the
    future
  • Establish prognosis and tx planning

32
Effective Assessment (Prevatt, 1999)
  • Prereferral usedmay be able to intervene before
    an assessment
  • Ecologically based assessment
  • Multimodal
  • Emphasis on family/school environment
  • Avoidance of label/pathology based approach
  • Emphasis on why things occur
  • Outcome-based
  • Adherence to legal and ethical guidelines
  • Uses tests with good psychometric
    propertiesreliable, valid, adequate normative
    data, cost effective
  • Intervention focused
  • Strengths and weaknesses
  • Learning-based strategies, school, family and
    community strategies
  • ? need for consultations

33
  • Must choose between depth and breadth in
    assessment
  • Should be multimethodusing several types of
    techniques and should use multiple informants

34
Interviews
  • The most common technique
  • Unstructured, semi-structured, structured
  • Rapport
  • Weaknesses of unstructured interviewsnot very
    reliable, may go off on tangents as they come up
  • Structured and semi-structured are more reliable.
  • May be used in combination.
  • Should cover
  • Parent and child
  • History of current difficulties
  • Childs educational hx
  • Home environment
  • Expectations for child
  • Childs strengths and competencies
  • Parent only
  • Details of pregnancy and birth
  • Developmental hx
  • Medical hx
  • Family characteristics and hx
  • Childs interpersonal skills
  • Child only
  • Job hx and goals
  • Sexual involvements
  • Friendships
  • Illicit substances

35
Behavioral Assessment
  • Behavioral observation
  • structured or unstructured
  • look for antecedents and consequences
  • most often done in schools
  • A-Antecedent, B-Behavior, C-Consequences
  • Functional assessment
  • evaluation of actual behaviors and childs
    ability to perform these
  • Self-monitoring
  • allows child to keep track of a specific behavior
    by recording its occurrence
  • Concern with all of these techniques reactivity

36
Checklists and Rating Scales
  • Not very expensive, widely used
  • Most take 5-15 minutes
  • Broad measures CBCL, TRF, YSR
  • Specific measures CDI, Conners, STAI-kiddie
  • Concernparents pathology may increase ratings
    of kids problems. Kids may downplay problems.
  • When looking at CBCL, TRF, YSR
  • Those in similar roles (parent-parent) corr about
    .6, adults in different roles (parent-teacher)
    corr about .3, children with adults corr about .2
  • All corrs are higher for externalizing.
  • Why?

37
Personality Assessment
  • Ask about functioning without asking about
    specific behaviors
  • Personality inventoriesMMPI-A
  • Projective measures
  • Ambiguous stimuli onto which individuals project
    ideas and feelings.
  • Many types-Rorschach, TAT/CAT/RAT, DAP.

38
Intellectual and Educational Assessment
  • Intelligence tests
  • Most commonly employed assessment device beyond
    interviews
  • WISC-IV10 mandatory, 5 supplementary scales.
  • Stanford-Binet
  • Both M 100 sd15 or 16.
  • Criticisms
  • Cultural loading and school based quality of some
    tests
  • Focus on speed of responses to detriment of
    methodical kids
  • View of IQ as rigid and inflexible
  • Using IQ tests makes IQ real and not a construct.
  • Educational testsWoodcock-Johnson, WIAT, WRAT

39
Neuropsychological Testing
  • Primary purpose
  • Find the implications of brain-related deficits
    and lesions
  • Much more specific than broader measures
  • Areas
  • Perceptual/sensory
  • Motor functions
  • Verbal functions/language/communication
  • Attention/learning/processing
  • Non-verbal functions

40
Strengths and Weaknesses of Testing
  • Strengths of standardized testing
  • Many testsfinding a good one in your area
    shouldnt be hard
  • Identifies strengths and weaknesses from a
    variety of perspectives
  • Weaknesses of testing
  • Assumes that everyone is motivated and honest
  • Some techniques may be biased

41
Classification and Diagnosis
  • In dx, we use either categories or dimensions
  • Keys to a classification system
  • Must be clearly defined
  • Groups or dimensions must exist (go together
    regularly)
  • Reliableget same dx across observers
  • Validprovide us with useful info, not overlap
    with other dx
  • Clinical utility

42
Clinically Derived Systems
  • From a consensus of clinicians about which sx
    usually go together
  • DSM-American (ICD-10-other countries)
  • Grew out of Kraepelins initial classification in
    1883
  • 1952-DSM-I had 2 categories for
    children-Adjustment reaction and childhood
    schizophrenia
  • Adultomorphism
  • 1968DSM-IInew section Behavior Disorders of
    Child and Adolescence
  • 1980DSM-IIImultiaxial
  • Now DSM-IV-TR
  • 5 axes
  • IClinical disorders
  • IIDevelopmental disorders, personality disorders
  • III-General medical conditions
  • IVPsychosocial stressors
  • V-Global assessment of functioning 0-100

43
Strengths and Weaknesses of the DSM
  • Reliabilitytest-retests is fair for dx such as
    ADHD, CD, ODD--.51. to .64
  • Inter-rater is better for some than othersautism
    .85, ODD .55
  • Strengthscommon diagnostic language
  • Wide acceptance and use
  • Multiaxial
  • Weaknessesusually used for classification (not
    for understanding or tx)
  • Medical model
  • Reliability for kids and adolescents behind
    adults
  • Very complex
  • Labeling
  • Self-fulfilling prophecies

44
Empirically-based Taxonomies
  • Collect info in a standardized manner from a
    large N of kids
  • Analyze data through statistical means
  • Explore associations between sx
  • Develop scales based on these behavioral items
  • CBCL by Thomas Achenbach

45
Therapeutic Interventions
  • Settings for interventions
  • Inpatient settings
  • Residential tx facilities
  • Group homes/therapeutic foster care homes
  • Day hospitals
  • Outpt settings
  • School based mental health services

46
Involvement in Treatment
  • Flisher et al 1997at least 17 of kids and
    adolescents with severe psychopathology never
    receive tx
  • Goodman et al 1997compared with those who do not
    receive services, those who do
  • Experienced higher levels of psychopathology
  • Showed lower levels of competence
  • More likely to have comorbid disorders
  • More likely to be non-Hispanic Caucasians
  • Less likely to be prepubertal girls
  • Tended to have parents who were
  • More educated
  • More dissatisfied with their family functioning
  • Less involved in monitoring childrens behavior
  • More likely to have received tx themselves

47
Who drops out?
  • High SES less likely to drop out
  • Attrition is lower when the whole family is
    involved
  • Most parent factors are not significant
  • Congruence between parental expectations and
    treatment recommendations is related to lower
    attrition
  • More coercive referral sources are more likely to
    drop out

48
Does therapy work?
  • Consumer Reports surveys say pts are satisfied,
    but does it work?
  • Outcome studieswaitlist controls, no treatment
    controls, attention-placebo control, standard
    tx/routine care control
  • Casey and Berman 1985first large scale
    meta-analysis
  • Tx outcome for those 12 and younger64
    studiessingle ES for each study
  • Mean ES .71 -across studies the avg treated child
    functioned better after tx than 76 of control
    kids
  • Most tx (other than dynamic) were more effective
    than no tx
  • Behavioral somewhat better than non-behavioral
  • Worked whether play or no-play and parents and
    kids vs kids only
  • Tx is somewhat more effective for specific
    problems than for social adjustment problems
  • Tx effective across observers
  • Other meta-analyses have found very similar
    things

49
The Next Step in Efficacy
  • Goal now is to establish empirically supported tx
    for specific problems
  • Two categories
  • Well-established tx
  • Probably efficacious tx (new tx that appears
    effective from 1 or 2 high-quality studies)
  • Problemclinic vs. research txgenerally clinic
    is less effective

50
Play Therapy
  • One technique to discuss across tx
  • Problem young kids are less verbal, so play tx
    uses play to concretize communications
  • 2 primary perspectives
  • Dynamickids cant do verbal free association
  • Now dynamic people view play as a mode of
    expression
  • Client-Centered
  • Axlinebasic principles of CCTunconditional
    regard, accurate empathy, genuiness
  • Non-directive
  • Not a great deal of support for play therapy as a
    stand-alone technique
  • Typical play therapy room contents
  • Tactile materials
  • Drawing materials
  • Dolls and dollhouses
  • Hand puppets
  • Nerf balls
  • Blocks
  • Communication facilitators

51
Psychodynamic Therapy
  • Very little support with children
  • Historical importance
  • Interpretation of unconscious conflicts

52
Behavior Therapy
  • 2 main typeschild oriented and parent oriented
  • Generally based on research principles
  • Child-focused
  • Applied Behavior Analysisfocus on antecedents
    and consequences of behavior
  • Reinforcement, prompting, modeling, shaping, time
    out, punish.
  • Token economies
  • Systematic desensitization

53
Parent-Oriented Behavior Therapy
  • Behavioral Parent Training-Barkley
  • Pay attention to and reward positive behavior
  • Ignore bad behavior
  • Allow natural consequences
  • Model appropriate behavior
  • Provide consistent and known consequences
  • Anticipate and plan for problem behavior
  • No idle threats
  • Limit the use of punishments
  • One 25 year follow up (Strain et al) showed
    positive results

54
Evaluating Behavior Therapy
  • Achieves results in a short period of timeless
    distress, lower cost
  • Methods are clearly delineated results easily
    measured
  • Works better with some problems than
    othersrarely used for complex personality
    disorders

55
Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy
  • EllisRational Emotive Therapy
  • Sustained emotional reactions are caused by
    internal sentences that people repeat to
    themselvesirrational beliefs
  • Eliminate self-defeatingness by rational
    examination
  • Must decide together what to do
  • BeckCognitive therapy
  • Negative beliefs that people have about self,
    world and future cause disorders.
  • Both behavioral and cognitive.
  • Ellisdeductiveknows there are irrational
    beliefs
  • Beckinductiveseeks negative beliefs
  • Social problem solving skills training,
    assertion trainingpart of this
  • Efficacy
  • Less research on Ellis modelwhat is there says
    that it does not work as well as Becks approach.

56
Family Systems Therapy
  • Family tx
  • All members all the time
  • Structural interventions
  • Change familys organizational patterns

57
Psychopharmacology
  • Medications are widely used, even if not widely
    studied in kids
  • Zito et al 2000studied kids aged 2-4 between at
    three sites/three payees
  • Stimulants 12.3, 8.9, 5.1 per 1000
  • Antidepressants3.2, 1.6, .7
  • Antidepressantslimited support, not studied
    until recently
  • Fairly equivocal results
  • Only two are approved (Prozac and Zoloft)
  • Suicide concern
  • Anxiolyticslimited evidence, limited research
  • Antipsychoticsolder kids with later onset of
    schizophrenia, higher intellectual functioning
    respond better
  • Psychostimulantsabout 75 of kids with ADHD
    respond well. Help attention and impulsivity but
    not social skills or academics
  • Drawbacks to medsside effects message that med
    use sends

58
Prevention
  • 20 of kids have disorders, even 10 would be a
    huge need if more than 5 of those in need got
    help
  • Primaryentire community
  • Secondary-children at risk
  • Tertiaryprevent recurrence
  • DARE
  • Head Start

59
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Symptoms
  • Inattention
  • Losing things
  • Disorganized
  • Cant follow through on steps
  • Easily distracted
  • Hyperactivity
  • Talkative
  • Driven by a motor
  • Run in situations when it is inappropriate
  • Keys
  • Before age 7 (but some studies find little diff
    between before or after 7)
  • 6 mos duration (may be too brief for young kids)
  • 2 or more settings
  • Evidence of significant impairment
  • 3 typesprimarily inattentive, primarily
    hyperactive, combined

60
Prevalence
  • Lots of controversy, lots of research
  • In 200925 of articles in Journal of Abnormal
    Child Psychology were about ADHD
  • Some controversy about whether it is all one
    disorder or two
  • Prevalence3-5 of kids (2-10)
  • 50-60 when clinical or special education samples
    are used
  • Kids tend to be referred for help between ages
    7-9
  • 50-80 will continue to have problems into
    adulthood
  • Boys outnumber girls by 21, some reports as high
    as 91

61
Gender Differences
  • Compared with boys with ADHD, girls with ADHD
    tend to
  • have lower intellectual functioning
  • have lower levels of hyperactivity
  • fewer comorbid externalizing problems
  • inattentive types
  • No gender differences in
  • fine motor skills
  • social functioning
  • academic performance
  • impulsivity
  • family relationship variables like parental
    depression or parental education

62
Inattention
  • May be able to pay attention in some situations
  • Not deficient in selective attention
  • Instead a basic deficit in the ability to sustain
    attentionCPT, reaction time
  • Deficit is context-dependent and task-dependent
  • All of this suggests, perhaps, a motivational
    deficit

63
Hyperactivity and Impulsivity
  • Hyperactivity
  • Far less robust dimension than inattention
  • Some evidence that they are more active on a 24
    hr basis (including sleep)
  • Greater restlessness
  • Differences most marked in younger kidsdecrease.
    with age
  • Situation dependent
  • Impulsivitycognitive vs. behavioral impulsivity
  • Act before they think
  • Complex tasksaccept 1st solution that comes to
    mind
  • Make very rapid responses, as well as irrelevant
    and inappropriate ones
  • Do not lack search strategies, but they are
    deficient

64
IQ and Academic Achievement
  • 7-15 pts below avgnot clear if IQ is low or poor
    test-taking skills
  • Do poorly in school
  • Repeat more grades, lower marks on standardized
    measures of reading, spelling, vocabulary, and
    math
  • Academic performance decreases with time
  • 40 receive some form of special education by
    adolescence
  • Cognitive etiologycore cognitive problems
    prevent development of problem-solving
  • Motivational factorsschool failures lower
    self-esteem and undermine desire to achieve as
    child grows older

65
ADHD and Memory
  • Intact as long as the list of stimuli is
    relatively short
  • Deteriorates as of stimuli to be remembered
    increases
  • Appears that, instead of increasing in effort as
    task becomes more difficult, actually expend less
    effort and use less efficient memory strategies

66
Higher Order Processes
  • Adequate on simple, but performance decreases as
    task complexity increases
  • Word knowledge2 vs. 5 choices
  • When asked to scan an array, they skip around and
    focus on novel or striking stimuli instead of
    processing all relevant info
  • Performance increases with interest in task
  • When told about more effective strategies, dont
    always use them
  • Poor metacognition

67
Response to Reinforcement
  • Performance will increase if every correct
    response is reinforced
  • Withdrawal of expected rewards can interfere with
    performance, even on simple tasks
  • Performance deteriorates when reward is given
    after every 2nd correct response or at regular
    intervals
  • Exceptionally strong need for immediate
    gratification
  • Tend to invest more energy and interest in
    obtaining the reward than solving the problem
    (not task-oriented)

68
Other Characteristics
  • Accident proneness1/2 described this way
  • 15 have had 4 or more serious injuries
  • 3x more likely to have accidental poisoning
  • Distorted self-perceptionspositive illusory bias

69
Comorbidity and Differential Diagnosis
  • Comorbidityrule rather than exception for ADHD
  • Between 42 93 for ext, 13-51 for
    internalizing
  • Conduct disorder20-50
  • CD alonemore antisocial parents, more family
    hostility
  • ADHD alonemore frequently off-task in school and
    play
  • Kids with both have worst features of both
  • LD
  • 10-92--Loose defs of LD. Rigorous defs -17-35
  • Inattention leads to learning probs and vice
    versa
  • Less task persistence in ADHD kids
  • Speech or language30-60 have impairments
  • Use fewer pronouns and conjunctions
  • Also more formal speech problems
  • Differential diagnosisbipolar, PTSD, FAS, lead
    poisoning

70
Course of the Disorder
  • Preschool
  • 6 mos required of DSM may be too short, at least
    1 yr is more predictive of future problems
  • Preschoolers restless, driven by a motor,
    impulsive, incr. risk for accidents and
    poisoning, moody, demanding of attn., defiant,
    noncompliant
  • 40 of 4 yo have problems with attention severe
    enough to be noted by teachers or parents but,
    for most of these kids, problems are gone in 6
    mos
  • Of 4 yo. with ADHD, only 48 will still have dx
    in middle childhood or adolescence
  • Those who develop it earlier have greater
    problems with cognitive functions, worse family
    functioning, increased comorbidity, increased
    likelihood of it lasting to adolescence

71
Course of the Disorder
  • Middle childhood
  • 50 experience peer rejection
  • ADHD who arent comorbid are in the minority
  • ½ will have individual or family tx
  • 1/3 will receive some special education services
  • Parents note failure to accept responsibility,
    having to supervise self-help activities such as
    dressing and bathing, temper tantrums, immaturity

72
Course of the Disorder
  • 50-80 continue to show sx of ADHD
  • 25 engage in antisocial behavior such as
    stealing or fire setting
  • 50-70 repeat grades
  • 8x as likely to be expelled or drop out of school

73
Course of the Disorder
  • Adulthood
  • Longitudinal studies show continuing problems
    with ADHD, antisocial PD, substance abuse (31 vs
    3 of controls)
  • More car accidents/tickets
  • Less job stability
  • Academic achievement suffers
  • No direct connection with criminalityonly if
    comorbid with CD

74
Etiology
  • No one theory that everyone accepts
  • Family-genetic risk factors
  • Twin studies70-80
  • Between 25-30 of first degree relatives of kids
    with ADHD also meet criteria
  • Neurobiological factorsabnormalities in
    frontal-striatal region
  • Limitations in self-control and behavioral
    inhibitions (Barkley)
  • Family factors
  • Negative controlling mother-child interactions
    begin when child is as young as 2 or 3
  • Mothers report incr. stress, incr. social
    isolation, incr. distress
  • Interactions improve on both sides when child is
    given Ritalin or when Valium is given to mother
  • Hoover Milichgave kids placebomothers told it
    was sugar reported increased hyperactivity, were
    more critical
  • Things that dont cause ADHDdiet, food
    additives, sugar

75
Treatment of ADHD
  • No known cure
  • Medication1937 math pills
  • Effectiveness rates range from 50-95 (about 70)
  • 20-30 show no effects or adverse effects
  • When treatedless impulsive, more planful, fewer
    task-irrelevant behaviors, more goal-directed,
    more coordinatedmakes beh more appropriate
  • Academic achievement and social skillsnot
    improvednever learned in the first place
  • Can create kids who credit success to medication
    and failure to selves
  • Other problemscan be addictive, can make kids
    jumpy or zombie-like, bland mood
  • Overuse? About 3 of all school age kids
  • 90 of scripts for methylphenidate are in USat
    least 5x higher than other places
  • Girls and adolescents are less likely to receive
    stimulants
  • 90 of visits to physician with complaints of
    hyperactivity result in script
  • At least 50 of kids dxd with ADHD are not
    treated in a way consistent with recommendations
    of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent
    Psychiatry

76
Treatment of ADHD
  • Behavioral Parent Training
  • Behavioral Interventions in the classroom
  • Both are empirically supported
  • Basically involve education into observing
    behavior, reinforcing behavior, token
    economies, appropriate discipline, empowering
    parents to work with schools, time out
  • Works best for kids 2-11
  • Intensive summer programs
  • Combination of behavioral methods and medications
    works best
  • Other interventions
  • Cognitive-behavioral interventionsmay help with
    problem solving
  • Social skills training
  • Dietnot effective for majority of kids
  • Funny glasses
  • Sensory integration training
  • Biofeedback?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com