Dam Safety in the 21st Century - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

Dam Safety in the 21st Century

Description:

The Reality of Risk Dam Safety in the 21st Century PFMA as a Dam Safety Tool Joe Ehasz FERC Regulator Perspective Doug Johnson USACE Perspective Doug Boyer – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:917
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: PaulaH151
Category:
Tags: 21st | century | dam | pfma | safety

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Dam Safety in the 21st Century


1
The Reality of Risk
Dam Safety in the 21st Century
  • PFMA as a Dam Safety Tool Joe Ehasz
  • FERC Regulator Perspective Doug Johnson
  • USACE Perspective Doug Boyer
  • Owner Perspective - Bill Christman

Portland, OR February 19, 2013
2
The Reality of Risk
Dam Safety in the 21st Century
The PFMA Process as a Dam Safety Tool
Joe Ehasz URS Energy
Construction, Inc
Portland, OR February 19, 2013
3
The Reality of Risk
Potential Failure Mode Analysis (PFMA)
  • The process utilized to determine the Potential
    Failure Modes
  • pertinent to the dam under investigation
  • Essentially asks the Question
  • How could this dam fail
  • What happens if it does
  • Are the identified potential failure modes
    recognized
  • What actions can be taken to reduce the dam
    failure likelihood

4
The Reality of Risk
  • Presentation of Three Actual Dam Failures that
  • Were scheduled to have PFMA performed
  • Failed prior to PFMA
  • Failure could have been avoided if PFMA process
    had been done

5
The Reality of Risk
  • Three Actual Dam Failures
  • Swift 2 Forebay Dam Washington - Failed
    April 21,2002
  • Silver Lake Michigan - Failed May 14, 2003
  • Taum Sauk Upper Reservoir Dam Missouri -
    Failed Dec. 14, 2005

6
The Reality of Risk
Swift No. 2 Hydroelectric Project
Forebay Dam Failure
April 21, 2002
7
The Reality of Risk
Swift No.2 Hydro Project
  • Constructed - 1957 1958
  • Length of water supply canal 3 miles
  • Impoundment - 2400 ac-ft
  • Embankment height in forebay 93 ft
  • Max water depth 53 ft

8
The Reality of Risk
Operating History
  • Considerable leakage upon first filling
  • Cracks and sinkholes in canal bottom
  • Mud boils below canal levels
  • Portions of dike removed and filter placed in
    canal bottom
  • No further distress until 2002 when failure
    occurred

9
The Reality of Risk
  • Sinkholes developed in forebay at 300 AM
  • Blowout followed at toe of embankment
  • Orifice expanded upstream
  • Embankment breached at about 630 AM
  • Flooding destroyed powerhouse
  • Discharge contained in the lower reservoir

10
The Reality of Risk
April 21, 2002 Failure
11
The Reality of Risk
  • Sinkholes developed in forebay at 300 AM
  • Blowout followed at toe of embankment
  • Orifice expanded upstream
  • Embankment breached at about 630 AM
  • Flooding destroyed powerhouse
  • Discharge contained in lower reservoir

12
The Reality of Risk
Potential Things That Could Have Been Done to
Recognize the Problem?
  • Periodic (annual) draining and inspection of the
    forebay and canal
  • Install piezometers beneath the basalt to
    measure pressures
  • Develop a complete water balance to establish
    the total loss of canal water
  • More study and critical review of construction
    conditions and photos
  • Perform a PFMA to develop the possible failure
    modes with consideration of the construction and
    series of repairs that were required upon first
    filling and later

13
The Reality of Risk
Silver Lake Failure May 14, 2003
  • High Rainfall Period
  • Fuse Plug Failure
  • Fuse Plug Foundation Eroded
  • Entire Lake Empted
  • Flooding Downstream Facilities

14
The Reality of Risk
Silver Lake Reservoir
May 13, 2003
15
The Reality of Risk
May 14, 2003
16
The Reality of Risk
May 14, 2003
17
The Reality of Risk
May 14, 2003
18

The Reality of Risk
Taum Sauk Pumped Storage Project
  • 450 MW Pumped Storage Project
  • Located in Reynolds County, Missouri
  • One of the First PSP, Started in 1963
  • Licensed by FPC in August 1965
  • Owned and Operated by Ameren UE
  • Upper Dam is a Continuous Dike 6,562 Ft. Long
  • Upper Reservoir Water Level Overtopped the Dam
  • Upper Reservoir Dam Failed on December 14, 2005

19
The Reality of Risk
Taum Sauk Upper Reservoir
Power Tunnel
Powerhouse
20
The Reality of Risk
  • Dumped and Sluced Rockfill
  • Upstream Reinforced Concrete Lining
  • Parapet Wall Placed atop the Rockfill Dam
  • Underdrainage Concerns Upon First Filling
  • Continued High Levels of Leakage Through Dam
  • Large Settlements and Movements of Dam and Wall
  • Relining in 2004 to Reduce Seepage
  • Revised Water Level Instrumentation in 2004

21
The Reality of Risk
Do you Really Operate This Full?
Taum Sauk Upper Reservoir Full
22
The Reality of Risk
December 14, 2005
23
The Reality of Risk
Potential Failure Mode Analysis (PFMA)
  • Is a Good process because it does ask the tough
    questions
  • How could this dam fail
  • What happens if it does
  • Are the identified potential failure modes
    recognized
  • What actions can be taken to reduce the dam
    failure likelihood

Because of that, I believe that it actually can
minimize or even eliminate failures
24
The Reality of Risk
Discussion Later!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com