Title: ABSTRACT
1Rutgers Intelligent Transportation Systems (RITS)
Laboratory Department of Civil Environmental
Engineering
Modeling Traveler Behavior via Day-to-Day
Learning Dynamics Impacts of Habitual Behavior
Paper No 10-2607
Ozlem Yanmaz-Tuzel, M.Sc. And Kaan Ozbay,
Ph.D. Rutgers, the State
University of New Jersey
LITERATURE REVIEW
- METHODOLOGY
- In the proposed framework, an agent-based
learning system via Bayesian-SLA is designed
which can learn the best possible actions and
model travelers day-to-day travel choices in a
non-stationary stochastic environment. - Each traveler maintains a choice probability
profile for the available alternatives, and
updates his/her probability profile based on
previous travel choices, exhibiting a tendency to
search for satisfying choices rather than the
best behavior inertia and bounded rationality. - The estimated learning parameters reflect
travelers perception about the system and their
response to the experienced traffic conditions.
ABSTRACT This paper focuses on the development
of learning-based behavioral mechanisms for
updating route and departure time choices when a
major and brand new facility is added to the
existing transportation system by creating new
route choices that did not exist previously. To
model this complex user behavior based on
empirical observations this study applies the
Bayesian-SLA framework recently developed by the
authors. In this approach, Bayesian-SLA framework
systematically accounts for commuters belief,
perceptions and habitual tendencies about the
transportation system, and represents these
dynamics as random variables. The developed
learning model is calibrated and validated using
real traffic and travel time data from New Jersey
Turnpike (NJTPK) toll road to investigate the
impacts of Interchange 15X installation on the
day-to-day departure time and route choice
behavior of NJTPK travelers. The estimation
confirm strong effect of habitual behavior on
traveler choice, consistent with the preliminary
traffic volume analysis findings. The proposed
Bayesian-SLA model can successfully capture the
significant learning dynamics, demonstrating the
possibility of developing learning models as a
viable approach to represent travel behavior.
- INTRODUCTION
- Modeling and understanding the relationship
between individuals travel perception and
learning process and the day-to-day traffic flows
remain an important challenge for transportation
researchers. - This paper focuses on the development of
learning-based behavioral mechanisms for updating
learned route and departure time choices in the
presence of new route inclusions to the
transportation system considering the impacts of
habitual behavior on travelers choice
mechanisms. -
- This study applies the Bayesian-SLA framework.
In this approach, Bayesian-SLA framework
systematically accounts for commuters belief,
perceptions and habitual tendencies about the
transportation system, and represents these
dynamics as random variables. - The developed learning model is calibrated and
validated using real traffic and travel time data
from New Jersey Turnpike (NJTPK) toll road to
investigate the impacts of Interchange 15X
construction on the day-to-day departure time and
route choice behavior of NJTPK travelers.
- EMPIRICAL SETTING
- The developed Bayesian-SLA framework is
implemented to investigate the impacts of the
addition of 15X Interchange on December 2005 on
the day-to-day departure time and destination
choice behavior of NJTPK travelers. - After nearly three years of construction, NJ
Turnpike Authority (NJTA) opened the 250 million
Interchange 15X on the Eastern Spur (just south
of Interchange 16E) on December 1, 2005. The new
interchange serves the new Secaucus Junction rail
transfer station. - The NJTA contributed an additional 84 million
to develop the 450 million adjacent Allied
Junction, which will have 3.5 million square feet
of combined commercial and residential
development, as well as up to 2,600 new parking
spaces when the development is completed. Upon
full development, Interchange 15X is expected to
handle 40,000 vehicles per day.
2Rutgers Intelligent Transportation Systems (RITS)
Laboratory Department of Civil Environmental
Engineering
Modeling Traveler Behavior via Day-to-Day
Learning Dynamics Impacts of Habitual Behavior
Paper No 10-2607
Ozlem Yanmaz-Tuzel, M.Sc. And Kaan Ozbay,
Ph.D. Rutgers, the State
University of New Jersey
- Estimation Results
- The estimation process resulted in Beta
distribution for the posterior distribution of
each parameter. Since beta distribution always
lies within 0, 1, the constraints on the
learning parameters will be satisfied at all
times. -
- Mean values for the parameters (a, b) are (0.029,
0.0029), and standard deviations are (0.011,
0.00093), respectively.
- The prior distribution of the learning parameters
(a, b) can be represented by p(a,b). In this
paper, Dirichlet (multivariate generalization of
the beta distribution), multivariate Normal and
Uniform distributions are tested as joint prior
distributions of p(a,b) -
-
- The posterior distribution of the learning
parameters given the observations, p(a,bD), can
be calculated using Bayes theorem -
-
- Posterior distribution of the learning
parameters is a very complex multidimensional
function which requires integrating. Thus, to
obtain the mean and variance of the parameters
(a, b) Metropolis-Hastings (M-H) algorithm is
used. The M-H algorithm is a rejection sampling
algorithm used to generate a sequence of samples
from a probability distribution that is difficult
to sample from directly. - To ensure MCMC convergence, Heidelberger and
Welch first test diagnostic was employed. This
diagnostic compares the observed sequence of MCMC
samples to a hypothetical stationary
distribution, using the Cramer-von-Mises
statistic. The test iteratively discards the
first 10 of the chain until the null hypothesis
is not rejected (i.e. the chain is stationary),
or until 50 of the original chain remains
- CONCLUSIONS
- This research focuses on modeling learning based
behavioral mechanisms for updating route and
departure time choices in light of new facility
additions to the existing transportation system.
The proposed model extends the existing SLA
theory by using it in a Bayesian framework and
bounded rationality (BR), while considering the
impacts of habitual behavior - Day-to-day learning behavior is modeled based on
Bayesian-SLA theory, where each user updates
his/her choice based on the rewards/punishments
received due to selected actions in previous
days. A linear reward-penalty reinforcement
scheme is considered to represent day-to-day
behavior of NJTPK users as a response to
construction of a new Interchange. - In order to account for travelers resistance to
switch routes, concept of habitual behavior
(inertia) is included in the proposed model, such
that the travelers switch to the new route only
if it has significantly less cost. - Finally, learning parameters were modeled as
probability distributions rather than
deterministic values, and Bayesian posterior
distributions are estimated. -
- The empirical results obtained from the real
transportation network confirm the strong effect
of habitual behavior on traveler choice. - The proposed Bayesian-SLA model can successfully
capture the significant learning dynamics,
demonstrating the possibility of developing a
psychological framework (i.e., learning models)
as a viable approach to represent dynamic travel
behavior. - A possible extension of the proposed methodology
is to investigate how individuals tolerance
level, and learning parameters change over time
as the users gain more experience with the
transportation system.
- Calibration and Validation of the Learning
Parameters - Calibration and validation are important
processes in the development and application of
day-to-day DTA models. These processes are
developed to ensure that the models accurately
replicate the observed traffic condition and
driver behavior. - Model calibration is a process whereby the values
of model parameters are adjusted so as to match
the simulated model outputs with observations
from the study site. It is usually formulated as
an optimization problem to determine the best set
of model parameter values in order to minimize
the discrepancies between the observed and
simulated values. - The calibration process is then to modify the
values of the model parameters ?, so to find the
best set of values which minimizes F. The
proposed objective function F minimizes the
difference between observed and simulated
volumes -
- After determining the optimal set of parameters
from the calibration process, a validation
process is performed in order to determine
whether the simulation model replicates the real
system. Mean standard errors (MSE) are
calculated for each day the validation process