Overview of Environmental Permitting for Transportation Projects - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 29
About This Presentation
Title:

Overview of Environmental Permitting for Transportation Projects

Description:

Overview of Environmental Permitting for Transportation Projects Preliminary Report Steve Lerch, JLARC Analyst Gary Walvatne, TechLaw Inc. December 17, 2004 – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:169
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 30
Provided by: DeaneCa1
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Overview of Environmental Permitting for Transportation Projects


1
Overview of Environmental Permitting for
Transportation Projects
  • Preliminary Report
  • Steve Lerch, JLARC Analyst
  • Gary Walvatne, TechLaw Inc.
  • December 17, 2004

2
Scope of Review
  • A pre-audit (overview of issues)
  • A review of permit streamlining activities in
  • Washington State
  • 24 state DOTs
  • The beginning of the audit process, to help TPAB
    consider detailed audit topics
  • Some initial management recommendations to
    agencies, when practical and supportable

3
Summary of Findings Washington
  • National leader in permit streamlining
  • Successes include
  • Multi-Agency Permitting (MAP) Team
  • On-line permit applications
  • Programmatic permits for routine maintenance
  • WSDOT liaison program.

4
Summary of Findings Other States
  • Interviews with 24 state DOTs
  • Two common themes
  • Create cultural change -- encourage creativity
    and non-traditional problem solving
  • Create efficiencies through use of technology.

5
Objectives of Review
  • Describe streamlining initiatives in Washington
    and other states
  • Identify successful projects in other states that
    could be implemented in Washington
  • Determine management-related success factors that
    foster effective streamlining
  • Identify options for future TPAB audits and/or
    evaluations

6
What is Environmental Permit Streamlining?
  • Expedited transportation project delivery while
    being good stewards of the environment
  • Streamlining Components
  • Reduced Time
  • Reduced Cost
  • Maintain or Improve Environmental Performance

7
State Reviews
  • Interviews in Washington, other states used the
    same interview format
  • Washington interviews were face-to-face
  • Included transportation, resource agencies
  • Interviews with other states held by telephone
  • Limited to State DOT staff
  • Focus Group of 10 State DOTs
  • Additional State DOTs

8
Streamlining Categories
  • Proactive Regulatory Affairs Activities
  • Process Re-engineering
  • Agency Resources
  • Technology
  • Time Management

9
Summary Tables
  • Provided in Appendices 4 and 5
  • Tables identify
  • Streamlining initiatives and projects
  • Responsible regulatory authority
  • Status of initiative/project
  • Accomplishments
  • Factors leading to successful development
  • Factors that were overcome

10
Washington State Review
  • Interviews with Transportation Agencies
  • WSDOT Environmental Services
  • Washington State Ferries
  • Washington State Rail
  • US DOT Federal Highway Administration

11
Washington State Review
  • Interviews with Resource Agencies
  • Washington Department of Ecology
  • Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife
  • US Environmental Protection Agency
  • US Fish and Wildlife Service
  • National Marine Fisheries Service (NOAA
    Fisheries)
  • WSDOT Northwest Region MAP Team

12
Washington Survey ResultsSuccesses
  • WSDOT MAP Team
  • WSDOT liaison program
  • On-line Joint Aquatic Resource Permit Application
    (JARPA)
  • 45-day hydraulic project approval for a JARPA

13
Washington Survey ResultsSuccesses
  • Development of dispute resolution processes
  • Interagency cooperative agreements
  • Dispute resolution
  • Information sharing
  • Communication

14
Washington Survey ResultsSuccesses
  • Programmatic permitting for maintenance and
    operations activities
  • TPEAC-initiated permits
  • WSDOT-initiated permits
  • WSDOT Environmental GIS Workbench
  • TPEAC activities encouraged individual agencies
    to start additional streamlining initiatives

15
Washington Survey ResultsAreas Requiring
Further Attention
  • Workload Forecasting
  • WSDOT Liaison Program
  • Highway Runoff
  • Talent Ruling 9th Circuit Court
  • Signatory Agency Committee
  • Design-Build Initiative
  • Reader-Friendly Documents

16
Washington Survey ResultsAreas Requiring
Further Attention
  • Inconsistent Funding
  • Failure to fund proposed initiatives
  • "Interrupted" funding
  • Start-and-stop funding
  • Low salaries create employee turnover
  • Inadequate funding for proposed mitigation
    alternatives for project impacts

17
Survey of Other States
  • Review streamlining for USDOT priority
    transportation projects
  • Survey streamlining developed or implemented by
    other State DOTs
  • Assess management successes for lessons learned
    that could be applied in Washington

18
Review of USDOT Priority Projects
  • Established by Executive Order 13274
  • Projects nominated by agencies and officials
  • 3 selection criteria
  • National or regional significance
  • High level of support from elected officials
  • Undue delay or anticipated delay due to slow
    federal agency review or coordination
  • Not considered model projects of the streamlining
    process

19
Survey of Other States
  • Focus Group of 10 State DOTs
  • California Ohio
  • Florida Oregon
  • Louisiana Pennsylvania
  • Minnesota Texas
  • North Carolina Utah

20
Survey of Other States
  • 14 Additional State DOTs
  • Alaska Nevada
  • Illinois New Hampshire
  • Indiana Oklahoma
  • Iowa South Carolina
  • Maine Tennessee
  • Mississippi Virginia
  • Missouri Wisconsin

21
Other StatesSuccessful Initiatives
  • Two common themes
  • Create cultural change encourage creativity and
    non-traditional problem solving
  • Create efficiencies through use of technology

22
Other StatesSuccessful Initiatives
  • Governmental affairs office to track legislation
  • Interagency agreements
  • Programmatic permits
  • Funding resource agency positions
  • Brief, concise, and legally-sufficient EISs
  • Multi-agency planning and permitting teams
  • GIS- and technology-based information management

23
Other StatesManagement Success Factors
  • Sense of urgency
  • Strong support from Executive and Legislative
    Branches

24
Other StatesLessons Learned
  • Standardize data systems
  • Use best-available scientific information to
    limit project field survey work
  • Make preliminary environmental assessments prior
    to project development

25
Other StatesLessons Learned
  • Create quality-improvement teams
  • Re-design project-delivery processes
  • Assess project risks continuously in terms of
    cost, scope, and schedule

26
Other StatesLessons Learned
  • Secure consistent legislative commitment to
    streamlining initiatives within natural resource
    agencies
  • Purchase right-of-way for environmental
    mitigation in advance of need
  • Provide internships at FHWA headquarters for DOT
    staff

27
Review Conclusions
  • Washington State is a national leader in permit
    streamlining
  • Compares favorably with other advanced
    streamlining programs
  • Review identifies initiatives with positive
    outcomes
  • Some activities too new to evaluate
  • Successful efforts in other states may hold
    promise for Washington

28
Management Recommendations
  • 1WSDOT should investigate FL, MN project
    delivery designs.
  • 2WSDOT, Ecology, WDFW should consider
    standardizing GIS, other data to ease exchange.
  • 3WSDOT, Ecology, WDFW should investigate use of
    best available scientific data as substitute
    for field survey work.

29
Options for Future Audits/Reviews
  • A Assess WSDOT progress in implementing
    environmental management system (delayed start).
  • B Determine impact of resource agency employee
    turnover on the permitting process.
  • C Identify additional performance measures for
    environmental permitting.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com