The Rational Offender - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

The Rational Offender

Description:

Social Context II Classical School Criminology ... most dismissed this as a valid theory of criminal behavior What emerged is called the Positive school ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:57
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: JeffM68
Learn more at: https://www.d.umn.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Rational Offender


1
The Rational Offender
  • The Classical School
  • Deterrence Theory
  • Rational Choice Theory
  • Routine Activities Theory

2
Social Context of the Classical School
  • Prior to the 1700s
  • The devil made me do it
  • Punishments/justice system?

3
Social Context II
  • Classical School Criminology (1700s-1800s)
  • Bentham, Beccaria, others rail against an
    inhumane justice system
  • Along the way, they articule a general theory
    of human behavior
  • Borrow heavily from Thomas Hobbes

4
Becarria
  • An Essay on Crimes and Punishment (1764)
  • On the origin of punishment (Hobbes)
  • What is the nature of human beings?
  • War of all against all
  • What should be done to the system of laws?
  • Interpretation of Laws
  • Obscurity of Laws

5
Beccaria II
  • What is the purpose of punishment?
  • Prevent the criminal from doing further injury
    to society, and to prevent others from committing
    the like offense.
  • Necessary conditions for this?
  • Proportion between crimes and punishment
  • Advantage of immediate punishment
  • Certainty more important than severity

6
The Classical School Fades
  • By the early 1900s, most dismissed this as a
    valid theory of criminal behavior
  • What emerged is called the Positive school
  • Changes in legal system didnt lower crime rates
  • Armchair theorizing questioned
  • Humans as determined rather than rational
  • From early 1900s until the 1970s, the positive
    school was unchallenged
  • Sociology was dominant force (search for root
    cause)

7
Rebirth of Deterrence
  • Social Context of U.S. in the 1970s
  • James Q Wilson, Thinking About Crime
  • There are no root causes of crime
  • Martinson
  • Nothing Works in rehabilitation
  • Murray
  • Punishment Programs rather than rehab programs
  • Economists enter Criminology
  • Beckers Rational Choice article

8
Current Neo-classical Theories
  • Deterrence theory
  • Swift, certain, severe punishment reduces crime
  • Focus on formal punishment
  • Rational Choice theory
  • Focus on how rational offender is
  • The flip-side of deterrence
  • Routine activity theory

9
Deterrence Theory Assumptions
  • 1. Humans are Rational (cost/benefit)
  • 2. Humans are self-interested and hedonistic
  • 3. Human behavior can be controlled through
    certain, swift, severe punishment

10
Deterrence Theory
  • Criminal behavior (or crime rates) vary directly
    with _______ of FORMAL punishment.
  • Certainty
  • Severity
  • Swiftness
  • MICRO or MACRO?
  • Specific or General

11
Marginal versus Absolute
  • Absolute deterrence the existence of formal
    punishment reduces crime
  • Marginal increases in existing formal
    punishment reduces crime further

12
General Deterrence (Macro)
  • What should reduce crime rates?
  • Evidence
  • Severity of Punishment
  • Death Penalty Research
  • Certainty of Punishment
  • Experiments in Certainty (KC patrol)
  • Swiftness of Punishment?

13
General Deterrence Micro Level
  • An individuals perceptions of _______ influence
    their decision to commit crimes.
  • Perceptual Deterrence
  • Criticism of objective do people really know
    the clearance rate?
  • Better what do you think the clearance rate is?

14
Perceptual Deterrence Research
  • Initial cross sectional studies
  • Perceived risk, severity SR crime
  • But, what is the causal order??
  • Experiential effect
  • SR crime perceptions or certainty/risk
  • Manipulation of Perceived Risk
  • Scared Straight

15
Specific Deterrence
  • A person who commits a crime and is punished is
    less likely to commit additional crimes.
  • Swift, Certain, Severe (Marginal)
  • How test these propositions?

16
Testing Specific Deterrence
  • Prison vs. Probation?
  • Perhaps, time in prison or type of prison
  • More realistically
  • Probation vs. Intensive Probation
  • Probation vs. Boot Camp

17
Deterrence Review
  • Deals only with formal legal sanctions.
  • Is this fair?
  • Classical school roots, policy implications
  • Empirical Support?
  • General Deterrence
  • Macro
  • Micro (Perceptual)
  • Specific Deterrence

18
Why little support for deterrence?
  • We cant get certain, severe, swift enough
  • The theory is based on bad assumptions
  • How rational are we?
  • Equality of opportunity, pleasure, pain?
  • Marginal deterrence

19
POLICY IMPLICATIONS
  • General Deterrence certain, swift, and severe
    punishment reduces crime rates, or the
    probability that an individual will offend
  • Specific Deterrence CSS punishment reduces
    recidivism
  • Cant/Wont make sentences swift, certain, and
    severe enough?
  • Incapacitate
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com