Title: Deterrence and Rational Choice Theories
1Deterrence and Rational Choice Theories
2Medieval Criminal Justice
- Trial by ordeal
- Forced confessions
- Severe public punishment
- Burning (hell on earth)
- Mutilation (body subordinate to soul)
- Ritual of a thousand deaths
3A Reform Movement
- The Enlightenment
- Faith in rationality, social contract theory
- Depart from supernatural theory
- The Classical School of criminology is born
- Assumptions about human nature
- Rational, autonomous, hedonistic, calculating
4A Theory of Deterrence
- On Crimes and Punishment, Beccaria (1764)
- Punishment protects the social contract
- Punishment should fit the crime, no more
- Underlying theory
- Prevention through deterrence is the primary
justification for punishment - Condemned by the Catholic Church
5Principles of Deterrence
- To deter, punishment should be
- Certain
- To increase fear of consequences
- Swift
- To make association with punishment
- Severe enough to outweigh the pleasure of crime
- Any more is tyrannical, inefficient
6Elaborations of Deterrence
- Specific v. general
- Punishment v. non-punishment
- Absolute v. restrictive
- Formal v. informal sanctions
7Specific v. General Deterrence
8Punishment/Non-Punishment Stafford and Warr (1993)
- Personal experience with punishment
- Personal experience avoiding punishment
- Vicarious experience with punishment
- Vicarious experience avoiding punishment
- Determines the deterrent effect
9Absolute v. Restrictive Deterrence
- Absolute deterrence
- Abstention
- Restrictive deterrence
- Less frequent
- Less severe
- Displacement
10Empirical Research
- There is moderate support for certainty, little
to none for severity - Why does certainty seem to work better than
severity? What does this tell us about how
offenders think?
11Formal v. Informal Sanctions
- Informal unofficial punishment
- Disapproval from significant others
- Feelings of remorse, guilt, shame
- Expands the range of negative consequence
- Informal sanctions enhance formal sanctions
- But not for everyone, why?
12In and Out and Back In Favor
- Deterrence theory fell out of favor in the 1800s,
replaced by positivism - Deterrence reemerged in the late 1960s as a
rationale for punishment - Coincided with a renewed emphasis on offender
deterrence and retribution within the criminal
justice system
13Practical Limits of Deterrence
- Penalties often learned after arrest
- Underestimate risk of being caught
- Clearance rates are generally low
- Crime displacement may occur
- Rational abilities may be impaired
- Drugs, alcohol, passion, mental disorder
- Some people have little to lose
14From Deterrenceto Rational Choice
- Deterrence theory focuses on the effect of
punishment on criminal choices - Rational choice theory focuses on the effect of
opportunity on criminal choices
15Rational Choice Theory
- Crime benefits the offender
- Crime brings pleasure
- Peoples rationality is bounded
- We gather, store, use information imperfectly
- We tend to focus on immediate gains, not
long-term costs - Offenders focus on situational opportunities
- Criminals are opportunistic
16Rational Motivationsfor Crime
- To obtain something
- To obtain pleasure
- To obtain sex
- To obtain peer approval
- To prove toughness
- To escape negative or unwanted situations
- To assert dominance or get ones way in a dispute
- To settle a grievance, revenge
17Rational Choices?
- A man beats his wife during an argument
- A father rapes his stepdaughter
- A man drives home drunk from a bar
18Crimes that are not rational?
19Cheating on Exams
- How would we control cheating using a rational
choice perspective? - Assumptions about cheating
- Interventions to prevent cheating
20Assessment of Choice Theory
- Opportunity rather than punishment
- Offenders tend to ignore long-term costs
- Situational factors rather than enduring
motivational factors - Assume the presence of criminal motivation
- Focus on offenders assessments of their
immediate situations
21Implications for Policy
- Situational crime prevention
- Reduce crime by blocking opportunities
- Consistent with the CJ emphasis on responsibility
and punishment - All crime is based at least in part on a choice
- Attempt to make criminal choices less attractive
by reducing opportunities
22Is there a place for morality in rational choice
theory?