ACHEA Conference July 2002 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 27
About This Presentation
Title:

ACHEA Conference July 2002

Description:

Title: PowerPoint Presentation Author: Dawn-Marie De Four-Gill Last modified by: Brian Nelson Created Date: 6/11/2003 8:25:16 PM Document presentation format – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:110
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: DawnMari67
Learn more at: http://sta.uwi.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: ACHEA Conference July 2002


1
Toward a student centeredUniversity of the West
Indies Meeting the challenges for a
highquality learning experience
  • Presented by
  • Sandra Gift
  • Senior Programme Officer
  • Quality Assurance Unit
  • University of the West Indies

2
Content of Presentation
  • Perspectives of reviewers on the quality of the
    learning experience
  • Some principles for high quality learning
  • Understanding student learning
  • Teaching and learning for employability, and
  • Students as stakeholders in the assessment of
    learning
  • General quality assurance issues

3
Factors underlying concernsabout quality
  • Rising costs
  • Efficient use of resources
  • Relevance of programmes offered
  • Educational achievements vs. programme objectives
  • Desire for international recognition
  • Assurance of employability

4
Conditions favouring a high qualitylearning
experience (1998-2000)
  • Modern facilities (laboratories etc.)
  • Modern, well stocked library
  • Competent and helpful academic staff
  • Industry links and employers satisfaction
  • Vocationally oriented education
  • Courses met stated aims and objectives

5
Conditions favouring a high qualitylearning
experience (1998-2000) Contd
  • Assessment by coursework in addition to written
    examinations
  • Quality assurance and enhancement process
    established
  • Innovative teaching methods employed
  • Significant improvement in quality of students
    intellects, skills of expression, argumentation
    and analysis

6
Conditions militating against a high quality
learning experience (1998-2000)
  • Pedagogical problems
  • Bunching of assignments
  • Insufficient time for reflection
  • Lectures as the principal mode of teaching
  • Some out-dated laboratory equipment
  • Inadequate stock for some library items
  • Insufficient computer resources

7
Conditions militating against a high quality
learning experience (1998-2000) contd
  • Lack of adequate linkages to the World of Work
  • Lack of guidance in course selection viz-a-viz
    career development
  • Passive attitude of students toward learning
  • Non-utilization of advice of external examiners
  • Lack of staff development to support better
    quality student learning

8
Towards a high quality learning experience
  • UWIs strategic plan 2002-2007 focus
  • Student-driven and supportive learning
    environment
  • Increases in service quality
  • Expansion and enhanced resourcing of Quality
    Assurance System to encourage and facilitate,
    inter alia
  • A comprehensive curriculum review

9
Towards a high quality learning experience
(contd)
  • Analysis of examination results and teaching,
    learning and assessment methods
  • Assisting students in developing entrepreneurial
    attitudes and skills
  • Devoting greater attention to pedagogy
  • Excellence in teaching, scholarship and research
  • Aligning degree options with emerging career
    options

10
Implications for higher educationadministrators
  • Critical inputs
  • Exercise the greatest care in the recruitment of
    teaching staff
  • Continuously maintain and upgrade the physical
    environment and range of general resources
  • Create a healthy emotional environment for
    student learning

11
Understanding student learning
  • Managers of students learning must
  • Be concerned about the acquisition and
    application of knowledge of pedagogy and learning
    styles
  • Ensure staff development for better understanding
    of student learning
  • Take into consideration the needs of mature
    students in higher education
  • Recognize that less mature students may not be
    adult learners

12
How students learn- some precepts
  • Students assimilate the same experience
    differently
  • Teachers may need to extend/modify the approach
    of many students
  • Students have to be made to engage the subject
    matter so that transformation and internalization
    can occur

13
How students learn- some precepts (contd)
  • Students new to a discipline may require
    conceptual orientation
  • Teachers need to assess students to effectively
    address underlying misconceptions or knowledge
    gaps
  • Teachers and students are both responsible for
    managing the learning process

14
How students learn- some precepts (contd)
  • Feedback is important
  • Prior knowledge needs to be activated
  • Learning best takes place in a relevant context
  • The environment is a critical determinant of the
    learning outcome
  • Reduce the amount of didactic teaching

15
How students learn- some precepts (contd)
  • Avoid content overload, too much material will
    encourage a surface approach
  • Assessment has a powerful impact on student
    behaviour (Fry, Ketteridge and Marshall, 2001)

16
Teaching and learning foremployability
  • Emerging elements of employability
  • Emphasis on learning to learn
  • Effective communication
  • Competent numeracy
  • Computer literacy and special competencies
  • Interpersonal skills
  • Problem-solving skills
  • Ability to manage transitions
  • Personal attitudes and attributes

17
Teaching and learning foremployability
  • Other elements of employability
  • Critical evaluation of the transfer of theory to
    practice
  • Personal attributes such as self-reliance and
    flexibility
  • Knowledge of organizational theory and behaviour

18
Factors for effective skills provision
  • Students must be active learners
  • Skills provision must be
  • Time-tabled
  • Assigned academic credit
  • Relevant to syllabuses and assignments
  • Realistic and related to students interests
  • Properly integrated either through subject
    units or through specially designed units

19
Factors for effective skills provision
  • Skills provision must be (contd)
  • Assessed
  • Graded
  • Interesting
  • Supported by relevant staff
  • Goal-driven
  • flexible
  • Greater emphasis need to be placed on team-based
    approach

20
Challenges for higher education administrators
  • Bringing into the classroom elements of the world
    of work
  • Transformation of the curricula to achieve
    worthwhile skills development
  • Recognition of extra-curricula activities
  • Use of specialist support for delivering skills
  • Developing the role played by career services
  • Legitimizing employability attributes through
    credit and assessment

21
Assessment of learning- students as stakeholders
-
  • Assessment provides an indication of educational
    effectiveness
  • Students perspectives have been marginalized
  • Students value assessment when
  • The marking can be trusted
  • True capabilities are measured, and, accurately
  • Provides effective feedback and recommendations
    for improvement

22
Assessment of learning- students as stakeholders
-
  • Students are critical of conventional
    examinations
  • Examinations largely test memory as poor
    learning,
  • Examinations are inappropriate ways of assessing
    genuine capabilities and knowledge (Mc Dowell
    and Sambee, 1999)
  • Students found alternative assessment to be
    stimulating and challenging

23
Assessment of learning- students as stakeholders
-
  • Increase in the use of alternative assessment
    signals a trend to involve students in
    assessment.
  • True nature of the student experience is often
    different from what curriculum objectives target.
  • Explore ways to incorporate students views on
    assessment.

24
Quality assurance and qualitymonitoring
  • Quality enhancement can be sustained only if it
    is premised on the energies and initiatives of
    frontline academics.
  • The work situation and the motivational
    well-being of staff at ground level are important

25
Quality assurance and qualitymonitoring some
issues
  • Key Questions
  • Is there staff ownership of procedures?
  • Is there a fully embedded quality culture?
  • Is the Quality focus leading to real improvement?
  • Are staff members committed to UWI?
  • Is teaching sufficiently recognized and rewarded?

26
Quality assurance and qualitymonitoring some
issues
  • As administrators of the quality assurance system
    we need to
  • Take full account of the constraints and any
    particular circumstances of the context which can
    impact negatively on the implementation of policy
    for enhancing the quality of the student learning
    experience.
  • Understand how academics perceive the effort to
    enhance quality what they actually do and the
    ways in which they adapt policy or work around it.

27
Quality assurance and qualitymonitoring some
issues
  • Individuals make the difference
  • It is important to note that individuals make the
    difference in ensuring quality and standards.
  • The dedication, care, competence and imagination
    of individuals affect the experience and
    achievement of the students.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com