Fick - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 53
About This Presentation
Title:

Fick

Description:

Title: THERMAL PROCESSES Subject: Elecronic materials lectures Author: Robert W. Hendricks Last modified by: Dr. Kathleen Meehan Created Date: 7/18/1996 4:26:32 PM – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:86
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 54
Provided by: Rober439
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Fick


1
Ficks Laws
  • Combining the continuity equation with the first
    law, we obtain Ficks second law

2
  • Solutions to Ficks Laws depend on the boundary
    conditions.
  • Assumptions
  • D is independent of concentration
  • Semiconductor is a semi-infinite slab with either
  • Continuous supply of impurities that can move
    into wafer
  • Fixed supply of impurities that can be depleted

3
Solutions To Ficks Second Law
  • The simplest solution is at steady state and
    there is no variation of the concentration with
    time
  • Concentration of diffusing impurities is linear
    over distance
  • This was the solution for the flow of oxygen from
    the surface to the Si/SiO2 interface in the last
    chapter

4
Solutions To Ficks Second Law
  • For a semi-infinite slab with a constant
    (infinite) supply of atoms at the surface
  • The dose is

5
Solutions To Ficks Second Law
  • Complimentary error function (erfc) is defined as
    erfc(x) 1 - erf(x)
  • The error function is defined as
  • This is a tabulated function. There are several
    approximations. It can be found as a built-in
    function in MatLab, MathCad, and Mathematica

6
Solutions To Ficks Second Law
  • This solution models short diffusions from a
    gas-phase or liquid phase source
  • Typical solutions have the following shape

7
Solutions To Ficks Second Law
  • Constant source diffusion has a solution of the
    form
  • Here, Q is the does or the total number of dopant
    atoms diffused into the Si
  • The surface concentration is given by

8
Solutions To Ficks Second Law
  • Limited source diffusion looks like

9
Comparison of limited source and constant source
models
1
10-1
exp(- )
2
10-2
erfc( )
10-3
Value of functions
10-4
10-5
10-6
0 0.5 1
1.5 2 2.5
3 3.5
10
Predep and Drive
  • Predeposition
  • Usually a short diffusion using a constant source
  • Drive
  • A limited source diffusion
  • The diffusion dose is generally the dopants
    introduced into the semiconductor during the
    predep
  • A Dteff is not used in this case.

11
Diffusion Coefficient
  • Probability of a jump is
  • Diffusion coefficient is proportional to jump
    probability

12
Diffusion Coefficient
  • Typical diffusion coefficients in silicon

Element Do (cm2/s) ED (eV)
B 10.5 3.69
Al 8.00 3.47
Ga 3.60 3.51
In 16.5 3.90
P 10.5 3.69
As 0.32 3.56
Sb 5.60 3.95
13
Diffusion Of Impurities In Silicon
  • Arrhenius plots of diffusion in silicon

14
Diffusion Of Impurities In Silicon
  • The intrinsic carrier concentration in Si is
    about 7 x 1018/cm3 at 1000 oC
  • If NA and ND are ltni, the material will behave as
    if it were intrinsic there are many practical
    situations where this is a good assumption

15
Diffusion Of Impurities In Silicon
  • Dopants cluster into fast diffusers (P, B, In)
    and slow diffusers (As, Sb)
  • As we develop shallow junction devices, slow
    diffusers are becoming very important
  • B is the only p-type dopant that has a high
    solubility therefore, it is very hard to make
    shallow p-type junctions with this fast diffuser

16
Limitations of Theory
  • Theories given here break down at high
    concentrations of dopants
  • ND or NA gtgt ni at diffusion temperature
  • If there are different species of the same atom
    diffuse into the semiconductor
  • Multiple diffusion fronts
  • Example P in Si
  • Diffusion mechanism are different
  • Example Zn in GaAs
  • Surface pile-up vs. segregation
  • B and P in Si

17
Successive Diffusions
  • To create devices, successive diffusions of n-
    and p-type dopants
  • Impurities will move as succeeding dopant or
    oxidation steps are performed
  • The effective Dt product is
  • No difference between diffusion in one step or in
    several steps at the same temperature
  • If diffusions are done at different temperatures

18
Successive Diffusions
  • The effective Dt product is given by
  • Di and ti are the diffusion coefficient and time
    for ith step
  • Assuming that the diffusion constant is only a
    function of temperature.
  • The same type of diffusion is conducted (constant
    or limited source)

19
Junction Formation
  • When diffuse n- and p-type materials, we create a
    pn junction
  • When ND NA , the semiconductor material is
    compensated and we create a metallurgical
    junction
  • At metallurgical junction the material behaves
    intrinsic
  • Calculate the position of the metallurgical
    junction for those systems for which our
    analytical model is a good fit

20
Junction Formation
  • Formation of a pn junction by diffusion

21
Junction Formation
  • The position of the junction for a limited source
    diffused impurity in a constant background is
    given by
  • The position of the junction for a continuous
    source diffused impurity is given by

22
Junction Formation
Junction Depth
Lateral Diffusion
23
Design and Evaluation
  • There are three parameters that define a diffused
    region
  • The surface concentration
  • The junction depth
  • The sheet resistance
  • These parameters are not independent
  • Irvin developed a relationship that describes
    these parameters

24
Irvins Curves
  • In designing processes, we need to use all
    available data
  • We need to determine if one of the analytic
    solutions applies
  • For example,
  • If the surface concentration is near the
    solubility limit, the continuous (erf) solution
    may be applied
  • If we have a low surface concentration, the
    limited source (Gaussian) solution may be applied

25
Irvins Curves
  • If we describe the dopant profile by either the
    Gaussian or the erf model
  • The surface concentration becomes a parameter in
    this integration
  • By rearranging the variables, we find that the
    surface concentration and the product of sheet
    resistance and the junction depth are related by
    the definite integral of the profile
  • There are four separate curves to be evaluated
  • one pair using either the Gaussian or the erf
    function, and the other pair for n- or p-type
    materials because the mobility is different for
    electrons and holes

26
Irvins Curves
27
Irvins Curves
  • An alternative way of presenting the data may be
    found if we set ?eff1/?sxj

28
Example
  • Design a B diffusion for a CMOS tub such that
    ?s900?/sq, xj3?m, and CB1?1015/cc
  • First, we calculate the average conductivity
  • We cannot calculate n or ? because both are
    functions of depth
  • We assume that because the tubs are of moderate
    concentration and thus assume (for now) that the
    distribution will be Gaussian
  • Therefore, we can use the P-type Gaussian Irvin
    curve to deduce that

29
Example
  • Reading from the p-type Gaussian Irvins curve,
    CS?4x1017/cc
  • This is well below the solid solubility limit for
    B in Si so we may conclude that it will be driven
    in from a fixed source provided either by ion
    implantation or possibly by solid state
    predeposition followed by an etch
  • In order for the junction to be at the required
    depth, we can compute the Dt value from the
    Gaussian junction equation

30
Example
  • This value of Dt is the thermal budget for the
    process
  • If this is done in one step at (for example) 1100
    C where D for B in Si is 1.5 x 10-13cm2/s, the
    drive-in time will be
  • Given Dt and the final surface concentration, we
    can estimate the dose
  • This is easy to deposit by ion implantation

31
Example
  • Let us also look at doing it by predep from the
    solid state (as is done in the VT lab course)
  • The text uses a predep temperature of 950 C
  • In this case, we will make a glass-like oxide on
    the surface that will introduce the B at the
    solid solubility limit
  • At 950 C, the solubility limit is 2.5x1020cm-3
    and D4.2x10-15 cm2/s
  • Solving for t

32
Example
  • This is a very short time and hard to control in
    a furnace thus, we should do the pre-dep at
    lower temperatures
  • In the VT lab, we use 830 860 C
  • Does the predep affect the drive in?
  • There is no affect on the thermal budget because
    it is done at such a low temperature

33
DIFFUSION SYSTEMS
  • Use open tube furnaces of the 3-Zone design
  • Wafers are mounted in quartz boat in center zone
  • Use solid, liquid or gaseous impurities for good
    reproducibility
  • Use N2 or O2 as carrier gas to move impurity
    downstream to crystals
  • Common gases are extremely toxic (AsH3 , PH3)

34
SOLID-SOURCE DIFFUSION SYSTEMS
35
LIQUID-SOURCE DIFFUSION SYSTEMS

36
GAS-SOURCE DIFFUSION SYSTEMS
37
DIFFUSION SYSTEMS
  • Al and Ga diffuse very rapidly in Si B is the
    only p-dopant routinely used
  • Sb, P, As are all used as n-dopants

38
DIFFUSION SYSTEMS
  • Typical reactions for solid impurities are

39
PRODUCTION DIFFUSION FURNACES
  • Commercial diffusion furnace showing the furnace
    with wafers (left) and gas control system
    (right). (Photo courtesy of Tystar Corp.)

40
PRODUCTION DIFFUSION FURNACES
  • Close-up of diffusion furnace with wafers.

41
Rapid Thermal Annealing
  • An alternative to the diffusion furnaces is the
    RTA or RTP furnace

42
Rapid Thermal Anneling
  • In this system, we try to heat the wafer quickly
    (but not so as to introduce fracture stresses)
  • RTAs usually use infrared lamps and heat by
    radiation
  • It is possible to ramp the wafer at 100 C /sec
  • Such devices are used to diffuse shallow
    junctions and to anneal radiation damage
  • In such a system, for the thermal conductivity of
    Si, a 12 in wafer can be heated to a uniform
    temperature in milliseconds
  • Therefore, 1 100 s annealing times are very
    reasonable

43
Rapid Thermal Annealing
44
Concentration-Dependent Diffusion
  • If the concentration of the doping exceeds the
    intrinsic carrier concentration at the diffusion
    temperature, another effect occurs
  • We have assumed that the diffusion coefficient,
    D, is independent of concentration
  • This is not valid if the concentration of the
    diffusing species is greater than the intrinsic
    carrier concentration
  • In this case, we see that diffusion is faster in
    the higher concentration regions

45
Concentration-Dependent Diffusion
  • The concentration profiles for P in Si look more
    like the solid lines than the dashed line for
    high concentrations (see French et al)

46
Concentration-Dependent Diffusion
  • If we define the diffusivity to be a function of
    composition, then we can still use Ficks law to
    describe the dopant diffusion
  • Usually, we cannot directly integrate/solve the
    differential equations when D is a function of C
  • We thus must solve the equationnumerically

47
Concentration-Dependent Diffusion
  • It has been observed that the diffusion
    coefficient usually depends on concentration by
    either of the following relations
  • Look, for example, at the diffusion of P in Si
    observed by French et al
  • How do we obtain information about the
    concentration dependence of diffusivity?
  • There is a lovely experiment done with B

48
Concentration-Dependent Diffusion
  • B has two isotopes B10 and B11
  • We create a wafer with a high concentration of
    one isotope (say B10) and then we diffuse the
    second isotope into this material
  • We use SIMS to determine the concentration of B11
    as a function of distance
  • This gives us the diffusion of B as a function of
    the concentration of B
  • These experiments have been done for a great many
    of the dopants in Si

49
Concentration-Dependent Diffusion
  • We find that the diffusivity can usually be
    written in the formfor n-type dopants
    andfor p-type dopants

50
Concentration-Dependent Diffusion
  • The superscripts are chosen because we believe
    the interaction is between charged vacancies and
    the charged diffusing species
  • For an n-type dopant in an intrinsic material,
    the diffusivity is
  • All of the various diffusivities are of the
    Arrhenius form

51
Concentration-Dependent Diffusion
  • The values for all the pre-exponential factors
    and activation energies are known (see next
    Table)
  • If we substitute into the expression for the
    effective diffusion coefficient, we
    findhere, ?D-/D0 and ?D/D0

52
Concentration-Dependent Diffusion
53
Concentration-Dependent Diffusion
  • Expressed this way, ? is the linear variation
    with composition and ? is the quadratic variation
  • Simulators like SUPREM include these effects and
    are capable of modeling very complex structures
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com