Title: Compensating Wage Differentials
1Chapter 8
- Compensating Wage Differentials
2What affects occupational choice?
- wages
- non-pecuniary characteristics
- since jobs have both of these attributes, people
face tradeoffs between them
3Compare two jobs - - Both pay 7.50/hour
- Firm X is offering an office job as a file clerk
- Firm Y is an asphalt company who needs workers to
help pave roads - Which firm will attract more applicants at a wage
of 7.50? - What will have to happen at Firm Y to attract
more workers?
4The extra wage that is paid to attract workers
into paving roads is called the compensating wage
differential
- workers require "combat pay" for undesirable
working conditions - on the other hand, the pleasant atmosphere of
desirable jobs must be bought by the workers
through lower pay
5Compensating Wage Differentials
- the price at which various qualitative job
characteristics are bought and sold - BADS result in positive differentials (higher
wages) - GOODS result in negative differentials (lower
wages)
6Holding worker characteristics constant,
employees in bad jobs receive higher wages than
those working under more pleasant conditions.
7What are these worker characteristics?
- skill
- age
- sex
- race
- marital status
- education
- geographic region
- union status
8We will assume
- workers maximize utility
- workers have perfect information about their jobs
- workers have mobility
9Utility Maximization
- if we used income maximization, the worker would
take the highest paying job regardless of
attributes - this is likely not the case with most workers
10Perfect Information
- workers are aware of the job characteristics and
the wages paid - this may not always be true
- for example, workers did not use to know the
adverse effect of asbestos
11Worker Mobility
- workers have a range of jobs to choose from and
can look for a new job while working - median job tenure in the U.S. is 3.5 years
12When graphing worker preferences for wages vs.
job characteristics, we use indifference curves
- we will put the wage on the y-axis
- we will put the risk of injury on the x-axis
- since risk is a bad, these indifference curves
will have an unusual shape - the indifference curves will be upward-sloping
and convex
13The indifference curves will be upward-sloping
- to accept more risk, an individual will require a
higher wage to remain equally satisfied - this is because the workers utility is lowered
if they incur an injury
14U1
15Suppose a person is currently at point A. If the
risk of the job rises to R1, the person will only
remain equally satisfied if...
U1
A
w0
R0
R1
16his wage increases to w1.
U1
w1
w0
R0
R1
17U2 represents a higher level of utility than U1
U2
U1
18At risk level R0, w2 gt w1. Thus, A must be
preferred to B.
U2
U1
A
w2
w1
B
R0
19The indifference curves will be convex
- at low risk of injury, the person is not as
willing to accept a lower wage for an additional
decrease in risk, relative to when risks are high
20.
U1
Given that risks are low, the worker requires
only a small increase in wage to accept
additional risk
W0
R0
21U1
When risk is higher, the worker will require a
larger increase in wage to accept additional risk
W1
R1
22Tom
Joe
The steeper the curve, the more risk averse the
worker. Joe is more risk averse than Tom.
23Tom
Joe
What is it worth to these men to have risk
lowered from R0 to R1?
w0
R0
R1
24Tom
Joe
Joe is willing to accept a much lower wage than
Tom to have risk reduced from R0 to R1
w0
w1T
w1J
R1
R0
25Isoprofit Curves
- are different across employers
- reflect the combinations of risk and wage that
result in the same level of profit for the firm - are upward-sloping and concave
26?0
Isoprofit Curve
27Isoprofit curves are upward-sloping
- since reducing risk is costly to the firm, it
will be willing to pay higher wages as jobs
become more risky - thus, there should be a positive relationship
between risk and wage reflected in the isoprofit
curve
28A firm is equally profitable at A or B. Note
that higher risk allows the firm to pay higher
wages.
?0
B
w1
A
w0
R0
R1
29Isoprofit curves are concave
- this is due to diminishing marginal returns to
reducing risk - at first, firms will use safety measures that can
be done so most easily and inexpensively - the more safety measures employed by a firm, the
more expensive and difficult additional measures
will be
30Risk can be reduced more cheaply at R1 than R0
?0
w1
w0
R0
R1
31Firms with steeper isoprofit curves find it more
costly to reduce risks.
?2
w0
?1
R0
32To reduce risk from R0 to R1 and keep profit
constant, Firm 1 would have to lower wages only
to w1 while Firm 2 would have to lower wages to
w2. Thus, Firm 1 can reduce the risk at
lower relative cost.
?2
w0
?1
w1
w2
R0
R1
33The zero profit isoprofit curve is most often the
only relevant isoprofit curve.
34Equilibrium
- occurs where the isoprofit curve is tangent to
the indifference curve - this means that the slope of the isoprofit curve
is equal to the slope of the indifference curve - the rate at which the firm is able to trade wages
for risk is equal to the rate at which workers
are willing to trade wages for risk
35U0
?0
36U0
?0
w
r
37Given isoprofit and indifference curves, we can
show that
- more risk averse workers will work at less risky
jobs that pay lower wages - firms with higher costs of reducing risks will
pay higher wages
38UB
UA
Indifference curves for two workers Worker A
and Worker B
39Isoprofit curves for two firms Firm X and Firm Z
?X
?Z
40UA
?X
?Z
wA
RA
41UB
UA
?X
wB
?Z
wA
RA
RB
42Wages Rise With Risk
- workers with strong preferences for safety are
willing to accept lower wages - workers with strong preferences for safety will
take jobs where safety can be generated at a
lower cost
43How do government programs controlling risk
affect workers utility?
- The federal government set safety standards for
many occupations through OSHA (Occupational
Safety and Health Administration)
44Suppose a firm is threatened with large fines by
the government if they do not comply to safety
standards. If the firm complies with the
standards, are the workers better off?
- not if the workers know the risks
- the workers may be better off if they are unaware
of the risks - we can use our model to show this
45U0
?0
w0
R0
46Suppose that R is the minimum acceptable amount
of risk allowable by government standards
U0
?0
w0
R0
R
47The firm will only offer a wage of w (any higher
wage would reduce profit)
U0
?0
w0
w
R0
R
48To remain equally happy, the worker would need a
wage of wR
U0
?0
w0
wR
w
R0
R
49What happens to worker utility at R?
U0
?0
w0
w
R0
R
50Utility falls from U0 to U
U0
U
?0
w0
w
R0
R
51Has government intervention helped?
52No, the worker is made worse off
53What happens when the worker does not know the
true level of risk?
- In this case, government intervention can make
the worker better off
54Unknown Risk
- Suppose a worker receives a wage of w0 and thinks
that the risk level is R0 - the worker thinks that his utility level is U0
- but, if the actual risk is Ra, the actual utility
level is Ua
55U0
The worker thinks that he is at point G
?0
G
w0
R0
56U0
But the worker is actually at point A...
?0
A
G
W0
R0
Ra
57U0
Ua
at utility level Ua
?0
A
G
w0
R0
Ra
58Government intervention can help in this case
- if the government sets the allowable risk level
between Ra and Rb,workers will actually end up on
a higher indifference curve. - the workers may perceive that they are worse off
(because their wage will be lower) when in fact
they have been made better off (because the level
of risk has been reduced)
59U0
Ua
?0
w0
R0
Ra
60U0
Ua
?0
w0
R0
Ra
Rb
61U0
Ua
Suppose the government chooses R as the minimum
amount of risk that is acceptable
?0
w0
R0
Rb
Ra
R
62U0
Ua
U1
The firm pays the worker a wage of w and the
worker ends up on indifference curve U1
?0
w0
w
R0
Rb
Ra
R