Title: A review on the luteal phase
1A review on the luteal phase
- P Devroey MD PhD
- Centre for Reproductive Medicine
- Dutch-speaking Brussels Free University
- Brussels - Belgium
2Learning objectives
- Is the luteal phase defective after
ovulation induction in anovulatory women ? - Is the luteal phase defective after
controlled ovarian superovulation ? - If yes, which is the mechanism behind ?
3Controlled ovarian superovulation for IVF
- Are the luteal phase LH concentrations
normal after controlled ovarian stimulation
with gonadotrophins alone ? - Are the luteal phase LH concentrations
normal after controlled ovarian stimulation
with the combination of GnRH agonists and
gonadotrophins ?
4Controlled ovarian superovulation for IVF
(continued)
- Are the luteal phase LH concentrations
normal after controlled ovarian stimulation
with the combination of GnRH antagonists
and gonadotrophins ? - Are the luteal phase LH concentrations
normal after controlled ovarian stimulation
with the combination of clomiphene citrate
and gonadotrophins ?
5Endometrium
- Is there any influence on endometrial
histology after the administration of
gonadotrophins before injection of human
chorionic gonadotrophins (hCG) ? - Is there any influence on endometrial
histology in GnRH agonist/antagonist -
gonadotrophin stimulated cycles 36 hours
after injection of hCG ?
6Luteal phase supplementation or substitution
- Is luteal phase supplementation mandatory in
GnRH - agonist / antagonist - gonadotrophin
stimulated cycles ?
7Is there any influence on endometrial
histology during the follicular phase in
gonadotrophin stimulated cycles before the
injection of hCG ?
8Is there any influence on endometrial
histology during the follicular phase in
gonadotrophin stimulated cycles before the
injection of hCG ?
Answer Yes 100 secretory advancement in
preovulatory endometria ( pre - hCG ) during
ovarian stimulation ( Marchini FS 1991 )
9Is there any influence on endometrial
histology in agonist / gonadotrophin
stimulated cycles 36 hours after hCG
administration ?
10Is there any influence on endometrial
histology in agonist / gonadotrophin
stimulated cycles 36 hours after hCG
administration ?
Answer Yes 100 ( n 40 patients ) 2 -
5 days advancement ( Ubaldi FS 1997 )
11Is there any influence on endometrial
histology in antagonist / gonadotrophin
stimulated cycles ?
12Is there any influence on endometrial
histology in antagonist / gonadotrophin
stimulated cycles ?
Answer Yes 100 ( n 55 patients ) 2 -
4 days advancement ( Kolibianakis FS
2002 )
13Endometrial biopsy on the day of ovulation
, natural cycle
No secretory features
14Endometrial biopsy on the day of oocyte
retrieval , GnRH agonist and gonadotrophin
stimulation cycle
Clear secretory features
15Is there any relation between endometrial
advancement and ongoing pregnancy rates ?
16Is there any relation between endometrial
advancement and ongoing pregnancy rates ?
Answer Yes
3 days gt 3 days P
hMG / agonist 10 / 32 0 / 7
recFSH / antagonist 8 / 49 0 / 6
TOTAL 18 / 81 0 / 13 lt 0.05
Endometrial advancement
Kolibianakis FS 2002
17Endometrial advancement persists in the
midluteal phase
YES or NO
18Histological regression of endometrium from
oocyte retrieval to the midluteal phase
Kolibianakis, Bourgain, Platteau, Albano, Van
Steirteghem, Devroey F S 80 2003
19Describe the LH concentration during the
luteal phase ( post hCG ) in agonist
gonadotrophin stimulated cycles
20Describe the LH concentration during the
luteal phase ( post hCG ) in agonist
gonadotrophin stimulated cycles
Answer Low
Smitz HR 1988
21Are the LH concentrations during the luteal
phase ( post hCG ) in agonist -
gonadotrophin stimulated cycles similar to
the LH concentrations in the follicular
phase ?
YES or NO
22Are the LH concentrations during the luteal
phase ( post hCG ) in agonist -
gonadotrophin stimulated cycles similar to
the LH concentrations in the follicular
phase ?
Answer No
Before hCG 1.5 mIU / ml
12 hours after hCG 0.5 mIU / ml
96 hours after hCG 0.2 mIU / ml P lt 0.0001
Demoulin FS 1991
WHY ?
23Is the luteal phase LH concentration
( post hCG ) in antagonist -
gonadotrophin cycles normal or decreased ?
24Is the luteal phase LH concentration
( post hCG ) in antagonist -
gonadotrophin cycles normal or decreased ?
Answer decreased
25Are the luteal phase concentrations
( post hCG ) similar in gonadotrophin alone
versus antagonist gonadotrophin stimulated
cycles ?
YES or NO
26Are the luteal phase concentrations
( post hCG ) similar in gonadotrophin alone
versus antagonist gonadotrophin stimulated
cycles ?
YES or NO
Answer Yes
Tavaniotou HR 2001
27Luteinizing hormone serum concentrations in
Clomid gonadotrophin antagonist or
gonadotrophin antagonist cycles
Tavaniotou F S 77 2002
28Is the luteal phase length normal after
gonadotrophin stimulation in non IVF ?
YES or NO
29Is the luteal phase length normal after
gonadotrophin stimulation in non IVF ?
YES or NO
Answer No
Cycles 78
Normal length 60
Shortened 18 ( 23 )
Olson FS 1983
30- Statement GnRH antagonist can be safely
administered in gonadotrophin stimulated IUI
cycles without luteal phase supplementation - Ragni HR 2001
31Is the statement in contradiction with the
lecture ?
YES or NO
32Is the statement in contradiction with the
lecture ?
YES or NO
Answer No
Stimulation FSH antagonist FSH alone
Mean no of follicles 2.7 3.2
FSH units 1080 1054
E2 ( ng/ml ) ( pre hCG) 500 900
LH ( U / L ) ( day 4 post hCG ) 1.8 2.5
Ragni HR 2001
33Steroid serum concentrations
Natural Stimulated cycles
Patients (n) 25 4
Progesterone (?g/L) 8.5 50.5
E2 (ng/L) 92.0 549.5
Tavaniotou Master Thesis Brussels 2000
34Luteal phase supplementation is mandatory
- hCG versus no treatment
significantly better - Vaginal progesterone versus no treatment
significantly
better - Pritts HR 17 2002
35(No Transcript)
36hCG versus prog IM E2V (RCT)
hCG Prog IM E2V
ET (n) 269 252
Pregnancies (n) 81 74
30 29
Smitz unpublished
37Progesterone IM E2V versus vaginal
progesterone E2V (RCT)
Prog IM Vaginal prog
ET (n) 131 131
Pregnancies (n) 40 46
30 35
Smitz HR 1992
38Vaginal progesterone versus vaginal
progesterone E2V (RCT)
Vaginal prog Vaginal prog E2V
ET (n) 183 195
Pregnancies (n) 65 64
35 32
Smitz HR 1993
39Is luteal support necessary in GnRH antagonist
cycles?
Fixed dose of rec FSH 150 IU, daily antagonist by
a follicle of 14mm By a follicle of 18mm patients
were randomized to receive rec hCG, rec LH, GnRH
agonist
No luteal support
When 40 patients had been included, the study
was canceled prematurely because of observed
premature luteal phase bleeding and extremely low
pregnancy rates.
Beckers et al 2004 JCEM
40Is luteal support necessary in GnRH antagonist
cycles?
Beckers et al 2004 JCEM
41Is GnRH agonist triggering an option ?
- PubMed 01.03.2011 n 83 publications
- Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist
triggering the way to eliminate ovarian
hyperstimulation syndrome - a 20 years
experience - Kol Sem Reprod Med 2010
42GnRH agonist triggering
GnRH-a hCG
n 84 n 95
Age (years) 33 34
Eggs (mean) 5.9 5.2
Embryos transferred 2.5 2.3
Pregnancy rates 20 19
Segal FS 1992
43Reflexion
- It is possible that down regulation of
pituitary receptors and reduced LH support
for the corpus luteum may occur even after
a single administration of GnRH agonist - Segal FS 1992
44Cycle outcome
Brussels Brussels
Agonist hCG
Stimulation (in patients) 18 24
OPU (n) 18 24
ET (n) 15 20
Ongoing pregnancy rate / started cycle 1/18 (5.6 ) 10/24 (41.7 )
Odds ratio (95 CI) 0.11 (0.02 0.52) P
level 0.005
Kolibianakis HR 2005
45GnRH agonist triggering in a GnRH
antagonist cycle
Triggering GnRH agonist 0.2 mg Triptorelin hCG 10 000
Vaginal progesterone
Estradiol valerate
Discontinuation - -
Pregnancy rate 5.6 41.7
Kolibianakis HR 2005
46Conclusions
- Ovarian superovulation (IVF) destroys luteal
phase function - Endocrinology
- Endometrium behaviour
- Luteal phase supplementation is mandatory
- The degree of luteal steroid production is
the key factor