Establishing Access To, Making Contact With, and Selecting Participants - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Establishing Access To, Making Contact With, and Selecting Participants

Description:

Establishing Access To, Making Contact With, and Selecting Participants 9310010A Nina 9310016A Alexia 9310018A Carl 9310032A Peggy 9310050A Doris – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:81
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: peggy
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Establishing Access To, Making Contact With, and Selecting Participants


1
Establishing Access To, Making Contact With, and
Selecting Participants
  • 9310010A Nina
  • 9310016A Alexia
  • 9310018A Carl
  • 9310032A Peggy
  • 9310050A Doris
  • Instructor Mavis Shang
  • Date Apr.9.2008

2
The Perils Of Easy Access
  • The easier the access, the more difficult the
    interview

3
Interviewing People Whom You Supervise
  • May not talk openly
  • Interviewing Your Students
  • Hardly be open to his or her teacher
  • Interviewing Acquaintances
  • May limit the potential of interview
  • Interviewing Friends
  • Assume you know your friend

4
Taking Oneself Just Seriously Enough
  • Not take themselves seriously as researchers
  • An uncritical attitude
  • Doing research is a work that elites do
  • Research has long been seen as a male preserve.

5
Access Through Formal Gatekeepers
  • Range from legitimate (to be respected) or
    self-declared (to be avoided)
  • E.g. parents, teachers, principals,
  • superintendents ? legitimate
  • Must gain access through the person who has
    responsibility for the operation

6
  • Research an experience that takes place in many
    sites
  • ? Do not need to seek access through
  • an authority
  • E.g. High school teachers who teach in
  • many schools ? go directly to them
  • The more adult the potential participants, the
    more likely that access can be direct.

7
Informal Gatekeepers
  • Persons who are widely respected and do not have
    authorities but hold moral suasion
  • ? not to use them formally for seeking access,
    but to gain their participation as a sign of
    respect
  • ? help researchers gain access to others

8
  • Avoid Self-appointed gatekeepers
  • Must be informed
  • Try to control everything

9
Access and Hierarchy
  • Difference between research and policy studies
  • ? The latter are often sponsored by an
  • agency
  • Affects the equity of the relationship between
    interviewer and participant
  • Interviewer seems higher

10
  • Establish access to participants through peers
    rather than through people above or below them

11
Making Contact
  • Do it yourself.
  • Third parties seldom do justice
  • Have not internalized
  • Do not have investment
  • Seldom response to questions that arise naturally

12
  • A contact visit
  • ? Select participants
  • ? build a foundation for interview
  • relationship

13
  • Make a contact visit in person
  • Telephoning is often the first step to contact.
  • The major purpose of the telephone contact
  • To set up a time that the interviewer can meet
  • participants in person to discuss the study.
  • Time For arranging a separate
  • Money contact visit
  • Effort

14
  • 1. The most important purpose of contact
  • visit is
  • To have a basically mutual relationship
  • with the participant.
  • Group contact visit
  • Advantage save time because the interviewer
  • can explain it to many people
    at
  • once.
  • Disadvantage one participant may affect the
  • attitude of the others
  • participating

15
  • Characteristics that can enhance a contact
  • visit
  • Tone Seriousness but friendliness
  • Approach Purposefulness but flexibility
  • Presentation Openness but conciseness

16
  • 2. A second important purpose of the
  • contact
  • visit
  • To decide whether the participants is
  • interested.
  • Participants should understand
  • The nature of the study
  • How he or she fits into it
  • The purpose of the three interview sequence

17
  • Building The Participant Pool
  • Another purpose of the contact visit
  • The appropriateness of a participant
  • The major standard for appropriates is
  • whether the study is central to the
  • participants experience.

18
  • Some Logistical Considerations
  • Develop a data base of their participants
  • A simple participant information form
  • Facilitate communication
  • Record basic data about
  • Keep in touch with the participants
  • Avoid disturbing the participants

19
  • The contact visits can also be used to
  • determine
  • The best times let participants choose the
  • hour
  • The best dates
  • The best places - convenient, private,, etc.
  • After the contact visit, interviewer should write
  • follow-up letters to the participant.
  • Disagree thank them for meeting
  • Agree confirm the schedule of interviewing

20
  • Sometimes the no-show is
  • Poor communication
  • Lack of enthusiasm
  • Before the interviewing begins,
  • Pay attention to the details of access and
  • contact.

21
Selecting Participants
  • In-depth interview
  • Purpose to understand the participants
  • experiences, not to predict or control that
  • experience
  • Researchers task
  • ? to describe the experiences
  • ? readers can connect to the experiences

22
  • Define the issue
  • ? to see whether the participants
  • experiences can be accepted to most
  • people
  • In-depth interviewers job
  • ? to ask some deeper questions that
  • make participants to say more about
  • their experiences during the interview

23
  • Two possibilities for making connection
  • (1) Find connections among the experiences
  • from the participants
  • (2) Open up for readers the possibility to
  • connect their stories
  • Purposeful sampling ?
  • a non-random sampling technique based on
  • member characteristics relevant to the
  • research problem.

24
  • Maximum variation sampling
  • ? select in order to get maximum
  • differences of perceptions about the topic
  • among rich information
  • ? allow the widest possibility for readers to
  • connect what they are reading

25
  • Another useful way
  • ? select some participants who are
  • outside that range
  • ? for interviewers to check themselves in
  • order to prevent drawing easy conclusions

26
  • Snares to Avoid in The Selection Process
  • Participant is reluctance to get involved
  • Strike a balance between easily accepting and
  • ardently persuade
  • Participants are too eager to be interviewed
  • In-depth interviewing elicit person to be
  • interesting no matter he is famous or not.

27
  • How Many Participants Are Enough?
  • Snowball sampling ask participants to identify
    people or sites to study (e.g. Homeless people)
  • Two criteria for enough
  • Sufficiency gt cannot interview only
  • person in any
    particular
  • category
  • Saturation information gt begins to hear

  • the same

  • information
  • Enough gt not learning anything new
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com