Steve Case - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Steve Case

Description:

www.nescon.org – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:127
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 44
Provided by: Gregg106
Learn more at: http://www.nescon.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Steve Case


1
Six Sigma and the Supply Chain
Steve Case Supplier Relations and Productivity
Expert October 2006
Export control review number TDR 06-9001
2
Agenda
  • Introduction
  • Raytheon overview
  • Why talk about the Supply Chain?
  • Clock-speed
  • Raytheon Six Sigma
  • What is it?
  • Involving suppliers in Six Sigma
  • Applying a structured methodology
  • Impact of insertion points

3
Company Background
Raytheon at a glance The data presented
represents the entire Raytheon Company
  • Early years
  • Radio tubes, WW II radar technology
  • Today
  • 21.9 Billion in Sales in 2005
  • 76,400 employees, 20 countries
  • 27,000 suppliers
  • gt7 Billion Annual Spend
  • 72 of spend is Direct . . . 28 of
    spend is Indirect
  • Core business focus
  • Government and defense electronics,
    business aviation

4
Why Talk Supply Chain
5
Direct Material is Often the Largest Single
Product Cost Element
  • To meet our cost and Six Sigma goals, we must
    manage supply as a core process, same as product
    development and project management, etc

50
30
15
5
Material OH Labor
Engr Product Cost Elements
6
Material Type Drives The Strategy
7
Material Costs Must be Addressed Early in the
Design Cycle . . .
8
Selecting Core Competencies
  • Where should we invest our limited resources to
    develop capabilities that will become our core
    competencies in the future?
  • Ask yourself
  • Which subcomponents will have the highest
    barriers to entry in the future?
  • Which will demand the highest profit margins in
    the future?
  • Which subcomponents will drive customer
    purchasing behavior in the future?
  • Which subcomponents are we good at producing
    today?

9
Raytheon Six SigmaTM
Visualize
Achieve
Commit
Prioritize
Improve
Characterize
Raytheon Six SigmaTM is a knowledge based
process we will use to transform our culture,
maximize customer value and enable business
growth.
10
Raytheon Six Sigma versus Traditional
Six Sigma
  • The traditional Six Sigma approach, utilized by
    Motorola, has its underpinnings in hardware
    design and manufacturing
  • The Raytheon Six SigmaTM approach was based on
    benchmarking with Allied Signal and General
    Electric and is more broad in scope
  • Includes all processes and functions
  • Integrates proven philosophies and a number of
    continuous improvement techniques and tools
  • (statistical lean tools)
  • Supported by a full time Six Sigma Expert
    network
  • Leads to a culture change

11
Traditional Approaches
  • What are the elements of part purchase price?

What SCM tools are available to reduce price?
  • Pricing targets
  • Multiple rounds of bidding
  • Leverage
  • Negotiation

Which element of cost do these tools address?
12
Raytheon Six SigmaTM with Suppliers
13
Down Selection Process for Supplier engagements
14
Supply Base Optimization
15
SBO Background Info
  • What is Supply Base Optimization ?
  • A data led, systematic approach to identifying a
    cross-functionally endorsed list of suppliers
    within a given commodity family
  • Stratification within a specific commodity family
    that identifies (1) approved suppliers, (2)
    preferred suppliers and (3) strategic suppliers
  • A dynamic commodity strategy for each commodity
    family which forces continuous optimization of
    the supply base, through the utilization of
    cross-functional subject matter experts (Eng,
    Quality, SCM, PL, etc.)
  • A Disciplined Governance process for list
    maintenance and standardized use of the SBO
    outputs

16
Supplier SelectionDecision Tools
17
R6s with Suppliers
  • R6s with Suppliers is a targeted effort examining
    total cost of ownership for a part or service
    focussed on maximizing cost reduction while
    minimizing investment.
  • Features
  • Widely proven methodology
  • Uses a gated flow making investment incremental
  • Leverages upon the large pool of R6s tool or
    technical expert resources as appropriate
  • Standard templates drive consistency

18
The Six Sigma With Suppliers Process
Analyze the BOM and determine the key suppliers
and parts
Get supplier commitment, set objectives and
prepare for workshop by analyzing unit costs and
quality
Conduct assessment workshop with supplier to
identify improvement projects
Begin improvement projects by analyzing current
conditions
Continue improvement projects by implementing
needed changes
Measure results and determine impact on
performance and cost
19
Prework Developing the Total Cost of Ownership
Focus on Total Cost of Ownership
20
Example from Actual Prework
21

Y/N Screening Evaluator
  • Purpose Recommended for initial general
    evaluation of potential suppliers. It provides a
    quick look at the viability of a candidate or it
    allows the comparison and prioritization of
    multiple candidates
  • Minimal product and supplier knowledge is
    required
  • Normally filled out by SCM personnel (MPM,
    Buyers), or interested IPT members
  • Output is radar chart
  • that provide a graphical representation of
    supplier candidacy
  • Identifies risk areas to R6sS success
  • Numerical score to be used as a comparative

22
The Y/N Evaluator
23
The Y/N Evaluators Output
24
The Candidate Evaluator 1.05
25
The Candidate Evaluator 1.05
Results
26
R6s with Suppliers Tools
  • DTC/CAIV Design to Cost / Cost as An Independent
    Variable Set and achieve product cost goals.
  • PBS Performance-Based Specifications Set
    specifications that clearly state what we need,
    not how to build it.
  • DFMA Design for Manufacturability and Assembly
    Identify alternative design solutions to
    eliminate non-essential elements of the design
    and non-essential steps in the manufacturing
    process.
  • DFSS Design for Six Sigma Analysis of
    uncertainty during the requirements definition
    and design process.
  • PSP Part Selection Process Identify
    opportunities to lower commodity cost, improve
    part standardization, reduce part count, and
    identify problem suppliers and parts.
  • PFMEA Process Failure Modes and Effects
    Analysis Improve process flow and identify
    high-risk process elements.
  • DOE Design of Experiments Optimize product
    designs or manufacturing processes by using
    experimentation that links variables to
    performance outputs.
  • Lean Lean Manufacturing Techniques Improve
    total production process from planning through
    shipping. Achieve consistent operational
    performance through improved product and
    information flow.
  • Blitz Blitz Workshops Eliminate waste and
    non-value-added activities in manufacturing and
    administrative processes.
  • STAATS Statistical Analysis and Acceptance Test
    Software Analyze supplier acceptance test data.
    Identify test reduction opportunities and
    parameters that drive yield.

27
Improvement Tools have Time Phased Benefits
Early Involvement
DTC
30X
PBS
DFSS
DFMA
Payback
Transition Effort
PSP
PFMEA
Lean /Kaizen Blitz/PI
Production Effort
Test reduction
5X
Concept Eval Dem-Val EMD
LRIP FRP Typical Program Life
Cycle
28
Linking Product Costs to Applicable Tools
Product Cost Structure
Step 1 Cost Components
GSA
Labor
Material
Factory O/H
Non-std processes Test rqmts Rework/repair Oversig
ht Labor efficiency Setup times
Non-std parts Mil parts Tech. decisions Make/buy
policies Buying leverage Supplier
costs Inspection rqmts
Buildings Support costs Inventory Automation
level Schedule mgmt
Admin support Corporate expenses Marketing Purchas
e volume Future business outlook
Step 2 Cost Drivers
PBS DFMA PSP (std, comm) Volume pricing Sub-tier
cost reduction Sub-tier source
selection Leveraged buys
DFMA STAATS DOE Automation studies Lean
PFMEA Process Improvement
Process Improvement Lean Standardized test
sets
Lean Consolidated buys Supplier partnering
Step 3 Applicable Tools
29
Assessment Workshop Typical Agenda
Day 1 Introductions R6s overview Tool
detail Supplier introduction Part cost
drivers Process tour Brainstorming
Day 2 Continue brainstorming Prioritize ideas
Conduct feasibility studies on ideas
generated Debrief Rank opportunities Develop
roadmap
30
Example of Baseline Results
Candidate Projects
Summary
Implementation Cost 600K Possible Savings
13,000K Payback
20X
31
Preparation is theSecret to Success
32
The Supplier Workshop The Keystone
Step 3 Prioritize - Supplier Workshop
Assess design and process
Learn tools to mitigate cost
Identify cost drivers and tool opportunities
Evaluate effect of tools
Create action plan
33
IPDS The Way We Do Business
Network Centric Systems
Defines the way we plan, capture and execute
programs
Provides an environment for continuous process
improvement Raytheon Six SigmaTM
Provides tools and processes that enable
Integrated Product Teams to perform their
tasks EVMS, IMP/IMS, CAIV
Provides One Company language and tools to
enable program capture and successful execution
Building a Process Culture - Requires Discipline!
34
Integrated Product Development System (IPDS) Gates
35
Example 1 Targeting Viewer
36
Example 2 Payload Delivery System
37
Example 3 Guided Projectile
38
Example 4 Guidance Component
  • Situation
  • Next generation guidance system needed
  • Reduce the price by 40
  • Meet performance profiles of multiple programs

Payback Ratio 651
39
The Right EngagementYield Handsome Returns
  • ROI is total impact of the project, and is
    expressed in multiples of investment
  • Total impact includes gap closure, cost avoidance
    and cost savings

40
Success Factors
  • Carefully select company core competencies
  • Identify and manage critical supplier
    relationships
  • Select strategic suppliers for engagements
  • Spend time up front to collect the essential data
    that no one person has
  • Target both immediate and long-term results
  • Use gated process that spends investment money
    incrementally
  • Ensure customer involvement
  • Gain top executive support for process and pull
    for results

41
Back-up
  • Supplier Relationships and Supplier Performance
    back-up materials

42
Success Factors
  • Dollarize potential impact before engaging
    management
  • Align multiple departments - both functional and
    product related
  • Communicate clear, structured methodology and
    roadmap during initial kickoff and revisit often
  • Spend time up front to collect the essential data
    that no one has
  • Offer up data to the supplier, dont just demand
    it of them
  • Target both immediate and long-term results
  • Use gated process that spends investment money
    incrementally
  • Ensure customer is involved
  • Gain top executive support for process and pull
    for results

43
Top Reasons for Failure
  • Tried to engage supplier during price
    negotiations
  • Product managers kicked off workshop by listing
    constraints
  • Price is far less than supplier costs
  • Supplier is a competitor
  • Supplier cant dollarize their own costs
  • Supplier cost model entries are far higher than
    actual costs
  • Engineers are unwilling to consider modifications
  • Prework data collected is incomplete
  • Distrust between supplier and OEM
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com