Example of Modeling Signal Transduction Systems - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Example of Modeling Signal Transduction Systems

Description:

Example of Modeling Signal Transduction Systems Julie Dickerson – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:95
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 47
Provided by: julied
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Example of Modeling Signal Transduction Systems


1
Example of Modeling Signal Transduction Systems
  • Julie Dickerson

2
References and Readings
  • P53 Models and data Oscillations and variability
    in the p53 system. Geva-Zatorsky N, Rosenfeld N,
    Itzkovitz S, Milo R, Sigal A, Dekel E, Yarnitzky
    T, Liron Y, Polak P, Lahav G, Alon U., Mol Syst
    Biol 200622006.0033.
  • Biomodels.net database of models from
    publications
  • SBML.org systems biology markup language
    definitions links to tools and models

3
Biological Problem
  • In the p53 system, p53 transcriptionally
    activates mdm2. Mdm2, in turn, negatively
    regulates p53 by both inhibiting its activity as
    a transcription factor and by enhancing its
    degradation rate
  • The concentration of p53 increases in response to
    stress signals, such as DNA damage. The main
    mechanism for this increase is stabilization of
    p53 due to reduced interaction with Mdm2.
  • Following stress signals, p53 activates
    transcription of several hundred genes that are
    involved in growth arrest, apoptosis, senescence,
    and DNA repair.
  • Isogenic cells in the same environment behaved in
    highly variable ways following DNA-damaging gamma
    irradiation some cells showed undamped
    oscillations for at least 3 days (more than 10
    peaks).
  • Reference Oscillations and variability in the
    p53 system. Geva-Zatorsky N, Rosenfeld N,
    Itzkovitz S, Milo R, Sigal A, Dekel E, Yarnitzky
    T, Liron Y, Polak P, Lahav G, Alon U., Mol Syst
    Biol 200622006.0033.

4
Modeling Problem
  • The amplitude of the oscillations was much more
    variable than the period. Sister cells continued
    to oscillate in a correlated way after cell
    division, but lost correlation after about 11 h
    on average. Other cells showed low-frequency
    fluctuations that did not resemble oscillations.
  • Why does this occur? Can models help us
    understand this?
  • Different families of mathematical models of the
    system point to the possible source of the
    variability in the oscillations low-frequency
    noise in protein production rates, rather than
    noise in other parameters such as degradation
    rates.
  • Models available at biomodels.net (numbers
    154-159, curated models)

5
Transcriptional activation
Negative regulation Inhibits transcription Enhance
s degradation
6
Also activates 100s of genes DNA
repair Apoptosis Growth arrest
Transcriptional activation
Stress signals DNA Damage
Negative regulation Inhibits transcription Enhance
s degradation
7
Feedback loops
  • Oscillatory dynamics, changing dynamics

monotone
Damped Oscillations
Sustained oscillation
8
P53 system
  • Studies with this system that used averages of
    cell responses showed damped oscillations
    following DNA damage.
  • Individual cell studies show a variation in
    responses in cells
  • Amplitudes changed, frequency did not change much

9
Fluorescent Microscopy
  • Fluorescence microscopy is one of the most used
    approaches in studying the location and movement
    of molecules and subcellular components in the
    cell.
  • Sample is itself the light source.
  • Based on the phenomenon that certain material
    emits energy detectable as visible light when
    irradiated with the light of a specific
    wavelength.
  • Samples can either be fluorescing in their
    natural form like chlorophyll and some minerals,
    or treated with fluorescing chemicals.
  • Usually, cellular components do not fluoresce
    themselves. Fluorescent markers are therefore
    introduced.

10
  • Fluorescent DyesFluorescent dyes are directly
    taken up by the cells. They are incorporated and
    concentrated in specific subcellular
    compartments. The living cells are then mounted
    on a microscope slide and examined.
  • ImmunofluorescenceImmunofluorescence involves
    the use of antibodies to which a fluorescent
    marker has been attached. Antibodies are
    molecules that recognize and bind selectively to
    specific target molecules in the cell. The
    fluorescent signal can be amplified by using an
    unlabelled primary antibody and detecting it with
    labelled secondary antibodies.
  • Tagging of ProteinsProtein molecules are tagged
    with a fluorescing marker. When a specific
    protein is modified in this way, the location of
    that protein can be studied. It is also possible
    to watch the movements of the proteins and its
    interactions with other cellular components
    inside the cell.

http//nobelprize.org/educational_games/physics/mi
croscopes/fluorescence/preparation.html
11
C. Elegans Nervous System The image shows the
brain region of a living C. elegans animal.
Different classes of neurons are labelled with
different colors. Photo H. Hutter, Max Planck
Institut, Heidelberg
Fluorescence triple-labeling of human cells. The
DNA in two interphase cell nuclei (left and
right) and in metaphase chromosomes from a third
cell (middle) are shown in blue. Specific DNA
sequences are labeled in red and green. Photo
Petra Björk, Stockholm University
Fluorescence triple-labeling of human cells.
Cytoplasmic fiber structures (microfilament) are
shown in red. Components of the cell nuclei are
shown in blue (nucleoli) and green (splicing
factor). Photo Petra Björk, Stockholm University
Epithelium Cells Immunofluorescence staining of
epithelium cell (Hep-2) mitochondria. (Zeiss)
12
(No Transcript)
13
Time Lapse microscopy of cells
From supplementary data Oscillations and
variability in the p53 system. Geva-Zatorsky N,
Rosenfeld N, Itzkovitz S, Milo R, Sigal A, Dekel
E, Yarnitzky T, Liron Y, Polak P, Lahav G, Alon
U., Mol Syst Biol 200622006.0033.
14
  • Prolonged oscillations in the nuclear levels of
    fluorescently tagged p53 and Mdm2 in individual
    MCF7, U280, cells following gamma irradiation.
    (A) Time-lapse fluorescence images of one cell
    over 29 h after 5 Gy of gamma irradiation.
    Nuclear p53-CFP and Mdm2-YFP are imaged in green
    and red, respectively. Time is indicated in
    hours.
  • (B) Normalized nuclear fluorescence levels of
    p53-CFP (green) and Mdm2-YFP (red) following
    gamma irradiation. Top left the cell shown in
    panel A. Other panels five cells from one field
    of view, after exposure to 2.5 Gy gamma
    irradiation.
  • Mol Syst Biol. 2006 2 2006.0033.
  • Published online 2006 June 13. doi
    10.1038/msb4100068.

15
(No Transcript)
16
Signal Analysis
  • Used Fourier analysis and spectrograms to
    estimate period of signals

17
Pitch (characteristic period) of Mdm2-YFP signals
of cells at various gamma irradiation doses. (A)
Histogram of the pitch values from movies of
cells exposed to 0, 0.3, 5, and 10 Gy, and from
all the movies together. For each movie, the
total number of cells is indicated, and the
number of oscillating (osc.) cells that had a
detectable pitch. (B) Fraction of cells (out of
the total number of cells) with a pitch value of
47 h, for different gamma doses. Black line is a
guide to the eye. Mol Syst Biol. 2006 2
2006.0033. Published online 2006 June 13. doi
10.1038/msb4100068.
18
Average amplitude, width, and time delay of
oscillation peaks and their variance. (AC)
Average values of the first five p53-CFP (green
triangles) and Mdm2-YFP (red squares) oscillation
peaks in 146 cells exposed to 5 Gy of gamma
irradiation, shown with their standard errors.
(A) Average oscillation amplitude of each of the
first five peaks (peak to trough). (B) Average
width (full-width half-maximum). (C) Average time
delay between the p53 peaks and the consecutive
Mdm2 peak. Mol Syst Biol. 2006 2 2006.0033.
Published online 2006 June 13. doi
10.1038/msb4100068.
19
Modeling
  • Find simplest models that can explain these
    different behaviors
  • Negative feedback
  • Delay oscillators with delay in response to
    signals
  • Relaxation oscillators negative feedback loop is
    supplemented with a positive loop on p53
  • Checkpoint model, two negative feedback loops,
    direct and an effect on an upstream regulator of
    p53.

20
Describing Models
  • Systems Biology Markup Language (SBML) is a
    computer-readable format for representing models
    of biochemical reaction networks in software.
    It's applicable to models of metabolism,
    cell-signaling, and many others. (sbml.org)

21
  • Function definition
  • A named mathematical function that may be used
    throughout the rest of a model.
  • Unit definition
  • A named definition of a new unit of measurement,
    or a redefinition of an existing SBML unit.
  • Compartment Type
  • A type of location where reacting entities such
    as chemical substances may be located.
  • Species type
  • A type of entity that can participate in
    reactions. Typical examples of species types
    include ions such as Ca2, molecules such as
    glucose or ATP, and more.
  • Compartment
  • A well-stirred container of a particular type and
    finite size where species may be located. A model
    may contain multiple compartments of the same
    compartment type. Every species in a model must
    be located in a compartment.
  • Species
  • A pool of entities of the same species type
    located in a specific compartment.
  • Parameter
  • A quantity with a symbolic name. In SBML, the
    term parameter is used in a generic sense to
    refer to named quantities regardless of whether
    they are constants or variables in a model.

22
  • Initial Assignment
  • A mathematical expression used to determine the
    initial conditions of a model.
  • Rule
  • A mathematical expression added to the set of
    equations constructed based on the reactions
    defined in a model. Rules can be used to define
    how a variable's value can be calculated from
    other variables, or used to define the rate of
    change of a variable. The set of rules in a model
    can be used with the reaction rate equations to
    determine the behavior of the model with respect
    to time.
  • Constraint
  • A means of detecting out-of-bounds conditions
    during a dynamical simulation and optionally
    issuing diagnostic messages. Constraints are
    defined by an arbitrary mathematical expression
    computing a true/false value from model
    variables, parameters and constants.
  • Reaction
  • A statement describing some transformation,
    transport or binding process that can change the
    amount of one or more species. For example, a
    reaction may describe how certain entities
    (reactants) are transformed into certain other
    entities (products). Reactions have associated
    kinetic rate expressions describing how quickly
    they take place.
  • Event
  • A statement describing an instantaneous,
    discontinuous change in a set of variables of any
    type (species quantity, compartment size or
    parameter value) when a triggering condition is
    satisfied.

23
Example
  • Identifier EnzymaticReaction.
  • Compartment (with identifier cytosol)
  • four species (with identifiers ES, P, S, and E)
  • Reactions (veq and vcat).
  • Veq
  • listOfReactants (E and S) and listOfProducts
    (ES). kinectic law
  • listOfParameters kon and koff
  • Vcat
  • listOfReactants (E S) and listOfProducts (E and
    P). kinectic law, not reversible.
  • listOfParameters kcat

24
(No Transcript)
25
Model I
  • Delay Oscillator
  • Action of Mdm2 on p53 is linear, first-order
    kinetics

x
y0
y
26
Model III
  • Delay Oscillator
  • Action of Mdm2 has a delay term, production rate
    of Mdm2 depends on earlier value of p53

27
Parameter sensitivity
28
Model IV
  • Delay Oscillator
  • Action of Mdm2 on p53 is nonlinear, saturating
    Michaelis-Menten

29
(No Transcript)
30
Model II
  • Relaxation operator, positive feedback loop to
    upregulate p53

31
(No Transcript)
32
Model V
  • Relaxation operator, positive feedback loop to
    upregulate p53

33
(No Transcript)
34
Model VI
S
  • Checkpoint
  • Mdm2 also affects a p53 precursor signaling
    protein, S, e.g., Phosphorylated ATM

35
(No Transcript)
36
Effect of cooperativity, n
n increasing
37
(No Transcript)
38
(No Transcript)
39
(No Transcript)
40
(No Transcript)
41
(No Transcript)
42
Noise model
  • Periodic noise that varied in phase for protein
    production
  • Not white high frequency noise

43
(No Transcript)
44
Model VI Simple
45
Model VI active/inactive p53
46
Model VI
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com