Title: The AIDS Epidemic
1The AIDS Epidemic
- Presented by
- Jay Wopperer
2HIV/AIDS-- Public Enemy 1?
3What causes AIDS?
- Intravenous Drug Use.
- Homosexual activity.
- Heterosexual activity.
- Blood Transfusions
- Work related fluid exchange contact, (i.e.
doctors, nurses, etc..)
4Statistic on AIDS
- 40 million adults and 2.7 million children were
living with HIV at the end of 2001. - 3 million people had died from AIDS or AIDS
related diseases in 2001 - 1.2 of the overall world population has HIV or
AIDS (8.6 in Africa, .6 in US) - In the US of the infected population 79 are men,
21 are women. - Average age range 30-34.
- NYC has the most people suffering from AIDS (over
120,000).
5The Cell Structure of AIDS
6AIDS and Ethnicity
7HIV/AIDS -The Graphical Model
HIV antibodies
HIV/AIDS
CD4 T-Cells
8AIDS-- The Mathematical Model
- We can think of AIDS as an S gt I Model. In other
words once one is infected, a person remains so
until death.
Where the contact rate depends on the
population size
9What does our N model mean?
As always N(t) S(t) I(t)
10What does our S model mean?
S is the number of people susceptible to AIDS N
is our total population I is the number of
people infected
is our death rate, a is the birth rate
11What does our I model mean?
Disease carried death.
Death rate for infectives so a measures
the increase in the death rate attributed to
disease.
In other words we have the infected rate minus
those that are going to die off.
12Mean Life Span of an Infective
- If there is no disease (I 0), so N (a - m)N
- Mean Life Span of an Infective (MLI)
- A single infective in an infinite population of
susceptibles creates
13Analysis of R0
- If R0gt1
- This implies that very few introduces infectives
will grow by a factor of R0 every MLI period. - If this is our case, then the population, N, will
dilute our infectives, I. In other words I/N -gt
0. - So our I class can be rejected, therefore
populations grows exponentially. - In fact, it grows by a factor of
14Continued
We can make the claim provided
Thus, we expect I/N to grow or decline by a
factor
over an MLI period.
Another important parameter combination is the
number of offspring an infective has over its MLI
15Results
- Case 1 R0 lt 1
- Disease is weakly contagious or highly
pathogenic. - N (t) gt infinity, I (t) gt 0
- Disease has no effect.
- Case 2 R1 lt 1 lt R0
- N (t) gt infinity, I (t) gt infinity, but I (t) /
N (t) gt 0
16Results (Continued)
- Case 3 1 lt R1
- P0 gt 1, P0 1
- P0 lt 1 and R1 lt
- Disease contagiousness dominates both
pathogenicity and host birth rate. - N (t) gt infinity and I (t) gt infinity. We see
that N (t) grows exponentially but at a much
slower rate than cases 1 and 2. - I (t) / N (t) gt
17Results (Continued)
- Case 4 P0 lt 1 and R0 gt
- Disease is highly contagious but births from
infectives are insufficient for exponential
growth. - Here xe ye
- The disease stabilizes the population size and
becomes endemic. - Results we obtained by papers written by H.
Thieme, O Diekmann and M. Kretzschmar
18Highly Contagious Diseases can Control a
Population
a a-m
Case 3
Case 4
a abo
bo a m
Case 2
Case 1
19Virus Dynamics
- The effect of AIDS on CD4 T cells
- HIV docks on the CD4 receptor of the T cells.
- The new model is very similar to the SEIR model.
20Steady States
- We obtain two steady states for our model
Our trivial steady state. Our nontrivial
steady state.
21Analysis of Our Steady States
To determine the stability of our steady states,
we use the Jacobian matrix
22Our Trivial Steady State
We evaluate our steady state at (T,0,0)
We see the trace lt 0
We see the det
If R0 lt 1, det gt 0 therefore stable
If R0 gt 1, det lt 0 therefore unstable
23Our Nontrivial Steady State
We evaluate our steady state at
Through this analysis it is difficult to
determine stability.
24Perilson
Mathematician for claims the stability of our
model will look like this
S
R0
S
U
25Conclusion
- These models are all very new, some as recent as
last year. Therefore AIDS research is still in
its primitive stages.
- The complexity of AIDS makes it difficult to hone
in on one specific problem, thus making it very
difficult to model and predict.