Process Modelling and Knowledge Management in the Legislative Process - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Process Modelling and Knowledge Management in the Legislative Process

Description:

Process Modelling and Knowledge Management in the Legislative Process G nther Schefbeck ECPRD Seminar Digitisation of Parliamentary Information and Archives Part 1 – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:135
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: fedp150
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Process Modelling and Knowledge Management in the Legislative Process


1
Process Modelling and Knowledge Managementin the
Legislative Process
  • Günther Schefbeck
  • ECPRD Seminar Digitisation of Parliamentary
    Information and Archives Part 1
  • Brussels, 30 May 2002

2
A legal enactment ... traditional style
3
Legislative Processes
  • Complex and multi-layered
  • Highly formalized legal procedure
  • (going back to 19th century)
  • vs.
  • Informal political decision-making process
    (semi-structured or negotiation process)
  • Interaction of political and legal layers

4
The value of legislative processes
  • A business process is a collection of activities
    that takes one or more kinds of inputs and
    creates an output that is of value to the
    customer (Hammer Champy)
  • What is the value of a law?

5
The value of laws
  • Individual law quality of content
  • Rule of law quality of justice
  • (Aristotle Under the rule of law the chances
    for justice are better than under the rule of
    men)
  • Law produced in a democratic process quality of
    legitimation
  • (Luhmann legitimization by procedure)

6
Rule of law in a democratic system
  • Knowledge of laws as a prerequisite for
    acceptance of laws and law enforcement
  • Transparency of the legislative process as a
    prerequisite for the acceptance of this process
    and its output
  • Crucial function of publicity of laws and
    legislative processes

7
Transparency and democracy
  • Means of parliamentary transparency
  • public access to (plenary!) meetings
  • media coverage
  • print documentation
  • are as young as democracy (or even younger early
    19th century) and
  • have been given a new quality through the NICT in
    the 1990s

8
The IT impact
  • 1970s law documentation (mainframes)
  • 1980s documentation of legislative processes
    (mainframes PCs)
  • 1990s electronic availability of data (metadata,
    full texts of documents, audio/video streaming)
    to the general public (PCs Internet)
  • Today electronification of legislative
    processes
  • Tomorrow ?

9
Legislative processes and E-business/government
functions
  • Information
  • Communication
  • Transaction
  • Communication and transaction functions have been
    made large-scale available through the Internet
    and Intranet applications

10
Five steps of electronic support of legislative
processes
  • Knowledge management
  • Workflow management
  • Improving the procedural quality
  • Improving the output quality
  • Improving the participatory quality

11
Process modelling
  • Knowledge management descriptive modelling
    (reduction of complexity)
  • Workflow management descriptive/prescriptive
    modelling (complex legal and administrative
    procedure)
  • Future development prescriptive
    modelling/process re-engineering (changing the
    legislative process, e.g. by introducing new
    instruments/steps)?

12
Present situation functional variety
  • Plain information systems
  • Mixed systems combining information with aspects
    of communication/transaction
  • Fully electronic workflow systems

13
Present situation organizational variety
  • Isolated systems of single parliamentary chambers
  • Overall systems of (bicameral) Parliaments
  • Integrated systems of all organs involved in the
    legislative process

14
Example Switzerland (1)
  • Workflow system introduced in 1998
  • Electronic production of all legislative
    documents
  • System and format breach Parliament
  • Authenticity paper document

15
Example Switzerland (2)
  • Functional view electronic workflow system with
    derived information function, parliamentary
    information and production systems
  • Organizational view government system,
    Parliament involved as a black box

16
Example Austria (1)
  • Workflow system operational since 1 January 2002
  • Electronic production and transfer of all
    legislative documents
  • System (but not format) breach Parliament
  • Authenticity paper document/at least as to
    publication from 1 January 2003 on electronic
    document

17
Example Austria (2)
  • Functional view electronic workflow system,
    governmental section using the existing Legal
    Information System as archival system,
    parliamentary section based on the existing
    Parliamentary Documentation System
  • Organizational view separated government and
    Parliament systems with interfaces

18
Example Austria (3-5)
Way of federal legislation (simplified
organizational view)
Federal Minister
Federal Government
Parliament
Federal President
Federal Chancellor
19
Process steps
Legal enactment
Government bill
Proposal to the Council of Ministers
Authentication
LIS
Consultation
Publication
Federal Minister
Federal Government
Parliament
Federal President
Federal Chancellor
20

Electronic workflow system
LIS
Federal Minister
Federal Government
Parliament
Federal President
Federal chancellor
21
Improving the procedural quality
  • Process modelling makes aware of capability of
    improvement
  • Necessary amendment of rules of procedure (shift
    of paradigm towards autheticity of electronic
    documents) gives opportunity to improve procedures

22
Improving the output quality
  • Legimatic systems for improving the formal
    quality of laws (checking the implementation of
    or implementing guidelines for legislation)
  • Impact assessment and simulation systems for
    improving the material quality of legislation

23
Improving the participatory quality
  • Already emerging standard solution introducing
    new communication tools into the representative
    system
  • Dichotomy indirect vs. direct democracy?
  • Visionary concepts for intermediate democracy
    models the discussion is opened
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com