Title: Identification of Hazardous Airborne Organisms
1Identification of Hazardous Airborne Organisms
Advisors Dr. Todd D. Giorgio and Dr. Paul H. King
2Introduction
- Also known as sick building syndrome,
Stachybotrys chartarum is becoming a much
publicized problem in the United States after
large outbreaks have been reported in Cleveland,
OH and Chicago, IL. - Colonies of stachybotrys release spores
containing mycotoxins that cause pulmonary
hemorrhaging and hemosiderosis - These diseases are often lethal in children, and
may be the cause of many deaths previously
attributed to SIDS.
3Background
- Stachybotrys is the most common form of hazardous
mold found in up to 46 million residential homes
and schools - Stachybotrys grows on materials with a high
cellulose content that are at least 94 water
saturated - Spores containing mycotoxins are released from
the mold as the fungus dries up - Mycotoxins cause pulmonary hemorrhaging and
hemosiderosis upon inhalation into the alveoli
and release of Satratoxin H
4The Toxin Satratoxin H
5History of Mold Testing
- Prior to the recent media interest in hazardous
molds, testing did not occur until mold was
visible or until physical symptoms of residents
occurred - Currently, the testing process is very slow.
Home tests require that a sample of the visible
mold be taken and sent to a laboratory. This is
often difficult, since the mold usually grows
between walls.
6Project Description
- Designing a chemical test to rapidly identify the
specific airborne mycotoxins produced by
stachybotrys - Creating an independent preventative or
diagnostic device to test for the airborne toxic
spores in homes that can be easily used by the
layperson
7Progression of Stachybotrys from Growth to
Illness
8Ways to Detect Stachybotrys
Type of Test Pros Cons
Physical ID of mold Does not take much equipment Easy to learn Unreliable (comparatively) Could expose identifier to mycotoxin
Genetic ID of mold Very precise Could determine whether the mold is a toxin-producer Must be taken into a laboratory Time consuming Requires much training Expensive
Chemical test for mycotoxin Precise Distinguishes the specific toxin produced Expensive lab equipment Usually needs to be taken to a laboratory
Biological test for mycotoxin Very precise Can calibrate sensitivity Only senses mycotoxin producing species Expensive Difficult technology Requires training May require laboratory
9Biological Testing Procedures
Type of Test Pros Cons
Antibody-coated refractive plate May be made into a portable device Can be calibrated Difficult technology Must create antibody Difficult sensitivity calibration
ELISA Common biological test Precise Simple positive/negative response Must create antibody Must be done in a laboratory May need fluorescence equipment
BIAcore Theres one at Vanderbilt! Precise Must create antibody Limited by material properties
Single-cell calorimeter Very small! Biologically calibrated Little toxin exposure is necessary Cannot calibrate Difficult design Expensive equipment Imprecise
10Timeline of Progress
11Pictures