Perspectives on Human Nature and Government - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Perspectives on Human Nature and Government

Description:

Jean-Jacques Rousseau Jean-Jacques Rousseau – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:201
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: SDU109
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Perspectives on Human Nature and Government


1
Perspectives on Human Nature and Government
  • Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau

2
Opening Questions
  • Are humans inherently good? Why?
  • What makes humans good/bad? Why?
  • Why do we have/need government or rules for
    society (if we even do)?

3
Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679)
  • Social order is created by humans. Therefore,
    they can change it.

Without government, society would be solitary,
poor, nasty, brutish, and short!
4
Thomas Hobbes
  • People need order.
  • People will be willing to give up individual
    liberties to maintain peace.
  • The social contract is an agreement to obey the
    laws.
  • But, human nature will not allow this to happen!
  • Thus, the need for authoritarian government.

5
John Locke (1632-1704)
  • Locke observed that, in society, people were
    rewarded based upon their industriousness.
  • But, people should not accumulate too much money,
    otherwise society could become a horrible place.
  • He proposed (like Hobbes before him) that people
    needed a sense of order. But how to achieve
    order while maximizing individual liberties?

6
John Locke
  • Locke stressed the moral imperative that
    prevented humans from pursuing a free-for-all.
  • A moral imperative is a principle originating
    inside a person's mind that compels him to act.

7
John Locke
  • In Locke's philosophy, tabula rasa is the theory
    that data is added to the human mind and rules
    for processing are formed solely by one's sensory
    experiences.
  • As understood by Locke, tabula rasa emphasizes
    the individual's freedom to author his or her own
    soul. Each individual is free to define the
    content of his or her character.

8
Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712-1778)
  • Human nature is basically good
  • Admired the noble savage humans living in a
    state of simple freedom governing themselves
    compassionate
  • Society civilization are corrupting forces on
    the individual
  • Society robs us of our freedom makes us
    bloodthirsty

9
Jean-Jacques Rousseau
  • Agreed with Hobbes Social Contract mutual
    agreement to protect the rights of everyone not
    only the wealthy.
  • No person is above
    the law.

10
Jean-Jacques Rousseau
  • "Man is born free and everywhere he is in
    chains."

11
  • Hobbes (1588-1679)
  • Without government, society would be solitary,
    poor, nasty, brutish,
  • and short!
  • Without society, man would live in a state of
    nature, where we each
  • have unlimited natural freedoms.
  • Humanity needs the Social Contract in which
    individuals honor the
  • rights of others but lose certain freedoms.
    Unfortunately, human
  • nature will not allow this to happen (we are
    essentially greedy and
  • egocentric), thus, the need for authoritarian
    government.
  • Locke (1632-1704)
  • -People need a sense of order.
  • Humans are born as blank slates (tabula rasa),
    which means society can instill proper morality,
    and thus, a conscience.
  • Tabula rasa also implies self-determination and
    nurture in the nature vs. nurture debate.
  • Rousseau (1712-1778)
  • -Believed in the concept of the Noble Savage, in
    which humans come from a state of compassionate
    simplicity.
  • -Believed that Human Nature is essentially good.
  • -Pride and civilization distance humanity from
    its original, natural state of goodness. "Man is
    born free and everywhere he is in chains."
  • -Agreed with Hobbes Social Contract, but felt
    more optimistic of its success.

12
  • Hobbes (1588-1679)
  • Without government, society would be solitary,
    poor, nasty, brutish,
  • and short!
  • Without society, man would live in a state of
    nature, where we each
  • have unlimited natural freedoms.
  • State of nature leads to Right to all things"
    and thus the freedom
  • to harm all who threaten one's own
    self-preservation
  • Right to all Things leads to War of all
    against all" (Bellum omnium
  • contra omnes), and thus chaos, anarchy, end of
    the world-type stuff.
  • Humanity needs the Social Contract in which
    individuals honor the
  • rights of others but lose certain freedoms.
    Unfortunately, human
  • nature will not allow this to happen (we are
    essentially greedy and
  • egocentric), thus, the need for authoritarian
    government.

13
  • Locke (1632-1704)
  • People need a sense of order.
  • Society avoids chaos because of the Moral
    Imperative.
  • The Moral Imperative is based on conscience
    (God).
  • Humans are born as blank slates (tabula rasa),
    which
  • means society can instill proper morality, and
    thus, a
  • conscience.
  • Tabula rasa also implies self-determination and
  • nurture in the nature vs. nurture debate.

14
  • Rousseau (1712-1778)
  • Believed in the concept of the Noble Savage, in
    which
  • humans come from a state of compassionate
    simplicity.
  • Believed that Human Nature is essentially good.
  • Pride and civilization distance humanity from
    its original,
  • natural state of goodness. "Man is born free
    and
  • everywhere he is in chains."
  • Agreed with Hobbes Social Contract, but felt
    more
  • optimistic of its success.

15
Which theory does Shelley seem to follow in
Frankenstein?
  • Hobbes (1, 4) Humans inherently bad need
    society to balance competing self-interests
  • Locke (2, 5) Humans are blank slate morality
    can be instilled by society
  • Rousseau (3,6) Humans are born good
    civilization drives us away from goodness

16
In your groups
  • Generate an open-ended discussion question about
    the monster that focuses on society, nature v.
    nurture, etc.
  • As a group, answer your question from your
    philosophers perspective and come up with
    responses to others critiques of your argument
  • Each group will assign a leader to lead the class
    in a brief (3-4 minute) discussion of your
    question.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com