Connectors, Cables, and Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 46
About This Presentation
Title:

Connectors, Cables, and Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC)

Description:

Title: Connectors, cables, and EMC Author: CReSIS Last modified by: callen Created Date: 9/8/2006 3:46:30 PM Document presentation format: On-screen Show – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:304
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 47
Provided by: CReSIS
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Connectors, Cables, and Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC)


1
Connectors, Cables, and Electromagnetic
Compatibility (EMC)
Chris Allen (callen_at_eecs.ku.edu) Course website
URL people.eecs.ku.edu/callen/713/EECS713.htm
2
Connectors
  • Purpose
  • Transmit signals ( DC levels) across board
    boundaries while preserving signal fidelity
  • Issues factors that can affect signal fidelity
    (Tr , noise level)
  • Crosstalk (inductive)
  • Series inductance
  • Electromagnetic interference
  • Ground continuity
  • Capacitance

3
Connectors
  • Consider the connection between two
    printed-circuit boards
  • Assume the connector length, H, is electrically
    shorti.e., H ltlt l, l vp Tr
  • Consider the return current path both current
    paths X and Y share the same ground pin
  • Part of the magnetic flux from signal X is
    enclosed in signal Ys circuit path
  • ? The result is mutual inductance between X and
    Y, LXYmutual inductance ? crosstalk
  • Estimate of LXY includes contribution by signal
    and return current
  • LXY has a componentfrom the current overlap
  • LXY has a componentfrom the ground pins
    inductance

4
Connectors
  • To first order
  • wherea distance from signal X to signal Y
    (inches)b distance from signal Y to ground pin
    (inches)c distance from signal X to ground pin
    (inches)D diameter of connector pin (inches)H
    pin length in connector (inches)LXY mutual
    inductance between loops X Y (nH)

Overlap
Ground pin
5
Connectors
  • Example
  • Consider a standard connector with 100-mil pitch,
    500-mil connector pin length, 10-mil pin diameter
  • Find LXY for case when X, Y, and return path are
    in adjacent pins
  • a 100 mils
  • b 100 mils
  • c 200 mils
  • H 0.5
  • D 0.010

80 of LXY is from ground pin 20 from overlap
Inductance from the ground pinis typically
larger than the overlap term
6
Connectors
  • The induced signal, E, is
  • Half of the crosstalk signal is launched in the
    forward direction, half in the reverse direction,
    therefore the induced voltage is LXY/(2RTr)
  • Consider GaAs gates (Tr 150 ps) with R Zo
    50 ?for LXY 9.37 nH, the crosstalk will be
    0.62
  • The coupled signal is 60 of the full signal
    swingmostly due to the shared ground pin
  • Lesson learned mutual inductance is mostly
    responsible for crosstalk generated by connectors

7
Connectors
  • How to reduce crosstalk in the connector?
  • Increase Tr ? may adversely affect system
    performance
  • Increase Zo and R
  • Decrease LXY
  • Now explore ways to reduce LXY
  • Recall that 80 if LXY came from the ground pin
    term
  • ? changing the pin spacing has little effect
  • To reduce LXY we can provide parallel ground pins

8
Connectors
  • After adding a ground pins, reduces LXY
  • For this case the return current through the
    lower ground pin is reduced 50 the mutual
    inductance due to overlap similarly reduced.
  • Likewise the addition of a second ground pin
    reduces the mutual inductance due to ground-pin
    inductance is reduced by 50.
  • However benefits from adding further ground-pin
    are reduced.

Ground pin
Overlap
9
Connectors
  • To reduce LXY further, separate X Y with
    intervening ground pins
  • For this case ground pins are added between the X
    Y signal pathsthe ground-pin inductance
    becomes less significant than the overlap
  • LXY is reduced by approximately 1/(1N2)
  • For N 5
  • Adding ground pins outside X Y does little to
    reduce crosstalk
  • Summary use plenty of extra ground pins
    separate signal pins as much as possible

10
Series inductance
  • Just as we saw with PC board traces, a
    disruption in the return current path results
    in an increased inductance
  • While the return current path follows the path
    of least inductance, a portion may pass through
    GND1 or GND3
  • The result will be a larger current loopthat
    introduces series inductance
  • Longer risetime
  • Potential crosstalk
  • Radiation of energy electromagnetic
    interference (EMI)

11
Series inductance
  • Guidelines for reducing series inductance
  • Use extra ground pins in connectorsprovides low
    impedance return path
  • Place all connectors with common elements close
    togetherreduces loop area
  • Provide a low impedance ground on both
    boardsreduces loop area

12
Ground continuity beneath connector
  • Ground pins in connector provide a return path
    for the signal current
  • Placement of the ground pins and how it connects
    to the ground plane is important
  • The large slot in the ground plane causes the
    return current to take a longer path

13
Ground continuity beneath connector
  • A preferred layout provides path for the return
    current

14
Ground continuity beneath connector
  • Should also consider reassigning the pins on the
    connector to avoid having all ground pins on the
    far side

15
High-speed signal connectors
  • Custom connectors have been designed for
    high-speed applications
  • Characteristics
  • Internal ground structures
  • Low-impedance ground path
  • Deliberately increased pin capacitance to balance
    the pin inductance

Amphenol NeXLev Characteristics Ball grid array
attach for high density surface mount Handles
data rates up to 12 Gb/s High signal density Up
to 145 real single-ended signals per linear
inch Approx 30 lb mating force for 300 I/O module
Amphenol NeXLev Mezzanine Connector
16
High-speed signal connectors
  • Custom connectors have been designed for
    high-speed applications

Designed for 25 Gb/s Performance 85 and 100 ohm
impedance High signal density Up to 84
differential signals per inch
Routing out in two layers. First layer shown in
blue, second layer shown in red.
Amphenol XCede Backplane Connector
Double ground vias are spaced 1.56 mm apart
providing a wide secondary routing channel.
17
Flex circuits as connectors/cables
  • Flexible circuits is a technology for assembling
    electronic circuits by mounting electronic
    devices on flexible plastic substrates, such as
    polyimide
  • Can support controlled-impedance transmission
    lines (e.g., 50 ?) in microstrip or stripline
    geometries
  • Low observed crosstalk (lt 2 in microstrip)
  • Different types of flex circuits are available

Single Layer
Double Layer
Multiple Layer
Rigid Flex
18
Flex circuits as connectors/cables
  • Flexible circuits is a technology for assembling
    electronic circuits by

19
Ribbon cables
  • In digital systems, multiple signals are passed
    between boards
  • For wide-bandwidth signals, controlled-impedance
    transmission lines are typically used
  • At low frequencies, ribbon cables are often used
  • Ribbon cables, like most other cable geometries,
    have limited frequency response due to the skin
    effect
  • As a result, the risetime becomes degraded
    (longer Tr) and this becomes worse with cable
    length
  • Crosstalk can also be significantAs in the
    connector, this depends on placement of ground
    conductors for return the current path
  • Can be reduced by introducing extra grounds
  • G S G G S G G S G

20
Ribbon cables
  • Alternative assignments of conductors within
    ribbon cable

21
Ribbon cables
  • To reduce the radiation from the cable, various
    techniques can be applied
  • Twist differential wire pairs
  • Shield the entire cable with conductive layer
    (e.g., foil)
  • Add a choke
  • Flat ribbon cable with periodically twisted
    adjacent wire pairs are commercially available

22
Ribbon cables
  • Shielded ribbon cable
  • Continuous conductive shield contains the
    electric field and provides return current path
    for any stray currents
  • Ensuring ground continuity at the connectors is
    essential to achieve the desired performance

23
Ribbon cables
  • Balanced and unbalanced lines
  • A balanced line is a pair of similar conductors
    that have equal impedances along their length and
    have equal impedances to ground and to other
    circuits.
  • Conductors in an unbalanced line have dissimilar
    conductors or do not have equal impedances to
    ground or other circuits
  • Balanced and unbalanced circuits can be
    interconnected using a transformer called a balun
  • Compared to unbalanced circuits, balanced
    circuits have better rejection of external noise

Balanced
Unbalanced
24
Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC)
  • EMC pertains to the ability of a device,
    equipment, or system to function satisfactorily
    in its electromagnetic (EM) environment without
    introducing intolerable EM disturbances to
    anything in that environment
  • The two main aspects of EMC are
  • function satisfactorily EM susceptibility (EMS)
  • without producing intolerable disturbances EM
    interference (EMI)
  • EMI standards are set by regulatory agencies
  • Commercial products in the USFederal
    Communication Commission (FCC), Part 15
  • Military products in the USMIL-STD-461E
  • EMS standards are set according to the
    application
  • Regulated medical devices, military
  • Unregulated commercial products (market driven)

25
FCC regulations for digital devices
  • For high-speed digital systems, EMS
    (susceptibility) is a measure of how well the
    system will perform its function in the presence
    of EM signals
  • example, next to an AM or FM radio transmitter,
    near an airport with a powerful radar
  • EMI for digital devices is regulated by FCC for
  • An unintentional radiator (device or system)
    that generates and uses timing signals or pulses
    at a rate in excess of 9,000 pulses (cycles) per
    second and uses digital techniques inclusive of
    telephone equipment that uses digital techniques
    or any device or system that generates and uses
    radio frequency energy for the purpose of
    performing data processing functions such as
    electronics computations, operations,
    transformations, recording, filing, sorting,
    storage, retrieval, or transfer.
  • fclk ? 9 kHz

26
FCC regulations for digital devices
  • The FCC divides digital devices into two classes
  • Class A marketed for use in commercial,
    industrial, or business environment
  • Class B marketed for use in the residential
    environment
  • Personal computers fall under Class B
  • Class B regulations are stricter than Class A
  • FCC regulations have the force of lawfines
    and/or jail for willful violation
  • Two forms of emissions are regulated
  • Conducted emissions
  • Radiated emissions
  • Conducted emissions pertain to currents passed
    through the units AC power cord and connected to
    the power grid.
  • The concern is enhanced radiation due to the
    large antenna represented by the AC
    distribution network

27
FCC regulations for digital devices
  • FCC regulation on conducted emissions are
    concerned with the frequency range from 450 kHz
    to 30 MHz
  • Although the emission to be controlled is
    current, the limits are in volts
  • A line impedance stabilization network (LISN)
    in-line with the AC power cord converts the
    interfering current to a measurable voltage

28
FCC regulations for digital devices
  • Line impedance stabilization network (LISN)
  • Purpose
  • prevent noise externalto test from
    contaminatingmeasurement
  • present constant impedance(in frequency and site
    to site) to the product between phase ground
    and betweenneutral ground
  • IP VP/50, IN VN/50
  • 50 ? represents input to spectrum analyzer
  • 1 k? (R1) is to provide discharge path for C1
    when 50 ? is not present
  • FCC limits for conducted emissions
  • Class A digital devices Class B digital devices
  • 0.45 to 1.705 MHz, 1000 ?V or 60 dB?V 0.45 to 30
    MHz, 250 ?V or 48 dB?V
  • 1.705 MHz to 50 MHz, 3000 ?V or 69.5 dB?V

29
FCC regulations for digital devices
  • Second form of emission is radiated emission
    electric and magnetic fields
  • Regulation requires measurement of E-field only
  • Measured field strength in ?V/m or dB?V/m
  • From 30 MHz to 40 GHz
  • Both V H polarizations with respect to ground
    plane of test site
  • Measured at a specific distance
  • To be measured in open-field test site over a
    ground plane with tuned dipole
  • Difficult to accomplish so preliminary tests
    are made with
  • Broadband antennas (biconical or log-periodic
    antennas)
  • In a semi-anechoic chamber

100-kHz BWquasi-peak detector
30
FCC regulations for digital devices
  • FCC limits for radiated emissionsfrom digital
    devices
  • Class A _at_ 10 m distance30 to 88 MHz 39
    dB?V/m88 to 216 MHz 43.5 dB?V/m216 to 960
    MHz 46 dB?V/mabove 960 MHz 49.5 dB?V/m
  • Class B _at_ 3 m distance30 to 88 MHz 40
    dB?V/m88 to 216 MHz 43.5 dB?V/m216 to 960
    MHz 46 dB?V/mabove 960 MHz 54 dB?V/m
  • In the far field, field strength goes as 1/r
  • so at 200 MHz, while both classes
  • have limit at 43.5 dB?V/m (150 ?V/m)
  • Class B limit is tighter by 10/3 or 3.33
  • due to the closer measurement
  • distance

31
FCC regulations for digital devices
  • How difficult is this level to achieve?
  • ExampleTTL low-power Schottky logic (Tr ? 6 ns,
    I ? 8 mA) test circuit using coplanar strip
    transmission lineThis simple circuit violates
    both Class A and B limits

32
Radiated emissions
  • In high-speed digital circuitsradiated emissions
    gt conducted emissions
  • Radiated emission come from currents on wires
    (PCB traces)
  • Current type is key in determining radiated
    emission level
  • Two current types
  • differential-mode current
  • common-mode current
  • Consider two parallel conductorseach carrying
    current I1, I2
  • These currents can be decomposed
    intodifferential-mode current, IDcommon-mode
    current, IC

33
Radiated emissions
  • ID, differential-mode currents equal amplitude,
    opposite direction
  • Differential currents desired currents on
    transmission line
  • Common-mode currents undesired
  • IC not predicted in transmission line analysis
  • Typically, IC ltlt ID
  • however IC produces larger radiated emissions
    than ID
  • Why?
  • From Faradays law that in the far field

Predicted in transmission line analysis
In far field, differential-mode fields cancel
In far field, common-mode fields add
34
Radiated emissions
  • Example
  • Consider a 1-m long ribbon cable, with a 50-mil
    pitch
  • When carrying a signal with 30-MHz, 20-mA
    differential current
  • it produces a radiated emission of 100 ?V/m _at_ 3 m
  • To produce the same radiated emission level with
    common-mode current requires 8 ?A (30-MHz
    frequency _at_ 3 m distance)
  • 20 mA / 8 ?A 2500 or 68 dB of difference
  • Conclusion The radiation efficiency of
    common-mode currents is more than 1,000,000 times
    greater than that of differential-mode currents
  • How are common-mode currents created?
  • Structural asymmetries, large loop areas

35
Radiated emissions
  • How to quantify the radiated emissions
  • Consider the conductor pair
  • Assumptions
  • Sinusoidal currents
  • Conductor spacing (S) is small, S ltlt ?
  • First the radiation from differential-mode
    current
  • At a point in the plane of the conductorsat a
    distance d from the midpoint
  • ED increases with current (ID), frequency (f),
    length (L), and separation (S) and decreases
    with distance (d)

36
Radiated emissions
  • Radiation from differential-mode current
  • Note the term L?S loop area A
  • The parameter of interest is
  • where K1 1.316 x 10-14/d
  • letting d 3 m (Class B)
  • makes K1 4.39 x 10-15
  • Thus ED/ID increases with frequency at 40
    dB/decade

37
Radiated emissions
  • Radiation from differential-mode current
  • Recall that for digital signalsfor f gt fCLK, the
    signal power spectral density changes at 20
    dB/decadefor f gt Fknee, the signal power
    spectral density changes at 40 dB/decade

38
Radiated emissions
  • Radiation from differential-mode current
  • Combining the spectral response of
    differential-mode current radiation with the
    digital signal spectrum yields the expected
    spectral characteristics radiated by a digital
    differential-mode current
  • To reduce ED we can
  • Reduce ID (technology limited)
  • Reduce Fknee (increase Tr)
  • Reduce the loop area, A
  • From a practical perspectivereducing the loop
    area, A, is most realistic

39
Radiated emissions
  • Now the radiation from common-mode current
  • At a point in the plane of the conductorsat a
    distance d from the midpoint
  • EC increases with current (IC), frequency (f),
    length (L),and decreases with distance (d)
  • Note
  • linear frequency, not f 2
  • no dependence on separation (S)
  • numerical scale factor is 8 orders of magnitude
    larger
  • Can simply into the form
  • where K2 1.257 x 10-6/d or for d 3 m, K2
    4.19 x 10-7
  • EC/IC increases with frequency at 20 dB/decade

40
Radiated emissions
  • Radiation from common-mode current
  • Combining the spectral response of common-mode
    current radiation with the digital signal
    spectrum yields the expected spectral
    characteristics radiated by a digital common-mode
    current
  • To reduce EC we can
  • Reduce IC
  • Reduce Fknee (increase Tr)
  • Reduce the length, L

41
Radiated emissions
  • Other differences in the radiation from
    common-mode and differential-mode currents
  • Radiated fields from differential-mode
    currentsare largest in the planecontaining the
    currentsand have nulls in the planeof symmetry
  • ED is smaller for reduced S
  • Radiated fields from common-mode currentsare
    uniformly large in all directions
  • EC is independent of S

42
Radiated emissions
  • Returning now to the example
  • fCLK 10 MHzTr 6 ns (TTL LS)
  • L 7 (178 mm)S 165 mils (4 mm)
  • ?V 4 VZo 400 ? ? ID 10 mA
  • Fknee 210 MHz ? Tr 2.4 ns
  • Spectral shape indicates radiation is from
    common-mode current

43
Radiated emissions
  • Returning now to the example
  • fCLK 10 MHz, Tr 6 ns, L 7 (178 mm), S
    165 mils (4 mm)
  • ?V 4 V, Zo 400 ? ? ID 10 mA
  • Assume IC 100 ?A
  • f ED max EC max
    .
  • 10 MHz fCLK 3 ?V/m (9 dB?V/m) 746 mV/m (117
    dB?V/m)
  • 200 MHz Fknee 1249 ?V/m (62 dB?V/m) 14.9 V/m
    (143 dB?V/m)

44
Reducing radiated emissions
  • To reduce EMI we can
  • Reduce the common-mode currents, IC ? EC
  • Reduce the loop area, A ? ED
  • Reduce Fknee ? ED and EC
  • To reduce Fknee (increase Tr)
  • We can insert a low-pass filter in the signal
    path if this does not impair the circuit
    performance
  • To reduce common-mode currents
  • We can use a common-mode choke
  • For currents where signal and return pass
    through the magnetic choke (e.g., 1, 2), the
    presence of the choke has no effect.
  • The number of turns 0 in this inductor.
  • For currents where the signal passes through the
    choke but the return does not (e.g., 3, 4), the
    choke increases the path inductance.
  • Number of turns 1 in this inductor.

45
Reducing radiated emissions
  • To enhance the chokes effectivenesswe can use
    multiple windings around the choke
  • We can reduce the loop area by using shielding
  • Signal conductors surrounded by a good conducting
    shield provides a low-impedance return path for
    the signals
  • If signal and return conductors are both
    surrounded by good conductor shields, the
    common-mode current will induce a return current
    in the shield
  • Radiated emissions are thus reduced
  • Breaks in the shield can cause significant
    radiated emissionsespecially at the cable ends
    where the shield and connector join
  • However multiple conductors within a shield may
    experience crosstalk

46
Reducing radiated emissions
  • Common-mode chokes suppress EC but do not help
    with ED
  • Recall that ED varies as a function of ?
  • We can take advantage of this feature in
    suppressing ED
  • Consider a twist in a conductor pairfor L ltlt l
    Tr/vp vp/(2 Fknee) ?knee/2
  • In the far field, the ED fields tend to cancel
  • Similarly, coupling into an adjacent straight
    wire will also cancel? reduces crosstalk
  • This technique, twisting wire pairs, does not
    help reduce radiation from common-mode currents
  • For adjacent twisted pair lines, crosstalk also
    cancels if twisted in a like direction and at
    similar intervals
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com