Better Management Practices in shrimp farming - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

Better Management Practices in shrimp farming

Description:

... for small-scale farmers, although possible for any ... Support farmers to: ... Farmers meetings. Regular pond visits. Training extension workers. Training ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:1429
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: card50
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Better Management Practices in shrimp farming


1
Better Management Practices in shrimp farming
Flavio Corsin
2
Increasing challenges
  • Shrimp farming successful till the 80s
  • Major source of livelihood/profits
  • 90s major diseases begin to appear (e.g. WSD)
  • Major impact on livelihood of small-scale
    producers
  • Drugs Chemicals (product quality)
  • Increasingly stringent standards
  • Declining prices
  • Environmental degradation
  • Allegations for poor socio-economical
    sustainability

3
Need forbetter more sustainableways to do
shrimp farming!
4
Need forsustainability
  • FAO CoC for Responsible Fisheries (whole
    fisheries sector)
  • Principles for responsible shrimp farming
  • Consortium program (WB, NACA, WWF, FAO, UNEP, )
  • Epidemiological (population-based) investigations
    to identify risk factors for diseases
  • DFID in Viet Nam and India (1997-2001)
  • ACIAR in India (2001)
  • Better Management Practices identified for India

5
BMP
  • BMP are practices that target
  • Environment protection
  • Improved shrimp health/production
  • Improved food safety
  • Socio-economic sustainability
  • Designed primarily for small-scale farmers,
    although possible for any scale
  • Reduced diseases is the main incentive

6
(No Transcript)
7
Markets
Should I buy these shrimp?
Yield Biomass
Shrimp Health
Environment
EarningsSocio-economics investment
Food safety
8
Valid regardless of the species or system
Principles for sustainable shrimp farming
Specific to the system
Better Management Practices Good Aquaculture
Practices
9
BMP history
  • NACA/MPEDA Farm demonstration in India (2002)
  • Gradual scaling up!
  • 2004-2005 NACA BMP projects in Viet Nam
  • Several more projects
  • ACIAR in Indonesia Thailand
  • NACA, FAO, WWF in Indonesia (post-tsunami)
  • NACA in Iran
  • WWF in Viet Nam
  • Government of Viet Nam
  • ACIAR BMP network
  • CARD, etc

10
BMPs in India
  • Started in 2002
  • Government promoted (MPEDA)
  • Aquaclubs (farmer groups)
  • Contract Hatcheries
  • Thousands of farmers

11
Establishment of NaCSA
BMPs in India
Expansion to 5 states
Expansion to other states
AP
Contract hatchery Seed Production
AP
2001 Survey 365 ponds Nellore n West God. Risk
factors BMPs
KA
OR
2007
KA
2005
2006
2003
2004
2002
GU
TN
NaCSA
GU
2002 Farm level demonstration 5 farmers 10
ponds 7 Ha 4 tonnes
2003 Village level extension 1 Village 1 Aquaclub
58 farmers 108 ponds 58 Ha 22 tonnes
2004 Creek level extension 6 Villages 7 Aquaclubs
130 farmers 254 ponds 173 Ha 40 tonnes
2005 State level expansion 3 States 19 Aquaclubs
736 farmers 1187 ponds 663 Ha 672 tonnes
2006 5 States 28 Aquaclubs 730 farmers 1370
ponds 813 Ha 870 t
2007-08 5 Coastal states 164 Societies 4903
farmers 5170 ha
Source N.R. Umesh, NaCSA
12
i. Reduced Disease Risks
ii. Improved profitability
BMPs in India
1 US 42 INR
  • Efficient use of resources (feed).
  • Reduced chemical use
  • Sharing of expenses
  • Easier loans
  • Food safety traceability
  • Links with market
  • Crop Calendar, Same time stocking with optimal
    density
  • Quality seed through Contract Hatcheries
  • Cooperation among farmers

Source N.R. Umesh, NaCSA
13
BMP in Viet Nam(NACA)
  • Started in 2004
  • Danida-funded project 5 provinces
  • NAFIQAVED developed GAP
  • Practices identified using experience from the
    region (India) within VN
  • System specific, practical affordable by
    farmers
  • Working with small-scale farmers
  • Promote disease control, food safety reduced
    environmental pollution

14
BMP in Viet Nam
  • Semi-intensive farming
  • Support farmers to
  • Prepare the pond better
  • Check seed quality at stocking (WSSV, general
    health)
  • Monitor pond bottom, water quality and shrimp
    health
  • Improve biosecurity during production
  • Keep records
  • Better management of heath problems (reduce
    chemical use)
  • Support implementation at every level (also
    extension workers, local and national authorities)

15
BMP dissemination
  • Farmers meetings
  • Regular pond visits
  • Training extension workers
  • Training volunteer Ext Workers
  • Extension material
  • Leaflets (10 steps)
  • Booklets
  • Pond books

16
Promoting farmer groups
  • Collaboration
  • Reduce costs WSSV testing of PL
  • Improve water management
  • Reduce disease spread
  • Volunteer extension workers
  • Key to BMPs dissemination
  • Help other farmers

17
BMP implementation
  • Farmers accepted BMPs
  • Evaluation at the end of cycle (questionnaire)
  • Indicators of BMP implementation
  • Removing soil before stocking
  • Not ploughing if acid soil
  • Testing PL for WSSV
  • Result of BMP application
  • Reduced the risk of mortality (x1.4 to x1.7)
  • Improved production per ha (x2 to x4)
  • Doubled probability of making a profit

18
BMP for all links
  • BMP for hatcheries
  • 6 pilots in 2 provinces
  • Similar production to non-BMP
  • Better quality (no antibiotics tested for
    pathogens,)
  • Better price by farmers
  • BMP for broodstock suppliers
  • BMP for seed middlemen

19
BMP/GAPHarmonization
  • BMP incorporated into GAP (NAFIQAVED) extension
    documents
  • Intensive farming
  • Semi-intensive farming
  • BMP disseminated also to other projects in VN

20
BMP in Viet Nam(WWF)
  • Started in 2007
  • CaMau prov. (1/4 production, 40 area)
  • Training for extension workers in farmer group
    establishment management
  • 6 cooperative gt100 farmers
  • QuangNam prov.
  • Wetland Alliance Program (Swedish-funded)
  • 13 groups 158 farmers
  • Soc Trang prov. (linked to MRC/RIA2 project)
  • 15 groups 278 farmers

21
BMP in Viet Nam
  • Farmers benefits
  • Improved production
  • Better technical expertise
  • Better cooperation
  • Increased bargaining power
  • Better access to credit (farmer funds)
  • Interest (farmers local govt) to expand
    activities
  • Exploring challenges and opportunities for
    certification (Shrimp Aquaculture Dialogue)
  • Developing links with the market
  • Collaboration with WWF Denmark buyers

22
Conclusions
  • BMP farmer groups are the solution for
    small-scale farmers
  • Monodon is arguably the only possible species
  • Declining prices
  • Solution?
  • BMP products are better
  • Markets request better products (better
    price/market access)
  • Need for traceability! Possible if farmers are
    clustered
  • Use WWF influence on consumers/retailers

23
Thank you
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com