Title: Better Management Practices in shrimp farming
1Better Management Practices in shrimp farming
Flavio Corsin
2Increasing challenges
- Shrimp farming successful till the 80s
- Major source of livelihood/profits
- 90s major diseases begin to appear (e.g. WSD)
- Major impact on livelihood of small-scale
producers - Drugs Chemicals (product quality)
- Increasingly stringent standards
- Declining prices
- Environmental degradation
- Allegations for poor socio-economical
sustainability
3Need forbetter more sustainableways to do
shrimp farming!
4Need forsustainability
- FAO CoC for Responsible Fisheries (whole
fisheries sector) - Principles for responsible shrimp farming
- Consortium program (WB, NACA, WWF, FAO, UNEP, )
- Epidemiological (population-based) investigations
to identify risk factors for diseases - DFID in Viet Nam and India (1997-2001)
- ACIAR in India (2001)
- Better Management Practices identified for India
5BMP
- BMP are practices that target
- Environment protection
- Improved shrimp health/production
- Improved food safety
- Socio-economic sustainability
- Designed primarily for small-scale farmers,
although possible for any scale - Reduced diseases is the main incentive
6(No Transcript)
7Markets
Should I buy these shrimp?
Yield Biomass
Shrimp Health
Environment
EarningsSocio-economics investment
Food safety
8Valid regardless of the species or system
Principles for sustainable shrimp farming
Specific to the system
Better Management Practices Good Aquaculture
Practices
9BMP history
- NACA/MPEDA Farm demonstration in India (2002)
- Gradual scaling up!
- 2004-2005 NACA BMP projects in Viet Nam
- Several more projects
- ACIAR in Indonesia Thailand
- NACA, FAO, WWF in Indonesia (post-tsunami)
- NACA in Iran
- WWF in Viet Nam
- Government of Viet Nam
- ACIAR BMP network
- CARD, etc
10BMPs in India
- Started in 2002
- Government promoted (MPEDA)
- Aquaclubs (farmer groups)
- Contract Hatcheries
- Thousands of farmers
11Establishment of NaCSA
BMPs in India
Expansion to 5 states
Expansion to other states
AP
Contract hatchery Seed Production
AP
2001 Survey 365 ponds Nellore n West God. Risk
factors BMPs
KA
OR
2007
KA
2005
2006
2003
2004
2002
GU
TN
NaCSA
GU
2002 Farm level demonstration 5 farmers 10
ponds 7 Ha 4 tonnes
2003 Village level extension 1 Village 1 Aquaclub
58 farmers 108 ponds 58 Ha 22 tonnes
2004 Creek level extension 6 Villages 7 Aquaclubs
130 farmers 254 ponds 173 Ha 40 tonnes
2005 State level expansion 3 States 19 Aquaclubs
736 farmers 1187 ponds 663 Ha 672 tonnes
2006 5 States 28 Aquaclubs 730 farmers 1370
ponds 813 Ha 870 t
2007-08 5 Coastal states 164 Societies 4903
farmers 5170 ha
Source N.R. Umesh, NaCSA
12i. Reduced Disease Risks
ii. Improved profitability
BMPs in India
1 US 42 INR
- Efficient use of resources (feed).
- Reduced chemical use
- Sharing of expenses
- Easier loans
- Food safety traceability
- Links with market
- Crop Calendar, Same time stocking with optimal
density - Quality seed through Contract Hatcheries
- Cooperation among farmers
Source N.R. Umesh, NaCSA
13BMP in Viet Nam(NACA)
- Started in 2004
- Danida-funded project 5 provinces
- NAFIQAVED developed GAP
- Practices identified using experience from the
region (India) within VN - System specific, practical affordable by
farmers - Working with small-scale farmers
- Promote disease control, food safety reduced
environmental pollution
14 BMP in Viet Nam
- Semi-intensive farming
- Support farmers to
- Prepare the pond better
- Check seed quality at stocking (WSSV, general
health) - Monitor pond bottom, water quality and shrimp
health - Improve biosecurity during production
- Keep records
- Better management of heath problems (reduce
chemical use) - Support implementation at every level (also
extension workers, local and national authorities)
15BMP dissemination
- Farmers meetings
- Regular pond visits
- Training extension workers
- Training volunteer Ext Workers
- Extension material
- Leaflets (10 steps)
- Booklets
- Pond books
16Promoting farmer groups
- Collaboration
- Reduce costs WSSV testing of PL
- Improve water management
- Reduce disease spread
- Volunteer extension workers
- Key to BMPs dissemination
- Help other farmers
17BMP implementation
- Farmers accepted BMPs
- Evaluation at the end of cycle (questionnaire)
- Indicators of BMP implementation
- Removing soil before stocking
- Not ploughing if acid soil
- Testing PL for WSSV
- Result of BMP application
- Reduced the risk of mortality (x1.4 to x1.7)
- Improved production per ha (x2 to x4)
- Doubled probability of making a profit
18BMP for all links
- BMP for hatcheries
- 6 pilots in 2 provinces
- Similar production to non-BMP
- Better quality (no antibiotics tested for
pathogens,) - Better price by farmers
- BMP for broodstock suppliers
- BMP for seed middlemen
19BMP/GAPHarmonization
- BMP incorporated into GAP (NAFIQAVED) extension
documents - Intensive farming
- Semi-intensive farming
- BMP disseminated also to other projects in VN
20BMP in Viet Nam(WWF)
- Started in 2007
- CaMau prov. (1/4 production, 40 area)
- Training for extension workers in farmer group
establishment management - 6 cooperative gt100 farmers
- QuangNam prov.
- Wetland Alliance Program (Swedish-funded)
- 13 groups 158 farmers
- Soc Trang prov. (linked to MRC/RIA2 project)
- 15 groups 278 farmers
21BMP in Viet Nam
- Farmers benefits
- Improved production
- Better technical expertise
- Better cooperation
- Increased bargaining power
- Better access to credit (farmer funds)
- Interest (farmers local govt) to expand
activities - Exploring challenges and opportunities for
certification (Shrimp Aquaculture Dialogue) - Developing links with the market
- Collaboration with WWF Denmark buyers
22Conclusions
- BMP farmer groups are the solution for
small-scale farmers - Monodon is arguably the only possible species
- Declining prices
- Solution?
- BMP products are better
- Markets request better products (better
price/market access) - Need for traceability! Possible if farmers are
clustered - Use WWF influence on consumers/retailers
23Thank you