Lysbeskyttende emballasje - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 26
About This Presentation
Title:

Lysbeskyttende emballasje

Description:

Hvilke faktorer er mest avgj rende for negative effekter som f lge av lys? ... UV-VIS spectrophotometer with integrating sphere. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:116
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: Ska94
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Lysbeskyttende emballasje


1
Lysbeskyttende emballasje
  • Fagseminar 19/5-2008
  • Den Norske Emballasjeforening
  • Fredrik E. Skaug
  • Elopak Board and barriers

2
Outline
  • Elopak (Hvem, Hva, Hvor)
  • Elopaks tilnærming til beskyttelse mot lys
  • Hvordan måles lysbarriere?
  • Kjemi (Verdt å Vite, eks. melk)
  • Hvilke faktorer er mest avgjørende for negative
    effekter som følge av lys?
  • Materialer og beskyttelse - lystransmissjonkurver
  • Elopaks materialer
  • Transparente materialer (PET)
  • HDPE

ELOPAK
3
Introducing ElopakWho we areWhat we doHow we
do it
4
Elopak Supplies Complete Packaging System
Solutions
Cartons
Competence
Handling
Filling
Closures
5
A Strong Portfolio of Packaging Systems for
Liquid Food Products
6
Elopak World Wide Presence
  • 17 manufacturing plants for carton and plastic
    bottles, materials handling equipment and filling
    machines for carton all over the world
  • Food science and technology are at the heart of
    what we do, however our people are our most
    valuable asset
  • The company is part of the privately owned Ferd
    Group.

7
Key figures 2007
  • Net sales revenue NOK 5.478 mill.
  • (EURO 683 mill.)
  • Carton sales 11,3 billion units
  • Operational Result NOK 296 mill.
  • (EURO 37 mill.)
  • Number of employees 2500 )
  • Number of salesand service offices More than
    40
  • Number formanufacturing units 17)
  • Sales to More than 100 markets
  • Pure-Pak Associates 4

) incl. Joint Ventures
8
Elopak history
  • Elopak (European licensee of Pure-Pak) was
    formed in 1957
  • A major supplier of Pure-Pak cartons in Europe.
  • In 1987, Elopak purchased the U.S. assets of
    Ex-Cell-O Corporation's Packaging Systems
    Division.
  • Today Elopak is one of the world's leading
    companies within liquid food packaging, with a
    global network of production centers, sales
    offices, subsidiaries and licensees.

Patent 19. October 1915
9
ELOPAK
10
Elopak approach - market trends
11
Competence and customer needs
  • Holds necessary competence within
  • Physics of light
  • Material science
  • Effect of light on liquid products (focus milk /
    juice)
  • Provides light barrier solutions based on
  • Customer needs
  • Own experience and trials

12
Explanation to light wavelengths
  • To show the relationship between visible light,
    color and wavelengths the electromagnetic
    spectrum is a good illustration
  • Light (UV or Visible) is given by one range of
    wavelengths, as is
  • IR-radiation,
  • radiowaves,
  • microwaves etc
  • Gamma rays

13
How to determine light barrier of a material
  • UV-VIS spectrophotometer with integrating sphere.
  • Given intensity from a controlled light source,
  • Percentage of light that goes through the package
    material per wavelength
  • Transmission data is given for 300nm-700nm.
  • all the wavelengths of visible light
    (400nm-700nm)
  • near UV range (300nm-400nm).

14
Model for action of light and oxygen
UVB UVA
Other photosensitizers in other foods act similar
to riboflavin. Absorbs at different wavelengths
15
The photosensitiser - Riboflavin
Absorption spectrum
16
Photosensitisers general principle
17
Effects of light exposure on milk
The classical picture
  • Vitamin degradation Riboflavin (in
    hours) Vitamin A Vitamin C
  • Oxidation products Dimethyl sulphide (in
    hours) Pentanal Hexanal 1-Octen-3-one
    Acetaldehyde 1-Hexen-3-one
  • Sensory changes Off-taste development

18
Sensory changes I
  • Burnt feather or sunlight flavour
  • Develops over 2 3 days (5 minutes in direct
    sunlight!)
  • Due to degradation of sulphur-containing amino
    acids in whey proteins
  • Was thought to be due to formation of methional
    now thought to be primarily due to the formation
    of dimethlysulphide

19
Sensory changes II
  • Cardboard or metallic flavour
  • Develops after 4 - 5 days
  • Due to lipid oxidation
  • e.g. formation of n-hexanal from linoleic
    acid

CH3(CH2)4CHCHCH2CHCH(CH2)7COOH
1O2
CH3(CH2)4CHCHCH2CHCH(CH2)7COOH
I O _ OH
CH3(CH2)4CHO
20
Which wavelengths of light are important?
nm 400 450
500 550 600
650 kJ.mol-1 298 238 198
Energy required for formation of singlet oxygen
92 kJ.mol-1 Energy required for
activation of singlet oxygen to triplet 104
kJ.mol-1
  • Visible light (400 700 nm) All l a potential
    problem

21
Most important influencing factors
  • Light source (emission spectra and intensity of
    the light sources)
  • Distance from light source to container
  • Obstacles between light source and container
  • Light barrier of the container (transmission
    spectrum)
  • Chemical premises (absorption spectra of
    photo-sensitizers).
  • Oxygen present in product/package
  • Oxygen transmission of material
  • Time
  • Temperature

22
Emission spectrum of sunlight
  • Exposure to sunlight should be avoided

23
Emission spectra of fluorescent tubes
Phillips 16/40 Yellow
Osram 19/40 Daylight
  • Some fluorescent tubes have emission lines which
    correspond to absorption bands of riboflavin

24
Light source - emission
Package material - transmission
Liquid product photosensitizer absorption
25
Light transmission, board vs plastics
26
Light transmission data, Elopak materials
27
Light transmission, pigmented PET
28
Light transsion of packaging materials
  • Plastic no barrier
  • Plastic no barrier
  • Plastic brown barrier
  • Cardboard
  • Plastic black barrier
  • UV light (200 380 nm) almost entirely absorbed
    by all packaging materials

29
Photo-protection by packaging materials
  • Many studies show
  • Transparent materials (glass and plastic) perform
    worst
  • Pigments in transparent plastics improve
    performance
  • Cartons and opaque plastics perform best
  • Direct comparisons between most studies are not
    possible due to multiple variables

Cladman et al 1998 Erikson 1997
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com