Strat Plan Model - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

Strat Plan Model

Description:

Performance measurement can be defined as. the process of routinely measuring the ... Old adage: you can't improve what you can't measure; moreover, if you don't ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:63
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: Pri83
Category:
Tags: adage | model | plan | strat

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Strat Plan Model


1
(No Transcript)
2
What is Performance Measurement?
  • Performance measurement can be defined as
  • the process of routinely measuring the
  • outputs and outcomes produced by a project,
  • thereby allowing one to assess the
  • effectiveness of project investments and
  • activities

3
Terms
  • Inputs resources allocated to a program
  • Outputs products, services or funded activities
  • Outcomes intended results of a program
  • Intermediate outcomes lead to end outcomes
  • End outcomes intended impact on society
  • Performance Measure measure associated with
    achievement of objective(s)
  • Performance Indicator An assumed indicator of
    performancefrequently a number or percentage

4
Assumed Causal Chain of Events
Enhanced Integration
Enhanced Decisions
Integration Planning
Better Criminal Records
Enhanced Public Safety
Integration Implementation
5
Assumed Causal Chain as Inputs, Outputs, and
Outcomes
Funding
Input
Integration Planning
Output
Integration Implementation
Output
Enhanced Integration
Intermediate Outcome
Better Criminal Records
Intermediate Outcome
Enhanced Decisions
Intermediate Outcome
Enhanced Public Safety
End Outcome
6
Outcomes and Performance Measures
  • Outcomes are the benefits or results gained by
    reaching goals, achieving objectives and
    resolving strategic issues
  • Performance Measures are specific, measurable,
    time-bound expressions of future accomplishment
    that relate to goals, objectives and strategic
    issues

7
  • Strategic Goal 3 Identify and recommend cost
  • effective biometric identification applications
  • Objective 3.1
  • By September 2004, research, identify, and
    recommend technological applications
  • that support biometrics for rapid identification.
  • Objective 3.2
  • By September 2004, research, identify, and
    evaluate the costs and benefits of
  • biometric identification applications.
  • Outcomes
  • Increased knowledge of biometric technologies
  • Improved cost-effective biometric
    identification solutions
  • Performance Measures
  • Number of research projects on biometric
    technological solutions completed
  • by September 2004
  • Number of research projects on costs and
    benefits of biometrics completed
  • by September 2004
  • Number of research reports presented to the
    Governing Body

8
Stakeholders must agree on performance measures
in advance
  • Perceived performance is an agreed-upon construct
  • Criteria for defining performance should be
    negotiated by stakeholders (and governing body)
    in advance of the PM process
  • Stakeholders will value outcomes differently
    depending on their role within (or relative to)
    the justice enterprise

9
Use scenario approach to reach agreement and
define performance
  • Bring stakeholders together to reach consensus on
    the desired state of integration
  • Define the current state of integration
    (baseline)
  • Quantify gap between current state and desired
    state
  • Define desired outcomes
  • Develop objectives and performance measures

10
Performance measurement caveats
  • Most people (including your employees and
    consultants) can learn to make the measures come
    out the way they think you want them to, while
    exerting a minimum of effort in actually
    improving a process
  • Always question the measures youve defined,
    keeping in mind that the people applying them
    could find ways of boosting the measures without
    really improving anything
  • Test each measure to determine if it operates as
    expected. Does it always go one way when things
    get better and the other when things get worse?

11
Sample Indicators
  • Quantitative Indicator Measurement of time from
    opening service ticket to closing ticket
  • Quantitative Indicator Measurement of time call
    was received to time ticket was opened.
  • Qualitative Indicator Measure of customer
    reaction to quality of service
  • Why would any one of these indicators be
    inadequate in isolation?

12
Family of related measures
  • Produce x widgets per hour
  • Produce x widgets per hour without exceeding y
    dollars
  • Produce x widgets per hour without exceeding y
    dollars with only one full-time employee
  • Produce x widgets per hour without exceeding y
    dollars and with only one full-time employee and
    generating z units of waste
  • Produce x widgets per hour without exceeding y
    dollars with only one full-time employee and
    generating z units of waste and at a zero defect
    rate

13
Performance measurement musts
  • Early and often, measure and evaluate progress
    toward the goals, objectives and outcomes defined
    by the governing body
  • Continually verify that defined measures actually
    correspond with the achievement of goals,
    objectives and outcomes
  • Resist overreaching measures of long-term,
    global outcomes tend to be unreliable.
  • Performance measurement is complex and requires
    significant expertiseinvolve experts!

14
Performance measurement indicators
  • Number of meetings held by Standards Committee
  • Number of research reports completed and
    published
  • Percentage reduction in annual felonies
  • Are these good indicators of performance?

15
Sample Unitary Measure
  • Number of criminal dispositions posted to
    criminal history repository
  • - How can this measure be subverted?
  • - Can this measure be improved by adding
    associated measures?

16
Logic Model Framework
 
17
Using Logic Model Framework to create performance
measures
  • Bring stakeholders together to work through logic
    model and define activities, outputs and outcomes
  • Reach consensus on measures related to
    activities, outputs and outcomes
  • Adopt a set of indicators that will accurately
    reflect the measures

18
Logic Model progression
Inputs
Activities
Outputs
Intermediate Outcomes
End Outcomes
19
Populated Logic Model
 
20
Working through the Logic Model
Inputs
Activities
Outputs
Intermediate Outcomes
End Outcomes
21
Logic Model group process
  • Use a focus group format
  • Start with long-term (end) outcomes
  • Work backwards from outcomes to inputs
  • Make sure each layer is logically linked to other
    layers

22
Why worry about all this?
  • Projects have been de-funded to lack of
    performance measure data
  • We are increasing asked to justify capital
    expenditures
  • We are in an era of increased public
    accountability

23
Final Points
  • Old adage you cant improve what you cant
    measure moreover, if you dont measure, things
    will probably get worse
  • You cant devise performance measures in a
    vacuum, you must involve stakeholders
  • You cant measure everything so you must
    carefully select a set of measures/indicators
    that are true barometers of performance
  • Involve experts when possible since performance
    measurement is tricky business
  • Remember that performance measurement can be
    expensive and time consuming so dont even bother
    unless you intend to use the results to provide
    ongoing process feedback
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com