Alternatives to BART Rule - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

Alternatives to BART Rule

Description:

Sources selling allowances: comply with Part 75 or submit to TSA if ... Prohibit source from emitting more emissions than source's allowance holdings. Penalty ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:53
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: kathyk4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Alternatives to BART Rule


1
Alternatives to BART Rule
  • Kathy Kaufman
  • Discussion with VISTAS
  • September 6-7, 2006

2
Overview Purpose of Alternatives to BART Rule
  • Fix Regional Haze Rule (RHR) to enable use of
    alternatives to BART in light of CEED court
    ruling.
  • Establish minimum elements of cap and trade
    programs under section 308(e)(2) of RHR.
  • Enable western states/tribes to continue use of
    GCVTC/WRAP strategies
  • -- Allow for Western states backstop SO2
    provisions -309(d) of RHR

3
Historical Background
  • Source-by Source BART
  • 1999 RHR 308(e)(1)
  • 2001 Guidelines proposed
  • Incl. Trading section
  • 2002 American Corn Growers
  • 2004 Guidelines 308(e)(1) revisions
    (re)proposed
  • 2005 Guidelines Final 6/15
  • Detailed trading section omitted due to CEED.
    Instead, separate rule?
  • Contained CAIR better than BART determination
  • Contained test for acceptability of alternative
    program
  • Trading/alternatives
  • 1999 RHR 308(e)(2) 309
  • 2000 WRAP submits Annex
  • 2003 Annex Rule
  • 2005 CEED nixes Annex Rule
  • 2005 (8/1) Alternatives to BART Rule proposed
  • 2006 (expected Sept.) Alternatives to BART
    rule final

4
CEED v. EPAD.C. Circuit, Feb. 18, 2005
  • Granted petition requesting that Annex Rule be
    vacated.
  • Basis of decision BART methodology used in
    Annex was invalid under American Corn Growers
  • Result
  • Rule which governed the 6 309 SIPs vacated
  • New deadlines and regulatory mechanism needed if
    GCVTC/WRAP strategies are to proceed
  • Provisions governing how alternative trading
    programs are shown to be better than BART must
    be revised to comply with CEED decision.

5
Source-by-source BART vs. Trading / Alternative
ID BART eligible sources
Determine sources subject to BART
source-by-source BART 308(e)(1)
trading or alternative to BART 308(e)(2)
Analyze Decide
Decide 309 or 308
BART determination
Demonstrate trading/alternative achieves greater
reasonable progress
6
Alternative Programs

309 Trading Program Requirements 40 CFR
51.309(d)(4) for WRAP states
308(e)(2) Trading Program Requirements 40 CFR
51.308(e)(2)(vi) For any States
or
7
RHR Revisions to allow continued use of
GCVTC/WRAP Strategies
  • Annex provisions repealed due to vacature
  • 309(f) (calling for Annex submittal)
  • 309(h) (codifying WRAP Annex)
  • Consequence milestones and all program details
    must be resubmitted
  • E.g, new source tribal set asides, allocation
    methodology, etc.
  • Basic requirements for backstop SO2 program SIP
    requirements provided in 309(d)(4)
  • Timing 309 SIPs / TIPs now also due in
    December, 2007
  • WRAP Annex process not repeated

8
308 Proposed Rules
  • Applies to all states
  • States can choose trading/alternative measure to
    BART 40 CFR 51.308(e)(2)
  • If alternative is cap trade program, rule
    identifies essential elements of the cap and
    trade program which must be met
  • 40 CFR 51.308(e)(2)(vi)

9
Approvability of Trading Program
  • If states choose cap and trade program in lieu of
    BART, then program must
  • Demonstrate trading program achieves greater
    reasonable progress than source-by-source BART
  • Meet criteria in 40 CFR 51.308(e)(2)(vi)
    essential elements of cap and trade programs
  • Trading program must include all necessary
    provisions to ensure emission reduction targets
    will be achieved
  • Be enforceable clearly written, and if
    regional, then participating states must have
    essentially the same program to ensure program is
    practicably enforceable.

10
Test for Greater Reasonable Progress i.e.
Better-than-BART
  • 308(e)(2) satisfied if
  • Emission reductions are greater under alternative
    and geographic distribution of emissions not
    substantially different
  • OR
  • If geographic distribution is different
  • Visibility does not decline at any affected
    Class I area
  • Alternative program produces greater overall
    improvement based on average across all areas.

11
Test for Greater Reasonable Progress i.e.
Better-than-BART, cont.
  • Where a requirement other than BART determines
    the level of emission reductions necessary, e.g.
  • CAIR
  • Reasonable progress
  • The BART benchmark is not forcing invalid
    reductions
  • Therefore, state may apply most-stringent BART
    assumptions in better than BART analysis

12
Universe of Sources in Program
  • Applicability
  • Define sources subject to program
  • BART and non-BART?
  • All sources in a category?
  • Facility cap?
  • BART and non-BART units at a facility? Program
    must be in place and established in SIP submitted
    December 2007.
  • Program must be in place and established in
    December, 2007 SIP submittal.

13
Elements Necessary in Trading Program
  • Allowances
  • - Total tonnage value of allowances allocated do
    not exceed emissions cap
  • Monitoring
  • Consistent accurate emissions measurements (a
    ton is a ton)
  • Those selling allowances
  • Boilers, combustion turbines, cement kilns Part
    75
  • Others source types Part 75 equivalent (same
    precision, reliability, accessibility, timeliness)

14
Elements Necessary in Trading Program, cont.
  • Recordkeeping
  • Ensure enforceability
  • Those selling allowances Meet Part 75
  • Reporting
  • Timely reporting with sufficient frequency to
    ensure enforceability, provide for audits
  • Sources selling allowances comply with Part 75
    or submit to TSA if EPA is not TSA

15
Elements Necessary in Trading Program, cont.
  • Tracking System
  • Publicly available, secure, centralized
  • Tracking in consistent manner
  • Authorized Account Representative
  • - Designate one individual authorized to
    represent source
  • Allowance Transfer
  • - Uniform procedures for timely transfer
    recording of allowances

16
Elements Necessary in Trading Program, cont.
  • Compliance
  • - Prohibit source from emitting more emissions
    than sources allowance holdings
  • Penalty
  • Mandatory allowance deduction for excess
    emissions
  • Allowance deduction shall be at least 3 to 1

17
Elements Necessary in Trading Program, cont.
  • Banking
  • - If banking is allowed, specify any restrictions
  • Program Assessment
  • - Periodic program assessment to determine if
    program is accomplishing goals, and determine if
    program modifications are needed
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com