Title: Alternatives to BART Rule
1Alternatives to BART Rule
- Kathy Kaufman
- Discussion with VISTAS
- September 6-7, 2006
2Overview Purpose of Alternatives to BART Rule
- Fix Regional Haze Rule (RHR) to enable use of
alternatives to BART in light of CEED court
ruling. - Establish minimum elements of cap and trade
programs under section 308(e)(2) of RHR. - Enable western states/tribes to continue use of
GCVTC/WRAP strategies - -- Allow for Western states backstop SO2
provisions -309(d) of RHR
3Historical Background
- Source-by Source BART
- 1999 RHR 308(e)(1)
- 2001 Guidelines proposed
- Incl. Trading section
- 2002 American Corn Growers
- 2004 Guidelines 308(e)(1) revisions
(re)proposed - 2005 Guidelines Final 6/15
- Detailed trading section omitted due to CEED.
Instead, separate rule? - Contained CAIR better than BART determination
- Contained test for acceptability of alternative
program
- Trading/alternatives
- 1999 RHR 308(e)(2) 309
- 2000 WRAP submits Annex
- 2003 Annex Rule
- 2005 CEED nixes Annex Rule
- 2005 (8/1) Alternatives to BART Rule proposed
- 2006 (expected Sept.) Alternatives to BART
rule final -
4CEED v. EPAD.C. Circuit, Feb. 18, 2005
- Granted petition requesting that Annex Rule be
vacated. - Basis of decision BART methodology used in
Annex was invalid under American Corn Growers - Result
- Rule which governed the 6 309 SIPs vacated
- New deadlines and regulatory mechanism needed if
GCVTC/WRAP strategies are to proceed - Provisions governing how alternative trading
programs are shown to be better than BART must
be revised to comply with CEED decision.
5Source-by-source BART vs. Trading / Alternative
ID BART eligible sources
Determine sources subject to BART
source-by-source BART 308(e)(1)
trading or alternative to BART 308(e)(2)
Analyze Decide
Decide 309 or 308
BART determination
Demonstrate trading/alternative achieves greater
reasonable progress
6Alternative Programs
309 Trading Program Requirements 40 CFR
51.309(d)(4) for WRAP states
308(e)(2) Trading Program Requirements 40 CFR
51.308(e)(2)(vi) For any States
or
7RHR Revisions to allow continued use of
GCVTC/WRAP Strategies
- Annex provisions repealed due to vacature
- 309(f) (calling for Annex submittal)
- 309(h) (codifying WRAP Annex)
- Consequence milestones and all program details
must be resubmitted - E.g, new source tribal set asides, allocation
methodology, etc. - Basic requirements for backstop SO2 program SIP
requirements provided in 309(d)(4) - Timing 309 SIPs / TIPs now also due in
December, 2007 - WRAP Annex process not repeated
8308 Proposed Rules
- Applies to all states
- States can choose trading/alternative measure to
BART 40 CFR 51.308(e)(2) - If alternative is cap trade program, rule
identifies essential elements of the cap and
trade program which must be met - 40 CFR 51.308(e)(2)(vi)
9Approvability of Trading Program
- If states choose cap and trade program in lieu of
BART, then program must - Demonstrate trading program achieves greater
reasonable progress than source-by-source BART -
- Meet criteria in 40 CFR 51.308(e)(2)(vi)
essential elements of cap and trade programs - Trading program must include all necessary
provisions to ensure emission reduction targets
will be achieved - Be enforceable clearly written, and if
regional, then participating states must have
essentially the same program to ensure program is
practicably enforceable.
10Test for Greater Reasonable Progress i.e.
Better-than-BART
- 308(e)(2) satisfied if
- Emission reductions are greater under alternative
and geographic distribution of emissions not
substantially different - OR
- If geographic distribution is different
- Visibility does not decline at any affected
Class I area - Alternative program produces greater overall
improvement based on average across all areas.
11Test for Greater Reasonable Progress i.e.
Better-than-BART, cont.
- Where a requirement other than BART determines
the level of emission reductions necessary, e.g. - CAIR
- Reasonable progress
- The BART benchmark is not forcing invalid
reductions - Therefore, state may apply most-stringent BART
assumptions in better than BART analysis
12Universe of Sources in Program
- Applicability
- Define sources subject to program
- BART and non-BART?
- All sources in a category?
- Facility cap?
- BART and non-BART units at a facility? Program
must be in place and established in SIP submitted
December 2007. - Program must be in place and established in
December, 2007 SIP submittal.
13Elements Necessary in Trading Program
- Allowances
- - Total tonnage value of allowances allocated do
not exceed emissions cap - Monitoring
- Consistent accurate emissions measurements (a
ton is a ton) - Those selling allowances
- Boilers, combustion turbines, cement kilns Part
75 - Others source types Part 75 equivalent (same
precision, reliability, accessibility, timeliness)
14Elements Necessary in Trading Program, cont.
- Recordkeeping
- Ensure enforceability
- Those selling allowances Meet Part 75
- Reporting
- Timely reporting with sufficient frequency to
ensure enforceability, provide for audits - Sources selling allowances comply with Part 75
or submit to TSA if EPA is not TSA
15Elements Necessary in Trading Program, cont.
- Tracking System
- Publicly available, secure, centralized
- Tracking in consistent manner
- Authorized Account Representative
- - Designate one individual authorized to
represent source - Allowance Transfer
- - Uniform procedures for timely transfer
recording of allowances
16Elements Necessary in Trading Program, cont.
- Compliance
- - Prohibit source from emitting more emissions
than sources allowance holdings - Penalty
- Mandatory allowance deduction for excess
emissions - Allowance deduction shall be at least 3 to 1
17Elements Necessary in Trading Program, cont.
- Banking
- - If banking is allowed, specify any restrictions
- Program Assessment
- - Periodic program assessment to determine if
program is accomplishing goals, and determine if
program modifications are needed