Black Hole Masses from Reverberation Mapping - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Black Hole Masses from Reverberation Mapping

Description:

Collaborators: M. Bentz, S. Collin, K. Dasyra, K. Denney, L. Ferrarese, K. Horne, S. Kaspi, T. ... Equal numbers of masses are overestimated and underestimated ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:131
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: bradl153
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Black Hole Masses from Reverberation Mapping


1
Black Hole Masses fromReverberation Mapping
Bradley M. Peterson The Ohio State University
  • Collaborators M. Bentz, S. Collin, K. Dasyra,
    K. Denney,
  • L. Ferrarese, K. Horne, S. Kaspi, T. Kawaguchi,
    C. Kuehn,
  • D. Maoz, K. Metzroth, T. Minezaki, H. Netzer,
    C.A. Onken,
  • R.W. Pogge, S.G. Sergeev, L. Tacconi, M.
    Vestergaard,
  • A. Wandel, Y. Yoshii

2
Key Points
  • The line-width measure used for
    reverberation-based masses should be the line
    dispersion ?line rather than FWHM.
  • New observations are leading to improved results,
    better identification of systematics.

3
Reverberation Mapping Results
  • Reverberation lags have been measured for 36
    AGNs, mostly for one or more Balmer lines, but in
    some cases for multiple lines.
  • AGNs with lags for multiple lines show that
    highest ionization emission lines respond most
    rapidly ? ionization stratification.

4
Evidence for a Virialized BLR
  • Gravity is important
  • Broad-lines show virial relationship between size
    of line-emitting region and line width, r ? ? ?2
  • Yields measurement of black-hole mass
  • M f (c?cent? 2 /G)

based on Peterson Wandel (1999)
5
Calibration of the Reverberation Mass Scale
  • Determine scale factor f that matches AGNs to
    the quiescent-galaxy MBH-?. relationship
  • Current best estimate f 5.5
    1.8
  • Scaling factor is empirically determined
  • This removes bias from the ensemble
  • Equal numbers of masses are overestimated and
    underestimated

M f (c?cent? 2 /G)
based on Onken et al. (2004)
6
Physical Interpretation of f
  • The Onken value is an average over the projection
    factors.
  • Example thin ring

Aside since unification requires 0 ? i ? imax,
simple disks without a polar component are
formally ruled out.
7
Characterizing Line Widths
  • FWHM
  • Trivial to measure
  • Less sensitive to blending and extended wings
  • Line dispersion ?line
  • Well defined
  • Less sensitive to narrow-line components
  • More accurate for low-contrast lines

Some trivial profiles
8
  • Reverberation-mapped AGNs show broad range of
    FWHM/?line.
  • Mass calibration is sensitive to which line-width
    measure is used!
  • Even worse, there is a bias with respect to AGN
    type (as reflected in the profiles)

Extreme examples
9
(No Transcript)
10
(No Transcript)
11
I Zw 1 type
NLS1
12
I Zw 1 type
NLS1
NGC 5548
13
(No Transcript)
14
Mean spectra
RMS spectra
From Collin et al. (2006)
15
Mean spectra
Pop 2
?line-based calibration
RMS spectra
Collin et al.
Pop 1
Pop A
Pop B
similar to Sulentic et al.
From Collin et al. (2006)
16
Mean spectra
Pop 2
FWHM-based
RMS spectra
Collin et al.
Pop 1
Pop A
Pop B
similar to Sulentic et al.
From Collin et al. (2006)
17
Line Width Measures
  • Conclusion ?line is probably a less biased
    indicator of the mass than FWHM.
  • Use of FWHM will lead us to underestimate the
    masses of NLS1s, I Zw 1-type objects, and
    narrower-line objects in general.
  • Can be corrected for empirically, however
    (see Collin, Kawaguchi, Peterson, Vestergaard
    2006).

18
HST ACS images are used to decompose light into
nuclear and starlight components. Effect is to
flatten radius-luminosity relationship. Starlight
components are stronger than previously supposed.
Bentz et al. (2006)
19
Other New Developments
  • New reverberation program on bright well-known
    Seyfert galaxies
  • Improve time sampling interval over original
    programs by as much as an order of magnitude in
    some cases.
  • Ultimate goal a velocity-delay map for at least
    one line in one AGN.
  • Secondary goal improve black hole mass
    measurements.

Denney et al., in preparation
Bentz et al., in preparation
20
NGC 4151
  • Reanalyzed two UV monitoring data sets from IUE
    archive.
  • UV and optical give consistent mass, 5 ? 107 M?

Metzroth, Onken, Peterson (2006) Bentz et al.,
in preparation
21
NGC 4151
  • Moreover, the reverberation-based mass is
    consistent with the (highly uncertain) stellar
    dynamical mass based on long-slit spectra of the
    Ca II triplet.

Onken, Valluri, et al., in preparation
22
The AGN MBH ? Relationship
AGNs Ca II triplet
AGNs CO bandhead
(Dasyra Tacconi)
Quiescent (Tremaine et al. 2002)
23
?
24
Could Inclination Play a Role?
  • Assume line width ?V ? (a2 sin2i )1/2 Vkep
  • Then f ? M? / VP ? 1 / (a2 sin2i )1/2
  • M? / VP cannot be used to deduce inclination for
    individual sources because NGC 5548 shows that VP
    values can span a factor 3.

Collin et al. (2006)
25
Could Inclination Play a Role?
  • However, we can compare the OBSERVED cumulative
    distribution of M? / VP with that predicted by
    this simple model for various values of a.
  • Reasonable agreement with simple model if only
    Population 1/A is used.
  • Implication is that at least some AGNs have
    narrow lines because of low inclination.

Collin et al. (2006)
26
Summary
  • As the database on reverberation mapped AGNs
    improves, identification of systematic biases
    becomes easier.
  • Evidence that inclination plays a role.
  • Reverberation-masses are less biased with respect
    to profile by using ?line as the line-width
    measure.
  • FWHM / ?line is sensitive to Eddington rate and
    inclination.

27
What Do Line Widths Say About Masses?
28
Brads gripe du jour
  • For fixed Eddington rate, more massive sources
    have larger line widths
  • NLS1 criterion of FWHM lt 2000 km s-1 omits
    higher-luminosity objects from class (I Zw
    1type objects, including, for example, 3C 273)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com