Title: Black Hole Masses from Reverberation Mapping
1Black Hole Masses fromReverberation Mapping
Bradley M. Peterson The Ohio State University
- Collaborators M. Bentz, S. Collin, K. Dasyra,
K. Denney, - L. Ferrarese, K. Horne, S. Kaspi, T. Kawaguchi,
C. Kuehn, - D. Maoz, K. Metzroth, T. Minezaki, H. Netzer,
C.A. Onken, - R.W. Pogge, S.G. Sergeev, L. Tacconi, M.
Vestergaard, - A. Wandel, Y. Yoshii
2Key Points
- The line-width measure used for
reverberation-based masses should be the line
dispersion ?line rather than FWHM. - New observations are leading to improved results,
better identification of systematics.
3Reverberation Mapping Results
- Reverberation lags have been measured for 36
AGNs, mostly for one or more Balmer lines, but in
some cases for multiple lines. - AGNs with lags for multiple lines show that
highest ionization emission lines respond most
rapidly ? ionization stratification.
4Evidence for a Virialized BLR
- Gravity is important
- Broad-lines show virial relationship between size
of line-emitting region and line width, r ? ? ?2 - Yields measurement of black-hole mass
- M f (c?cent? 2 /G)
based on Peterson Wandel (1999)
5Calibration of the Reverberation Mass Scale
- Determine scale factor f that matches AGNs to
the quiescent-galaxy MBH-?. relationship - Current best estimate f 5.5
1.8 - Scaling factor is empirically determined
- This removes bias from the ensemble
- Equal numbers of masses are overestimated and
underestimated
M f (c?cent? 2 /G)
based on Onken et al. (2004)
6Physical Interpretation of f
- The Onken value is an average over the projection
factors. - Example thin ring
Aside since unification requires 0 ? i ? imax,
simple disks without a polar component are
formally ruled out.
7Characterizing Line Widths
- FWHM
- Trivial to measure
- Less sensitive to blending and extended wings
- Line dispersion ?line
- Well defined
- Less sensitive to narrow-line components
- More accurate for low-contrast lines
Some trivial profiles
8- Reverberation-mapped AGNs show broad range of
FWHM/?line. - Mass calibration is sensitive to which line-width
measure is used! - Even worse, there is a bias with respect to AGN
type (as reflected in the profiles)
Extreme examples
9(No Transcript)
10(No Transcript)
11I Zw 1 type
NLS1
12I Zw 1 type
NLS1
NGC 5548
13(No Transcript)
14Mean spectra
RMS spectra
From Collin et al. (2006)
15Mean spectra
Pop 2
?line-based calibration
RMS spectra
Collin et al.
Pop 1
Pop A
Pop B
similar to Sulentic et al.
From Collin et al. (2006)
16Mean spectra
Pop 2
FWHM-based
RMS spectra
Collin et al.
Pop 1
Pop A
Pop B
similar to Sulentic et al.
From Collin et al. (2006)
17Line Width Measures
- Conclusion ?line is probably a less biased
indicator of the mass than FWHM. - Use of FWHM will lead us to underestimate the
masses of NLS1s, I Zw 1-type objects, and
narrower-line objects in general. - Can be corrected for empirically, however
(see Collin, Kawaguchi, Peterson, Vestergaard
2006).
18HST ACS images are used to decompose light into
nuclear and starlight components. Effect is to
flatten radius-luminosity relationship. Starlight
components are stronger than previously supposed.
Bentz et al. (2006)
19Other New Developments
- New reverberation program on bright well-known
Seyfert galaxies - Improve time sampling interval over original
programs by as much as an order of magnitude in
some cases. - Ultimate goal a velocity-delay map for at least
one line in one AGN. - Secondary goal improve black hole mass
measurements.
Denney et al., in preparation
Bentz et al., in preparation
20NGC 4151
- Reanalyzed two UV monitoring data sets from IUE
archive. - UV and optical give consistent mass, 5 ? 107 M?
Metzroth, Onken, Peterson (2006) Bentz et al.,
in preparation
21NGC 4151
- Moreover, the reverberation-based mass is
consistent with the (highly uncertain) stellar
dynamical mass based on long-slit spectra of the
Ca II triplet.
Onken, Valluri, et al., in preparation
22The AGN MBH ? Relationship
AGNs Ca II triplet
AGNs CO bandhead
(Dasyra Tacconi)
Quiescent (Tremaine et al. 2002)
23?
24Could Inclination Play a Role?
- Assume line width ?V ? (a2 sin2i )1/2 Vkep
- Then f ? M? / VP ? 1 / (a2 sin2i )1/2
- M? / VP cannot be used to deduce inclination for
individual sources because NGC 5548 shows that VP
values can span a factor 3.
Collin et al. (2006)
25Could Inclination Play a Role?
- However, we can compare the OBSERVED cumulative
distribution of M? / VP with that predicted by
this simple model for various values of a. - Reasonable agreement with simple model if only
Population 1/A is used. - Implication is that at least some AGNs have
narrow lines because of low inclination.
Collin et al. (2006)
26Summary
- As the database on reverberation mapped AGNs
improves, identification of systematic biases
becomes easier. - Evidence that inclination plays a role.
- Reverberation-masses are less biased with respect
to profile by using ?line as the line-width
measure. - FWHM / ?line is sensitive to Eddington rate and
inclination.
27What Do Line Widths Say About Masses?
28Brads gripe du jour
- For fixed Eddington rate, more massive sources
have larger line widths - NLS1 criterion of FWHM lt 2000 km s-1 omits
higher-luminosity objects from class (I Zw
1type objects, including, for example, 3C 273)