Qualitative Theories of Cognition - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

Qualitative Theories of Cognition

Description:

Can break down getting a cup of coffee into 7, 20, or 50 tasks ... D.C. Principles. Individual agents. Distributed collection of interacting people and artifacts ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:32
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: gregor67
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Qualitative Theories of Cognition


1
Qualitative Theories of Cognition
  • Studying context

2
Agenda
  • Questions
  • When was P1 due?
  • Some assumptions/problems with previous models
  • Summary of other models of cognition
  • Situated action, activity theory, distributed
    cognition

3
Modeling Problems
  • 1. Terminology - example
  • High frequency use experts -gt cmd language
  • Infrequent novices -gt menus
  • Whats frequent, novice?
  • 2. Dependent on grain of analysis used
  • Can break down getting a cup of coffee into 7,
    20, or 50 tasks
  • That affects number of rules and their types

4
Modeling Problems (contd.)
  • 3. Does not involve user per se
  • Doesnt inform designer of what user wants
  • 4. Time-consuming and lengthy
  • Not necessarily unique problem
  • 5. One user, one computer issue (lack of social
    context)

5
Context and Cognition
  • Human information processor models all involve
    unaided individual
  • In reality, people work with other people and
    other artifacts
  • Other models of human cognition
  • Situation action
  • Activity theory
  • Distributed cognition

6
Situated Action
  • Noted proponent Lucy Suchman
  • Much of the theory that underlies ethnography

7
Situated Action
  • Studies situated activity or practice
  • Activity grows out of the particulars of a
    situation
  • Improvisation is important
  • Basic unit of analysis is the activity of
    persons acting in a setting

8
Example
  • Need 3/4 of 2/3 of cup of cottage cheese
  • Just has a simple measuring cup available
  • Person solves problem by
  • Measuring 2/3 cup
  • Pouring out into a circle
  • Divide into quadrants
  • Take away one
  • One time solution to one time problem

9
Other comments on S.A.
  • Emergent property of moment-by-moment
    interactions
  • Improvisation
  • Detailed temporal accounts
  • De-emphasizes rigid plans and rational problem
    solving

10
S.A. Principles
  • Structuring of an activity grows out of immediacy
    of the situation
  • People engage in opportunistic, flexible ways to
    solve problems
  • Formulaic plans
  • Rational problem solving

11
Activity Theory
  • Long history
  • HCI proponent Bonnie Nardi

12
Activity Theory
  • Unit of analysis is an activity
  • Components

subject, object, actions, operations
Noun
Held by subject, motivates activity object of
game
Goal-directedprocesses tasks
How actionis carried out
13
A.T. Principles
  • Key idea Notion of mediation by artifacts
  • Our work is a computer-mediated activity
  • Starring role goes to activity
  • In regular HCI, stars are person and machine
  • Context is not out there. It is generated by
    people in activities

14
Distributed Cognition
  • HCI Proponent Ed Hutchins
  • Distributed collection of interacting people and
    artifacts

15
Distributed Cognition
  • Unit of analysis is cognitive system composed of
    individuals and the artifacts they use
  • Studies the coordination and cooperation between
    people and artifacts in a distributed process

like activity
16
D.C. Principles
  • Individual agents
  • Distributed collection of interacting people and
    artifacts
  • Functional system is what matters, not individual
    thoughts in peoples heads

17
Comparing Models
  • The role of goals or intentions
  • S.A. retrospective reconstructions
  • A.T. D.C central
  • Persistent structures
  • S.A. emphasize emergent/ contingent/
    improvisatory over routine/predictable
  • A.T. our activity assimilates experience of
    humanity
  • D.C. much focus on transformation of artifacts
    over time

18
Comparing Models
  • People and things
  • MHP model each as a machine, study the diad of
    H-C
  • S.A. qualitatively different, but mostly
    reactive
  • A.T. computers and people not equals, a moral
    stance
  • D.C. both are agents, study multiagent system

19
Some Commentary
  • Take the reading with a grain of salt.
  • How does this influence design?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com