NonExperimental Research Designs - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 43
About This Presentation
Title:

NonExperimental Research Designs

Description:

Explores relationships to explain individual variation ... Medford Boys Growth Study. K 1 2 3. Males. Females. Overhand Throw for Distance. Overhand Throw ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:129
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 44
Provided by: cathycl
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: NonExperimental Research Designs


1
Non-Experimental Research Designs
2
Non-Experimental Designs
  • Purpose Examines a present situation or
    population as it naturally exists
  • 1st step in inductive process of theory
    development
  • No treatment or intervention
  • Does not determine cause effect

Not determined by methods!
3
Non-Experimental Designs
  • Descriptive (demographic)
  • Correlational
  • Causal Comparative

4
Non-Experimental Designs
  • Descriptive (demographic)
  • Correlational
  • Causal Comparative

5
Descriptive Designs
  • Purpose Describes a present situation or
    population as it naturally exists
  • Typical methods survey or observation
  • Research question common
  • Research hypothesis??

Not determined by methods!
6
Non-Experimental Designs
  • Descriptive (demographic)
  • Correlational
  • Causal Comparative

7
Correlational Research
  • Explores relationships to explain individual
    variation
  • Uses statistical technique of correlation or
    regression
  • Criterion variables
  • Predictor variables

8
Purpose of Correlational Research
  • Used to predict future events even when we do not
    know why they occur
  • Supports or refutes theory - preliminary to
    hypothesis testing

9
Correlation Coefficient
  • Direction
  • Strength

10
Strongest?
Positive?
Negative?
11
Correlation Coefficient
r
-1.0 0 1.0
12
Correlational Research
  • Simple Correlation (bivariate)
  • Multiple Correlation
  • Canonical Correlation

13
Using Correlation for Prediction
  • Simple regression (bivariate)
  • Multiple Linear Regression
  • Regression (prediction) equation

14
?
15
Spurious Relationships
  • Relationship between 2 variables is explained by
    a third variable
  • Balding Heart attacks hormone levels
  • Height - Heart attacks childhood nutrition
  • Controlled with partial correlation

16
Partial Correlation Technique
17
Partial Correlation Technique
18
Partial Correlation Technique
19
Examples of Correlational Research
  • A researcher measured students self esteem and
    linked these scores to hours that students
    participated in recreational activities
  • Causal mechanism

parental support
20
Examples of Correlational Research
  • A researcher measured students self esteem and
    linked these scores to ratings of their physical
    attractiveness
  • A researcher measured how quickly students
    complete a test to see if their speed was
    associated with test scores

21
Examples of Correlational Research
  • A researcher investigated the relationship
    between age and reaction time in a simple task
    (push the left button to a red light, the right
    button to a green light)
  • A researcher studied a group of 20-yr olds by
    examining the association between height and the
    age (in weeks) when they first began walking

22
Flawed Interpretations of Correlational Research
  • Positive correlation between babies born and
    population of storks around the calendar year
    storks cause babies.
  • Causal mechanism Climate

23
Flawed Interpretations of Correlational Research
  • Positive correlation between speed of test taking
    and scores on test speed causes better
    performance.
  • Causal mechanism Students who take test faster
    may have prepared better, which makes them score
    high and take the test more quickly

24
Flawed Interpretations of Correlational Research
  • Positive correlation between of churches and
    of liquor stores in American cities going to
    church causes you to drink.
  • Causal mechanism Larger cities have more
    churches and more liquor stores.

25
Statement of the Problem
  • The problem was to determine the extent to which
    participants in outdoor recreation programs in
    college drop out and the reasons for their
    dropping out.
  • Correlational Design
  • IV, DV
  • Research Hypothesis or Question
  • Partial Correlation Control

26
Caution!!!
  • Do not assume cause-and-effect

27
Non-Experimental Designs
  • Descriptive (demographic)
  • Correlational
  • Causal Comparative

28
Causal Comparative Research
  • Groups classified according to common preexisting
    characteristic and compared on some other measure
  • No intervention, manipulation, or random
    assignment

29
What causes lung cancer?
  • Finding People with lung cancer smoke more than
    people without lung cancer. There are no other
    differences in lifestyle characteristics between
    the groups.
  • Conclusion Smoking is a possible cause of lung
    cancer.
  • Caution A third factor? Proper matching?

30
Value of Causal Comparative Research
  • Uncovers relationships to be investigated
    experimentally
  • Used to establish cause-effect when experimental
    design not possible
  • Less expensive and time consuming than
    experimental research

31
Two Variations
  • IV presumed cause DV presumed effect
  • Groups formed on the basis of how much TV they
    watch, and compared on academic achievement
    (GPA).
  • Groups formed on the basis of gender, and
    compared on strength of career aspirations.

32
Two Variations (cont.)
  • IV presumed effect DV presumed cause
  • Groups formed on the basis of whether they
    dropped out of high school, and compared on lack
    of mentoring relationship.
  • Groups formed on the basis of difficulty in
    learning to read, and compared on time parent
    spent reading to child.

33
Strengthening CC Designs
  • Strong inference
  • Time sequence
  • Common prior antecedents
  • Matched group design
  • Extreme groups design
  • Statistical control

34
Common IVs in C-C Research
  • Sex
  • Ability
  • Personality
  • Socioeconomic status
  • Preschool experiences

35
Examples of Causal Comparative Research
  • A researcher measured the mathematical reasoning
    ability of young children who had enrolled in
    Montessori schools and compared the scores with a
    group of similar children who had not been to
    Montessori schools.
  • A researcher measured the frequency of students
    misbehavior at schools which use corporal
    punishment and compared that to schools which did
    not use corporal punishment.

36
Examples of Causal Comparative Research
  • A researcher compared the high school dropout
    rate between students who had been retained (held
    back) in elementary school vs. similar students
    who had not been retained
  • A researcher formed 3 groups of preschoolers
    those who never watched Sesame Street, those who
    watched it sometimes, and those who watched it
    frequently and then compared the 3 groups on a
    reading readiness test

37
Common Methods Used in Non-Experimental Designs
  • Survey (poll, census)
  • Observation
  • Ethonographic (qualitative, naturalistic)

38
Common Content Areas that Use Non-Experimental
Designs
  • Historical
  • Epidemiological
  • Normative
  • Developmental (longitudinal vs. cross-sectional)

39
Developmental Research
  • Longitudinal
  • Powerful (within subject)
  • Time consuming
  • Attrition
  • Testing effect
  • Cross Sectional
  • Less time consuming
  • Cohorts problem

40
Methodological Problems of Developmental Research
  • Unrepresentative scores
  • Unclear semantics
  • Lack of reliability
  • Statistical problems

For children
41
Medford Boys Growth Study
Initial assessments
20 years
10 years
Final
1956 1961 1966 1971 1976
1981 1986
42
Overhand Throw for Distance
K 1 2 3
Males
Females
43
Overhand Throwby Grade and Gender
44
Use of Non-Experimental Designs
  • Naturalistic
  • vs.
  • Positivistic

45
Statement of the Problem
  • The problem was to determine the extent to which
    participants in outdoor recreation programs in
    college drop out and the reasons for their
    dropping out.
  • Descriptive Design
  • IV
  • DV
  • Research Hypothesis or Question

46
Statement of the Problem
  • The problem was to determine the extent to which
    participants in outdoor recreation programs in
    college drop out and the reasons for their
    dropping out.
  • Descriptive Design Developmental Study
  • IV
  • DV
  • Research Hypothesis or Question

47
Statement of the Problem
  • The problem was to determine the extent to which
    participants in outdoor recreation programs in
    college drop out and the reasons for their
    dropping out.
  • Descriptive Design using Poll Method
  • IV
  • DV
  • Research Hypothesis or Question

48
Statement of the Problem
  • The problem was to determine the extent to which
    participants in outdoor recreation programs in
    college drop out and the reasons for their
    dropping out.
  • Descriptive Design using Case Study Method
  • IV
  • DV
  • Research Hypothesis or Question

49
Statement of the Problem
  • The problem was to determine the extent to which
    participants in outdoor recreation programs in
    college drop out and the reasons for their
    dropping out.
  • Correlational Design using Survey Method
  • IV
  • DV
  • Research Hypothesis or Question

50
Statement of the Problem
  • The problem was to determine the extent to which
    participants in outdoor recreation programs in
    college drop out and the reasons for their
    dropping out.
  • Causal Comparative Design
  • IV, DV
  • Research Hypothesis or Question
  • Strengthen??

51
Statement of the Problem
  • The problem was to determine the extent to which
    participants in outdoor recreation programs in
    college drop out and the reasons for their
    dropping out.
  • Causal-Comp Design Developmental Study
  • IV, DV
  • Research Hypothesis or Question
  • Strengthen?

52
Summary
  • Design should be chosen according to
  • What will best examine the problem you have
    developed?
  • What is ethical?
  • What is feasible?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com