PARADIGMS, THEORY, AND RESEARCH - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

PARADIGMS, THEORY, AND RESEARCH

Description:

You want to find out who likes coed dorms better - women or men. You gather data. ... Hypothetical results: women like coed dorms better than men do. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:224
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: julieh2
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: PARADIGMS, THEORY, AND RESEARCH


1
CHAPTER 2
  • PARADIGMS, THEORY, AND RESEARCH

2
Dictionary definitions (from Hypertext Webster
Gateway)
  • Deduction That which is deduced or drawn from
    premises by a process of reasoning an inference
    a conclusion
  • Induction The act or process of reasoning from a
    part to a whole, from particulars to generals, or
    from the individual to the universal also, the
    result or inference so reached

3
Definitions from Babbie text
  • Deduction the logical model in which specific
    expectations are developed on the basis of
    general principles
  • Induction the logical model in which general
    principles are developed from specific
    observations

4
Deduction the logical model in which specific
expectations are developed on the basis of
general principles
Theory
Hypotheses
  • Observations

Empirical Generalizations
Theory
5
Induction the logical model in which general
principles are developed from specific
observations
Observations
Empirical Generalizations
Theory
6
Deduction and Induction on the Wheel of Science
7
Defining concepts from the Wheel (definitions
from Babbie)
  • Theories - systematic explanations for the
    observations that relate to a particular aspect
    of life sets of propositions explaining a
    phenomenon
  • Hypotheses - expectations about the nature of
    things derived from theories a statement of
    something that ought to be observed in the real
    world if the theory is correct. Variables are the
    building blocks of hypotheses.

8
  • Observations - the process of information
    gathering or data collection in research.
  • Empirical Generalizations - conclusions based on
    the results of data analysis, either qualitative
    or quantitative.

9
Deduction the logical model in which specific
expectations are developed on the basis of
general principles
Theory
Hypotheses
  • Observations

Empirical Generalizations
Theory
10
Example from Text Explain what's in the diagrams
(a, b, c).
11
A social scientific example of the deductive
method
  • Identify a topic of interest e.g., occupational
    success
  • Develop your theory on the basis of prior social
    scientific theory or create a new theory
  • The theory should address why some people are
    more successful in their occupations than others.

12
  • Specify your major variables e.g., level of
    education, gender, income, level of occupational
    prestige
  • Derive one or more testable hypotheses
  • Conduct research, collect observations, and
    analyze data
  • Consider the theoretical implications of your
    empirical results

13
How to develop hypotheses
  • Clearly identify independent and dependent
    variables
  • Develop a logical argument for an IV-DV
    relationship
  • Specify the nature of the expected relationship
    (next 4 slides)

14
Nature of the expected relationship (1)
  • (1) Quantitative IV DV
  • Positive/Direct IV?DV? and IV?DV?
  • Level of formal education will be positively
    related to level of occupational prestige, with
    people at higher levels of formal education
    having higher levels of occupational prestige.
  • Negative/Indirect IV?DV? and IV?DV?
  • Level of formal education will be negatively
    related to level of prejudice, with people at
    higher levels of formal education having lower
    levels of racial prejudice.

15
Nature of the expected relationship (2)
  • (2) Non-quantitative IV Quantitative DV
  • Certain categories of IV will have higher values
    of DV.
  • Gender will be related to level of church
    attendance, with females will having higher
    levels of church attendance than males.
  • Certain categories of IV will have lower values
    of DV.
  • Religious affiliation will be related to
    attitude toward abortion, with Catholics having
    lower levels of approval of abortion than those
    in other religious groups (Protestants, Jewish
    people, other religion, no religious affiliation).

16
Nature of the expected relationship (3)
  • (3) Quantitative IV Non-quantitative DV
  • Higher values of IV will fall into certain
    categories of DV.
  • Level of job satisfaction will be related to
    whether people would continue to work if rich,
    with those at higher levels of job satisfaction
    being more likely to say they would continue to
    work if rich than people at lower levels of job
    satisfaction.
  • Lower values of IV will fall into certain
    categories of DV.
  • Age will be related to attitude toward capital
    punishment, with younger people being less likely
    to favor capital punishment than older people.

17
Nature of the expected relationship (4)
  • (4) Non-quantitative IV and non-quantitative DV
  • Certain categories of IV will fall into certain
    categories of DV.
  • Gun ownership will be related to attitude toward
    mandatory firearms registration, with people who
    own guns being less likely to favor mandatory
    firearms registration than people who do not own
    guns.
  • Whether or not people have children will be
    related to type of vehicle owned, with people who
    have children being more likely to own mini-vans
    than those who do not.

18
Hypothesis development using the GSS
  • General Social Survey Codebook
  • On left, use Mnemonic link if you know the
    variable name(s).
  • On left, use Subject link if you are trying to
    find variables that would be relevant to a
    particular topic.

19
Induction the logical model in which general
principles are developed from specific
observations
Observations
Empirical Generalizations
Theory
20
Example from Text Explain what's in the diagrams
(a, b, c).
21
A social scientific example of the inductive
method
  • You want to find out who likes coed dorms better
    - women or men.
  • You gather data. What specific behaviors or
    statements made by people might you be able to
    observe that would be relevant to your research
    question?
  • You analyze your data. Hypothetical results
    women like coed dorms better than men do.
  • Based on your results, what theory could you
    develop that might account for this? Why do
    women like coed dorms better?

22
Deduction/Induction - Which is better?
  • Deduction is often viewed as more scientific,
    because hypotheses are tested.
  • However, see Wheel of Science (next slide) both
    are important parts of the scientific process.
  • Induction is most often used in exploratory
    phases of research and deduction in confirmatory
    phases.

23
Wheel of Science Revisited
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com