Ble 2 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Ble 2

Description:

Standard Method (Conversion CRD risk) Simulation Analysis Method. Credit Risk. Operational Risk ... Dwh & calculator ready. 22. B le 2 : La vision du banquier ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:77
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: FB477
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Ble 2


1
Bâle 2 les entreprisesACI Belgium20 octobre
2005
La vision du banquier Alain de Brauwere - Basel2
Coordinator - Fortis Bank
2
Agenda
  • 1. Banks objectives and constraints
  • 2. Fortis Bank overall targets
  • 3. Relationship between the bank and its
    customer

3
BASEL REVISED FRAMEWORK (June 2004)
Strengthen soundness stability of
international banking system Promote stronger
risk mgt practices
4
BASEL REVISED FRAMEWORK (June 2004)
5
Basel RF - PILLAR 1 MINIMUM REQUIRED
CAPITALRisk assets ratio
  • Unchanged, but
  • Impacted by IFRS
  • Limited to Unexpected Loss
  • Under review by BC EC
  • Unchanged, but
  • Capital covers Unexpected Loss
  • Shortfall coverage EL by provisions

New Add-on
  • New approaches
  • Risk sensitive
  • Based on Bank own estimates
  • Credit risk mitigation integrated

Unchanged, but Definition of Banking Trading
Books reviewed
6
European Capital Requirements Directive - CRD
  • Scope
  • All credit institutions (banks)
  • All investment firms
  • Level of application
  • CRD is applicable primarily on an individual
    basis
  • CRD is also to be applied at sub- and
    consolidated levels
  • Supervision - Responsibilities
  • Consolidating supervisor
  • Pillar 1 - Modelling
  • Pillar 1 - Permission to go IRB and/or AMA
  • Pillar 3
  • Coordination role
  • Host supervisors

7
CRD - Level of application
Subsidiaries other than credit institutions
investment firms not submitted at solo level
8
CRD - 3 Pillars - Key drivers
PILLAR 1MINIMUM REQUIRED CAPITALSUPERVISOR -
DRIVEN
SUPERVISORS REQ. Approaches Quantitative
requirement Qualitative requirementCalculation
FormulaPermission to go AIRBA AMA
BANKs CHOICE Choice of approachesModelling
PD LGD EAD
VAR Data Use Systems Policy
Pillar 2Capital Adequacy Assessment Banks
-Driven
Pillar 3DisclosureMarket - Driven
9
CRD - 3 Pillars - Key drivers
PILLAR 2CAPITAL ADEQUACY ASSESSMENTBANKs
-DRIVEN
Pillar 1 Minimum RequiredCapitalSupervisor -
Driven
ICAAP Produce ICAAP number and assessment
SREP Produce conclusions
Dialogue Challenge
Pillar 3DisclosureMarket - Driven
ICAAP Iteration
Supervisory measures
10
CRD - 3 Pillars - Key drivers
Pillar 1 Minimum RequiredCapitalSupervisor -
Driven
PILLAR 3DISCLOSUREMARKET -DRIVEN

Supervisory DisclosuresCRD requirements Banking
industry pressure Market pressure gt
Supervisors Policy
Institution DisclosuresMinimum List CRD
Pillar 1 Market pressure gt Banks Policy
Pillar 2Capital AdequacyAssessmentBanks -
Driven
11
CRD - 3 Pillars - Link between Pillars
12
CRD - 3 PillarsSome banks use economic capital
ECAP ICAAP
13
CRD - 3 Pillars - Reporting
PILLAR 1 Only credit, operational, market
risks Minimum Required Capital Supervisor
- Driven
CoRep
PILLAR 2 All risks Capital Adequacy
Assessment Banks - Driven
Dialogue
PILLAR 3 Banks disclosures Pillar 1
Market - Driven
PILLAR 3 Supervisors disclosures CRD
implementation Market - Driven
Publications
14
CRD - 3 Pillars - Reporting
PILLAR 1 Only credit, operational, market
risks Minimum Required Capital Supervisor
- Driven
CoRep
PILLAR 2 All risks Capital Adequacy
Assessment Banks - Driven
Dialogue
Financial Statements
Financial Reporting (FinRep)
Other Reportings
PILLAR 3 Banks disclosures Pillar 1
Market - Driven
PILLAR 3 Supervisors disclosures CRD
implementation Market - Driven
Publications
15
Agenda
  • 1. Banks objectives and constraints
  • 2. Fortis Bank overall targets
  • 3. Relationship between the bank and its
    customer

16
FORTIS BANK OVERALL TARGET
FROM IMPLEMENTATION DATE, i.e. 1 January
2008,START WITH THE MOST ADVANCED
APPROACHES Pillar 1 Credit risk AIRBA Pillar 1
Operational risk AMA Pillar 1 Market
risk VaR (unchanged) Pillar 2 All
risks VaR Pillar 3 Disclosures Market high
standards
  • GOALS
  • Have in use an embedded high-performance risk
    management
  • Keep in line with the most advanced peer
    banks aiming our competitive position
  • Reconcile the management tools and the
    supervisory constraints
  • Ensure convergence between regulatory and
    economic capital
  • Minimise the P1 Minimum Required Capital and
    P2 Adequate Capital
  • Accelerate cross-border integrationUse Basel
    Program as a leverage

17
FORTIS BANK OVERALL TARGET
  • ACT AS ONE COMPANY
  • One cross-border bank, based on business lines
  • FB-wide consistent choices of Basel approaches
  • Models developed centrally or under central
    supervision
  • Centralised data repositories
  • Centralised calculation of Risk Weighted Assets
    Capital requirements
  • Centralised solvency reporting and market
    disclosures
  • Consolidated supervisory review
  • Top-down From consolidated level to local level
  • Customer is the cornerstone of our business

18
FORTIS BANK OVERALL TARGET
  • P1 - CREDIT RISK Advanced Internal Ratings
    Based Approach
  • Materiality assessment performed on consolidated
    level and consistent top-down
  • Outstandings to customers can be linked to B/L
    and legal entity
  • One single FB-wide rating by customer
  • Central repository and central computing of risk
    weighted assets and minimum required capital
  • Economic capital computed bottom-up and using as
    inputs the P1 data
  • P1 - OPERATIONAL RISK Advanced Measurement
    Approach
  • AMA on a unified basis for parent and
    subsidiaries (CRD art. 105)FB-wide single
    policy framework, consistently implemented
  • Qualifying criteria met by the parent and
    subsidiaries considered together (CRD art 105)
  • AMA applied at top consolidated level and based
    on business lines
  • Central computing of capital requirementsand
    Risk sensitive apportionment of the capital to
    the legal entities
  • Same methodology for computing economic and
    regulatory capital

19
Pillar 2ICAAP ECAP ForCap
Pillar 2 Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment
Process (ICAAP) Economic Capital
(ECAP) Internal management tool (ForCap)
  • Integrated risk management and organisation based
    on Business Lines.
  • One single approach, one single management tool,
    one single capital figure
  • One single tool ForCAp and one single figure
  • ForCap incorporates the full diversification
    within and between risk types
  • Bottom-up computing
  • Supervisory challenging
  • In line with principles 1 (ICAAP) 2 (SREP) of
    Pillar 2
  • Approach, methodologies and models fully
    documented
  • SREP conclusions gt Dialogue gt ICAAP iteration

20
Pillar 2ICAAP ECAP ForCap
Pillar 2 Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment
Process (ICAAP) Economic Capital
(ECAP) Internal management tool (ForCap)
  • UNEXPECTED LOSS
  • Bank must hold capital to ensure it will remain
    solvent even if it experiences an unusually
    adverse outcome inits activities and thereby
    suffers a large loss. This amount is directly
    proportional to the amount of risk to which the
    bank is exposed.
  • Economic capital is the appropriate tool Not
    the Pillar 1 Minimum Required Capital
  • The cost of capital is one of the element to be
    covered by the margins
  • EXPECTED LOSS
  • Bank suffers expected losses linked to the
    current operating of their activities.
  • Those expected losses are supported by the P/L
  • Expected losses in one of the element to be
    covered by the margins.

21
Pillars 1 2Consistency
22
Agenda
  • 1. Banks objectives and constraints
  • 2. Fortis Bank overall targets
  • 3. Relationship between the bank and its
    customer

23
Credit Risk Pillar 1 Advanced IRB ApproachRisk
components
  • Risk components are all based on banks own
    estimates
  • Probability of Default is the assessment of the
    likelihood of default of the borrower over one
    year.Expressed as a , and counterparty
    specific.(PD)
  • Loss Given Default is the assessment of the loss
    incurred on a facility at default of a
    counterparty. Expressed as a , and transaction
    specific.(LGD)
  • Exposure at Default expected gross exposure of
    the facility upon default of the obligor.
    Expressed in amounts, and transaction
    specific.(EAD)
  • Maturity the effective maturity of a credit
    facility with a maximum of 5 years (M)

24
Credit Risk Risk drivers
25
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com